Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 66
Question 650
An external partner accesses a tenant application without ever traversing the company's office firewall. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect the service model and the tenant's IAM, application, data and guest-OS control assignments.
- Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records.
- Identify storage encryption state, TLS connection settings and custody of cryptographic keys.
- Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect the service model and the tenant's IAM, application, data and guest-OS control assignments. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud shared responsibility. Its appropriate purpose is: Shared responsibility divides security obligations according to the cloud service model; provider data-center security does not replace tenant controls. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
B:Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
C:Identify storage encryption state, TLS connection settings and custody of cryptographic keys. This item belongs to a different control area: Encryption. Its appropriate purpose is: Encryption makes data unreadable to an unauthorized party without the appropriate key; it differs from a one-way hash. For the stated case, Identity as security perimeter is the closer match. Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries.
Question 651
A startup standardizes Microsoft 365 and Azure sign-ins and needs centrally managed tenant identities. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation.
- Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource.
- Inspect role definitions, active assignments and role audit events for tenant administrators.
- Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Inspect tenant user and group objects, enterprise application registration and sign-in events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect named locations, policy exclusions, targeting and sign-in location evaluation. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access locations. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access can evaluate network locations alongside identities and risk, but location by itself should not be assumed trustworthy. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.
B:Inspect subscription or resource role assignments and effective permissions for the target resource. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure resource RBAC versus Entra roles. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure RBAC governs Azure resource permissions, whereas Microsoft Entra roles govern directory services. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.
C:Inspect role definitions, active assignments and role audit events for tenant administrators. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra role-based access control. Its appropriate purpose is: Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity is the closer match. Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention.
Question 652
A security lead wants privileged operators to elevate for two hours rather than hold constant access. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.
- Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications.
- Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles.
- Register an application and control its service principal permissions for unattended application access.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles. This is the directly applicable response. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
Incorrect Answers
A:Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
B:Use Microsoft Entra ID as the cloud identity and access-management service for users, groups and applications. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
D:Register an application and control its service principal permissions for unattended application access. This item belongs to a different control area: Service principals. Its appropriate purpose is: Service principals represent applications or services rather than individual human users; credentials and consent must be governed. For the stated case, Privileged Identity Management eligible roles is the closer match. PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles.
Question 653
A department transfer should trigger specified account and group handling rather than manual email tickets. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Automate defined joiner, mover and leaver identity tasks using Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where supported.
- Deploy Windows Hello for Business for strong device-associated user authentication on supported Windows endpoints.
- Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience.
- Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Automate defined joiner, mover and leaver identity tasks using Microsoft Entra Lifecycle Workflows where supported. This is the directly applicable response. Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control.
Incorrect Answers
B:Deploy Windows Hello for Business for strong device-associated user authentication on supported Windows endpoints. This item belongs to a different control area: Windows Hello for Business. Its appropriate purpose is: Windows Hello for Business replaces reusable password use in supported scenarios with device-bound asymmetric credentials and local user verification. For the stated case, Lifecycle workflows is the closer match. Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control.
C:Connect on-premises Active Directory identities with Microsoft Entra ID for a coordinated hybrid identity experience. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Lifecycle workflows is the closer match. Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control.
D:Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Lifecycle workflows is the closer match. Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control.
Question 654
An analyst sees suspicious sign-ins from unfamiliar infrastructure and needs identity-risk context. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported.
- Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users.
- Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins.
- Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins. This is the directly applicable response. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.
Incorrect Answers
A:Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported. This item belongs to a different control area: Password protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.
B:Enable self-service password reset with verified registration and appropriate identity checks for eligible users. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.
D:Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Identity Protection risk detection is the closer match. Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk.
Question 655
A firm wants to restrict sensitive file downloads during unmanaged-device cloud app sessions. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events.
- Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths.
- Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes.
- Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
Incorrect Answers
B:Inspect firewall policies, rule collections, traffic logs and routed connection paths. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure Firewall is a managed stateful network security service; it is not an identity provider or a retention tool. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
C:Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
D:Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.
Question 656
A regulator requests defensible content search and collection from an approved matter. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?
- Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents.
- Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion.
- Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps.
- Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.
B:Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance score. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.
C:Inspect Activity explorer events, filters, users, activity types and timestamps. This item belongs to a different control area: Activity explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Activity explorer focuses on what happened to data, unlike Content explorer's inventory of classified content. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview eDiscovery is the closer match. eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention.
Question 657
A tenant created a sensitivity label but staff cannot see it because no publication policy targets them. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?
- Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress.
- Create and publish Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels that classify and protect content according to policy.
- Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities.
- Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Create and publish Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels that classify and protect content according to policy. This is the directly applicable response. Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Sensitivity labels is the closer match. Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing.
C:Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Sensitivity labels is the closer match. Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing.
D:Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview Audit. Its appropriate purpose is: Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention. For the stated case, Sensitivity labels is the closer match. Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing.
Question 658
An administrator wants to know which devices are exposed to a newly published software CVE. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- Disallowed network flows are blocked by the expected rule without disrupting explicitly permitted connections.
- Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue.
- Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope.
- The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation.
Incorrect Answers
A:Disallowed network flows are blocked by the expected rule without disrupting explicitly permitted connections. This item belongs to a different control area: Network security groups. Its appropriate purpose is: NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection. For the stated case, Defender Vulnerability Management is the closer match. Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation.
B:Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Web Application Firewall. Its appropriate purpose is: A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering. For the stated case, Defender Vulnerability Management is the closer match. Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation.
C:Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud unified security posture. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group. For the stated case, Defender Vulnerability Management is the closer match. Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation.
Question 659
A support team wants to administer private VMs without opening inbound port 3389 from the Internet. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent.
- Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives.
- The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
- Expected source events are searchable in the intended workspace and support threat analytics.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.
Incorrect Answers
B:Test events meeting detection criteria produce expected alerts or incidents without overwhelming false positives. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.
C:The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.
D:Expected source events are searchable in the intended workspace and support threat analytics. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Azure Bastion is the closer match. Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service.
Question 660
A subnet allows a management port from all addresses and needs a narrow source-based restriction. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?
- Disallowed network flows are blocked by the expected rule without disrupting explicitly permitted connections.
- The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.
- Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy.
- The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Disallowed network flows are blocked by the expected rule without disrupting explicitly permitted connections. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.
Incorrect Answers
B:The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.
C:Supported malicious link access is blocked or warned according to the configured policy. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.
D:The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Network security groups is the closer match. NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection.