cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 46

Question 450

A receiver must request multicast only from source 192.0.2.31 for group 232.3.3.3. After deploying the recommended IGMPv3 source include mode change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Intended customer control frames cross the service without exposing provider control state.
  2. The IGMP state records the intended source and excludes other senders.
  3. (*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream.
  4. Receivers continue forwarding through the surviving RP without changing group configuration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The IGMP state records the intended source and excludes other senders. This is the directly observable outcome for IGMPv3 source include mode. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Intended customer control frames cross the service without exposing provider control state. This validates L2PT protocol selection and isolation but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

C:

(*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream. This validates PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

D:

Receivers continue forwarding through the surviving RP without changing group configuration. This validates Anycast RP with shared address but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

Question 451

Frames for an unknown unicast destination flood within an intended VLAN. After deploying the recommended Ethernet MAC learning and flooding change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Intended guest frames match their rule and general traffic uses the appropriate default.
  2. Stable source MAC entries map to intended ingress interfaces and unknown floods are limited.
  3. Frame captures show the planned outer service tag and intact customer VLAN identity.
  4. Candidate routers acquire the intended RP mappings for authorized multicast ranges.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Stable source MAC entries map to intended ingress interfaces and unknown floods are limited. This is the directly observable outcome for Ethernet MAC learning and flooding. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Intended guest frames match their rule and general traffic uses the appropriate default. This validates Filter-based VLAN rule precedence but does not directly demonstrate the required Ethernet MAC learning and flooding result. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

C:

Frame captures show the planned outer service tag and intact customer VLAN identity. This validates QinQ service VLAN outer tag but does not directly demonstrate the required Ethernet MAC learning and flooding result. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

D:

Candidate routers acquire the intended RP mappings for authorized multicast ranges. This validates PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping but does not directly demonstrate the required Ethernet MAC learning and flooding result. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

Question 452

A scheduler uses tiny buffers for bursty business traffic. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Rename the buffer setting Gigantic and assume memory becomes unlimited.
  2. Decode outbound VLAN tag priority versus Layer 3 DSCP in packet capture.
  3. Inspect classifier family and IPv6 marked packet queue counters.
  4. Compare queue occupancy drops and latency across representative bursts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Compare queue occupancy drops and latency across representative bursts. This checks whether bursty traffic sees acceptable loss with controlled memory usage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Rename the buffer setting Gigantic and assume memory becomes unlimited. That bypass leaves the Queue buffer-size allocation issue unresolved. Excessively small buffers cause avoidable drops while overlarge buffers increase delay.

B:

Decode outbound VLAN tag priority versus Layer 3 DSCP in packet capture. That check applies chiefly to IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet, not the current Queue buffer-size allocation issue. Egress buffers absorb short bursts but cannot compensate for persistent overload.

C:

Inspect classifier family and IPv6 marked packet queue counters. That check applies chiefly to Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family, not the current Queue buffer-size allocation issue. Egress buffers absorb short bursts but cannot compensate for persistent overload.

Question 453

A branch bandwidth issue appears because multicast continues hairpinning through a distant RP. Which technical principle BEST explains the ASM shared tree versus SPT switchover decision?

  1. Junos routing policy evaluates ordered terms and control-flow actions.
  2. Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state.
  3. RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements.
  4. PIM-SM can transition from shared RP tree to a source shortest-path tree.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

PIM-SM can transition from shared RP tree to a source shortest-path tree. In this situation, the relevant action is to verify PIM sparse-mode SPT switch behavior and source-specific forwarding entries.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Junos routing policy evaluates ordered terms and control-flow actions. That principle is related to Junos BGP policy term matching, not the main ASM shared tree versus SPT switchover choice. Assuming all ASM traffic must stay permanently on RP shared tree may waste bandwidth.

B:

Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state. That principle is related to Multicast routing table incoming outgoing lists, not the main ASM shared tree versus SPT switchover choice. Assuming all ASM traffic must stay permanently on RP shared tree may waste bandwidth.

C:

RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements. That principle is related to Static RP mapping group range, not the main ASM shared tree versus SPT switchover choice. Assuming all ASM traffic must stay permanently on RP shared tree may waste bandwidth.

Question 454

A shared Ethernet segment must have only one active forwarding attachment at any time. After deploying the recommended EVPN single-active multihoming access mode change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Peers agree on a common Ethernet segment and relevant EVPN ES routes.
  2. The selected active leaf forwards while standby becomes active after controlled failure.
  3. Tunnel packets reach the remote VTEP and encapsulated frames traverse the overlay.
  4. The BGP route becomes active after recursive next-hop resolution succeeds.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The selected active leaf forwards while standby becomes active after controlled failure. This is the directly observable outcome for EVPN single-active multihoming access mode. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Peers agree on a common Ethernet segment and relevant EVPN ES routes. This validates Ethernet segment identifier ESI consistency but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN single-active multihoming access mode result. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

C:

Tunnel packets reach the remote VTEP and encapsulated frames traverse the overlay. This validates VXLAN VTEP loopback underlay route but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN single-active multihoming access mode result. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

D:

The BGP route becomes active after recursive next-hop resolution succeeds. This validates BGP next-hop reachability hidden route but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN single-active multihoming access mode result. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

Question 455

A provider accidentally announces a full internet table into a small branch BGP session. After deploying the recommended BGP prefix-limit peer protection change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Received and advertised route sets satisfy their separate intended controls.
  2. Isolated endpoints reach the intended shared gateway but not peer isolated ports.
  3. Only sanctioned routes pass the policy and term counters identify the decision.
  4. Excessive routes trigger the intended protection without destabilizing unrelated sessions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Excessive routes trigger the intended protection without destabilizing unrelated sessions. This is the directly observable outcome for BGP prefix-limit peer protection. BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Received and advertised route sets satisfy their separate intended controls. This validates BGP import versus export policy direction but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP prefix-limit peer protection result. BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources.

B:

Isolated endpoints reach the intended shared gateway but not peer isolated ports. This validates Private VLAN isolated port separation but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP prefix-limit peer protection result. BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources.

C:

Only sanctioned routes pass the policy and term counters identify the decision. This validates Junos BGP policy term matching but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP prefix-limit peer protection result. BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources.

Question 456

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A MAC address keeps moving between ports because a physical loop exists. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Without an effective querier snooping tables can lose active receiver ports.
  2. Removing the inner tag can merge otherwise separate customer networks.
  3. A loop can cause rapid MAC movement and high broadcast utilization.
  4. Without supported control protocol tunneling customer STP may not work across the service.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A loop can cause rapid MAC movement and high broadcast utilization. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect ethernet-switching table per VLAN and MAC movement logs.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Without an effective querier snooping tables can lose active receiver ports. This is a IGMP querier on subscriber VLAN failure pattern, not the primary Ethernet MAC learning and flooding failure in this case. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

B:

Removing the inner tag can merge otherwise separate customer networks. This is a QinQ service VLAN outer tag failure pattern, not the primary Ethernet MAC learning and flooding failure in this case. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

D:

Without supported control protocol tunneling customer STP may not work across the service. This is a L2PT customer BPDU tunneling failure pattern, not the primary Ethernet MAC learning and flooding failure in this case. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

Question 457

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: An engineer places an export policy on the wrong BGP direction and unexpected prefixes remain accepted. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Reversing policy direction may leak or wrongly accept routes.
  2. Inserting prepends into all paths can cause unexpected global traffic shifts.
  3. Ignoring the local-AS loop check can introduce unstable routing behavior.
  4. Inspecting only a configured class name can hide actual drops and misclassification.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Reversing policy direction may leak or wrongly accept routes. Import changes received-route eligibility while export governs what is sent to peers. A useful corrective investigation is to compare show route receive-protocol and advertising-protocol with policy configuration.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inserting prepends into all paths can cause unexpected global traffic shifts. This is a BGP AS path prepend outbound advertisement failure pattern, not the primary BGP import versus export policy direction failure in this case. Import changes received-route eligibility while export governs what is sent to peers.

C:

Ignoring the local-AS loop check can introduce unstable routing behavior. This is a BGP AS_PATH loop prevention and length failure pattern, not the primary BGP import versus export policy direction failure in this case. Import changes received-route eligibility while export governs what is sent to peers.

D:

Inspecting only a configured class name can hide actual drops and misclassification. This is a CoS end-to-end verification of drop behavior failure pattern, not the primary BGP import versus export policy direction failure in this case. Import changes received-route eligibility while export governs what is sent to peers.

Question 458

Guest devices must accept a portal workflow before gaining restricted internet access. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs.
  2. Expose internal management networks to every guest once they open the portal page.
  3. Configure a supported multi-supplicant policy with the intended authorization granularity.
  4. Configure supported reauthentication or session restoration after AAA recovery.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation. The expected validation is that the guest is redirected appropriately and receives only permitted post-portal access.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Expose internal management networks to every guest once they open the portal page. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Captive portal web authentication. A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation.

C:

Configure a supported multi-supplicant policy with the intended authorization granularity. This addresses 802.1X multi-supplicant port control rather than the required Captive portal web authentication decision. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation.

D:

Configure supported reauthentication or session restoration after AAA recovery. This addresses RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication rather than the required Captive portal web authentication decision. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation.

Question 459

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A dual-homed router reports no neighbor despite successful IP pings across the link. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Designing arbitrary direct interarea exchanges without a backbone can partition routing.
  2. A physical pair or overload fault can stop power before any voice VLAN setup matters.
  3. DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange.
  4. Different configured area IDs prevent neighbors forming even when IP transport works.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Different configured area IDs prevent neighbors forming even when IP transport works. OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. A useful corrective investigation is to compare the interface area bindings and decoded Hello area field.

Incorrect Answers

A:

OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. Designing arbitrary direct interarea exchanges without a backbone can partition routing.

B:

OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. A physical pair or overload fault can stop power before any voice VLAN setup matters.

C:

OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange.

Question 460

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: One laptop has the correct username but an untrusted EAP server certificate. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Accepting every certificate to restore access undermines network identity controls.
  2. Broad first-match conditions can eclipse later VLAN classification terms.
  3. Treating one successful login as authorization for every attached client increases exposure.
  4. Placing critical admin endpoints behind MAC-only authentication permits spoofing risk.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Accepting every certificate to restore access undermines network identity controls. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect EAP failure reason and client/server trust chains.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Broad first-match conditions can eclipse later VLAN classification terms. This is a Filter-based VLAN rule precedence failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation failure in this case. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy.

C:

Treating one successful login as authorization for every attached client increases exposure. This is a 802.1X multi-supplicant port control failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation failure in this case. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy.

D:

Placing critical admin endpoints behind MAC-only authentication permits spoofing risk. This is a MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation failure in this case. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests