cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 51

Question 500

A VM-hosted service needs access to a storage account without any password committed to its repository. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Enforce Microsoft Entra Conditional Access requiring compliant device signals for sensitive application access.
  2. Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles.
  3. Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement.
  4. Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This is the directly applicable response. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Enforce Microsoft Entra Conditional Access requiring compliant device signals for sensitive application access. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access compliant devices. Its appropriate purpose is: Conditional Access combines signals and access controls; device compliance comes from the supported management and enrollment state. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.

B:

Use Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management to require time-limited activation of eligible privileged roles. This item belongs to a different control area: Privileged Identity Management eligible roles. Its appropriate purpose is: PIM reduces standing privilege and provides just-in-time activation controls for supported roles. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.

C:

Scope Conditional Access to selected cloud applications and test policy results before enforcement. This item belongs to a different control area: Conditional Access application targeting. Its appropriate purpose is: A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate. For the stated case, Managed identities is the closer match. Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization.

Question 501

A company wants finance servers isolated from a public test environment inside Azure. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries.
  2. Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables.
  3. Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources.
  4. Inspect protected resource coverage, workload alerts, enabled plans and alert investigation evidence.
  5. Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint endpoint detection and response capabilities to investigate malicious device activity.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries. This is the directly applicable response. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

B:

Inspect VNet and subnet address plans, peering relationships and route tables. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Incorrect Answers

C:

Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources. This item belongs to a different control area: Cloud Security Posture Management. Its appropriate purpose is: CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

D:

Inspect protected resource coverage, workload alerts, enabled plans and alert investigation evidence. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud workload protection. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

E:

Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint endpoint detection and response capabilities to investigate malicious device activity. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Endpoint EDR. Its appropriate purpose is: Endpoint detection and response targets device-level malicious behavior, not Microsoft 365 document retention. For the stated case, Azure virtual network segmentation is the closer match. Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows.

Question 502

A customer asks how a Microsoft service describes its approach to personal information. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments.
  2. Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions.
  3. Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status.
  4. Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Examine data handling notices, customer controls and the relevant published privacy commitments. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect eDiscovery cases, custodians, holds, search results and export or review actions. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview eDiscovery. Its appropriate purpose is: eDiscovery supports legal and regulatory evidence workflows; it is distinct from real-time data loss prevention. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

C:

Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention labels govern specific items; a broad location-level retention policy does not provide the same fine-grained labeling behavior. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

D:

Inspect label settings, publication policy scopes and actual label application to target documents. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitivity labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Sensitivity labels classify content and may apply protection; labels must be made available through appropriate policy publishing. For the stated case, Microsoft privacy principles is the closer match. Privacy principles guide responsible data handling and transparency; they do not automatically classify every document.

Question 503

A security manager wants to trace cloud technical findings into a compliance framework dashboard. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence.
  2. An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition.
  3. The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards.
  4. Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The compliance dashboard reflects assessment status and supporting remediation evidence for selected standards. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Unapproved cloud app usage becomes visible to reviewers with relevant discovery evidence. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps discovery. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud app discovery assesses shadow IT usage, not the same task as investigating on-premises domain controller compromise. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

B:

An analyst can reconstruct the incident sequence and document an evidence-based disposition. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

D:

Relevant on-premises directory attack behavior generates supported identity threat detections. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender for Identity monitors on-premises identity threats and domain controller signals; it is not a cloud app SaaS discovery catalog. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

Question 504

A security review asks how to enforce approved session restrictions for a supported application. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect data connectors, ingestion status, workspace tables and representative security events.
  2. Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events.
  3. Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions.
  4. Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect session policy scope, controlled activities and matched cloud app session events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect data connectors, ingestion status, workspace tables and representative security events. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.

C:

Inspect vault secrets, access configuration, audit logs and consuming identity permissions. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault secrets. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.

D:

Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud Apps session controls is the closer match. Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors.

Question 505

An application needs to retrieve an API token at runtime without storing it in a configuration file. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards.
  2. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies.
  3. Store and access application secrets in Azure Key Vault with appropriately controlled authorization.
  4. Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Store and access application secrets in Azure Key Vault with appropriately controlled authorization. This is the directly applicable response. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

B:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

D:

Use Microsoft Sentinel incidents and investigation context to triage related alerts and affected entities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel incident investigation. Its appropriate purpose is: Incident management helps investigate and coordinate alerts; it differs from automatic enforcement through a playbook. For the stated case, Azure Key Vault secrets is the closer match. Key Vault manages keys, secrets and certificates; it is not a general-purpose file storage or SIEM service.

Question 506

An organization wants structured tracking of actions required by a compliance standard. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Authorized reviewers can identify where labeled or classified items reside in supported data locations.
  2. Covered content is retained or disposed of according to the policy and location configuration.
  3. Assessment owners can see outstanding control work, evidence and completion status for the chosen framework.
  4. Target items receive the correct retention label and follow the configured item-level lifecycle behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Assessment owners can see outstanding control work, evidence and completion status for the chosen framework. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authorized reviewers can identify where labeled or classified items reside in supported data locations. This item belongs to a different control area: Content explorer. Its appropriate purpose is: Content explorer helps inspect classified data inventory; Activity explorer focuses on actions and activity history. For the stated case, Compliance Manager is the closer match. Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance.

B:

Covered content is retained or disposed of according to the policy and location configuration. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention policies. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks. For the stated case, Compliance Manager is the closer match. Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance.

D:

Target items receive the correct retention label and follow the configured item-level lifecycle behavior. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention labels govern specific items; a broad location-level retention policy does not provide the same fine-grained labeling behavior. For the stated case, Compliance Manager is the closer match. Compliance Manager maps control activities and improvements; it does not automatically guarantee legal compliance.

Question 507

A procurement reviewer requests Microsoft's available independent audit documents for a cloud service. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect Service Trust Portal document categories and available audit reports for the requested service.
  2. Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities.
  3. Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation.
  4. Covered content is retained or disposed of according to the policy and location configuration.
  5. Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Inspect Service Trust Portal document categories and available audit reports for the requested service. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.

C:

Use the Microsoft Service Trust Portal to retrieve available Microsoft compliance, audit and trust-related documentation. This is the directly applicable response. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use the Microsoft Purview portal to discover and administer supported compliance, information protection and risk capabilities. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Purview portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.

D:

Covered content is retained or disposed of according to the policy and location configuration. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention policies. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.

E:

Inspect score breakdown, applicable improvement actions and updates to action completion. This item belongs to a different control area: Compliance score. Its appropriate purpose is: Compliance score measures tracked improvement progress; it is not a universal regulatory certification or breach-risk guarantee. For the stated case, Service Trust Portal is the closer match. The Service Trust Portal offers Microsoft service assurance resources; customers remain responsible for their own compliance obligations.

Question 508

An architecture review finds a privileged administrator account that can bypass all network restrictions and read exports without additional checks. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted.
  2. External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access.
  3. An exercise demonstrates that a single failed control does not expose the protected data without further safeguards.
  4. Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

An exercise demonstrates that a single failed control does not expose the protected data without further safeguards. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

A verified sign-in succeeds without automatically allowing operations that the identity has not been granted. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

B:

External identities sign in through the trusted home provider and receive only the application's authorized access. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity federation. Its appropriate purpose is: Federation extends authentication trust across security domains; it does not automatically grant unrestricted permissions. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

D:

Only validated principals with appropriate entitlements can reach sensitive cloud resources regardless of location. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

Question 509

An organization discovers staff frequently choose its company name plus a year as their password. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events.
  2. Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution.
  3. Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported.
  4. Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results.
  5. Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Inspect banned-password lists, password change results and protection audit or enforcement events. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

C:

Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported. This is the directly applicable response. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configured controls respond to risky sign-ins or compromised-user signals and investigations track resolution. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

D:

Inspect the review scope, reviewer decisions, cadence and application of review results. This item belongs to a different control area: Access reviews. Its appropriate purpose is: Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

E:

Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Question 510

A contractor can successfully sign in but must not edit finance data outside the assigned role. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records.
  2. Identify storage encryption state, TLS connection settings and custody of cryptographic keys.
  3. Compare a securely computed digest with a trusted expected digest or properly managed password verifier.
  4. Compare authentication records with resource permission grants and denied-operation logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Compare authentication records with resource permission grants and denied-operation logs. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Examine risk registers, accountable owners, policies, regulatory mappings and control test records. This item belongs to a different control area: Governance risk and compliance. Its appropriate purpose is: Governance sets direction, risk management evaluates exposure, and compliance verifies obligations against controls. For the stated case, Authentication and authorization is the closer match. Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do.

B:

Identify storage encryption state, TLS connection settings and custody of cryptographic keys. This item belongs to a different control area: Encryption. Its appropriate purpose is: Encryption makes data unreadable to an unauthorized party without the appropriate key; it differs from a one-way hash. For the stated case, Authentication and authorization is the closer match. Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do.

C:

Compare a securely computed digest with a trusted expected digest or properly managed password verifier. This item belongs to a different control area: Cryptographic hashing. Its appropriate purpose is: Hashing supports integrity checks or password verification when designed correctly; hashing by itself does not provide encryption or confidentiality. For the stated case, Authentication and authorization is the closer match. Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests