Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 112
Question 1110
A TACACS+ connection succeeds to one PSN but fails to another because the device-admin service is disabled. The observed failure is: A healthy RADIUS UDP exchange does not establish TCP TACACS+ availability. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- The supported recovery is to use any random open TCP port without matching device-admin service settings.
- The supported recovery is to assume a RADIUS UDP 1812 test proves TACACS TCP 49 is reachable.
- The supported recovery is to repair the listener and firewall reachability then test administrator login against each PSN.
- The supported recovery is to disable the device admin service on every target PSN.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Recheck nAD TACACS server, port 49 or authorized alternate, PSN service state, TCP session and TACACS log. For the specific situation, a TACACS+ connection succeeds to one PSN but fails to another because the device-admin service is disabled.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use any random open TCP port without matching device-admin service settings. This action does not repair the identified failure. A healthy RADIUS UDP exchange does not establish TCP TACACS+ availability. Instead, repair the listener and firewall reachability then test administrator login against each PSN. For the specific situation, a TACACS+ connection succeeds to one PSN but fails to another because the device-admin service is disabled.
B:Assume a RADIUS UDP 1812 test proves TACACS TCP 49 is reachable. This action does not repair the identified failure. A healthy RADIUS UDP exchange does not establish TCP TACACS+ availability. Instead, repair the listener and firewall reachability then test administrator login against each PSN. For the specific situation, a TACACS+ connection succeeds to one PSN but fails to another because the device-admin service is disabled.
D:Disable the device admin service on every target PSN. This action does not repair the identified failure. A healthy RADIUS UDP exchange does not establish TCP TACACS+ availability. Instead, repair the listener and firewall reachability then test administrator login against each PSN. For the specific situation, a TACACS+ connection succeeds to one PSN but fails to another because the device-admin service is disabled.
Question 1111
A network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment. What action addresses this authenticated network-access scenario?
- Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands.
- Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit.
- Turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists.
- Choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify the effect through rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Incorrect Answers
A:Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. This does not implement the required control for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting.
B:Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. The relevant evidence is rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
C:Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Question 1112
A network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment. What verification should the engineer use before declaring success?
- RADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp.
- A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations directly establish the result of RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Incorrect Answers
B:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
C:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
D:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Question 1113
A network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment. Which underlying service behavior supports the proposed solution?
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations.
- Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Incorrect Answers
A:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
B:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
D:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Question 1114
A network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands. Why does that proposed shortcut not satisfy the requirement?
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist.
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. The relevant risk is that confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Question 1115
A network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment. The observed failure is: Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit.
- Turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists.
- Enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test.
- Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This restores the intended operational behavior for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
B:Turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
D:Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a network operations team sees RADIUS session-start data but lacks evidence about commands issued to network equipment.
Question 1116
A compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- In this case, use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit.
- In this case, turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists.
- In this case, choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required.
- In this case, treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Verify the effect through rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. This is the targeted action for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. The relevant evidence is rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
B:Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead the intended policy action is choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required.
D:Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Use the supported approach: choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required.
Question 1117
A compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is an old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- The supporting evidence is rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
B:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
C:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Check rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. Session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
Question 1118
A compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that a captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- The governing principle is that session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations.
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to choose session accounting for network access and TACACS command accounting for device-admin actions as required. This is the governing technical behavior for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting.
Incorrect Answers
A:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
B:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
D:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Instead session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. Verify the actual state using rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
Question 1119
A compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- The material consequence is that accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- The material consequence is that confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The shortcut is unsuitable because session-level network access evidence and device administrative command auditing cover different operations. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Question 1120
A compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators. The observed failure is: Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists.
- The supported recovery is to enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test.
- The supported recovery is to treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands.
- The supported recovery is to use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This restores the intended operational behavior for RADIUS client accounting versus TACACS command accounting. Recheck rADIUS accounting messages, TACACS per-command records, administrator identity, device and timestamp.
Incorrect Answers
A:Turn off device command accounting because user session logging exists. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
C:Treat every RADIUS interim update as a record of all IOS CLI commands. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.
D:Use a printer MAC address as the administrator identity in every command audit. This action does not repair the identified failure. Confusing the two can miss unauthorized device changes even when endpoint connection logs exist. Instead, enable the appropriate accounting records and reconcile login and command traces during a controlled test. For the specific situation, a compliance report treats endpoint MAC addresses as the identities of device configuration administrators.