cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 45

Question 440

A WAN peer expects a traffic-entry preference but sees inconsistent MED attributes. Which technical principle BEST explains the BGP MED inbound traffic hint decision?

  1. Communities can be selectively matched manipulated and stripped in routing policy.
  2. MED is a nontransitive path attribute often compared between paths from the same neighboring AS.
  3. BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements.
  4. L2PT encapsulates selected customer Layer 2 control frames across a provider domain.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

MED is a nontransitive path attribute often compared between paths from the same neighboring AS. In this situation, the relevant action is to export appropriate MED values where comparison conditions and policy support them.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Communities can be selectively matched manipulated and stripped in routing policy. That principle is related to BGP communities match and deletion, not the main BGP MED inbound traffic hint choice. Assuming MED overrides every higher-priority BGP selection criterion leads to false expectations.

C:

BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements. That principle is related to BGP multipath equal-cost path installation, not the main BGP MED inbound traffic hint choice. Assuming MED overrides every higher-priority BGP selection criterion leads to false expectations.

D:

L2PT encapsulates selected customer Layer 2 control frames across a provider domain. That principle is related to L2PT customer BPDU tunneling, not the main BGP MED inbound traffic hint choice. Assuming MED overrides every higher-priority BGP selection criterion leads to false expectations.

Question 441

A user changes from contractor to employee but the wired session retains its old authorization. After deploying the recommended 802.1X periodic reauthentication change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. The guest is redirected appropriately and receives only permitted post-portal access.
  2. Incoming multicast packets arrive on the interface selected by a valid source route.
  3. New identity policy takes effect without repeatedly disrupting healthy clients.
  4. Session logs identify the failing exchange or authorized role without broad policy bypass.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

New identity policy takes effect without repeatedly disrupting healthy clients. This is the directly observable outcome for 802.1X periodic reauthentication. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The guest is redirected appropriately and receives only permitted post-portal access. This validates Captive portal web authentication but does not directly demonstrate the required 802.1X periodic reauthentication result. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.

B:

Incoming multicast packets arrive on the interface selected by a valid source route. This validates Multicast source route policy and RPF but does not directly demonstrate the required 802.1X periodic reauthentication result. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.

D:

Session logs identify the failing exchange or authorized role without broad policy bypass. This validates Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring but does not directly demonstrate the required 802.1X periodic reauthentication result. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.

Question 442

An exchange peer approaches route memory capacity after a misconfigured advertisement. Which technical principle BEST explains the BGP prefix-limit peer protection decision?

  1. L2PT encapsulates selected customer Layer 2 control frames across a provider domain.
  2. BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources.
  3. iBGP may preserve external next-hop attributes unless policy changes them.
  4. AS_PATH prepending may influence remote inbound selection but is not guaranteed to override peer policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

BGP prefix controls limit received-route scale and safeguard resources. In this situation, the relevant action is to apply supported BGP accepted-prefix limits and operational alerts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

L2PT encapsulates selected customer Layer 2 control frames across a provider domain. That principle is related to L2PT customer BPDU tunneling, not the main BGP prefix-limit peer protection choice. No route-count guard can overwhelm route memory or control-plane processing.

C:

IBGP may preserve external next-hop attributes unless policy changes them. That principle is related to iBGP next-hop-self on edge, not the main BGP prefix-limit peer protection choice. No route-count guard can overwhelm route memory or control-plane processing.

D:

AS_PATH prepending may influence remote inbound selection but is not guaranteed to override peer policy. That principle is related to BGP AS path prepend outbound advertisement, not the main BGP prefix-limit peer protection choice. No route-count guard can overwhelm route memory or control-plane processing.

Question 443

An ingress filter maps an intended management flow to a user VLAN unexpectedly. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Apply an OSPF import policy and claim it assigns Ethernet frames to VLANs.
  2. Inspect ingress and egress double-tag format and switch VLAN translation state.
  3. Test communication matrix among each community and shared gateway.
  4. Check filter terms counters and learned VLAN association for sample ingress frames.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Check filter terms counters and learned VLAN association for sample ingress frames. This checks whether matching flows land in the intended VLAN without changing unrelated traffic handling.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Apply an OSPF import policy and claim it assigns Ethernet frames to VLANs. That bypass leaves the Filter-based VLAN assignment issue unresolved. An overly broad match can reclassify unrelated packets into the wrong broadcast domain.

B:

Inspect ingress and egress double-tag format and switch VLAN translation state. That check applies chiefly to QinQ service VLAN outer tag, not the current Filter-based VLAN assignment issue. Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone.

C:

Test communication matrix among each community and shared gateway. That check applies chiefly to Private VLAN community and promiscuous roles, not the current Filter-based VLAN assignment issue. Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone.

Question 444

A switch accidentally places an unauthenticated device into the internal employee VLAN. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Verify assigned VLAN and ACLs with valid employee and guest test clients.
  2. Test actual RADIUS outage distinct from deliberate Access-Reject responses.
  3. Label the production VLAN Guest and assume access becomes restricted automatically.
  4. Inspect authenticator sessions and RADIUS logs before and after service restoration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Verify assigned VLAN and ACLs with valid employee and guest test clients. This checks whether guests receive only allowed connectivity and protected subnets stay unreachable.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Test actual RADIUS outage distinct from deliberate Access-Reject responses. That check applies chiefly to RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy, not the current Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients issue. Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients.

C:

Label the production VLAN Guest and assume access becomes restricted automatically. That bypass leaves the Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients issue unresolved. An overly permissive guest VLAN becomes an alternative corporate-network entry.

D:

Inspect authenticator sessions and RADIUS logs before and after service restoration. That check applies chiefly to RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication, not the current Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients issue. Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients.

Question 445

An edge receives external routes but iBGP clients cannot reach the provider-facing next-hop IP. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Add approved BGP community tags and match them in explicit import or export policies.
  2. Apply a scoped BGP next-hop-self or next-hop resolution design at the appropriate edge.
  3. Apply controlled AS_PATH prepending in export policy to appropriate external neighbors.
  4. Set a larger LOCAL_PREF and assume that makes an unresolved next hop reachable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Apply a scoped BGP next-hop-self or next-hop resolution design at the appropriate edge. iBGP may preserve external next-hop attributes unless policy changes them. The expected validation is that internal clients install reachable paths and forward via the intended exit router.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Add approved BGP community tags and match them in explicit import or export policies. This addresses BGP communities tagging routing intent rather than the required iBGP next-hop-self on edge decision. iBGP may preserve external next-hop attributes unless policy changes them.

C:

Apply controlled AS_PATH prepending in export policy to appropriate external neighbors. This addresses BGP AS path prepend outbound advertisement rather than the required iBGP next-hop-self on edge decision. iBGP may preserve external next-hop attributes unless policy changes them.

D:

Set a larger LOCAL_PREF and assume that makes an unresolved next hop reachable. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for iBGP next-hop-self on edge. Unreachable preserved eBGP next hops can make internally advertised routes unusable.

Question 446

A helpdesk ticket reports intermittent wired access on one switch interface. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Replace every access switch because one Ethernet interface reports no authenticated sessions.
  2. Restrict MAC RADIUS to low-trust device segments and use stronger 802.1X for capable users.
  3. Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy.
  4. Collect show dot1x interface and access session state plus relevant RADIUS logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Collect show dot1x interface and access session state plus relevant RADIUS logs. Authentication monitoring must inspect credentials authorization and port state separately. The expected validation is that session logs identify the failing exchange or authorized role without broad policy bypass.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Replace every access switch because one Ethernet interface reports no authenticated sessions. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring. Checking only link-up LED can miss failed 802.1X or RADIUS authorization.

B:

Restrict MAC RADIUS to low-trust device segments and use stronger 802.1X for capable users. This addresses MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations rather than the required Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring decision. Authentication monitoring must inspect credentials authorization and port state separately.

C:

Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy. This addresses 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation rather than the required Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring decision. Authentication monitoring must inspect credentials authorization and port state separately.

Question 447

A technician assumes an IPv4 239/8 address can be reused unchanged as an IPv6 multicast address. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect show msdp peer and source-active caches for known sources.
  2. Review RP election discovery information and group-range reachability.
  3. Inspect IPv6 multicast destination and scope flags in packet traces.
  4. Configure 239.255.0.1 as an IPv6 multicast group and claim syntax is interoperable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect IPv6 multicast destination and scope flags in packet traces. This checks whether packets remain inside the permitted IPv6 scope and group memberships reflect the destination.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect show msdp peer and source-active caches for known sources. That check applies chiefly to MSDP source active exchange, not the current IPv6 multicast scope and group use issue. IPv6 multicast uses ff00::/8 scoped addressing separate from IPv4 group syntax.

B:

Review RP election discovery information and group-range reachability. That check applies chiefly to PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping, not the current IPv6 multicast scope and group use issue. IPv6 multicast uses ff00::/8 scoped addressing separate from IPv4 group syntax.

D:

Configure 239.255.0.1 as an IPv6 multicast group and claim syntax is interoperable. That bypass leaves the IPv6 multicast scope and group use issue unresolved. Mis-scoped multicast can leak too far or fail to reach authorized hosts.

Question 448

A visitor copies the allowed printer MAC address to a laptop. After deploying the recommended MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Spoofed MAC identity cannot grant administrator or high-trust employee access.
  2. The local route table follows documented acceptance policy while LSDB visibility is understood.
  3. Access-Accept authorizes approved access while explicit rejections remain denied.
  4. Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Spoofed MAC identity cannot grant administrator or high-trust employee access. This is the directly observable outcome for MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations. MAC addresses can be imitated and are weaker credentials than authenticated EAP identities.

Incorrect Answers

B:

The local route table follows documented acceptance policy while LSDB visibility is understood. This validates OSPF routing policy import filtering but does not directly demonstrate the required MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations result. MAC addresses can be imitated and are weaker credentials than authenticated EAP identities.

C:

Access-Accept authorizes approved access while explicit rejections remain denied. This validates RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling but does not directly demonstrate the required MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations result. MAC addresses can be imitated and are weaker credentials than authenticated EAP identities.

D:

Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not. This validates Dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS but does not directly demonstrate the required MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations result. MAC addresses can be imitated and are weaker credentials than authenticated EAP identities.

Question 449

One multihoming link fails but remote routers cannot withdraw the failed segment's reachability efficiently. Which technical principle BEST explains the EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery decision?

  1. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.
  2. RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements.
  3. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.
  4. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence. In this situation, the relevant action is to advertise correct EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto-discovery routes for the segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic. That principle is related to EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM, not the main EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery choice. Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability.

B:

RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements. That principle is related to Static RP mapping group range, not the main EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery choice. Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability.

D:

Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment. That principle is related to EVPN single-active multihoming access mode, not the main EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery choice. Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability.

Question 450

A receiver must request multicast only from source 192.0.2.31 for group 232.3.3.3. After deploying the recommended IGMPv3 source include mode change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Intended customer control frames cross the service without exposing provider control state.
  2. The IGMP state records the intended source and excludes other senders.
  3. (*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream.
  4. Receivers continue forwarding through the surviving RP without changing group configuration.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The IGMP state records the intended source and excludes other senders. This is the directly observable outcome for IGMPv3 source include mode. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Intended customer control frames cross the service without exposing provider control state. This validates L2PT protocol selection and isolation but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

C:

(*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream. This validates PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

D:

Receivers continue forwarding through the surviving RP without changing group configuration. This validates Anycast RP with shared address but does not directly demonstrate the required IGMPv3 source include mode result. IGMPv3 supports source filters needed for Source Specific Multicast participation.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests