Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 34
Question 330
A migrated access switch tags ordinary endpoint frames that expect untagged delivery. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the Ethernet access interface VLAN membership implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.
- Untagged frames enter the correct VLAN and reach only eligible peers.
- Configure compatible Multiple VLAN Registration Protocol operation on supported links.
- Change the LLDP system-name to the desired VLAN and assume membership changes.
- Apply BPDU protection to appropriate edge ports and document recovery.
- Set supported access interface VLAN membership for the intended user segment.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Untagged frames enter the correct VLAN and reach only eligible peers. This is direct observable evidence for Ethernet access interface VLAN membership.
E:Set supported access interface VLAN membership for the intended user segment. This is the intended implementation action for Ethernet access interface VLAN membership.
Incorrect Answers
B:Configure compatible Multiple VLAN Registration Protocol operation on supported links. This belongs to MVRP dynamic VLAN registration, not the specified Ethernet access interface VLAN membership operation. Access VLAN membership maps untagged endpoint traffic into one logical broadcast domain.
C:Change the LLDP system-name to the desired VLAN and assume membership changes. This would not be an appropriate Ethernet access interface VLAN membership decision. Changing the switch IP address does not correct an endpoint access VLAN mismatch.
D:Apply BPDU protection to appropriate edge ports and document recovery. This belongs to BPDU protection on access edges, not the specified Ethernet access interface VLAN membership operation. Access VLAN membership maps untagged endpoint traffic into one logical broadcast domain.
Question 331
An edge policy uses community values to decide whether to advertise specific routes. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?
- Inspect show route hidden extensive and relevant policy terms.
- Inspect show route extensive for route preference protocol and active flag.
- Rename a BGP group Backup and assume it inserts communities into all updates.
- Verify received community values and the matching routing-policy terms.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify received community values and the matching routing-policy terms. This checks whether tagged prefixes follow documented export or preference behavior at the target neighbor.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect show route hidden extensive and relevant policy terms. That check applies chiefly to BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis, not the current BGP communities tagging routing intent issue. BGP communities carry policy metadata without directly supplying next-hop reachability.
B:Inspect show route extensive for route preference protocol and active flag. That check applies chiefly to BGP route preference versus OSPF, not the current BGP communities tagging routing intent issue. BGP communities carry policy metadata without directly supplying next-hop reachability.
C:Rename a BGP group Backup and assume it inserts communities into all updates. That bypass leaves the BGP communities tagging routing intent issue unresolved. Marking a community without a matching policy may not change routing.
Question 332
A multiarea OSPF topology has a nonbackbone area disconnected from area zero. After deploying the recommended OSPF area-border backbone connectivity change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Remote IPv6 routers receive only the intended OSPFv3 external destinations.
- Active routes prefer the expected lowest cumulative OSPF metric.
- Interarea prefixes traverse the intended backbone with stable SPF reachability.
- Excess traffic is treated according to policy and compliant traffic continues.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Interarea prefixes traverse the intended backbone with stable SPF reachability. This is the directly observable outcome for OSPF area-border backbone connectivity. Standard multi-area OSPF uses the backbone to exchange interarea information.
Incorrect Answers
A:Remote IPv6 routers receive only the intended OSPFv3 external destinations. This validates OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6 but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF area-border backbone connectivity result. Standard multi-area OSPF uses the backbone to exchange interarea information.
B:Active routes prefer the expected lowest cumulative OSPF metric. This validates OSPF path cost selection but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF area-border backbone connectivity result. Standard multi-area OSPF uses the backbone to exchange interarea information.
D:Excess traffic is treated according to policy and compliant traffic continues. This validates Junos ingress policer rate limit but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF area-border backbone connectivity result. Standard multi-area OSPF uses the backbone to exchange interarea information.
Question 333
An IP phone and a laptop share an edge port and require different authentication mechanisms. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs.
- Allow failed EAP authentication to receive unrestricted MAC authorization automatically.
- Configure supported 802.1X authenticator on edge ports and RADIUS server reachability.
- Apply deliberate supported authentication method ordering and independent role policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Apply deliberate supported authentication method ordering and independent role policy. Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path. The expected validation is that a proper 802.1X user receives employee access while device fallback remains limited.
Incorrect Answers
A:Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs. This addresses Captive portal web authentication rather than the required 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority decision. Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path.
B:Allow failed EAP authentication to receive unrestricted MAC authorization automatically. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority. Uncontrolled method fallback can turn a stronger supplicant policy into a weak MAC-only policy.
C:Configure supported 802.1X authenticator on edge ports and RADIUS server reachability. This addresses 802.1X supplicant authenticator RADIUS roles rather than the required 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority decision. Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path.
Question 334
MST instance 2 unexpectedly selects an access switch as its root after a priority change. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?
- Create an extra VLAN name Root and expect MSTP bridge priority to change.
- Inspect spanning-tree mstp instance root and port roles on all participating switches.
- Validate allowed gateway ping and blocked peer-to-peer Layer 2 paths.
- Decode Ethernet EtherType and both VLAN IDs in packet captures.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Inspect spanning-tree mstp instance root and port roles on all participating switches. This checks whether each MST instance elects its planned root and stable forwarding paths.
Incorrect Answers
A:Create an extra VLAN name Root and expect MSTP bridge priority to change. That bypass leaves the MSTP instance root selection issue unresolved. Leaving roots uncontrolled may put access switches in core transit roles.
C:Validate allowed gateway ping and blocked peer-to-peer Layer 2 paths. That check applies chiefly to Private VLAN isolated port separation, not the current MSTP instance root selection issue. MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections.
D:Decode Ethernet EtherType and both VLAN IDs in packet captures. That check applies chiefly to QinQ tag protocol EtherType compatibility, not the current MSTP instance root selection issue. MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections.
Question 335
A laptop authenticates but cannot reach its assigned subnet after a dynamic filter is installed. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Restrict MAC RADIUS to low-trust device segments and use stronger 802.1X for capable users.
- Trace authentication outcome dynamic VLAN and firewall/filter policies for the effective session.
- Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy.
- Clear every network-wide security filter before finding the conflicting session policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Trace authentication outcome dynamic VLAN and firewall/filter policies for the effective session. Authentication success does not guarantee matching VLAN mapping or permitted data-plane access. The expected validation is that the device has the correct authorized VLAN and permitted flows according to one coherent policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Restrict MAC RADIUS to low-trust device segments and use stronger 802.1X for capable users. This addresses MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations rather than the required Multiple access control enforcement troubleshooting decision. Authentication success does not guarantee matching VLAN mapping or permitted data-plane access.
C:Configure appropriate supplicant EAP trust and supported RADIUS certificate or credential policy. This addresses 802.1X EAP authentication credential validation rather than the required Multiple access control enforcement troubleshooting decision. Authentication success does not guarantee matching VLAN mapping or permitted data-plane access.
D:Clear every network-wide security filter before finding the conflicting session policy. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Multiple access control enforcement troubleshooting. Mixed ACLs and fallback methods can cause access failure after a valid login.
Question 336
A standards-based phone must learn the intended voice VLAN through LLDP-MED. After deploying the recommended LLDP-MED voice network policy change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Negotiated power class and delivered wattage match the handset requirement.
- Peers maintain only supported stale routes during a bounded restart and withdraw them when unsafe.
- The handset receives voice VLAN policy and tags voice frames as intended.
- Phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The handset receives voice VLAN policy and tags voice frames as intended. This is the directly observable outcome for LLDP-MED voice network policy. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
Incorrect Answers
A:Negotiated power class and delivered wattage match the handset requirement. This validates PoE class discovery and allocation but does not directly demonstrate the required LLDP-MED voice network policy result. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
B:Peers maintain only supported stale routes during a bounded restart and withdraw them when unsafe. This validates BGP graceful restart session continuity but does not directly demonstrate the required LLDP-MED voice network policy result. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
D:Phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment. This validates Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic but does not directly demonstrate the required LLDP-MED voice network policy result. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
Question 337
A dual-homed router reports no neighbor despite successful IP pings across the link. Which technical principle BEST explains the OSPFv2 area identifier consistency decision?
- Junos OSPF export policies govern which eligible routes enter OSPF as externals.
- OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster.
- OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends.
- Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. In this situation, the relevant action is to put both interfaces in the same intended OSPF area and verify shared area policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:Junos OSPF export policies govern which eligible routes enter OSPF as externals. That principle is related to OSPF external export policy redistribution, not the main OSPFv2 area identifier consistency choice. Different configured area IDs prevent neighbors forming even when IP transport works.
B:OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster. That principle is related to OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links, not the main OSPFv2 area identifier consistency choice. Different configured area IDs prevent neighbors forming even when IP transport works.
D:Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients. That principle is related to Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients, not the main OSPFv2 area identifier consistency choice. Different configured area IDs prevent neighbors forming even when IP transport works.
Question 338
During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A queue policy assigns all routing protocol packets to best effort and sessions flap. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?
- Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy.
- Unbounded high-priority traffic can starve nonpriority queues.
- Starving critical control-plane messages can trigger cascading route instability.
- Treating both streams as one unrestricted VLAN can violate QoS and segmentation rules.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Starving critical control-plane messages can trigger cascading route instability. Network-control traffic may need separate protection from bulk and voice services. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect CoS classification and adjacency stability under data load.
Incorrect Answers
A:Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy. This is a Packet loss priority PLP marking failure pattern, not the primary Network-control forwarding class differentiation failure in this case. Network-control traffic may need separate protection from bulk and voice services.
B:Unbounded high-priority traffic can starve nonpriority queues. This is a Scheduler strict priority and starvation failure pattern, not the primary Network-control forwarding class differentiation failure in this case. Network-control traffic may need separate protection from bulk and voice services.
D:Treating both streams as one unrestricted VLAN can violate QoS and segmentation rules. This is a Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic failure pattern, not the primary Network-control forwarding class differentiation failure in this case. Network-control traffic may need separate protection from bulk and voice services.
Question 339
IPv6 voice flows receive default queue treatment while IPv4 voice works. After deploying the recommended Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Authorized IPv4 and IPv6 voice receive equivalent intended forwarding-class treatment.
- Approved voice packets gain the intended forwarding class while bulk packets do not.
- AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication.
- Captures and counters explain ingress class egress queue and final header marking.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Authorized IPv4 and IPv6 voice receive equivalent intended forwarding-class treatment. This is the directly observable outcome for Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family. Packet classification must account for the correct protocol header family.
Incorrect Answers
B:Approved voice packets gain the intended forwarding class while bulk packets do not. This validates Junos multifield firewall filter classification but does not directly demonstrate the required Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family result. Packet classification must account for the correct protocol header family.
C:AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication. This validates RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy but does not directly demonstrate the required Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family result. Packet classification must account for the correct protocol header family.
D:Captures and counters explain ingress class egress queue and final header marking. This validates CoS processing order ingress to egress but does not directly demonstrate the required Junos IPv6 DSCP classifier family result. Packet classification must account for the correct protocol header family.
Question 340
During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: An expired security credential stays accepted on a long-lived active switch port. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?
- Excessively short reauthentication periods can destabilize normal connectivity.
- A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation.
- Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.
- Placing critical admin endpoints behind MAC-only authentication permits spoofing risk.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Excessively short reauthentication periods can destabilize normal connectivity. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision. A useful corrective investigation is to review session timers and test role change after reauthentication.
Incorrect Answers
B:A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation. This is a Captive portal web authentication failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X periodic reauthentication failure in this case. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.
C:Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN. This is a LLDP-MED voice network policy failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X periodic reauthentication failure in this case. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.
D:Placing critical admin endpoints behind MAC-only authentication permits spoofing risk. This is a MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations failure pattern, not the primary 802.1X periodic reauthentication failure in this case. Reauthentication refreshes an existing access session's policy decision.