Question 50
A company needs an exact SQL Server instance configuration with native backup chains but chooses a lightweight schema/data export as its only rollback strategy. Which Azure SQL or SQL Server administrative approach is MOST appropriate?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Use supported backup/restore, BACPAC or database-copy methods based on source/target compatibility and offline downtime budget, then validate security, consistency and performance after migration. This is the supported administration mechanism for the described workload. A BACPAC export captures schema and data for applicable databases but is not an instance backup that automatically recreates all server features and jobs. Verify with: Inspect backup format, target offering limits, export size, authentication mapping, integrity checks, DBCC findings, workload baselines and cutover test results.
Incorrect Answers
Choose database vCore or DTU purchasing models, compute tier and elastic-pool membership from measured resource patterns, isolation needs and predictable workload peaks. This addresses Azure SQL Database service tiers and elastic pools, not the controlling requirement here. Elastic pools share resources across eligible Azure SQL databases; adding a pool cannot eliminate an individual database's workload or resource configuration limits. Prefer: Use supported backup/restore, BACPAC or database-copy methods based on source/target compatibility and offline downtime budget, then validate security, consistency and performance after migration.
Use a current migration assessment to inventory database dependencies, unsupported features, downtime constraints and target platform compatibility before moving data. This addresses Azure SQL migration assessment and feature compatibility, not the controlling requirement here. Successful schema import does not prove that instance-level jobs, security identities and linked dependencies survive a migration. Prefer: Use supported backup/restore, BACPAC or database-copy methods based on source/target compatibility and offline downtime budget, then validate security, consistency and performance after migration.
Size Managed Instance and SQL Server VM compute, storage latency and throughput using performance evidence, including correct storage-layout and platform support limits. This addresses Managed Instance and SQL VM compute storage scaling, not the controlling requirement here. Increasing CPU cannot fix a saturated log throughput budget or a storage path with high sustained write latency. Prefer: Use supported backup/restore, BACPAC or database-copy methods based on source/target compatibility and offline downtime budget, then validate security, consistency and performance after migration.


