cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 32

Question 310

Two otherwise similar candidate BGP paths differ in their origin attributes. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Rewrite the Ethernet source MAC and expect that to alter BGP origin attribute.
  2. Place route acceptance on BGP import and announcement selection on BGP export.
  3. Configure appropriate inet6-unicast family and compatible IPv6 next-hop reachability.
  4. Examine and apply origin attribute handling only within an intentional routing-policy decision.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Examine and apply origin attribute handling only within an intentional routing-policy decision. BGP origin distinguishes IGP EGP and incomplete values with limited relative ranking. The expected validation is that chosen path reflects the complete ordered decision process rather than origin alone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Rewrite the Ethernet source MAC and expect that to alter BGP origin attribute. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for BGP origin attribute influence. Treating origin as more important than LOCAL_PREF or AS_PATH yields incorrect predictions.

B:

Place route acceptance on BGP import and announcement selection on BGP export. This addresses BGP import versus export policy direction rather than the required BGP origin attribute influence decision. BGP origin distinguishes IGP EGP and incomplete values with limited relative ranking.

C:

Configure appropriate inet6-unicast family and compatible IPv6 next-hop reachability. This addresses BGP NLRI IPv6 unicast inet6 family rather than the required BGP origin attribute influence decision. BGP origin distinguishes IGP EGP and incomplete values with limited relative ranking.

Question 311

A new floor installs forty IP phones and a switch reports insufficient PoE budget. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Diagnose PoE physical link LLDP-MED voice VLAN and DHCP stages in order.
  2. Configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports.
  3. Change the voice VLAN IP address and assume it increases available PoE wattage.
  4. Calculate supported switch PoE budget and per-port device allocation before deployment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Calculate supported switch PoE budget and per-port device allocation before deployment. IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints. The expected validation is that all approved phones receive adequate negotiated power without exceeding switch capacity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Diagnose PoE physical link LLDP-MED voice VLAN and DHCP stages in order. This addresses IP phone first-hop diagnostic workflow rather than the required PoE power budget switch capacity decision. IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints.

B:

Configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports. This addresses LLDP-MED voice network policy rather than the required PoE power budget switch capacity decision. IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints.

C:

Change the voice VLAN IP address and assume it increases available PoE wattage. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for PoE power budget switch capacity. Summing device requirements above available chassis budget causes port power denial.

Question 312

A link failure leaves downstream multicast state pointing at an obsolete upstream neighbor. Which technical principle BEST explains the PIM join prune forwarding path decision?

  1. MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections.
  2. PIM builds and removes multicast distribution state using joins and prunes.
  3. Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state.
  4. IPv4 multicast destination ranges are group identifiers rather than ordinary host addresses.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

PIM builds and removes multicast distribution state using joins and prunes. In this situation, the relevant action is to verify PIM join prune messages and incoming outgoing interface lists across the chain.

Incorrect Answers

A:

MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections. That principle is related to MSTP instance root selection, not the main PIM join prune forwarding path choice. Missing join or stale prune state interrupts receiver delivery despite source health.

C:

Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state. That principle is related to Multicast routing table incoming outgoing lists, not the main PIM join prune forwarding path choice. Missing join or stale prune state interrupts receiver delivery despite source health.

D:

IPv4 multicast destination ranges are group identifiers rather than ordinary host addresses. That principle is related to IPv4 multicast group address versus unicast, not the main PIM join prune forwarding path choice. Missing join or stale prune state interrupts receiver delivery despite source health.

Question 313

Two Anycast RPs use distinct control planes and must share source-active information. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure supported MSDP peering and source-active advertisements between intended RP nodes.
  2. Enable compatible PIM on intended routed interfaces and verify neighbor discovery.
  3. Use compatible IGMPv3 source membership and PIM SSM range design.
  4. Configure IGMP snooping alone and expect it to exchange MSDP source-active records across routers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure supported MSDP peering and source-active advertisements between intended RP nodes. MSDP can exchange source-active awareness across ASM RP domains. The expected validation is that remote RP learns eligible sources and establishes multicast data delivery to subscribers.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Enable compatible PIM on intended routed interfaces and verify neighbor discovery. This addresses PIM sparse-mode neighbor discovery rather than the required MSDP source active exchange decision. MSDP can exchange source-active awareness across ASM RP domains.

C:

Use compatible IGMPv3 source membership and PIM SSM range design. This addresses SSM without rendezvous point rather than the required MSDP source active exchange decision. MSDP can exchange source-active awareness across ASM RP domains.

D:

Configure IGMP snooping alone and expect it to exchange MSDP source-active records across routers. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for MSDP source active exchange. Missing MSDP source advertisements can isolate multicast sources between RPs.

Question 314

A protected user access port is administratively disabled after receiving an unexpected BPDU. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the BPDU protection on access edges implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.

  1. Apply BPDU protection to appropriate edge ports and document recovery.
  2. Configure root protection on links that must not receive superior root advertisements.
  3. Enable BPDU protection on every core trunk without assessing spanning-tree adjacency.
  4. Align supported outer-tag TPID and VLAN-stacking configuration across participating devices.
  5. Rogue bridge BPDUs trigger the intended guard action without affecting valid trunks.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Apply BPDU protection to appropriate edge ports and document recovery. This is the intended implementation action for BPDU protection on access edges.

E:

Rogue bridge BPDUs trigger the intended guard action without affecting valid trunks. This is direct observable evidence for BPDU protection on access edges.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure root protection on links that must not receive superior root advertisements. This belongs to Root protection on designated links, not the specified BPDU protection on access edges operation. BPDU protection blocks unexpected spanning-tree participation at designated access edges.

C:

Enable BPDU protection on every core trunk without assessing spanning-tree adjacency. This would not be an appropriate BPDU protection on access edges decision. Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks.

D:

Align supported outer-tag TPID and VLAN-stacking configuration across participating devices. This belongs to QinQ tag protocol EtherType compatibility, not the specified BPDU protection on access edges operation. BPDU protection blocks unexpected spanning-tree participation at designated access edges.

Question 315

Corporate users present certificates but authentication fails after an enterprise CA rollover. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Review authentication policy and RADIUS response attributes with an authorized test identity.
  2. Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy.
  3. Disable RADIUS certificate checking for all wired users permanently.
  4. Collect show dot1x interface and access session state plus relevant RADIUS logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy. The expected validation is that authorized user EAP exchanges complete while invalid or expired certificates are rejected.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review authentication policy and RADIUS response attributes with an authorized test identity. This addresses RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling rather than the required 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation decision. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy.

C:

Disable RADIUS certificate checking for all wired users permanently. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation. Accepting every certificate to restore access undermines network identity controls.

D:

Collect show dot1x interface and access session state plus relevant RADIUS logs. This addresses Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring rather than the required 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation decision. EAP credential validation requires mutual compatible authentication and trust policy.

Question 316

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: An SSM receiver appears to depend on an ASM RP despite having a known source. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. An unrestricted policy can carry sensitive multicast into unintended domains.
  2. Using ASM-only membership for an SSM group prevents the intended source-specific join.
  3. Treating IGMP as an interrouter PIM replacement prevents routed multicast delivery.
  4. A physical pair or overload fault can stop power before any voice VLAN setup matters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Using ASM-only membership for an SSM group prevents the intended source-specific join. Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect IGMPv3 membership and PIM (S,G) route with no shared-tree dependency.

Incorrect Answers

A:

An unrestricted policy can carry sensitive multicast into unintended domains. This is a Multicast policy group scoping failure pattern, not the primary SSM without rendezvous point failure in this case. Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point.

C:

Treating IGMP as an interrouter PIM replacement prevents routed multicast delivery. This is a IGMPv2 membership report and leave failure pattern, not the primary SSM without rendezvous point failure in this case. Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point.

D:

A physical pair or overload fault can stop power before any voice VLAN setup matters. This is a PoE fault isolation and cable pair failure pattern, not the primary SSM without rendezvous point failure in this case. Source Specific Multicast builds source-directed trees without an ASM rendezvous point.

Question 317

Distribution links show VLAN membership configured but only one side tagged the relevant VLAN. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Review protected-interface events and BPDU counters before recovering the port.
  2. Check show ethernet-switching interfaces VLAN tables and tagged frame captures.
  3. Globally disable all spanning-tree and VLAN filters to make one service appear reachable.
  4. Inspect root-protection state and spanning-tree topology events.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Check show ethernet-switching interfaces VLAN tables and tagged frame captures. This checks whether end-to-end captures preserve intended VLAN identity and forwarding without unapproved leakage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review protected-interface events and BPDU counters before recovering the port. That check applies chiefly to BPDU protection on access edges, not the current Layer 2 trunk VLAN mismatch diagnosis issue. VLAN delivery requires consistent port roles tags and eligible forwarding state at every hop.

C:

Globally disable all spanning-tree and VLAN filters to make one service appear reachable. That bypass leaves the Layer 2 trunk VLAN mismatch diagnosis issue unresolved. Troubleshooting only end-host IP routes can miss a transport VLAN mismatch.

D:

Inspect root-protection state and spanning-tree topology events. That check applies chiefly to Root protection on designated links, not the current Layer 2 trunk VLAN mismatch diagnosis issue. VLAN delivery requires consistent port roles tags and eligible forwarding state at every hop.

Question 318

A new interconnect permits routing control ICMP but rejects BGP session initiation. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Test routes against the exact prefix conditions and inspect show route advertising-protocol.
  2. Inspect negotiated families and show route table inet.0 protocol bgp.
  3. Inspect show bgp neighbor and firewall filter counters for TCP179.
  4. Allow all internet TCP ports permanently as a necessary BGP adjacency fix.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Inspect show bgp neighbor and firewall filter counters for TCP179. This checks whether peering establishes over the authorized endpoints without opening unrelated management ports.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test routes against the exact prefix conditions and inspect show route advertising-protocol. That check applies chiefly to Junos BGP policy term matching, not the current BGP TCP 179 and firewall reachability issue. BGP relies on TCP transport and does not form merely because IP reachability exists.

B:

Inspect negotiated families and show route table inet.0 protocol bgp. That check applies chiefly to BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family, not the current BGP TCP 179 and firewall reachability issue. BGP relies on TCP transport and does not form merely because IP reachability exists.

D:

Allow all internet TCP ports permanently as a necessary BGP adjacency fix. That bypass leaves the BGP TCP 179 and firewall reachability issue unresolved. Rejecting TCP session establishment keeps BGP Idle or Active.

Question 319

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: One multihoming link fails but remote routers cannot withdraw the failed segment's reachability efficiently. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Incorrect or stale host bindings can return the wrong MAC or fail to suppress requests.
  2. Treating both uplinks as independent uncoordinated bridges can form duplication or loops.
  3. DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange.
  4. Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect Type1 A-D per-ES and per-EVI routes before and after a link failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Incorrect or stale host bindings can return the wrong MAC or fail to suppress requests. This is a EVPN ARP suppression from IP MAC bindings failure pattern, not the primary EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery failure in this case. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.

B:

Treating both uplinks as independent uncoordinated bridges can form duplication or loops. This is a EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding failure pattern, not the primary EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery failure in this case. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.

C:

DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange. This is a OSPF interface MTU mismatch failure pattern, not the primary EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery failure in this case. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.

Question 320

Two enterprise WAN exits receive equally specific destinations but primary egress should be favored. After deploying the recommended BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Flapping prefixes are damped according to intended thresholds and recover within acceptable time.
  2. Enterprise routers prefer approved primary exit while allowing backup on withdrawal.
  3. The upstream accepts advertised MED values with understood decision constraints.
  4. Untagged frames enter the correct VLAN and reach only eligible peers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enterprise routers prefer approved primary exit while allowing backup on withdrawal. This is the directly observable outcome for BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Flapping prefixes are damped according to intended thresholds and recover within acceptable time. This validates BGP route damping flap penalty but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection result. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

C:

The upstream accepts advertised MED values with understood decision constraints. This validates BGP MED inbound traffic hint but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection result. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

D:

Untagged frames enter the correct VLAN and reach only eligible peers. This validates Ethernet access interface VLAN membership but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection result. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests