Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 62
Question 610
A trunk toward the access layer expects specific VLAN priority bits for voice and video. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings.
- Configure supported IEEE 802.1p rewrite mapping at the Ethernet egress boundary.
- Configure supported priority treatment with bounds and sufficient lower-class service.
- Modify BGP local-pref and assume it rewrites Ethernet PCP marking.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Configure supported IEEE 802.1p rewrite mapping at the Ethernet egress boundary. 802.1p PCP bits are distinct from IP DSCP and may require explicit mapping. The expected validation is that captures show intended 802.1Q PCP values without damaging VLAN identity.
Incorrect Answers
A:Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings. This addresses Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier rather than the required IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet decision. 802.1p PCP bits are distinct from IP DSCP and may require explicit mapping.
C:Configure supported priority treatment with bounds and sufficient lower-class service. This addresses Scheduler strict priority and starvation rather than the required IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet decision. 802.1p PCP bits are distinct from IP DSCP and may require explicit mapping.
D:Modify BGP local-pref and assume it rewrites Ethernet PCP marking. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet. Assuming IP DSCP automatically sets all Ethernet priority bits causes inconsistencies.
Question 611
Two RP sites should provide resilience while receivers retain a stable RP address. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Build supported anycast-RP reachability and synchronize source awareness as required.
- Apply scoped multicast policy restricting eligible groups at the proper boundary.
- Replace RP configuration with an ordinary Ethernet anycast MAC and assume PIM state synchronizes.
- Configure reachable appropriate RP mapping for the required ASM group range.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Build supported anycast-RP reachability and synchronize source awareness as required. Anycast RP can present one logical RP address across multiple physical routers. The expected validation is that receivers continue forwarding through the surviving RP without changing group configuration.
Incorrect Answers
B:Apply scoped multicast policy restricting eligible groups at the proper boundary. This addresses Multicast policy group scoping rather than the required Anycast RP with shared address decision. Anycast RP can present one logical RP address across multiple physical routers.
C:Replace RP configuration with an ordinary Ethernet anycast MAC and assume PIM state synchronizes. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Anycast RP with shared address. Identical RP addresses without source-state coordination can break ASM reachability.
D:Configure reachable appropriate RP mapping for the required ASM group range. This addresses PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree rather than the required Anycast RP with shared address decision. Anycast RP can present one logical RP address across multiple physical routers.
Question 612
A classifier places premium voice and ordinary data in the same loss priority. Which technical principle BEST explains the Packet loss priority PLP marking decision?
- Forwarding classes express per-hop traffic treatment and map to transmission queues.
- Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone.
- Egress buffers absorb short bursts but cannot compensate for persistent overload.
- Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone. In this situation, the relevant action is to assign deliberate PLP values through classification or policing policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Forwarding classes express per-hop traffic treatment and map to transmission queues. That principle is related to Junos forwarding class to queue mapping, not the main Packet loss priority PLP marking choice. Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy.
C:Egress buffers absorb short bursts but cannot compensate for persistent overload. That principle is related to Queue buffer-size allocation, not the main Packet loss priority PLP marking choice. Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy.
D:Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point. That principle is related to SSM without rendezvous point, not the main Packet loss priority PLP marking choice. Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy.
Question 613
A port carries the PC data untagged but the handset sends voice frames to the wrong tagged VLAN. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.
- Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control.
- Phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment.
- Apply a deliberate trust boundary and separate PC and voice VLAN access policies.
- Set correct voice VLAN membership and data VLAN handling for the access port.
- Configure supported LLDP-MED voice policy with appropriate QoS marking guidance.
Explanation
Correct Answers
B:Phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment. This is direct observable evidence for Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic.
D:Set correct voice VLAN membership and data VLAN handling for the access port. This is the intended implementation action for Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic.
Incorrect Answers
A:Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control. This would not be an appropriate Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic decision. Treating both streams as one unrestricted VLAN can violate QoS and segmentation rules.
