Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 83
Question 820
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. The observed failure is: Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Which remediation resolves the underlying fault while maintaining policy?
- The supported recovery is to correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts.
- The supported recovery is to assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee.
- The supported recovery is to accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership.
- The supported recovery is to bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
B:Assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
C:Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
D:Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Question 821
A single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows. Which administrator action is appropriate for this ISE access-control problem?
- Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval.
- Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot.
- Configure the supported per-user device-registration limit and an approved removal or replacement process.
- Assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Verify the effect through my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Incorrect Answers
A:This does not implement the required control for BYOD maximum devices per user control. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory.
B:Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. BYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain. The relevant evidence is my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
D:Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Question 822
A single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows. Which collected records establish that the ISE decision actually took effect?
- A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- My Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of BYOD maximum devices per user control for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. BYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain.
B:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
C:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. Check my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts.
Question 823
A single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows. Which statement about the relevant technology is correct?
- All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- BYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain.
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The supported implementation is to configure the supported per-user device-registration limit and an approved removal or replacement process. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. Instead bYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain.
C:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
D:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. Verify the actual state using my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts.
Question 824
A single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval. What specific security or operational failure should be anticipated?
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory.
- Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- A justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because bYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. The relevant risk is that ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. Check my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts.
Question 825
A single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows. The observed failure is: Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Which remediation resolves the underlying fault while maintaining policy?
- Adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices.
- Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot.
- Assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory.
- Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This restores the intended operational behavior for BYOD maximum devices per user control.
Incorrect Answers
B:Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
C:Assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
D:Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, a single employee registers far more personal devices than the security program allows.
Question 826
An employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record. What action addresses this authenticated network-access scenario?
- In this case, delete the global user account to free one device registration slot.
- In this case, assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory.
- In this case, set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval.
- In this case, configure the supported per-user device-registration limit and an approved removal or replacement process.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify the effect through my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
Incorrect Answers
A:Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. BYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain. The relevant evidence is my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
B:Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
C:This does not implement the required control for BYOD maximum devices per user control. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
Question 827
An employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record. What verification should the engineer use before declaring success?
- The supporting evidence is a device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- The supporting evidence is my Devices inventory, owner account, configured device limit and enrollment attempts.
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of BYOD maximum devices per user control for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
C:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
D:This observation cannot verify BYOD maximum devices per user control. A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
Question 828
An employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record. Which underlying service behavior supports the proposed solution?
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- The governing principle is that all Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- The governing principle is that a policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
- The governing principle is that bYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to configure the supported per-user device-registration limit and an approved removal or replacement process. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
B:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
C:This generalization is not valid for BYOD maximum devices per user control. A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
Question 829
An employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval. Why does that proposed shortcut not satisfy the requirement?
- The material consequence is that ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory.
- The material consequence is that a justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
- The material consequence is that a correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The shortcut is unsuitable because bYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
Incorrect Answers
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD maximum devices per user control problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
Question 830
An employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record. The observed failure is: Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- The supported recovery is to assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory.
- The supported recovery is to set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval.
- The supported recovery is to delete the global user account to free one device registration slot.
- The supported recovery is to adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:BYOD device quota governs how many personal endpoint registrations an employee may retain.
Incorrect Answers
A:Assume the switch session table is the definitive My Devices ownership inventory. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
B:Set every employee's device limit to unlimited without security approval. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.
C:Delete the global user account to free one device registration slot. This action does not repair the identified failure. Ignoring stale registrations can either exhaust legitimate quota or leave uncontrolled device inventory. Instead, adjust ownership records and re-enroll within the approved limit after removing obsolete devices. For the specific situation, an employee replaces a lost phone but the portal refuses enrollment because the device limit includes the old record.