Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 117
Question 1160
An engineer needs read-only show commands but the shell profile assigns an incompatible privilege level. The observed failure is: An overprivileged shell profile can expose device configuration controls beyond intended duties. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to use a RADIUS wireless authorization profile as the sole TACACS shell policy.
- The supported recovery is to narrow the profile and test privilege and command capability for representative roles.
- The supported recovery is to give every successful TACACS login privilege fifteen automatically.
- The supported recovery is to assume a shell prompt appearance alone proves every command is denied correctly.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Shell profiles influence the administrative shell context but should align with separate command authorization rules. Recheck iSE shell profile attributes, device privilege level, login role and effective command access.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use a RADIUS wireless authorization profile as the sole TACACS shell policy. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overprivileged shell profile can expose device configuration controls beyond intended duties. Instead, narrow the profile and test privilege and command capability for representative roles. For the specific situation, an engineer needs read-only show commands but the shell profile assigns an incompatible privilege level.
C:Give every successful TACACS login privilege fifteen automatically. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overprivileged shell profile can expose device configuration controls beyond intended duties. Instead, narrow the profile and test privilege and command capability for representative roles. For the specific situation, an engineer needs read-only show commands but the shell profile assigns an incompatible privilege level.
D:Assume a shell prompt appearance alone proves every command is denied correctly. This action does not repair the identified failure. An overprivileged shell profile can expose device configuration controls beyond intended duties. Instead, narrow the profile and test privilege and command capability for representative roles. For the specific situation, an engineer needs read-only show commands but the shell profile assigns an incompatible privilege level.
Question 1161
A help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role.
- Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions.
- Create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback.
- Disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Verify the effect through command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Incorrect Answers
A:This does not implement the required control for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes.
B:Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. The relevant evidence is command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
D:Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Question 1162
A help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
- Command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs.
- A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:These observations directly establish the result of TACACS command set permit deny semantics for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Incorrect Answers
A:A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
B:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
D:A browser theme label without a current authorization trace. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Question 1163
A help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
- Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
B:All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
C:A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Question 1164
A help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes.
- A justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
- A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The shortcut is unsuitable because command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Incorrect Answers
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. The relevant risk is that broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs.
Question 1165
A help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands. The observed failure is: Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions.
- Disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login.
- Tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations.
- Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This restores the intended operational behavior for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Incorrect Answers
A:Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
B:Disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
D:Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, a help desk role must run show interfaces but must not execute configure terminal or erase commands.
Question 1166
An ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions. Which configuration decision most directly satisfies the requirement?
- In this case, create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback.
- In this case, use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions.
- In this case, disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login.
- In this case, permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. The relevant evidence is command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
C:Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead the intended policy action is create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback.
D:This does not implement the required control for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Use the supported approach: create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback.
Question 1167
An ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions. What observations most directly test this network-access condition?
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs.
- The supporting evidence is a device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- The supporting evidence is a current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations directly establish the result of TACACS command set permit deny semantics for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
C:A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
D:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Check command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. Command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Question 1168
An ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions. What principle of ISE authentication and authorization explains this case?
- The governing principle is that a policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
- The governing principle is that a successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- The governing principle is that command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy.
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to create explicit TACACS command sets with correct permit and deny rules and review any unlisted-command fallback. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
B:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
D:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. Instead command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. Verify the actual state using command set entries and arguments, permit-unlisted toggle, actual command authorization and denial logs. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Question 1169
An ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role. Which negative consequence BEST explains the shortcut’s flaw?
- The material consequence is that reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The material consequence is that broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- The material consequence is that a correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because command authorization evaluates configured command and argument patterns under the selected TACACS policy. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the TACACS command set permit deny semantics problem. A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
Question 1170
An ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions. The observed failure is: Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. How should the administrator correct and verify this failure?
- The supported recovery is to disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login.
- The supported recovery is to permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role.
- The supported recovery is to tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations.
- The supported recovery is to use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This restores the intended operational behavior for TACACS command set permit deny semantics. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:Disable TACACS command authorization after successful user login. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
B:Permit all unlisted commands while claiming a strict read-only role. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.
D:Use only a CLI banner message as enforcement of command restrictions. This action does not repair the identified failure. Broad default permit or incorrect pattern matching can allow unintended configuration changes. Instead, tighten command set rules and test both safe show commands and prohibited disruptive operations. For the specific situation, an ISE TACACS rule includes a broad permit-any-command option that bypasses intended command restrictions.