Question 280
An engineering team deploys zone-redundant compute and assumes the architecture also survives a complete Azure region failure without geo backups. Which TWO complementary actions provide the appropriate response AND evidence to verify it? Select TWO.
Explanation
Correct Answers
Inspect recovery objectives, replication modes, failure domains, backup frequencies, availability SLA, network and DNS cutover plus application dependency map. This is the discriminating system or configuration evidence for the case. High availability reduces some outages but cannot substitute for recoverable backups after corruption or human deletion; RPO and RTO are separate targets. Corresponding approach: Select a supported HA and disaster recovery architecture from business-defined RPO, RTO, region failure assumptions, planned failover steps and service-specific capabilities. It supplies the evidence portion of this complementary answer.
Select a supported HA and disaster recovery architecture from business-defined RPO, RTO, region failure assumptions, planned failover steps and service-specific capabilities. This is the supported administration mechanism for the described workload. High availability reduces some outages but cannot substitute for recoverable backups after corruption or human deletion; RPO and RTO are separate targets. Verify with: Inspect recovery objectives, replication modes, failure domains, backup frequencies, availability SLA, network and DNS cutover plus application dependency map. It supplies the implementation portion of this complementary answer.
Incorrect Answers
Check Managed Instance region pairing, VNet/DNS dependencies, SQL MI link prerequisites where used, migration and failover sequence, replication health and authentication continuity. This choice pertains to Managed Instance hybrid recovery and operational readiness, not the needed response/evidence pair. Use: Select a supported HA and disaster recovery architecture from business-defined RPO, RTO, region failure assumptions, planned failover steps and service-specific capabilities. Check: Inspect recovery objectives, replication modes, failure domains, backup frequencies, availability SLA, network and DNS cutover plus application dependency map.
After a planned or forced failover the intended database endpoint serves valid writes and read-only workloads under documented consistency limits. This choice pertains to Azure SQL Database active geo replication and failover groups, not the needed response/evidence pair. Use: Select a supported HA and disaster recovery architecture from business-defined RPO, RTO, region failure assumptions, planned failover steps and service-specific capabilities. Check: Inspect recovery objectives, replication modes, failure domains, backup frequencies, availability SLA, network and DNS cutover plus application dependency map.
Choose Azure SQL failover groups or active geo-replication according to group-level endpoint continuity, supported replication topology, read scale and application reconnect requirements. This choice pertains to Azure SQL failover groups versus active geo replication decisions, not the needed response/evidence pair. Use: Select a supported HA and disaster recovery architecture from business-defined RPO, RTO, region failure assumptions, planned failover steps and service-specific capabilities. Check: Inspect recovery objectives, replication modes, failure domains, backup frequencies, availability SLA, network and DNS cutover plus application dependency map.


