cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 34

Question 330

A government agency requires stronger verification before allowing staff to open sensitive cloud apps. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs.
  2. Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
  3. The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results.
  4. Require an additional authentication factor for relevant user sign-ins using supported Entra MFA methods.
  5. Inspect policy targeting, device compliance information and sign-in evaluation details.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

D:

Require an additional authentication factor for relevant user sign-ins using supported Entra MFA methods. This is the directly applicable response. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

C:

The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

E:

Inspect policy targeting, device compliance information and sign-in evaluation details. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

Question 331

A remote contractor must access a finance application from a managed laptop but cannot receive blanket network trust. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Access decisions re-evaluate context and give only the privileges required for an approved task.
  2. External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access.
  3. Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location.
  4. A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Access decisions re-evaluate context and give only the privileges required for an approved task. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network.

Incorrect Answers

B:

External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity federation. Its appropriate purpose is: Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions. For the stated case, Zero Trust is the closer match. Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network.

C:

Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Zero Trust is the closer match. Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network.

D:

A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Zero Trust is the closer match. Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network.

Question 332

A security analyst needs a classification basis for rules protecting records with structured identifiers. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns.
  2. Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus.
  3. A privacy review can explain how personal information is governed and how customers exercise supported data controls.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress.
  5. Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns. This is the directly applicable response. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.

B:

Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.

Incorrect Answers

C:

A privacy review can explain how personal information is governed and how customers exercise supported data controls. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft privacy principles. Its appropriate purpose is: Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.

D:

Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.

E:

Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance score. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.

Question 333

Contractors repeatedly request the same set of three project resources and need manager approval. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied.
  2. Approved requesters receive the packaged resources temporarily and their access expires as designed.
  3. The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked.
  4. Test sign-ins from targeted and excluded networks receive the configured location-aware control.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Approved requesters receive the packaged resources temporarily and their access expires as designed. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied. This item belongs to a different control area: Multifactor authentication. Its appropriate purpose is: MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

C:

The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

D:

Test sign-ins from targeted and excluded networks receive the configured location-aware control. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

Question 334

A detection engineer is tuning a rule so it identifies suspicious sequences while minimizing harmless matches. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard.
  2. Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives.
  3. Malicious attachments are blocked or handled according to the configured action before users consume them.
  4. The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud security policies and recommendations. Its appropriate purpose is: A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

C:

Malicious attachments are blocked or handled according to the configured action before users consume them. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

D:

The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

Question 335

A security group needs a governed process to review insider data-handling risk alerts. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Assessment owners can see outstanding control work, evidence and completion status for the chosen framework.
  2. Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards.
  3. Inspect policy indicators, generated alerts, case evidence and role-controlled access.
  4. Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns.
  5. Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards. This is the directly applicable response. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

C:

Inspect policy indicators, generated alerts, case evidence and role-controlled access. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Assessment owners can see outstanding control work, evidence and completion status for the chosen framework. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

D:

Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitive information type classification. Its appropriate purpose is: Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

E:

Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps. This item belongs to a different control area: Activity explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Activity explorer focuses on what happened to data, unlike Content explorer's inventory of classified content. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

Question 336

A board requests evidence that cybersecurity risks have owners and approved treatment actions. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Authenticate the principal first and separately authorize only the permitted resource actions.
  2. Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application.
  3. Maintain documented governance decisions, risk ownership and compliance control evidence.
  4. Protect and verify identities as a primary perimeter for cloud access rather than relying only on a building network.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Maintain documented governance decisions, risk ownership and compliance control evidence. This is the directly applicable response. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authenticate the principal first and separately authorize only the permitted resource actions. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

B:

Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity federation. Its appropriate purpose is: Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

D:

Protect and verify identities as a primary perimeter for cloud access rather than relying only on a building network. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

Question 337

A privacy office wants to assess service commitments before approving a new cloud process. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents.
  2. Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments.
  3. Inspect Content explorer's classification breakdown and permission-scoped item drill-down.
  4. Inspect assessments, improvement actions, assigned owners and uploaded evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

C:

Inspect Content explorer's classification breakdown and permission-scoped item drill-down. This item belongs to a different control area: Content explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

D:

Inspect assessments, improvement actions, assigned owners and uploaded evidence. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Question 338

Two organizations collaborate while keeping independent identity directories and avoiding shared static passwords. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Risks have assigned treatment decisions and controls have evidence linked to applicable requirements.
  2. A modified input produces a different computed digest while an unchanged trusted item passes the comparison.
  3. Access decisions re-evaluate context and give only the privileges required for an approved task.
  4. External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Risks have assigned treatment decisions and controls have evidence linked to applicable requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

B:

A modified input produces a different computed digest while an unchanged trusted item passes the comparison. This item belongs to a different control area: Cryptographic hashing. Its appropriate purpose is: Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

C:

Access decisions re-evaluate context and give only the privileges required for an approved task. This item belongs to a different control area: Zero Trust. Its appropriate purpose is: Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

Question 339

An auditor asks who owns application configuration, customer information and physical server security in an IaaS deployment. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location.
  2. The application accepts the intended provider's authenticated users and respects account disablement and configured access.
  3. The responsibility matrix explicitly assigns customer-managed safeguards and those settings have accountable owners.
  4. External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The responsibility matrix explicitly assigns customer-managed safeguards and those settings have accountable owners. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

B:

The application accepts the intended provider's authenticated users and respects account disablement and configured access. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity providers and directories. Its appropriate purpose is: An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

D:

External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity federation. Its appropriate purpose is: Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

Question 340

An enterprise wants a consolidated incident view across identities, devices and email threats. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations.
  2. Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries.
  3. Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.
  4. Use Microsoft Defender XDR to correlate incidents and signals across supported Microsoft security products.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use Microsoft Defender XDR to correlate incidents and signals across supported Microsoft security products. This is the directly applicable response. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

B:

Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

C:

Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests