cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 76

Question 750

A hybrid enterprise wants detection of identity attacks targeting domain accounts and directory infrastructure. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions.
  2. Inspect monitored domain controllers, identity alerts and suspicious activity timelines.
  3. Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.
  4. Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect monitored domain controllers, identity alerts and suspicious activity timelines. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

C:

Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

D:

Inspect WAF rules, managed-rule matches and HTTP request logs for the affected endpoint. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Identity is the closer match. Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog.

Question 751

An incident manager wants centralized visibility into investigations without opening unrelated admin portals. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused.
  2. Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations.
  3. Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud.
  4. Inspect portal incident queues, product-specific alerts, assets and investigation links.
  5. Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations. This is the directly applicable response. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.

D:

Inspect portal incident queues, product-specific alerts, assets and investigation links. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.

C:

Inspect asset inventory, secure score, alerts, plans and recommendations in Defender for Cloud. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.

E:

Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.

Question 752

Two Azure applications require separate address spaces and only limited intentional interconnection. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results.
  2. Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments.
  3. Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries.
  4. Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.
  5. Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries. This is the directly applicable response. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

E:

Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

B:

Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

D:

Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Question 753

A TLS service has certificates managed manually and wants centralized version tracking and permissions. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
  2. Affected endpoints generate actionable detections and responders can investigate the activity chain.
  3. The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused.
  4. The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.

B:

Affected endpoints generate actionable detections and responders can investigate the activity chain. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Endpoint EDR. Its appropriate purpose is: Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.

D:

The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.

Question 754

A reviewer asks why comparing file digests cannot reveal the original file contents as decryption would. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted.
  2. Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location.
  3. A modified input produces a different computed digest while an unchanged trusted item passes the comparison.
  4. The application accepts the intended provider's authenticated users and respects account disablement and configured access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

A modified input produces a different computed digest while an unchanged trusted item passes the comparison. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Cryptographic hashing is the closer match. Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality.

B:

Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Cryptographic hashing is the closer match. Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality.

D:

The application accepts the intended provider's authenticated users and respects account disablement and configured access. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity providers and directories. Its appropriate purpose is: An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application. For the stated case, Cryptographic hashing is the closer match. Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality.

Question 755

A bank permits mobile access to customer records only when device compliance requirements are satisfied. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced.
  2. A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app.
  3. A managed tenant identity can sign in to integrated cloud resources under assigned access policies.
  4. Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

C:

A managed tenant identity can sign in to integrated cloud resources under assigned access policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

D:

Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

Question 756

An enterprise wants a consolidated incident view across identities, devices and email threats. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries.
  2. Use Microsoft Defender XDR to correlate incidents and signals across supported Microsoft security products.
  3. The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused.
  4. Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal.
  5. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Use Microsoft Defender XDR to correlate incidents and signals across supported Microsoft security products. This is the directly applicable response. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

D:

Inspect cross-product incidents, linked alerts, entity timeline and incident evidence in the Defender portal. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

C:

The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

E:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents is the closer match. Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance.

Question 757

A detection engineer is tuning a rule so it identifies suspicious sequences while minimizing harmless matches. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data.
  2. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies.
  3. A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard.
  4. Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.
  5. Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data. This is the directly applicable response. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

E:

Inspect analytic rule query logic, schedule, thresholds and representative matching events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

C:

A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud security policies and recommendations. Its appropriate purpose is: A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

D:

Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules is the closer match. Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern.

Question 758

An Azure Linux VM requires periodic SSH access but security prohibits a public IP for the workload. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Operators can navigate from a unified incident to related evidence across connected Defender services.
  2. Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage.
  3. Analysts can connect relevant observed indicators with contextualized threat information to guide investigation.
  4. Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Operators can navigate from a unified incident to related evidence across connected Defender services. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

B:

Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud workload protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

C:

Analysts can connect relevant observed indicators with contextualized threat information to guide investigation. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

Question 759

A workstation shows behavior consistent with credential theft and needs endpoint threat visibility. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect onboarded device inventory, detection alerts, process timelines and investigation findings.
  2. Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths.
  3. Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations.
  4. Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect onboarded device inventory, detection alerts, process timelines and investigation findings. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure Firewall is a managed stateful network security service; it is not an identity provider or a retention tool. For the stated case, Defender for Endpoint EDR is the closer match. Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention.

C:

Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud Security Posture Management. Its appropriate purpose is: CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert. For the stated case, Defender for Endpoint EDR is the closer match. Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention.

D:

Inspect incident timelines, alert evidence, related entities and assigned ownership. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Defender for Endpoint EDR is the closer match. Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention.

Question 760

An Azure Linux VM requires periodic SSH access but security prohibits a public IP for the workload. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations.
  2. Use Azure Bastion to reach supported Azure VMs over RDP or SSH without exposing public management ports directly.
  3. Inspect threat intelligence indicators, associated reports and their links to observed activity.
  4. Inspect Bastion deployment, VM public IP assignments and management connection paths.
  5. Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Use Azure Bastion to reach supported Azure VMs over RDP or SSH without exposing public management ports directly. This is the directly applicable response. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

D:

Inspect Bastion deployment, VM public IP assignments and management connection paths. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

C:

Inspect threat intelligence indicators, associated reports and their links to observed activity. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

E:

Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud workload protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests