Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 89
Question 880
A VM-hosted service needs access to a storage account without any password committed to its repository. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.
- Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs.
- Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles.
- A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app.
- Inspect the resource's system- or user-assigned identity and its destination-resource RBAC grants.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This is the directly applicable response. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
E:Inspect the resource's system- or user-assigned identity and its destination-resource RBAC grants. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
Incorrect Answers
B:Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
C:Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles. This item belongs to a different control area: Privileged Identity Management eligible roles. Its appropriate purpose is: PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
D:A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
Question 881
An internal auditor asks where to find available Microsoft's service compliance documentation. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Inspect Service Trust Portal document categories and available audit reports for the requested service.
- Use Microsoft Purview records management capabilities to govern records according to declared lifecycle and disposition requirements.
- Authorized investigators can preserve and retrieve relevant evidence with traceable case handling.
- Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation.
- Inspect Content explorer's classification breakdown and permission-scoped item drill-down.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Inspect Service Trust Portal document categories and available audit reports for the requested service. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.
D:Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation. This is the directly applicable response. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use Microsoft Purview records management capabilities to govern records according to declared lifecycle and disposition requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Records management. Its appropriate purpose is: Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.
C:Authorized investigators can preserve and retrieve relevant evidence with traceable case handling. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview eDiscovery. Its appropriate purpose is: eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.
E:Inspect Content explorer's classification breakdown and permission-scoped item drill-down. This item belongs to a different control area: Content explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.
Question 882
A SOC wants a defined alert type to automatically create a ticket and notify an on-call team. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments.
- Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured.
- Use Sentinel automation rules and supported playbooks to orchestrate defined incident-response tasks.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps discovery to identify and assess cloud applications used by the organization.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use Sentinel automation rules and supported playbooks to orchestrate defined incident-response tasks. This is the directly applicable response. SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks is the closer match. SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment.
B:Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps session controls. Its appropriate purpose is: Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks is the closer match. SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment.
D:Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps discovery to identify and assess cloud applications used by the organization. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps discovery. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks is the closer match. SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment.
Question 883
An organization wants a common preservation period for selected Microsoft 365 locations. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments.
- Use Microsoft Purview retention policies to manage preservation or deletion of supported content at selected locations.
- Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation.
- A qualifying risky activity is triaged through the authorized insider-risk workflow with documented disposition.
- Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior.
Explanation
Correct Answers
B:Use Microsoft Purview retention policies to manage preservation or deletion of supported content at selected locations. This is the directly applicable response. Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks.
E:Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks.
Incorrect Answers
A:Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft privacy principles. Its appropriate purpose is: Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document. For the stated case, Retention policies is the closer match. Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks.
C:Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation. This item belongs to a different control area: Service Trust Portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations. For the stated case, Retention policies is the closer match. Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks.
D:A qualifying risky activity is triaged through the authorized insider-risk workflow with documented disposition. This item belongs to a different control area: Insider risk management. Its appropriate purpose is: Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy. For the stated case, Retention policies is the closer match. Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks.
Question 884
A data steward wants to locate repositories containing many items marked highly confidential. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Microsoft Purview eDiscovery to identify, preserve and collect relevant content for authorized investigations.
- Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards.
- Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities.
- Use Microsoft Purview Content explorer to examine classified content locations and relevant item details with proper roles.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Use Microsoft Purview Content explorer to examine classified content locations and relevant item details with proper roles. This is the directly applicable response. Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Purview eDiscovery to identify, preserve and collect relevant content for authorized investigations. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview eDiscovery. Its appropriate purpose is: eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention. For the stated case, Content explorer is the closer match. Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history.
B:Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards. This item belongs to a different control area: Insider risk management. Its appropriate purpose is: Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy. For the stated case, Content explorer is the closer match. Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history.
C:Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Content explorer is the closer match. Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history.
Question 885
A supplier must collaborate on a project using its home organization credentials without becoming a full internal employee. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect workflow triggers, task execution history and resulting group or access changes.
- Inspect SSPR policy scope, method registration, registration status and reset audit logs.
- Inspect guest account records, cross-tenant access settings and assigned resource permissions.
- Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Inspect guest account records, cross-tenant access settings and assigned resource permissions. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect workflow triggers, task execution history and resulting group or access changes. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.
B:Inspect SSPR policy scope, method registration, registration status and reset audit logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.
D:Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.
Question 886
A compliance group needs a catalog of cloud apps employees access outside the approved list. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard.
- Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence.
- Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives.
- An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.
Incorrect Answers
A:A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud security policies and recommendations. Its appropriate purpose is: A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.
C:Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.
D:An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.
Question 887
A nonprofit wants to distinguish sign-ins from approved office egress IP addresses during policy rollout. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins.
- Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity.
- Schedule Microsoft Entra access reviews to let owners recertify whether users still need access.
- Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity. This is the directly applicable response. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.
C:Schedule Microsoft Entra access reviews to let owners recertify whether users still need access. This item belongs to a different control area: Access reviews. Its appropriate purpose is: Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.
D:Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles. This item belongs to a different control area: Privileged Identity Management eligible roles. Its appropriate purpose is: PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.
Question 888
A security center receives several alerts tied to the same compromised account and needs one investigative view. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition.
- Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue.
- Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy.
- Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
Incorrect Answers
B:Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
C:Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
D:Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
Question 889
A TLS service has certificates managed manually and wants centralized version tracking and permissions. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect device vulnerability inventory, recommendations, software exposure and remediation status.
- Inspect onboarded device inventory, detection alerts, process timelines and investigation findings.
- Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration.
- Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect device vulnerability inventory, recommendations, software exposure and remediation status. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
B:Inspect onboarded device inventory, detection alerts, process timelines and investigation findings. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Endpoint EDR. Its appropriate purpose is: Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
D:Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
Question 890
An operations group must keep emergency access distinct from ordinary just-in-time privileged activity. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource.
- Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs.
- Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs.
- Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure resource RBAC versus Entra roles. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure RBAC governs Azure resource permissions, whereas Microsoft Entra roles govern directory services. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
B:Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Multifactor authentication. Its appropriate purpose is: MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
D:Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.