Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 22
Question 210
An internal user with a name overlapping an AD account receives the wrong authentication result. The observed failure is: An overly generic fallback sequence can reject valid accounts or confuse local and directory identities. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- The supported recovery is to ignore identity aliases and assert identical usernames always denote one person.
- The supported recovery is to create precise realm conditions and prove access for representative users from both stores.
- The supported recovery is to route every realm to the first available directory without checking account domain.
- The supported recovery is to assume the wireless VLAN ID identifies the user's password database.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This restores the intended operational behavior for Identity source sequence realm routing.
Incorrect Answers
A:Ignore identity aliases and assert identical usernames always denote one person. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overly generic fallback sequence can reject valid accounts or confuse local and directory identities. Instead, create precise realm conditions and prove access for representative users from both stores. For the specific situation, an internal user with a name overlapping an AD account receives the wrong authentication result.
C:Route every realm to the first available directory without checking account domain. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overly generic fallback sequence can reject valid accounts or confuse local and directory identities. Instead, create precise realm conditions and prove access for representative users from both stores. For the specific situation, an internal user with a name overlapping an AD account receives the wrong authentication result.
D:Assume the wireless VLAN ID identifies the user's password database. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overly generic fallback sequence can reject valid accounts or confuse local and directory identities. Instead, create precise realm conditions and prove access for representative users from both stores. For the specific situation, an internal user with a name overlapping an AD account receives the wrong authentication result.
Question 211
A correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group. Which configuration decision most directly satisfies the requirement?
- Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity.
- Remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app.
- Use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions.
- Inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify the effect through selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Incorrect Answers
A:Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. This does not implement the required control for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies.
B:Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
C:Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Question 212
A correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group. What observations most directly test this network-access condition?
- A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- Selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Incorrect Answers
A:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
C:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
D:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Question 213
A correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group. What principle of ISE authentication and authorization explains this case?
- Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access.
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The supported implementation is to inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Incorrect Answers
B:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
C:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
D:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Question 214
A correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity. Which negative consequence BEST explains the shortcut’s flaw?
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match.
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. The relevant risk is that fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes.
Question 215
A correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group. The observed failure is: Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- Remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app.
- Use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions.
- Correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes.
- Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This restores the intended operational behavior for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Incorrect Answers
A:Remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
B:Use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
D:Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, a correct password succeeds but a device is still blocked by an authorization rule referencing an outdated endpoint group.
Question 216
An operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile. Which administrator action is appropriate for this ISE access-control problem?
- In this case, inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace.
- In this case, remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app.
- In this case, use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions.
- In this case, assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. This is the targeted action for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies.
Incorrect Answers
B:Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function.
C:Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead the intended policy action is inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace.
D:Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Use the supported approach: inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace.
Question 217
An operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile. Which collected records establish that the ISE decision actually took effect?
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is an old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies for the described endpoint or network device. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
C:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
D:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Check selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
Question 218
An operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile. Which statement about the relevant technology is correct?
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that a captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- The governing principle is that identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to inspect and correct the authentication policy and authorization policy independently based on the live rule trace. This is the governing technical behavior for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies.
Incorrect Answers
A:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
B:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
C:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Instead identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. Verify the actual state using selected policy set, authentication verdict, authorization matched condition, returned RADIUS attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
Question 219
An operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity. What specific security or operational failure should be anticipated?
- The material consequence is that accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Question 220
An operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile. The observed failure is: Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Which remediation resolves the underlying fault while maintaining policy?
- The supported recovery is to use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions.
- The supported recovery is to assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity.
- The supported recovery is to remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app.
- The supported recovery is to correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:This restores the intended operational behavior for Distinguishing authentication versus authorization policies. Identity verification determines who or what authenticated while authorization determines permitted access.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use only a policy rule display name without checking matched conditions. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
B:Assume Access-Accept always means unlimited campus network connectivity. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.
C:Remove user password checks because the assigned ACL blocks an app. This action does not repair the identified failure. Fixing an identity store cannot by itself repair an incorrect VLAN or dACL authorization match. Instead, correct the authorization rule or result and verify live RADIUS authorization attributes. For the specific situation, an operations team modifies the identity store to repair an access rejection that actually comes from the selected authorization profile.