cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 60

Question 590

A project team needs to show how completing selected assessment actions affects a Microsoft compliance progress indicator. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status.
  2. Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion.
  3. Inspect audit search parameters, event operations, actors and timestamps for the relevant workload.
  4. Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention labels govern specific items; a broad location-level retention policy does not provide the same fine-grained labeling behavior. For the stated case, Compliance score is the closer match. Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee.

C:

Inspect audit search parameters, event operations, actors and timestamps for the relevant workload. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview Audit. Its appropriate purpose is: Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention. For the stated case, Compliance score is the closer match. Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee.

D:

Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention policies. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks. For the stated case, Compliance score is the closer match. Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee.

Question 591

A compliance team wants privacy-conscious investigation of repeated risky data transfer patterns by authorized employees. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data.
  2. Use Microsoft Purview retention labels and publishing or auto-application policies for item-level lifecycle handling.
  3. Use the compliance score in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager as a progress indicator for assessed improvement actions.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management to investigate configured potentially risky user activities under approved privacy safeguards. This is the directly applicable response. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft privacy principles. Its appropriate purpose is: Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

B:

Use Microsoft Purview retention labels and publishing or auto-application policies for item-level lifecycle handling. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention labels govern specific items; a broad location-level retention policy does not provide the same fine-grained labeling behavior. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

C:

Use the compliance score in Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager as a progress indicator for assessed improvement actions. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance score. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee. For the stated case, Insider risk management is the closer match. Insider risk policies correlate relevant insider indicators; they do not authorize indiscriminate surveillance or replace privacy and employment policy.

Question 592

A project identifies a new data residency obligation and needs to assign ownership, policy and an auditable response. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration.
  2. Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records.
  3. Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals.
  4. Compare authentication records with resource permission grants and denied-operation logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect identity records, provider trust configuration, account lifecycle status and application sign-in integration. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity providers and directories. Its appropriate purpose is: An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

C:

Review identities, sign-in activity, access entitlements and whether resource decisions use identity signals. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

D:

Compare authentication records with resource permission grants and denied-operation logs. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Governance risk and compliance is the closer match. Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls.

Question 593

A student portal receives SQL-injection-style requests through its public HTTPS endpoint. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results.
  2. Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue.
  3. A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard.
  4. The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Malicious web request patterns are blocked or logged while legitimate web requests continue. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.

C:

A targeted remediation clears the relevant security recommendation without loosening the intended standard. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud security policies and recommendations. Its appropriate purpose is: A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.

D:

The identified vulnerable installations are remediated and exposure assessments show reduced risk. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure Web Application Firewall is the closer match. A WAF targets application-layer HTTP risks such as injection, unlike basic network port filtering.

Question 594

A legal group asks whether transparency and user control are reflected in the chosen cloud solution. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Use Microsoft Purview Activity explorer to review events associated with labels and protection activities in supported workloads.
  2. Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data.
  3. The investigator finds applicable activity events and can document who performed an action and when.
  4. Inspect the relevant Purview solution pages, available roles and enabled features.
  5. Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data. This is the directly applicable response. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

E:

Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Purview Activity explorer to review events associated with labels and protection activities in supported workloads. This item belongs to a different control area: Activity explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Activity explorer focuses on what happened to data, unlike Content explorer's inventory of classified content. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

C:

The investigator finds applicable activity events and can document who performed an action and when. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview Audit. Its appropriate purpose is: Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

D:

Inspect the relevant Purview solution pages, available roles and enabled features. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Question 595

A university wants certain faculty cloud resources protected from unmanaged personal laptops. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Users sign in with the intended phishing-resistant cryptographic authentication method instead of sharing reusable secrets.
  2. A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app.
  3. Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements.
  4. On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Users sign in with the intended phishing-resistant cryptographic authentication method instead of sharing reusable secrets. This item belongs to a different control area: Passkeys and FIDO2. Its appropriate purpose is: FIDO2 passkeys bind authentication to the legitimate relying party and resist credential phishing more effectively than SMS codes. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

C:

Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

D:

On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Conditional Access compliant devices is the closer match. Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state.

Question 596

An enterprise wants to identify risky cloud services appearing in its network usage logs. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence.
  2. A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results.
  3. Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage.
  4. The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A qualifying incident triggers the approved response steps with auditable execution results. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.

C:

Supported workloads generate relevant security detections that the team can triage. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud workload protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.

D:

The approved service can use the intended material and unauthorized key operations are refused. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps discovery is the closer match. Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise.

Question 597

A support contractor needs limited directory operations for a defined handover window. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account.
  2. Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements.
  3. The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions.
  4. Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The operator can perform the approved directory task without access to unrelated privileged functions. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Approved guests access only shared resources and can be removed without exposing a generic shared account. This item belongs to a different control area: External guest collaboration. Its appropriate purpose is: B2B collaboration supports external users while preserving explicit guest access and tenant policy boundaries. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.

B:

Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.

D:

Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra role-based access control is the closer match. Entra administrative roles govern directory and identity operations; Azure resource RBAC is a separate scope model.

Question 598

A finance team finds that employee passwords have been reused and wants to limit successful attacker sign-ins. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The engineer can perform the allowed resource action but cannot manage unrelated resources or tenant identity settings.
  2. A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app.
  3. An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied.
  4. On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

An eligible sign-in is completed only after the required second factor or equivalent strong authentication is satisfied. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The engineer can perform the allowed resource action but cannot manage unrelated resources or tenant identity settings. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure resource RBAC versus Entra roles. Its appropriate purpose is: Azure RBAC governs Azure resource permissions, whereas Microsoft Entra roles govern directory services. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

B:

A noncompliant device is blocked or challenged while compliant devices can access the targeted app. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

D:

On-premises identity changes are reflected in Entra ID according to the configured sync topology. This item belongs to a different control area: Hybrid identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Hybrid identity coordinates on-premises and cloud identity management; it does not automatically move every workload to Azure. For the stated case, Multifactor authentication is the closer match. MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone.

Question 599

A data team discovers application access granted years ago with no recertification process. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked.
  2. The workload accesses only the granted resource and no static application credential is embedded in code.
  3. Stale access is removed or explicitly reaffirmed according to the completed review decisions.
  4. Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Stale access is removed or explicitly reaffirmed according to the completed review decisions. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

B:

The workload accesses only the granted resource and no static application credential is embedded in code. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

D:

Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization. Its appropriate purpose is: Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift. For the stated case, Access reviews is the closer match. Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request.

Question 600

A government office needs evidence that official records cannot be casually deleted before required disposition. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Purview records management capabilities to govern records according to declared lifecycle and disposition requirements.
  2. Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations.
  3. Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data.
  4. Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Use Microsoft Purview records management capabilities to govern records according to declared lifecycle and disposition requirements. This is the directly applicable response. Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Microsoft Purview Audit to search supported Microsoft 365 audit events for accountability and investigations. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview Audit. Its appropriate purpose is: Audit provides activity logging and search, not a tool to classify documents or automatically enforce retention. For the stated case, Records management is the closer match. Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag.

C:

Apply Microsoft's published privacy principles when assessing transparency, control and responsible handling of personal data. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft privacy principles. Its appropriate purpose is: Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document. For the stated case, Records management is the closer match. Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag.

D:

Use Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager to organize improvement actions and track regulatory assessment progress. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance Manager. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance. For the stated case, Records management is the closer match. Records management adds governance and disposition requirements; it differs from simply adding a decorative classification tag.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests