Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 82
Question 810
An employee's second personal device is authorized before completing required device registration. The observed failure is: Failing to transition authorization can strand compliant clients or give unregistered devices full access. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- The supported recovery is to use guest portal artwork to control authentication phases.
- The supported recovery is to put unregistered devices on the production VLAN from the first DHCP lease.
- The supported recovery is to correct the policy transition and verify one new and one already-registered device.
- The supported recovery is to assume every certificate issued means every active NAD session immediately changes VLAN.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:BYOD setup and final access are separate policy phases tied to identity and enrollment state. Recheck initial and final authorization profiles, endpoint identity group, certificate issue and CoA trace.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use guest portal artwork to control authentication phases. This action does not repair the identified failure. Failing to transition authorization can strand compliant clients or give unregistered devices full access. Instead, correct the policy transition and verify one new and one already-registered device. For the specific situation, an employee's second personal device is authorized before completing required device registration.
B:Put unregistered devices on the production VLAN from the first DHCP lease. This action does not repair the identified failure. Failing to transition authorization can strand compliant clients or give unregistered devices full access. Instead, correct the policy transition and verify one new and one already-registered device. For the specific situation, an employee's second personal device is authorized before completing required device registration.
D:Assume every certificate issued means every active NAD session immediately changes VLAN. This action does not repair the identified failure. Failing to transition authorization can strand compliant clients or give unregistered devices full access. Instead, correct the policy transition and verify one new and one already-registered device. For the specific situation, an employee's second personal device is authorized before completing required device registration.
Question 811
A personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account. Which configuration decision most directly satisfies the requirement?
- Authenticate an authorized employee before linking a personal device to that user's BYOD inventory and policy.
- Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership.
- Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity.
- Assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Incorrect Answers
B:This does not implement the required control for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access.
C:Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. The relevant evidence is authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
D:Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Question 812
A personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account. What observations most directly test this network-access condition?
- A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- Authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of BYOD integration of corporate user identity for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification.
C:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
D:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. Check authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping.
Question 813
A personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account. What principle of ISE authentication and authorization explains this case?
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification.
- Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to authenticate an authorized employee before linking a personal device to that user's BYOD inventory and policy. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. Instead employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification.
B:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
D:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. Verify the actual state using authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping.
Question 814
A personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership. Which negative consequence BEST explains the shortcut’s flaw?
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access.
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. The relevant risk is that device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. Check authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping.
Question 815
A personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account. The observed failure is: Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity.
- Assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee.
- Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership.
- Correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Incorrect Answers
A:Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
B:Assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
C:Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, a personal tablet is enrolled without verifying whether its owner still has an active employee account.
Question 816
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. Which administrator action is appropriate for this ISE access-control problem?
- In this case, authenticate an authorized employee before linking a personal device to that user's BYOD inventory and policy.
- In this case, bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity.
- In this case, assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee.
- In this case, accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
B:Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. The relevant evidence is authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
C:Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
D:This does not implement the required control for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Question 817
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. Which collected records establish that the ISE decision actually took effect?
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is an old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- The supporting evidence is authenticated user identity, directory state, registered device ownership and certificate mapping.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of BYOD integration of corporate user identity for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
B:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
C:This observation cannot verify BYOD integration of corporate user identity. An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
Question 818
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. Which statement about the relevant technology is correct?
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification.
- The governing principle is that a captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The supported implementation is to authenticate an authorized employee before linking a personal device to that user's BYOD inventory and policy. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
C:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
D:This generalization is not valid for BYOD integration of corporate user identity. A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
Question 819
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership. What specific security or operational failure should be anticipated?
- The material consequence is that device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access.
- The material consequence is that accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The shortcut is unsuitable because employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the BYOD integration of corporate user identity problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Question 820
An ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user. The observed failure is: Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Which remediation resolves the underlying fault while maintaining policy?
- The supported recovery is to correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts.
- The supported recovery is to assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee.
- The supported recovery is to accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership.
- The supported recovery is to bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Employee BYOD authorization needs verified user ownership as well as endpoint identification. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
Incorrect Answers
B:Assume a MAC OUI proves the current user is an employee. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
C:Accept any typed username as proof of employee ownership. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.
D:Bind every device to a shared generic contractor identity. This action does not repair the identified failure. Device records without reliable owner binding can survive role changes and permit inappropriate access. Instead, correct owner identity linkage and reject enrollment for disabled or unrelated accounts. For the specific situation, an ISE registration form presents a device name but does not bind the registration to a valid organizational user.