Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 109
Question 1080
A security team tightens disk encryption requirements but has not verified compliant client coverage. The observed failure is: Blind enforcement of untested checks can disrupt productive systems and prompt unsafe exemptions. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to refine checks using the pilot and promote supported policy after measuring expected failure cases.
- The supported recovery is to mark every endpoint compliant to avoid help desk calls.
- The supported recovery is to apply all new posture policies globally without testing available endpoint evidence.
- The supported recovery is to disable security auditing while rolling out stricter requirements.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Posture deployments can change the enforced endpoint access policy and must account for client compatibility. Recheck agent version, requirement match rates, pilot compliance, application access and rollback result.
Incorrect Answers
B:Mark every endpoint compliant to avoid help desk calls. This action does not repair the identified failure. Blind enforcement of untested checks can disrupt productive systems and prompt unsafe exemptions. Instead, refine checks using the pilot and promote supported policy after measuring expected failure cases. For the specific situation, a security team tightens disk encryption requirements but has not verified compliant client coverage.
C:Apply all new posture policies globally without testing available endpoint evidence. This action does not repair the identified failure. Blind enforcement of untested checks can disrupt productive systems and prompt unsafe exemptions. Instead, refine checks using the pilot and promote supported policy after measuring expected failure cases. For the specific situation, a security team tightens disk encryption requirements but has not verified compliant client coverage.
D:Disable security auditing while rolling out stricter requirements. This action does not repair the identified failure. Blind enforcement of untested checks can disrupt productive systems and prompt unsafe exemptions. Instead, refine checks using the pilot and promote supported policy after measuring expected failure cases. For the specific situation, a security team tightens disk encryption requirements but has not verified compliant client coverage.
Question 1081
A network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- Use RADIUS for network access authentication and authorization and supported TACACS+ for granular device administration.
- Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly.
- Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set.
- Disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the effect through aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log.
Incorrect Answers
B:Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. This does not implement the required control for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration.
C:That option would use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set, but it addresses a different concern. This is the targeted action for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration.
D:Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead the intended policy action is use RADIUS for network access authentication and authorization and supported TACACS+ for granular device administration.
Question 1082
A network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- AAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:These observations directly establish the result of RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration for the described endpoint or network device. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration.
Incorrect Answers
A:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
B:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
D:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
Question 1083
A network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. This is the governing technical behavior for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration.
Incorrect Answers
A:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
B:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
C:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
Question 1084
A network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy.
- The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
Incorrect Answers
A:Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
C:The only result is an unrelated portal background color change. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
D:Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
Question 1085
A network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse. The observed failure is: Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set.
- Use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately.
- Disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login.
- Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Recheck aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
C:Disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
D:Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a network engineer configures an IOS switch to use RADIUS for command-by-command privilege control and finds authorization too coarse.
Question 1086
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. Which configuration decision most directly satisfies the requirement?
- In this case, use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set.
- In this case, use RADIUS for network access authentication and authorization and supported TACACS+ for granular device administration.
- In this case, disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login.
- In this case, assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. The relevant evidence is aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Use the supported approach: use RADIUS for network access authentication and authorization and supported TACACS+ for granular device administration.
Question 1087
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. What observations most directly test this network-access condition?
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is an old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Question 1088
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. What principle of ISE authentication and authorization explains this case?
- The governing principle is that rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration.
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that a captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Incorrect Answers
B:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration. Instead rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Verify the actual state using aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Question 1089
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly. Which negative consequence BEST explains the shortcut’s flaw?
- The material consequence is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy.
- The material consequence is that accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The shortcut is unsuitable because rADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Incorrect Answers
B:Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:The only result is an unrelated portal background color change. This unrelated assertion does not explain the RADIUS network access versus TACACS device administration problem. The relevant risk is that choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Check aAA service protocol, network access or CLI request, policy set, command authorization records and accounting log. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
Question 1090
A new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set. The observed failure is: Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- The supported recovery is to use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately.
- The supported recovery is to disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login.
- The supported recovery is to assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly.
- The supported recovery is to use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:RADIUS and TACACS+ provide different AAA functions and message models for network access versus device administration. Use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately.
Incorrect Answers
B:Disable all AAA accounting when switching from endpoint policy to device login. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
C:Assume a RADIUS Access-Accept automatically authorizes every IOS command granularly. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.
D:Use a guest captive portal as an administrative command set. This action does not repair the identified failure. Choosing the wrong AAA service can leave per-command device controls unavailable or bypass policy. Instead, use a proper TACACS+ device-admin policy and verify both privileged commands and endpoint network access separately. For the specific situation, a new ISE deployment mixes endpoint EAP authentication logs with administrative login commands in the same policy set.