Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 110
Question 1090
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. The observed failure is: Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- The supported recovery is to use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately.
- The supported recovery is to disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login.
- The supported recovery is to assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly.
- The supported recovery is to use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately.
Incorrect Answers
B:Disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Question 1091
A switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session. Which configuration decision most directly satisfies the requirement?
- Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log.
- Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default.
- Configure and test authentication, authorization and accounting explicitly for the chosen TACACS+ device-admin flow.
- Delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Verify the effect through login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Incorrect Answers
A:This does not implement the required control for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists.
B:Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. The relevant evidence is login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
D:A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Question 1092
A switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session. What observations most directly test this network-access condition?
- A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- Login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log.
- A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
C:A browser theme label without a current authorization trace. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
D:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Question 1093
A switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session. What principle of ISE authentication and authorization explains this case?
- All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions.
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The supported implementation is to configure and test authentication, authorization and accounting explicitly for the chosen TACACS+ device-admin flow. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
C:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Instead aAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions.
D:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Verify the actual state using login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log.
Question 1094
A switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log. Which negative consequence BEST explains the shortcut’s flaw?
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists.
- Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- A justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because aAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. The relevant risk is that a working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log.
Question 1095
A switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session. The observed failure is: A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default.
- Enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command.
- Delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session.
- Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This restores the intended operational behavior for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Incorrect Answers
A:Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
C:Delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
D:Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, a switch administrator logs in but no record exists of the configuration commands executed during the session.
Question 1096
An ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run. Which administrator action is appropriate for this ISE access-control problem?
- In this case, give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default.
- In this case, delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session.
- In this case, assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log.
- In this case, configure and test authentication, authorization and accounting explicitly for the chosen TACACS+ device-admin flow.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify the effect through login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Incorrect Answers
A:Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. The relevant evidence is login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
B:A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
C:This does not implement the required control for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Question 1097
An ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run. Which collected records establish that the ISE decision actually took effect?
- The supporting evidence is a device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
- The supporting evidence is login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Incorrect Answers
A:A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
B:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
C:A browser theme label without a current authorization trace. This observation cannot verify AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. Check login authentication event, shell authorization result, command set decision and command accounting log. AAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Question 1098
An ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run. Which statement about the relevant technology is correct?
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- The governing principle is that all Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- The governing principle is that a policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
- The governing principle is that aAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to configure and test authentication, authorization and accounting explicitly for the chosen TACACS+ device-admin flow. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
B:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
C:This generalization is not valid for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
Question 1099
An ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log. What specific security or operational failure should be anticipated?
- The material consequence is that a justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
- The material consequence is that a correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that a working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The shortcut is unsuitable because aAA has distinct functions for verifying identity, deciding permitted operations and recording actions. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
Question 1100
An ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run. The observed failure is: A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Which remediation resolves the underlying fault while maintaining policy?
- The supported recovery is to delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session.
- The supported recovery is to enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command.
- The supported recovery is to assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log.
- The supported recovery is to give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This restores the intended operational behavior for AAA authentication authorization and accounting separation. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
Incorrect Answers
A:Delete command accounting events after a troubleshooting session. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
C:Assume authentication automatically saves every configuration command to an audit log. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.
D:Give every authenticated admin unrestricted privilege fifteen by default. This action does not repair the identified failure. A working login alone does not prove command restriction or audit evidence exists. Instead, enable the missing policy and accounting path then test a permitted command and a denied command. For the specific situation, an ISE report lists successful logins but managers wrongly assume it proves which changes users were authorized to run.