cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 30

Question 290

A hybrid enterprise wants detection of identity attacks targeting domain accounts and directory infrastructure. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Traffic paths honor the intended segment boundaries and only deliberately connected networks can communicate.
  2. An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged.
  3. Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue.
  4. Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Traffic paths honor the intended segment boundaries and only deliberately connected networks can communicate. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

B:

An authorized workload retrieves the secret while unauthorized principals are denied and access is logged. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

C:

Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Question 291

An application needs to retrieve an API token at runtime without storing it in a configuration file. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.
  2. Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.
  3. Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions.
  4. Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

B:

Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

D:

Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

Question 292

A SOC seeks a single investigation timeline for alerts generated by several Microsoft Defender services. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Only approved flows traverse the central firewall while prohibited traffic is logged or denied.
  2. Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation.
  3. An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition.
  4. Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Only approved flows traverse the central firewall while prohibited traffic is logged or denied. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure Firewall is a managed stateful network security service; it is not an identity provider or a retention tool. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

C:

An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

D:

Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Question 293

An architecture review finds development and production servers sharing an undifferentiated network segment. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events.
  2. Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal.
  3. Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events.
  4. Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

B:

Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

C:

Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps session controls. Its appropriate purpose is: Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Question 294

A research consortium wants a temporary bundle of groups and apps granted through an approval workflow. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Approved requesters receive the packaged resources temporarily and their access expires as designed.
  2. On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology.
  3. The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked.
  4. Test sign-ins from targeted and excluded networks receive the configured location-aware control.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Approved requesters receive the packaged resources temporarily and their access expires as designed. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

Incorrect Answers

B:

On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

C:

The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

D:

Test sign-ins from targeted and excluded networks receive the configured location-aware control. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.

Question 295

A litigation team needs to preserve selected mailboxes and documents for a legal hold. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps.
  2. Inspect record declarations, retention settings, disposition reviews and action history.
  3. Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions.
  4. Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps. This item belongs to a different control area: Activity explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Activity explorer focuses on what happened to data, unlike Content explorer's inventory of classified content. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

B:

Inspect record declarations, retention settings, disposition reviews and action history. This item belongs to a different control area: Records management. Its appropriate purpose is: Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

D:

Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

Question 296

A threat report shows users opening suspicious links despite initial message delivery. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections.
  2. Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint.
  3. Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud.
  4. Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

C:

Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

D:

Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Links is the closer match. Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware.

Question 297

An architect needs continuous visibility into cloud misconfigurations rather than manual annual checklists. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect data connectors, ingestion status, workspace tables and representative security events.
  2. Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations.
  3. Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events.
  4. Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect data connectors, ingestion status, workspace tables and representative security events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

C:

Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps session controls. Its appropriate purpose is: Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

D:

Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

Question 298

A nonprofit wants to distinguish sign-ins from approved office egress IP addresses during policy rollout. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs.
  2. Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results.
  3. Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation.
  4. Inspect detected risk events, risk levels, policy outcomes and remediation history.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Privileged Identity Management eligible roles. Its appropriate purpose is: PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.

B:

Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results. This item belongs to a different control area: Access reviews. Its appropriate purpose is: Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.

D:

Inspect detected risk events, risk levels, policy outcomes and remediation history. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Conditional Access locations is the closer match. Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy.

Question 299

A project needs phishing-resistant sign-in credentials for a privileged group working across browsers and devices. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods.
  2. The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked.
  3. Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
  4. Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation.
  5. Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods. This is the directly applicable response. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

E:

Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

C:

Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

D:

Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Question 300

A municipal IT group cannot retire legacy on-premises directories but must provision users to cloud services. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with governed request, approval and expiration rules.
  2. Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users.
  3. Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience.
  4. Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience. This is the directly applicable response. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Entra entitlement management access packages with governed request, approval and expiration rules. This item belongs to a different control area: Entitlement management access packages. Its appropriate purpose is: Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

B:

Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

D:

Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests