Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 14
Question 130
A new ASM group has receivers but no RP information on branch routers. After deploying the recommended PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- Isolated endpoints reach the intended shared gateway but not peer isolated ports.
- Multicast frames reach receiver ports instead of every port by default.
- Every receiver-facing router resolves the same intended RP for each permitted group.
- (*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:(*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream. This is the directly observable outcome for PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.
Incorrect Answers
A:Isolated endpoints reach the intended shared gateway but not peer isolated ports. This validates Private VLAN isolated port separation but does not directly demonstrate the required PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree result. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.
B:Multicast frames reach receiver ports instead of every port by default. This validates IGMP snooping access-port replication but does not directly demonstrate the required PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree result. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.
C:Every receiver-facing router resolves the same intended RP for each permitted group. This validates Static RP mapping group range but does not directly demonstrate the required PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree result. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.
Question 131
During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: The operator assumes priority-high can be unlimited without policy consequences. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?
- Configuring only an egress rewrite does not automatically set an upstream classifier.
- Overbroad classifiers permit bulk traffic to consume low-latency queues.
- IPv4 unicast route reception does not imply IPv6 family availability.
- Unbounded high-priority traffic can starve nonpriority queues.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Unbounded high-priority traffic can starve nonpriority queues. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect priority queue usage and nonpriority throughput under saturation.
Incorrect Answers
A:Configuring only an egress rewrite does not automatically set an upstream classifier. This is a CoS processing order ingress to egress failure pattern, not the primary Scheduler strict priority and starvation failure in this case. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation.
B:Overbroad classifiers permit bulk traffic to consume low-latency queues. This is a Junos multifield firewall filter classification failure pattern, not the primary Scheduler strict priority and starvation failure in this case. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation.
C:IPv4 unicast route reception does not imply IPv6 family availability. This is a BGP NLRI IPv6 unicast inet6 family failure pattern, not the primary Scheduler strict priority and starvation failure in this case. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation.
Question 132
A branch adjacency flaps after one interface uses a much shorter dead timer. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?
- Verify per-interface network type and Hello processing at both endpoints.
- Compare show ospf neighbor with show ospf3 neighbor and inet versus inet6 routes.
- Change only the router ID and claim incompatible timer settings will be ignored.
- Inspect show ospf neighbor and capture Hellos from both interfaces.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Inspect show ospf neighbor and capture Hellos from both interfaces. This checks whether a full adjacency forms after bidirectional Hellos and compatible timers are observed.
Incorrect Answers
A:Verify per-interface network type and Hello processing at both endpoints. That check applies chiefly to OSPF point-to-point network type, not the current OSPFv2 Hello and Dead timer adjacency issue. OSPF neighbors exchange compatible Hellos before database synchronization.
B:Compare show ospf neighbor with show ospf3 neighbor and inet versus inet6 routes. That check applies chiefly to OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations, not the current OSPFv2 Hello and Dead timer adjacency issue. OSPF neighbors exchange compatible Hellos before database synchronization.
C:Change only the router ID and claim incompatible timer settings will be ignored. That bypass leaves the OSPFv2 Hello and Dead timer adjacency issue unresolved. Mismatched Hello or Dead intervals block a reliable adjacency.
Question 133
A route reflector fails to propagate one client route because client and nonclient roles are wrong. Which technical principle BEST explains the BGP route reflection cluster decision?
- BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility.
- BGP route reflection reduces iBGP full-mesh needs using originator and cluster loop controls.
- EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.
- MP-BGP uses address-family negotiation and next-hop encodings for IPv6 NLRI.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:BGP route reflection reduces iBGP full-mesh needs using originator and cluster loop controls. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure supported route reflector clients and cluster identifiers with loop safeguards.
Incorrect Answers
A:BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility. That principle is related to BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity, not the main BGP route reflection cluster choice. Incorrect reflection topology can hide otherwise valid internal paths.
C:EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic. That principle is related to EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM, not the main BGP route reflection cluster choice. Incorrect reflection topology can hide otherwise valid internal paths.
D:MP-BGP uses address-family negotiation and next-hop encodings for IPv6 NLRI. That principle is related to BGP NLRI IPv6 unicast inet6 family, not the main BGP route reflection cluster choice. Incorrect reflection topology can hide otherwise valid internal paths.
Question 134
A designated-forwarder change causes duplicate broadcast frames toward the dual-homed server. Which technical principle BEST explains the EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM decision?
- EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.
- PIM establishes multicast router adjacencies independently of host IGMP group membership.
- EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.
- Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic. In this situation, the relevant action is to validate supported DF election and its per-segment or VLAN role assignments.
Incorrect Answers
A:EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection. That principle is related to EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding, not the main EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM choice. Incorrect DF state may duplicate BUM traffic or strand a segment after failure.
B:PIM establishes multicast router adjacencies independently of host IGMP group membership. That principle is related to PIM sparse-mode neighbor discovery, not the main EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM choice. Incorrect DF state may duplicate BUM traffic or strand a segment after failure.
D:Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment. That principle is related to EVPN single-active multihoming access mode, not the main EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM choice. Incorrect DF state may duplicate BUM traffic or strand a segment after failure.
Question 135
An enterprise wants RP group mappings distributed rather than manually repeated. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?
- Add a hostname DNS alias and claim it automatically distributes multicast RP election results.
- Build supported anycast-RP reachability and synchronize source awareness as required.
- Configure supported dynamic RP discovery or bootstrap policies where the topology supports them.
- Apply scoped multicast policy restricting eligible groups at the proper boundary.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Configure supported dynamic RP discovery or bootstrap policies where the topology supports them. Dynamic RP discovery advertises RP group associations while PIM still requires routing reachability. The expected validation is that candidate routers acquire the intended RP mappings for authorized multicast ranges.
Incorrect Answers
A:Add a hostname DNS alias and claim it automatically distributes multicast RP election results. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping. Incorrect discovery scope or policy leaves segments with stale RP maps.
B:Build supported anycast-RP reachability and synchronize source awareness as required. This addresses Anycast RP with shared address rather than the required PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping decision. Dynamic RP discovery advertises RP group associations while PIM still requires routing reachability.
D:Apply scoped multicast policy restricting eligible groups at the proper boundary. This addresses Multicast policy group scoping rather than the required PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping decision. Dynamic RP discovery advertises RP group associations while PIM still requires routing reachability.
Question 136
A new ABR introduces external advertisements into an area intended to be stub. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the OSPF stub area external LSA suppression implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.
- Configure compatible stub area attributes on all affected OSPF routers.
- Troubleshoot OSPF and OSPFv3 sessions and tables as distinct address-family contexts.
- Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required.
- The stub receives an appropriate default or interarea reachability without external type-5 flooding.
- Configure only a BGP export policy and claim the OSPF area became stub.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Configure compatible stub area attributes on all affected OSPF routers. This is the intended implementation action for OSPF stub area external LSA suppression.
D:The stub receives an appropriate default or interarea reachability without external type-5 flooding. This is direct observable evidence for OSPF stub area external LSA suppression.
Incorrect Answers
B:Troubleshoot OSPF and OSPFv3 sessions and tables as distinct address-family contexts. This belongs to OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations, not the specified OSPF stub area external LSA suppression operation. OSPF stub areas restrict external AS-external advertisements and require compatible area flags.
C:Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required. This belongs to OSPF designated router election broadcast LAN, not the specified OSPF stub area external LSA suppression operation. OSPF stub areas restrict external AS-external advertisements and require compatible area flags.
E:Configure only a BGP export policy and claim the OSPF area became stub. This would not be an appropriate OSPF stub area external LSA suppression decision. Mixing stub and normal-area settings prevents correct neighbor establishment.
Question 137
IP multicast join tables are populated but UDP stream packets never arrive. After deploying the recommended Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes change, which result MOST directly verifies success?
- AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication.
- A consistent state chain from source to receivers explains successful data delivery.
- Multicast frames reach receiver ports instead of every port by default.
- Each hop has the intended upstream join and only subscribed downstream interfaces.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:A consistent state chain from source to receivers explains successful data delivery. This is the directly observable outcome for Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes. Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic.
Incorrect Answers
A:AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication. This validates RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy but does not directly demonstrate the required Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes result. Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic.
C:Multicast frames reach receiver ports instead of every port by default. This validates IGMP snooping access-port replication but does not directly demonstrate the required Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes result. Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic.
D:Each hop has the intended upstream join and only subscribed downstream interfaces. This validates PIM join prune forwarding path but does not directly demonstrate the required Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes result. Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic.
Question 138
A high-PLP class does not drop earlier because drop profiles ignore loss priority. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?
- Inspect drop-profile thresholds and queue drop counters under load.
- Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves.
- Measure policer counters and packet loss at below and above configured rate.
- Decode outbound VLAN tag priority versus Layer 3 DSCP in packet capture.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Inspect drop-profile thresholds and queue drop counters under load. This checks whether queue statistics show probabilistic early drops according to class and PLP settings.
Incorrect Answers
B:Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves. That bypass leaves the RED WRED drop profile thresholds issue unresolved. Poorly chosen thresholds can drop valuable traffic or fail to control congestion.
C:Measure policer counters and packet loss at below and above configured rate. That check applies chiefly to Junos ingress policer rate limit, not the current RED WRED drop profile thresholds issue. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.
D:Decode outbound VLAN tag priority versus Layer 3 DSCP in packet capture. That check applies chiefly to IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet, not the current RED WRED drop profile thresholds issue. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.
Question 139
A new leaf is missing from the replication membership of a VXLAN VNI. Which technical principle BEST explains the EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes decision?
- EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.
- EVPN IP/MAC learning can support distributed ARP suppression where platforms support it.
- OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.
- Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution. In this situation, the relevant action is to validate EVPN Type3 inclusive multicast route advertisement and remote replication lists.
Incorrect Answers
A:EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection. That principle is related to EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding, not the main EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes choice. Missing IMET state can break ARP and unknown unicast even with selected Type2 routes.
B:EVPN IP/MAC learning can support distributed ARP suppression where platforms support it. That principle is related to EVPN ARP suppression from IP MAC bindings, not the main EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes choice. Missing IMET state can break ARP and unknown unicast even with selected Type2 routes.
C:OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU. That principle is related to OSPF interface MTU mismatch, not the main EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes choice. Missing IMET state can break ARP and unknown unicast even with selected Type2 routes.
Question 140
A handset is in the data VLAN because no LLDP-MED network policy is advertised. Which technical principle BEST explains the LLDP-MED voice network policy decision?
- PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching.
- LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
- IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints.
- EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports.
Incorrect Answers
A:PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching. That principle is related to PoE class discovery and allocation, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.
C:IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints. That principle is related to PoE power budget switch capacity, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.
D:EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability. That principle is related to BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.