Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 71
Question 700
A firm wants to restrict sensitive file downloads during unmanaged-device cloud app sessions. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations.
- Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths.
- Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured.
- A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results.
- Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events.
Explanation
Correct Answers
C:Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured. This is the directly applicable response. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
E:Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
B:Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure Firewall is a managed stateful network security service; it is not an identity provider or a retention tool. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
D:A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
Question 701
A SOC analyst needs to enrich observed IP indicators with broader adversary intelligence. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators.
- Inspect threat intelligence indicators, associated reports and their links to observed activity.
- Apply Azure network security group rules to allow or deny traffic by source, destination, port and protocol at subnet or NIC scope.
- Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources.
- Inspect policy assignments, noncompliant resources and recommendation-to-remediation mappings.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators. This is the directly applicable response. Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization.
B:Inspect threat intelligence indicators, associated reports and their links to observed activity. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization.
Incorrect Answers
C:Apply Azure network security group rules to allow or deny traffic by source, destination, port and protocol at subnet or NIC scope. This item belongs to a different control area: Network security groups. Its appropriate purpose is: NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection. For the stated case, Microsoft Threat Intelligence is the closer match. Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization.
D:Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud Security Posture Management. Its appropriate purpose is: CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert. For the stated case, Microsoft Threat Intelligence is the closer match. Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization.
E:Inspect policy assignments, noncompliant resources and recommendation-to-remediation mappings. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud security policies and recommendations. Its appropriate purpose is: A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources. For the stated case, Microsoft Threat Intelligence is the closer match. Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization.
Question 702
A payroll app should open only on organization-compliant endpoints even if a password is correct. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Enforce Microsoft Entra Conditional Access requiring compliant device signals for sensitive application access.
- Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience.
- Register an application and control its service principal permissions for unattended application access.
- Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Enforce Microsoft Entra Conditional Access requiring compliant device signals for sensitive application access. This is the directly applicable response. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.
Incorrect Answers
B:Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.
C:Register an application and control its service principal permissions for unattended application access. This item belongs to a different control area: Service principals. Its appropriate purpose is: Service principals represent applications or services rather than individual human users; credentials and consent must be governed. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.
D:Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.
Question 703
A business wants enhanced inspection of executable payloads arriving as email attachments. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports.
- Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives.
- Apply Azure Web Application Firewall to inspect HTTP and HTTPS requests for common web-application attacks.
- Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.
- Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Inspect Safe Attachments policy scope, file verdicts and attachment detection reports. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.
E:Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies. This is the directly applicable response. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.
Incorrect Answers
B:Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.
C:Apply Azure Web Application Firewall to inspect HTTP and HTTPS requests for common web-application attacks. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.
D:Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments is the closer match. Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs.
Question 704
A field workforce frequently works offline and needs secure local Windows sign-in backed by device-bound keys. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity.
- Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience.
- Deploy Windows Hello for Business for strong device-associated user authentication on supported Windows endpoints.
- Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Deploy Windows Hello for Business for strong device-associated user authentication on supported Windows endpoints. This is the directly applicable response. Windows Hello for Business replaces reusable password use in supported scenarios with device-bound asymmetric credentials and local user verification.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use location-based Conditional Access rules only as one evaluated sign-in signal, not as proof of identity. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Windows Hello for Business is the closer match. Windows Hello for Business replaces reusable password use in supported scenarios with device-bound asymmetric credentials and local user verification.
B:Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Windows Hello for Business is the closer match. Windows Hello for Business replaces reusable password use in supported scenarios with device-bound asymmetric credentials and local user verification.
D:Invite and govern partner users with Microsoft Entra B2B collaboration instead of issuing shared internal passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Windows Hello for Business is the closer match. Windows Hello for Business replaces reusable password use in supported scenarios with device-bound asymmetric credentials and local user verification.
Question 705
An IT team plans a new Conditional Access control and wants to avoid locking out emergency administrators. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement.
- Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.
- Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events.
- Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs.
- Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement. This is the directly applicable response. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.
D:Inspect included and excluded users, target apps, conditions and report-only evaluation logs. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.
Incorrect Answers
B:Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.
C:Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.
E:Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.
Question 706
A regional workforce connects to cloud applications from home networks and unmanaged locations. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests.
- Inspect whether access policies, segmentation, application safeguards and encryption operate at independent layers.
- Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals.
- Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
Incorrect Answers
A:Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests. This item belongs to a different control area: Zero Trust. Its appropriate purpose is: Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
B:Inspect whether access policies, segmentation, application safeguards and encryption operate at independent layers. This item belongs to a different control area: Defense in depth. Its appropriate purpose is: Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
D:Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
Question 707
An enterprise wants staff departures reflected in application access as directory accounts are disabled. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration.
- Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records.
- Compare a securely computed digest with a trusted expected digest or properly managed password verifier.
- Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application.
Incorrect Answers
B:Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Identity providers and directories is the closer match. An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application.
C:Compare a securely computed digest with a trusted expected digest or properly managed password verifier. This item belongs to a different control area: Cryptographic hashing. Its appropriate purpose is: Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality. For the stated case, Identity providers and directories is the closer match. An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application.
D:Review the sign-in context, permissions granted and enforcement of checks even for internal network requests. This item belongs to a different control area: Zero Trust. Its appropriate purpose is: Zero Trust does not automatically trust a user, device or connection because it originates on a corporate network. For the stated case, Identity providers and directories is the closer match. An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application.
Question 708
A government agency requires stronger verification before allowing staff to open sensitive cloud apps. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results.
- A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app.
- An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied.
- Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.
Incorrect Answers
A:The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.
B:A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.
D:Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.
Question 709
A retail booking site on Azure public IPs suffers large floods of unwanted inbound network packets. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Azure DDoS Protection for protection of exposed Azure public IP resources against volumetric network attacks where appropriate.
- Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards.
- Enable applicable Defender for Cloud workload protection plans to detect threats affecting supported cloud workloads.
- Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Use Azure DDoS Protection for protection of exposed Azure public IP resources against volumetric network attacks where appropriate. This is the directly applicable response. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.
C:Enable applicable Defender for Cloud workload protection plans to detect threats affecting supported cloud workloads. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud workload protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.
D:Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.
Question 710
A TLS service has certificates managed manually and wants centralized version tracking and permissions. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses.
- Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations.
- Affected endpoints generate actionable detections and responders can investigate the activity chain.
- Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments.
- Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration.
Explanation
Correct Answers
B:Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations. This is the directly applicable response. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
E:Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
C:Affected endpoints generate actionable detections and responders can investigate the activity chain. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Endpoint EDR. Its appropriate purpose is: Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.
D:Inspect assigned compliance standards, evaluated controls and their associated resource assessments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault keys and certificates is the closer match. Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy.