cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 41

Question 400

An IT team wants one cloud directory for employee groups and enterprise application access. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with governed request, approval and expiration rules.
  2. Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications.
  3. Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods.
  4. Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications. This is the directly applicable response. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with governed request, approval and expiration rules. This item belongs to a different control area: Entitlement management access packages. Its appropriate purpose is: Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.

C:

Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.

D:

Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.

Question 401

A company repeatedly creates Azure resources with overly permissive network settings. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data.
  2. Use security policies, standards and recommendations to drive governed cloud configuration hardening.
  3. Connect relevant data sources to a Microsoft Sentinel-enabled Log Analytics workspace for centralized security analysis.
  4. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use security policies, standards and recommendations to drive governed cloud configuration hardening. This is the directly applicable response. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

C:

Connect relevant data sources to a Microsoft Sentinel-enabled Log Analytics workspace for centralized security analysis. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

D:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

Question 402

A project ends but its guest users remain members of a confidential collaboration group. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs.
  2. Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation.
  3. Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs.
  4. Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect authentication method registration, authentication details and MFA satisfaction in sign-in logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Multifactor authentication. Its appropriate purpose is: MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

B:

Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

C:

Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

Question 403

An attacker appears to be moving laterally through on-premises Active Directory credentials. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged.
  2. Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections.
  3. The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused.
  4. Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

C:

The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

D:

Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Question 404

A business wants enhanced inspection of executable payloads arriving as email attachments. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.
  2. Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint.
  3. Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events.
  4. Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.

B:

Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.

C:

Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.

Question 405

An enterprise wants one place to prioritize cloud security recommendations and relevant workload alerts. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
  2. Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent.
  3. An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition.
  4. Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

B:

Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Bastion. Its appropriate purpose is: Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

C:

An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Question 406

A finance employee receives a phishing email containing a credential-stealing website link. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged.
  2. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.
  3. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios.
  4. Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations.
  5. Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios. This is the directly applicable response. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

E:

Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

B:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

D:

Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

Question 407

A supplier wants its own identity system to authenticate staff to a partner's ordering portal. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Maintain documented governance decisions, risk ownership and compliance control evidence.
  2. Review the federation trust, issuer metadata, accepted tokens and sign-in transaction records.
  3. A controlled test shows protected ciphertext at rest and secure transport during approved client communication.
  4. Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application.
  5. Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Review the federation trust, issuer metadata, accepted tokens and sign-in transaction records. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

D:

Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application. This is the directly applicable response. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Maintain documented governance decisions, risk ownership and compliance control evidence. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

C:

A controlled test shows protected ciphertext at rest and secure transport during approved client communication. This item belongs to a different control area: Encryption. Its appropriate purpose is: Encryption makes data unreadable to an unauthorized party without the appropriate key; it differs from a one-way hash. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

E:

Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests. This item belongs to a different control area: Zero Trust. Its appropriate purpose is: Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network. For the stated case, Identity federation is the closer match. Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions.

Question 408

An event organizer needs to grant and later revoke temporary guest access to planning files. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
  2. Assign the least-privileged supported Microsoft Entra administrative role for a directory task.
  3. Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods.
  4. Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This is the directly applicable response. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Assign the least-privileged supported Microsoft Entra administrative role for a directory task. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra role-based access control. Its appropriate purpose is: Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.

C:

Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.

D:

Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, External guest collaboration is the closer match. B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries.

Question 409

A compliance officer wants searchable evidence of selected administrative and user actions in the tenant. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect audit search parameters, event operations, actors and timestamps for the relevant workload.
  2. The reviewer obtains the applicable provider assurance documentation without treating it as proof of the customer's controls.
  3. Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations.
  5. Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Inspect audit search parameters, event operations, actors and timestamps for the relevant workload. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention.

D:

Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations. This is the directly applicable response. Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The reviewer obtains the applicable provider assurance documentation without treating it as proof of the customer's controls. This item belongs to a different control area: Service Trust Portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview Audit is the closer match. Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention.

C:

Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview Audit is the closer match. Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention.

E:

Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview Audit is the closer match. Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention.

Question 410

A subnet allows a management port from all addresses and needs a narrow source-based restriction. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios.
  2. Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses.
  3. Apply Azure network security group rules to allow or deny traffic by source, destination, port and protocol at subnet or NIC scope.
  4. Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Apply Azure network security group rules to allow or deny traffic by source, destination, port and protocol at subnet or NIC scope. This is the directly applicable response. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.

B:

Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.

D:

Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests