cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft SC-900 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
SC-900 Exam - Verified By Experts
SC-900 Premium Bundle
$29.98

SC-900 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 259 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 10, 2026
  • Training Course 147 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 413 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 69 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft SC-900 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft SC-900 Premium File
Premium File 259 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft SC-900 Video Training Course
Training Course 147 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 413 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft SC-900 Practice Test 19

Question 180

An auditor wants a current view of cloud security posture and open hardening recommendations. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent.
  2. Simulated or observed attack conditions show mitigation telemetry while legitimate traffic remains reachable.
  3. The targeted risky process behavior is blocked without unnecessarily disrupting approved workloads.
  4. Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Security owners see prioritized exposures and applicable workload detections in the expected scope. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Administrators can manage target VMs through Bastion while direct public RDP or SSH exposure is absent. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Bastion. Its appropriate purpose is: Bastion supplies browser- or client-mediated secure VM management access; it is not a DDoS service. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

B:

Simulated or observed attack conditions show mitigation telemetry while legitimate traffic remains reachable. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure DDoS Protection. Its appropriate purpose is: DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

C:

The targeted risky process behavior is blocked without unnecessarily disrupting approved workloads. This item belongs to a different control area: Endpoint attack surface reduction. Its appropriate purpose is: ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud unified security posture is the closer match. Defender for Cloud combines CSPM and cloud workload protection capabilities; it is not the same as a single network security group.

Question 181

A security operator wants threat detections for cloud resources as part of the Defender for Cloud service. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration.
  2. Enable applicable Defender for Cloud workload protection plans to detect threats affecting supported cloud workloads.
  3. Operators can navigate from a unified incident to related evidence across connected Defender services.
  4. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies.
  5. Inspect protected resource coverage, workload alerts, enabled plans and alert investigation evidence.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

Enable applicable Defender for Cloud workload protection plans to detect threats affecting supported cloud workloads. This is the directly applicable response. Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture.

E:

Inspect protected resource coverage, workload alerts, enabled plans and alert investigation evidence. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect key or certificate versions, permissions and renewal or rotation configuration. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure Key Vault keys and certificates. Its appropriate purpose is: Key Vault supports cryptographic key and certificate lifecycle; secret storage alone is not a substitute for proper key policy. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud workload protection is the closer match. Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture.

C:

Operators can navigate from a unified incident to related evidence across connected Defender services. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender portal. Its appropriate purpose is: The Defender portal provides a unified security operations interface; it is not a replacement for configuring every underlying product. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud workload protection is the closer match. Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture.

D:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to analyze suspicious email attachments with configured protection policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Attachments focuses on file-based email threats, whereas Safe Links protects URLs. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud workload protection is the closer match. Cloud workload protection detects threat signals and suspicious runtime behavior; CSPM primarily addresses configuration posture.

Question 182

A compliance program needs standard security configuration expectations across multiple cloud subscriptions. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections.
  2. Inspect policy assignments, noncompliant resources and recommendation-to-remediation mappings.
  3. Inspect NSG effective rules, priority ordering and flow evaluation for the affected network interface.
  4. Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect policy assignments, noncompliant resources and recommendation-to-remediation mappings. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect Safe Links policy assignments, URL click events and detections. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

C:

Inspect NSG effective rules, priority ordering and flow evaluation for the affected network interface. This item belongs to a different control area: Network security groups. Its appropriate purpose is: NSGs provide ordered L3/L4 traffic filtering in Azure, not deep web-request inspection. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

D:

Inspect automation rule triggers, Logic Apps playbook runs and action execution outcomes. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SOAR playbooks. Its appropriate purpose is: SOAR automates and orchestrates workflows; it complements rather than replaces detection analytics and human judgment. For the stated case, Cloud security policies and recommendations is the closer match. A recommendation identifies a technical improvement; a documented policy or assigned standard provides expectations for assessed resources.

Question 183

A warehouse team relies on a perimeter firewall as its only safeguard for sensitive payroll records. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Design several complementary security layers across identity, network, application and data boundaries.
  2. Authenticate the principal first and separately authorize only the permitted resource actions.
  3. Use a trusted identity provider and directory to manage identities and support application sign-in.
  4. Protect and verify identities as a primary perimeter for cloud access rather than relying only on a building network.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Design several complementary security layers across identity, network, application and data boundaries. This is the directly applicable response. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Authenticate the principal first and separately authorize only the permitted resource actions. This item belongs to a different control area: Authentication and authorization. Its appropriate purpose is: Authentication proves identity or possession of credentials; authorization determines what that identity may do. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

C:

Use a trusted identity provider and directory to manage identities and support application sign-in. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity providers and directories. Its appropriate purpose is: An identity provider handles authentication while a directory stores and organizes identities and attributes; neither equals the protected application. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

D:

Protect and verify identities as a primary perimeter for cloud access rather than relying only on a building network. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity as security perimeter. Its appropriate purpose is: Cloud users and workloads access resources from varied networks, making authenticated identity and authorization central boundaries. For the stated case, Defense in depth is the closer match. Defense in depth reduces reliance on any one protection; it is not a claim that all risks can be eliminated.

Question 184

A merger introduces overlapping user identifiers and the team must verify identity matching before scaling synchronization. Which TWO steps together provide the most directly applicable response AND an evidence check for this specific requirement? Select TWO.

  1. Require an additional authentication factor for relevant user sign-ins using supported Entra MFA methods.
  2. Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements.
  3. Inspect synchronization health, scope filters, matching rules and recent export errors.
  4. Inspect workflow triggers, task execution history and resulting group or access changes.
  5. Configure and monitor an appropriate supported Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization method for hybrid users.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Inspect synchronization health, scope filters, matching rules and recent export errors. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

E:

Configure and monitor an appropriate supported Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization method for hybrid users. This is the directly applicable response. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Require an additional authentication factor for relevant user sign-ins using supported Entra MFA methods. This item belongs to a different control area: Multifactor authentication. Its appropriate purpose is: MFA combines different factor categories to reduce account takeover from a stolen password alone. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

B:

Authorized users can reset forgotten passwords after meeting the defined verification requirements. This item belongs to a different control area: Self-service password reset. Its appropriate purpose is: SSPR helps account recovery; it does not grant additional resource authorization or bypass verification. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

D:

Inspect workflow triggers, task execution history and resulting group or access changes. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization is the closer match. Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift.

Question 185

A company needs network-layer DDoS mitigation and attack insights for its Azure-hosted public service. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators.
  2. Use Azure DDoS Protection for protection of exposed Azure public IP resources against volumetric network attacks where appropriate.
  3. Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses.
  4. Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Use Azure DDoS Protection for protection of exposed Azure public IP resources against volumetric network attacks where appropriate. This is the directly applicable response. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Microsoft Threat Intelligence capabilities and relevant threat context to enrich analysis of adversaries and indicators. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Threat Intelligence. Its appropriate purpose is: Threat intelligence adds context on threats and indicators; it does not by itself implement endpoint blocking or identity authorization. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

C:

Use Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management to discover, prioritize and track exposed device software weaknesses. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender Vulnerability Management. Its appropriate purpose is: Vulnerability management focuses on identifying and prioritizing exposures; it is distinct from active incident correlation. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

D:

Configure Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules to detect defined suspicious patterns in ingested security data. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel analytics rules. Its appropriate purpose is: Sentinel analytics rules evaluate telemetry to raise detections; collecting logs alone is insufficient to identify a defined pattern. For the stated case, Azure DDoS Protection is the closer match. DDoS Protection addresses distributed denial-of-service traffic aimed at network services; it does not replace a web-application rule engine.

Question 186

An architect needs continuous visibility into cloud misconfigurations rather than manual annual checklists. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. Expected source events are searchable in the intended workspace and support threat analytics.
  2. The intended risky session action is monitored or restricted according to configured controls.
  3. Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources.
  4. Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Misconfigurations are tracked to remediation and future posture scans reflect the corrected resources. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Expected source events are searchable in the intended workspace and support threat analytics. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Sentinel SIEM ingestion. Its appropriate purpose is: A SIEM collects and correlates security telemetry; data ingestion is foundational before analytic rules can detect events. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

B:

The intended risky session action is monitored or restricted according to configured controls. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Cloud Apps session controls. Its appropriate purpose is: Session controls provide real-time governance of supported cloud app activities; discovery alone does not enforce session behaviors. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

D:

Related endpoint, identity and email signals appear together in a coordinated investigation. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Defender XDR unified incidents. Its appropriate purpose is: Defender XDR correlates detections across product domains; it does not replace storage of encryption keys or data retention governance. For the stated case, Cloud Security Posture Management is the closer match. CSPM evaluates configuration and exposure risk proactively, rather than solely responding to an endpoint malware alert.

Question 187

A governance administrator is consolidating tool navigation for data lifecycle and compliance processes. Before changing configuration, which evidence should the team examine to assess THIS particular requirement?

  1. Inspect the relevant Purview solution pages, available roles and enabled features.
  2. Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior.
  3. Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus.
  4. Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect the relevant Purview solution pages, available roles and enabled features. This is the relevant evidence check for this situation. The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect retention policy scope, duration settings and resulting content lifecycle behavior. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention policies. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention policies apply lifecycle rules to selected locations or content sets; they do not substitute for DLP sharing blocks. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview portal is the closer match. The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification.

C:

Inspect classifier configuration, matched items and classification results in a controlled test corpus. This item belongs to a different control area: Sensitive information type classification. Its appropriate purpose is: Classification identifies content characteristics to support protection policies; classifying alone does not block exfiltration. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview portal is the closer match. The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification.

D:

Inspect label configuration, policy publication or auto-application scope and labeled item status. This item belongs to a different control area: Retention labels. Its appropriate purpose is: Retention labels govern specific items; a broad location-level retention policy does not provide the same fine-grained labeling behavior. For the stated case, Microsoft Purview portal is the closer match. The Purview portal is a central interface for multiple compliance and data-governance solutions, not itself a finished compliance certification.

Question 188

An internal auditor requests an Azure resource assessment view aligned to an industry benchmark. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios.
  2. Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries.
  3. Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint attack surface reduction rules to restrict risky endpoint behaviors where supported.
  4. Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Use Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance views to map cloud resource findings to applicable standards. This is the directly applicable response. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use Defender for Office 365 Safe Links policies to evaluate and protect users from malicious links in supported email and collaboration scenarios. This item belongs to a different control area: Defender for Office 365 Safe Links. Its appropriate purpose is: Safe Links addresses URL-based threats; it does not inspect attached files for malware. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

B:

Separate workloads into appropriately designed Azure virtual networks and subnets with explicit connectivity boundaries. This item belongs to a different control area: Azure virtual network segmentation. Its appropriate purpose is: Virtual networks provide logical network isolation; separate security policies may still be needed to limit allowed flows. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

C:

Use Microsoft Defender for Endpoint attack surface reduction rules to restrict risky endpoint behaviors where supported. This item belongs to a different control area: Endpoint attack surface reduction. Its appropriate purpose is: ASR rules reduce common exploit paths on endpoints and can be tested in audit mode before enforcement. For the stated case, Defender for Cloud regulatory compliance is the closer match. Regulatory compliance views relate assessed technical controls to frameworks; they do not by themselves certify organizational legal compliance.

Question 189

A college pilot targets one student cloud application before extending sign-in controls campus-wide. After implementing the intended safeguard, which outcome BEST demonstrates that the stated requirement has been met?

  1. The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results.
  2. Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts.
  3. A managed tenant identity can sign in to integrated cloud resources under assigned access policies.
  4. The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The intended application sessions are governed and unrelated apps are not accidentally blocked. This observable outcome tests whether the requirement has actually been met. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.

Incorrect Answers

A:

The specified lifecycle event triggers consistent identity tasks and leaves auditable results. This item belongs to a different control area: Lifecycle workflows. Its appropriate purpose is: Lifecycle workflows automate repeatable identity onboarding and offboarding tasks; review of ongoing entitlements remains a separate control. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.

B:

Expected in-scope users and attribute updates appear in Entra ID without duplicate cloud accounts. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra Connect synchronization. Its appropriate purpose is: Directory synchronization must be scoped and observed; enabling it without verifying source objects can create identity drift. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.

C:

A managed tenant identity can sign in to integrated cloud resources under assigned access policies. This item belongs to a different control area: Microsoft Entra ID cloud identity. Its appropriate purpose is: Microsoft Entra ID provides cloud directory and identity services, not network packet filtering or document retention. For the stated case, Conditional Access application targeting is the closer match. A policy should be tested for targeted principals and applications, with emergency-access exclusions where appropriate.

Question 190

An organization discovers staff frequently choose its company name plus a year as their password. Which approach MOST directly addresses the stated requirement?

  1. Schedule Microsoft Entra access reviews to let owners recertify whether users still need access.
  2. Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords.
  3. Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported.
  4. Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Apply Microsoft Entra Password Protection policies and custom banned-password screening where supported. This is the directly applicable response. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Schedule Microsoft Entra access reviews to let owners recertify whether users still need access. This item belongs to a different control area: Access reviews. Its appropriate purpose is: Access reviews periodically reassess existing permissions, unlike a new initial access request. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

B:

Assign an Azure managed identity to a supported workload so it obtains Entra tokens without storing app passwords. This item belongs to a different control area: Managed identities. Its appropriate purpose is: Managed identities remove workload credential handling for supported Azure resources but still require appropriate authorization. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

D:

Use Microsoft Entra ID Protection signals to identify and respond to risky users or sign-ins. This item belongs to a different control area: Identity Protection risk detection. Its appropriate purpose is: Identity Protection detects identity-related risk signals; a generic role assignment alone does not assess risk. For the stated case, Password protection is the closer match. Password protection blocks weak password choices; it does not replace MFA or a full identity risk policy.

Microsoft Security, Compliance, and Identity Fundamentals (SC-900) Practice Tests