cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 15

Question 140

A handset is in the data VLAN because no LLDP-MED network policy is advertised. Which technical principle BEST explains the LLDP-MED voice network policy decision?

  1. PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching.
  2. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.
  3. IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints.
  4. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports.

Incorrect Answers

A:

PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching. That principle is related to PoE class discovery and allocation, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.

C:

IEEE PoE total power budget and per-port allocation constrain powered endpoints. That principle is related to PoE power budget switch capacity, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.

D:

EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability. That principle is related to BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation, not the main LLDP-MED voice network policy choice. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.

Question 141

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A RADIUS Access-Accept succeeds but the switch keeps the default guest VLAN. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation.
  2. Missing OIF state yields no receiver traffic despite an upstream multicast feed.
  3. Treating a MAC address as strong cryptographic proof can weaken segmentation.
  4. Successful authentication alone does not prove dynamic VLAN attributes are accepted.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Successful authentication alone does not prove dynamic VLAN attributes are accepted. RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect RADIUS tunnel attributes and actual assigned port VLAN membership.

Incorrect Answers

A:

RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication. A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation.

B:

RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication. This is a Multicast routing table incoming outgoing lists failure pattern, not the primary Dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS failure in this case.

C:

RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication. Treating a MAC address as strong cryptographic proof can weaken segmentation.

Question 142

A VLAN disappears from a transit because one switch does not participate in dynamic registration. Which technical principle BEST explains the MVRP dynamic VLAN registration decision?

  1. MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections.
  2. MVRP advertises VLAN registration dynamically between compatible bridge ports.
  3. PIM builds and removes multicast distribution state using joins and prunes.
  4. VLAN stacking requires compatible tag interpretation and consistent port behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

MVRP advertises VLAN registration dynamically between compatible bridge ports. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure compatible Multiple VLAN Registration Protocol operation on supported links.

Incorrect Answers

A:

MSTP can group VLANs into instances with independent root bridge elections. That principle is related to MSTP instance root selection, not the main MVRP dynamic VLAN registration choice. Incomplete participation can leave VLANs unregistered on intermediate trunks.

C:

PIM builds and removes multicast distribution state using joins and prunes. That principle is related to PIM join prune forwarding path, not the main MVRP dynamic VLAN registration choice. Incomplete participation can leave VLANs unregistered on intermediate trunks.

D:

VLAN stacking requires compatible tag interpretation and consistent port behavior. That principle is related to QinQ tag protocol EtherType compatibility, not the main MVRP dynamic VLAN registration choice. Incomplete participation can leave VLANs unregistered on intermediate trunks.

Question 143

Two ASBRs advertise the same external route and different internal distances affect path choice. After deploying the recommended OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. The local route table follows documented acceptance policy while LSDB visibility is understood.
  2. Access-Accept authorizes approved access while explicit rejections remain denied.
  3. The preferred external route follows correct E1 total metric or E2 selection rules.
  4. Hello packets agree on area identification and neighbors reach Full.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The preferred external route follows correct E1 total metric or E2 selection rules. This is the directly observable outcome for OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics. OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The local route table follows documented acceptance policy while LSDB visibility is understood. This validates OSPF routing policy import filtering but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics result. OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric.

B:

Access-Accept authorizes approved access while explicit rejections remain denied. This validates RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics result. OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric.

D:

Hello packets agree on area identification and neighbors reach Full. This validates OSPFv2 area identifier consistency but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics result. OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric.

Question 144

A protected user access port is administratively disabled after receiving an unexpected BPDU. Which technical principle BEST explains the BPDU protection on access edges decision?

  1. Authentication monitoring must inspect credentials authorization and port state separately.
  2. BPDU protection blocks unexpected spanning-tree participation at designated access edges.
  3. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.
  4. MVRP advertises VLAN registration dynamically between compatible bridge ports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

BPDU protection blocks unexpected spanning-tree participation at designated access edges. In this situation, the relevant action is to apply BPDU protection to appropriate edge ports and document recovery.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authentication monitoring must inspect credentials authorization and port state separately. That principle is related to Junos Layer 2 authentication session monitoring, not the main BPDU protection on access edges choice. Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks.

C:

Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned. That principle is related to Ethernet MAC learning and flooding, not the main BPDU protection on access edges choice. Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks.

D:

MVRP advertises VLAN registration dynamically between compatible bridge ports. That principle is related to MVRP dynamic VLAN registration, not the main BPDU protection on access edges choice. Enabling it on legitimate interswitch links can unnecessarily disable useful uplinks.

Question 145

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A replacement switch uses a smaller routed interface MTU than the adjacent router. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange.
  2. Treating NSSA redistribution as a normal stub area can suppress required external routes.
  3. Treating every Two-Way adjacency as a fatal database synchronization failure causes unnecessary changes.
  4. Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

DBD packet rejection can leave neighbors oscillating at ExStart or Exchange. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect detailed neighbor state and interface MTU on both systems.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Treating NSSA redistribution as a normal stub area can suppress required external routes. This is a OSPF NSSA type-seven translation failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interface MTU mismatch failure in this case. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

C:

Treating every Two-Way adjacency as a fatal database synchronization failure causes unnecessary changes. This is a OSPF neighbor state troubleshooting workflow failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interface MTU mismatch failure in this case. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

D:

Treating every packet as identical PLP may defeat differentiated congestion policy. This is a Packet loss priority PLP marking failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interface MTU mismatch failure in this case. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

Question 146

A user port is connected to an untagged workstation but assigned to the wrong VLAN. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Combine required static VLAN membership with deliberate dynamic registration policy.
  2. Configure root protection on links that must not receive superior root advertisements.
  3. Change the LLDP system-name to the desired VLAN and assume membership changes.
  4. Set supported access interface VLAN membership for the intended user segment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Set supported access interface VLAN membership for the intended user segment. Access VLAN membership maps untagged endpoint traffic into one logical broadcast domain. The expected validation is that untagged frames enter the correct VLAN and reach only eligible peers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Combine required static VLAN membership with deliberate dynamic registration policy. This addresses MVRP static versus dynamic registration rather than the required Ethernet access interface VLAN membership decision. Access VLAN membership maps untagged endpoint traffic into one logical broadcast domain.

B:

Configure root protection on links that must not receive superior root advertisements. This addresses Root protection on designated links rather than the required Ethernet access interface VLAN membership decision. Access VLAN membership maps untagged endpoint traffic into one logical broadcast domain.

C:

Change the LLDP system-name to the desired VLAN and assume membership changes. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Ethernet access interface VLAN membership. Changing the switch IP address does not correct an endpoint access VLAN mismatch.

Question 147

A fabric expects active-active service but one leaf never forwards eligible traffic. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Disable split-horizon protection to obtain unbounded active-active forwarding.
  2. Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers.
  3. Test link failure and traffic across both healthy peers while inspecting ES state.
  4. Inspect EVPN Type3 routes and flood lists for the affected VNI.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Test link failure and traffic across both healthy peers while inspecting ES state. This checks whether traffic can use eligible multihomed links while loss of one link preserves connectivity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Disable split-horizon protection to obtain unbounded active-active forwarding. That bypass leaves the EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding issue unresolved. Treating both uplinks as independent uncoordinated bridges can form duplication or loops.

B:

Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers. That check applies chiefly to EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance, not the current EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding issue. EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.

D:

Inspect EVPN Type3 routes and flood lists for the affected VNI. That check applies chiefly to EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes, not the current EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding issue. EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.

Question 148

Ingress marked traffic is classified as best effort because no correct classifier is applied. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters.
  2. Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically.
  3. Inspect drop-profile thresholds and queue drop counters under load.
  4. Inspect rewrite rule binding and compare inbound versus outbound DSCP captures.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters. This checks whether packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically. That bypass leaves the Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier issue unresolved. Incorrect ingress mapping sends high-priority traffic to default queues.

C:

Inspect drop-profile thresholds and queue drop counters under load. That check applies chiefly to RED WRED drop profile thresholds, not the current Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier issue. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.

D:

Inspect rewrite rule binding and compare inbound versus outbound DSCP captures. That check applies chiefly to DSCP egress rewrite rules, not the current Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier issue. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.

Question 149

A VXLAN tenant generates excessive ARP broadcasts across all VTEPs. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments.
  2. Configure supported single-active EVPN multihoming and failover selection.
  3. Apply supported ARP suppression using valid local or EVPN learned bindings.
  4. Suppress all ARP requests while intentionally removing every IP/MAC mapping.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Apply supported ARP suppression using valid local or EVPN learned bindings. EVPN IP/MAC learning can support distributed ARP suppression where platforms support it. The expected validation is that eligible ARP lookups are answered locally and unnecessary BUM replication decreases.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments. This addresses Ethernet segment identifier ESI consistency rather than the required EVPN ARP suppression from IP MAC bindings decision. EVPN IP/MAC learning can support distributed ARP suppression where platforms support it.

B:

Configure supported single-active EVPN multihoming and failover selection. This addresses EVPN single-active multihoming access mode rather than the required EVPN ARP suppression from IP MAC bindings decision. EVPN IP/MAC learning can support distributed ARP suppression where platforms support it.

D:

Suppress all ARP requests while intentionally removing every IP/MAC mapping. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for EVPN ARP suppression from IP MAC bindings. Incorrect or stale host bindings can return the wrong MAC or fail to suppress requests.

Question 150

A 10-Gbps link and a 100-Gbps link appear to receive indistinguishable default OSPF cost. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Raise one link bandwidth value in a monitoring chart without checking OSPF cost calculation.
  2. Configure matching supported OSPF authentication parameters on both neighbors.
  3. Use a consistent OSPF reference-bandwidth policy across the intended routing domain.
  4. Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Use a consistent OSPF reference-bandwidth policy across the intended routing domain. OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster. The expected validation is that faster links receive the planned comparative metrics in the routing database.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Raise one link bandwidth value in a monitoring chart without checking OSPF cost calculation. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links. Inconsistent reference bandwidth across routers may distort intended route decisions.

B:

Configure matching supported OSPF authentication parameters on both neighbors. This addresses OSPF authentication key or algorithm rather than the required OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links decision. OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster.

D:

Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required. This addresses OSPF designated router election broadcast LAN rather than the required OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links decision. OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests