Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 68
Question 670
A desktop team needs to pilot blocking risky application behaviors while checking business impact. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations.
- Inspect Bastion deployment, VM public IP assignments and management connection paths.
- Inspect ASR rule configuration, audit or block events and exclusions for the affected endpoints.
- Inspect NSG effective rules, priority ordering and flow evaluation for the affected network interface.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Inspect ASR rule configuration, audit or block events and exclusions for the affected endpoints. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect posture findings, resource coverage, attack paths where available and suggested remediations. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud Security Posture Management. Its appropriate purpose is: CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert. For the stated case, Endpoint attack surface reduction is the closer match. ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement.
B:Inspect Bastion deployment, VM public IP assignments and management connection paths. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Bastion. Its appropriate purpose is: Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service. For the stated case, Endpoint attack surface reduction is the closer match. ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement.
D:Inspect NSG effective rules, priority ordering and flow evaluation for the affected network interface. This item belongs to a different control area: Network security groups. Its appropriate purpose is: NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection. For the stated case, Endpoint attack surface reduction is the closer match. ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement.
Question 671
An HR team wants new interns to request a predefined collection of resources that expire after the internship. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events.
- Inspect policy targeting, device compliance information and sign-in evaluation details.
- Inspect access package catalogs, eligibility, request policy and expiration configuration.
- Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Inspect access package catalogs, eligibility, request policy and expiration configuration. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.
B:Inspect policy targeting, device compliance information and sign-in evaluation details. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.
D:Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure resource RBAC versus Entra roles. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure RBAC governs Azure resource permissions, whereas Microsoft Entra roles govern directory services. For the stated case, Entitlement management access packages is the closer match. Entitlement management standardizes access bundles and access-request governance for groups, apps and sites.
Question 672
A SOC analyst needs to navigate between correlated incidents and underlying device evidence. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Connect relevant data sources to a Microsoft Sentinel-enabled Log Analytics workspace for centralized security analysis.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations.
- Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations.
- Store and access application secrets in Azure Key Vault with appropriately controlled authorization.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations. This is the directly applicable response. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
Incorrect Answers
A:Connect relevant data sources to a Microsoft Sentinel-enabled Log Analytics workspace for centralized security analysis. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
B:Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
D:Store and access application secrets in Azure Key Vault with appropriately controlled authorization. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
Question 673
An organization needs to identify files containing financial account identifiers before policy enforcement. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns.
- Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities.
- Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress.
- Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns. This is the directly applicable response. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
C:Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
D:Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft privacy principles. Its appropriate purpose is: Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
Question 674
A service desk agent must manage user passwords but should not manage tenantwide security configurations. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- Users sign in with the intended phishing-resistant cryptographic authentication method instead of sharing reusable secrets.
- Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements.
- Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced.
- The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.
Incorrect Answers
A:Users sign in with the intended phishing-resistant cryptographic authentication method instead of sharing reusable secrets. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.
B:Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.
C:Known weak or organization-specific passwords are rejected where the configured protection is enforced. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.
Question 675
An incident manager wants centralized visibility into investigations without opening unrelated admin portals. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations.
- Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations.
- Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Use the Microsoft Defender portal to review integrated Defender alerts, incidents and security investigations. This is the directly applicable response. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Azure Key Vault to centrally control cryptographic key or certificate material and its authorized operations. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
B:Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
C:Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud to review Azure and multicloud security posture and workload protection recommendations. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Microsoft Defender portal is the closer match. The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product.
Question 676
A customer service website needs configurable web attack protection on incoming HTTP traffic. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps discovery to identify and assess cloud applications used by the organization.
- Apply Azure Web Application Firewall to inspect HTTP and HTTPS requests for common web-application attacks.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint endpoint detection and response capabilities to investigate malicious device activity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Apply Azure Web Application Firewall to inspect HTTP and HTTPS requests for common web-application attacks. This is the directly applicable response. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use supported Defender for Cloud Apps Conditional Access App Control session controls for cloud app activity when configured. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps session controls. Its appropriate purpose is: Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.
B:Use Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps discovery to identify and assess cloud applications used by the organization. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps discovery. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.
D:Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint endpoint detection and response capabilities to investigate malicious device activity. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Endpoint EDR. Its appropriate purpose is: Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.
Question 677
An automation app calls an Azure resource API and credential rotation causes frequent outages. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- The engineer can perform the allowed resource action but cannot manage unrelated resources or tenant identity settings.
- The workload accesses only the granted resource and no static application credential is embedded in code.
- An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied.
- Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The workload accesses only the granted resource and no static application credential is embedded in code. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
Incorrect Answers
A:The engineer can perform the allowed resource action but cannot manage unrelated resources or tenant identity settings. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure resource RBAC versus Entra roles. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure RBAC governs Azure resource permissions, whereas Microsoft Entra roles govern directory services. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
C:An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied. This item belongs to a different control area: Multifactor authentication. Its appropriate purpose is: MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
D:Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.
Question 678
A privacy team wants to find documents that match defined personal-data patterns in supported locations. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.
- The reviewer obtains the applicable provider assurance documentation without treating it as proof of the customer's controls.
- Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns.
- Use the compliance score in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager as a progress indicator for assessed improvement actions.
- Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus.
- Inspect assessments, improvement actions, assigned owners and uploaded evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answers
B:Use supported Microsoft Purview sensitive information types or classifiers to identify defined sensitive data patterns. This is the directly applicable response. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
D:Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
Incorrect Answers
A:The reviewer obtains the applicable provider assurance documentation without treating it as proof of the customer's controls. This item belongs to a different control area: Service Trust Portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
C:Use the compliance score in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager as a progress indicator for assessed improvement actions. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance score. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
E:Inspect assessments, improvement actions, assigned owners and uploaded evidence. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Sensitive information type classification is the closer match. Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration.
Question 679
A SOC manager wants consistent incident assignment and status tracking during triage. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators.
- Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments.
- Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.
- Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This is the directly applicable response. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
B:Use Microsoft Defender for Identity to detect suspicious identity activity involving supported on-premises Active Directory environments. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
D:Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation is the closer match. Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook.
Question 680
A cloud admin only needs Global Administrator rights during monthly maintenance windows. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs.
- Inspect application and service principal objects, consented permissions and authentication credential lifecycle.
- Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events.
- Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Inspect PIM eligible and active assignments, activation policies and role activation logs. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
Incorrect Answers
B:Inspect application and service principal objects, consented permissions and authentication credential lifecycle. This item belongs to a different control area: Service principals. Its appropriate purpose is: Service principals represent applications or services rather than individual human users; credentials and consent must be governed. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
C:Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
D:Inspect registered passkey credentials, permitted authentication-method settings and sign-in method details. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.