C:Apply a deliberate trust boundary and separate PC and voice VLAN access policies. This belongs to Phone and PC shared switch-port security, not the specified Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic operation. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.
E:Configure supported LLDP-MED voice policy with appropriate QoS marking guidance. This belongs to LLDP-MED voice priority signaling, not the specified Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic operation. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.
Question 614
A secured OSPF link fails after one router rotates authentication credentials. After deploying the recommended OSPF authentication key or algorithm change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Accepted authenticated Hellos lead to a stable neighbor relationship.
- Interarea prefixes traverse the intended backbone with stable SPF reachability.
- Both IPv4 and IPv6 routes appear via their configured protocols independently.
- The upstream accepts advertised MED values with understood decision constraints.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Accepted authenticated Hellos lead to a stable neighbor relationship. This is the directly observable outcome for OSPF authentication key or algorithm. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.
Incorrect Answers
B:Interarea prefixes traverse the intended backbone with stable SPF reachability. This validates OSPF area-border backbone connectivity but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF authentication key or algorithm result. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.
C:Both IPv4 and IPv6 routes appear via their configured protocols independently. This validates OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF authentication key or algorithm result. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.
D:The upstream accepts advertised MED values with understood decision constraints. This validates BGP MED inbound traffic hint but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF authentication key or algorithm result. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.
Question 615
A router receives packets marked DSCP EF and must map them to expedited forwarding. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically.
- Combine per-class classification queue occupancy drop and packet-marking evidence across bottlenecks.
- Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings.
- Configure supported priority treatment with bounds and sufficient lower-class service.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority. The expected validation is that packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue.
Incorrect Answers
A:Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier. Incorrect ingress mapping sends high-priority traffic to default queues.
B:Combine per-class classification queue occupancy drop and packet-marking evidence across bottlenecks. This addresses CoS end-to-end verification of drop behavior rather than the required Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier decision. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.
D:Configure supported priority treatment with bounds and sufficient lower-class service. This addresses Scheduler strict priority and starvation rather than the required Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier decision. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.
Question 616
A phone fails to power despite a configured PoE-enabled interface. After deploying the recommended PoE fault isolation and cable pair change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- The handset receives voice VLAN policy and tags voice frames as intended.
- Phones send frames with expected voice tags and priority values where supported.
- BUM frames are not looped back to the originating Ethernet segment.
- The phone powers reliably on the approved port with no short or overload alarms.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The phone powers reliably on the approved port with no short or overload alarms. This is the directly observable outcome for PoE fault isolation and cable pair. PoE delivery requires compatible power sourcing and physical cable conditions.
Incorrect Answers
A:The handset receives voice VLAN policy and tags voice frames as intended. This validates LLDP-MED voice network policy but does not directly demonstrate the required PoE fault isolation and cable pair result. PoE delivery requires compatible power sourcing and physical cable conditions.
B:Phones send frames with expected voice tags and priority values where supported. This validates LLDP-MED voice priority signaling but does not directly demonstrate the required PoE fault isolation and cable pair result. PoE delivery requires compatible power sourcing and physical cable conditions.
C:BUM frames are not looped back to the originating Ethernet segment. This validates EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance but does not directly demonstrate the required PoE fault isolation and cable pair result. PoE delivery requires compatible power sourcing and physical cable conditions.
Question 617
A software switchover occurs and peers must avoid immediate route loss where supported. After deploying the recommended BGP graceful restart session continuity change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Authorized user EAP exchanges complete while invalid or expired certificates are rejected.
- Peers maintain only supported stale routes during a bounded restart and withdraw them when unsafe.
- Tagged prefixes follow documented export or preference behavior at the target neighbor.
- Active route reflects Junos protocol preference then applicable next-hop and policy conditions.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Peers maintain only supported stale routes during a bounded restart and withdraw them when unsafe. This is the directly observable outcome for BGP graceful restart session continuity. Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance.
Incorrect Answers
A:Authorized user EAP exchanges complete while invalid or expired certificates are rejected. This validates 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP graceful restart session continuity result. Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance.
C:Tagged prefixes follow documented export or preference behavior at the target neighbor. This validates BGP communities tagging routing intent but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP graceful restart session continuity result. Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance.
D:Active route reflects Junos protocol preference then applicable next-hop and policy conditions. This validates BGP route preference versus OSPF but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP graceful restart session continuity result. Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance.
Question 618
During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: After a route-filter change an unwanted IPv6 summary appears as an OSPFv3 external. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?
- Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks.
- Reusing an IPv4-only route filter can leave IPv6 export expectations unmet.
- Global IPv6 addressing alone does not guarantee OSPFv3 routing.
- Mixed OSPF interface network types can produce confusing neighbor behavior.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Reusing an IPv4-only route filter can leave IPv6 export expectations unmet. Routing policy must match the relevant address family as well as eligible source routes. A useful corrective investigation is to verify source route active state policy terms and destination inet6.0 routes.
Incorrect Answers
A:Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks. This is a BPDU protection on access edges failure pattern, not the primary OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6 failure in this case. Routing policy must match the relevant address family as well as eligible source routes.
C:Global IPv6 addressing alone does not guarantee OSPFv3 routing. This is a OSPFv3 IPv6 link-local neighbor formation failure pattern, not the primary OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6 failure in this case. Routing policy must match the relevant address family as well as eligible source routes.
D:Mixed OSPF interface network types can produce confusing neighbor behavior. This is a OSPF point-to-point network type failure pattern, not the primary OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6 failure in this case. Routing policy must match the relevant address family as well as eligible source routes.
Question 619
An overly aggressive dampening design suppresses a recovered critical prefix. Which technical principle BEST explains the BGP route damping flap penalty decision?
- Route damping suppresses unstable routes but adds recovery latency.
- ECMP commonly hashes traffic flows rather than balancing individual packets deterministically.
- OSPF stub areas restrict external AS-external advertisements and require compatible area flags.
- BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Route damping suppresses unstable routes but adds recovery latency. In this situation, the relevant action is to apply supported route-flap damping only where its stability tradeoff is justified.
Incorrect Answers
B:ECMP commonly hashes traffic flows rather than balancing individual packets deterministically. That principle is related to BGP ECMP per-flow hashing, not the main BGP route damping flap penalty choice. Damping critical destinations without review can prolong customer downtime.
C:OSPF stub areas restrict external AS-external advertisements and require compatible area flags. That principle is related to OSPF stub area external LSA suppression, not the main BGP route damping flap penalty choice. Damping critical destinations without review can prolong customer downtime.
D:BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements. That principle is related to BGP multipath equal-cost path installation, not the main BGP route damping flap penalty choice. Damping critical destinations without review can prolong customer downtime.
Question 620
A Junos VSTP domain unintentionally selects one root for all VLANs. Which technical principle BEST explains the VSTP per-VLAN root distribution decision?
- Spanning tree chooses port roles to avoid loops while maintaining redundant paths.
- VSTP runs per-VLAN spanning-tree decisions rather than one shared instance.
- Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone.
- RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:VSTP runs per-VLAN spanning-tree decisions rather than one shared instance. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure appropriate VSTP VLAN-specific bridge priorities and port values.
Incorrect Answers
A:Spanning tree chooses port roles to avoid loops while maintaining redundant paths. That principle is related to MSTP root port and alternate path, not the main VSTP per-VLAN root distribution choice. Misconfigured VLAN-specific roots can send traffic over inefficient links.
C:Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone. That principle is related to Filter-based VLAN assignment, not the main VSTP per-VLAN root distribution choice. Misconfigured VLAN-specific roots can send traffic over inefficient links.
D:RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity. That principle is related to RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling, not the main VSTP per-VLAN root distribution choice. Misconfigured VLAN-specific roots can send traffic over inefficient links.