cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 16

Question 150

An administrator changes a department attribute locally and wants it reflected in cloud group assignments. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts.
  2. Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced.
  3. The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions.
  4. The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

C:

The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra role-based access control. Its appropriate purpose is: Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

D:

The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

Question 151

A factory retains Windows domain controllers while introducing Microsoft 365 for its staff. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect access package catalogs, eligibility, request policy and expiration configuration.
  2. Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs.
  3. Inspect synchronization status, source directories and matching cloud user identities.
  4. Inspect role definitions, active assignments and role audit events for tenant administrators.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect synchronization status, source directories and matching cloud user identities. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect access package catalogs, eligibility, request policy and expiration configuration. This item belongs to a different control area: Entitlement management access packages. Its appropriate purpose is: Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

B:

Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Privileged Identity Management eligible roles. Its appropriate purpose is: PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

D:

Inspect role definitions, active assignments and role audit events for tenant administrators. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra role-based access control. Its appropriate purpose is: Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model. For the stated case, Hybrid identity is the closer match. Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure.

Question 152

A litigation team needs to preserve selected mailboxes and documents for a legal hold. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The record follows the required preservation and disposition process with auditable controls.
  2. The analyst can trace relevant label or DLP activity to an auditable event record.
  3. Intended users can apply the approved label and the configured protection behaves on labeled content.
  4. Authorized investigators can preserve and retrieve relevant evidence with traceable case handling.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Authorized investigators can preserve and retrieve relevant evidence with traceable case handling. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The record follows the required preservation and disposition process with auditable controls. This item belongs to a different control area: Records management. Its appropriate purpose is: Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

B:

The analyst can trace relevant label or DLP activity to an auditable event record. This item belongs to a different control area: Activity explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Activity explorer focuses on what happened to data, unlike Content explorer's inventory of classified content. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

C:

Intended users can apply the approved label and the configured protection behaves on labeled content. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.

Question 153

A hospital wants supported passwordless strong authentication for clinicians using security keys. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications.
  2. Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
  3. Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins.
  4. Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Offer phishing-resistant FIDO2 passkey authentication with supported Microsoft Entra methods. This is the directly applicable response. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

B:

Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

C:

Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Question 154

A SOC manager wants consistent incident assignment and status tracking during triage. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators.
  2. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.
  3. Inspect monitored domain controllers, identity alerts and suspicious activity timelines.
  4. Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.
  5. Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.

D:

Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This is the directly applicable response. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.

C:

Inspect monitored domain controllers, identity alerts and suspicious activity timelines. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.

E:

Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.

Question 155

A project needs phishing-resistant sign-in credentials for a privileged group working across browsers and devices. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect guest account records, cross-tenant access settings and assigned resource permissions.
  2. Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation.
  3. Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details.
  4. Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect guest account records, cross-tenant access settings and assigned resource permissions. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

B:

Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

D:

Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Passkeys and FIDO2 is the closer match. FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes.

Question 156

An analyst sees suspicious sign-ins from unfamiliar infrastructure and needs identity-risk context. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect detected risk events, risk levels, policy outcomes and remediation history.
  2. Inspect SSPR policy scope, method registration, registration status and reset audit logs.
  3. Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events.
  4. Inspect the resource's system- or user-assigned identity and its destination-resource RBAC grants.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect detected risk events, risk levels, policy outcomes and remediation history. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect SSPR policy scope, method registration, registration status and reset audit logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.

C:

Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.

D:

Inspect the resource's system- or user-assigned identity and its destination-resource RBAC grants. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.

Question 157

A security team wants to reject common compromised-style passwords during password changes. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Automate defined joiner, mover and leaver identity tasks using Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where supported.
  2. Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported.
  3. Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience.
  4. Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported. This is the directly applicable response. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Automate defined joiner, mover and leaver identity tasks using Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where supported. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

C:

Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

D:

Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Question 158

An enterprise wants one place to prioritize cloud security recommendations and relevant workload alerts. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations.
  2. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.
  3. The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
  4. Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud.
  5. Use Azure Bastion to reach supported Azure VMs over RDP or SSH without exposing public management ports directly.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations. This is the directly applicable response. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

D:

Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

C:

The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

E:

Use Azure Bastion to reach supported Azure VMs over RDP or SSH without exposing public management ports directly. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Bastion. Its appropriate purpose is: Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Question 159

An auditor asks who owns application configuration, customer information and physical server security in an IaaS deployment. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect the service model and the tenant's IAM, application, data and guest-OS control assignments.
  2. Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration.
  3. Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application.
  4. Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location.
  5. Apply the customer's responsibility for identities, data and cloud configuration rather than assuming the provider performs every control.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Inspect the service model and the tenant's IAM, application, data and guest-OS control assignments. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

E:

Apply the customer's responsibility for identities, data and cloud configuration rather than assuming the provider performs every control. This is the directly applicable response. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity providers and directories. Its appropriate purpose is: An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

C:

Establish a standards-based trust between identity providers so one organization can authenticate users for a relying application. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity federation. Its appropriate purpose is: Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

D:

Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Cloud shared responsibility is the closer match. Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls.

Question 160

A company needs network-layer DDoS mitigation and attack insights for its Azure-hosted public service. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives.
  2. The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
  3. Simulated or observed attack conditions show mitigation telemetry while legitimate traffic remains reachable.
  4. Analysts can connect relevant observed indicators with contextualized threat information to guide investigation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Simulated or observed attack conditions show mitigation telemetry while legitimate traffic remains reachable. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

B:

The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

D:

Analysts can connect relevant observed indicators with contextualized threat information to guide investigation. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests