cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 37

Question 360

A multicast source exists but group join state never reaches a configured rendezvous point. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.

  1. Configure reachable appropriate RP mapping for the required ASM group range.
  2. Configure an IP host default gateway and assume that automatically elects a PIM RP.
  3. Use IGMPv3-capable receivers and source-specific membership where applicable.
  4. (*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream.
  5. Align multicast RPF expectations with unicast or configured multicast routing topology.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Configure reachable appropriate RP mapping for the required ASM group range. This is the intended implementation action for PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree.

D:

(*,G) joins establish a shared tree via the intended RP and receivers get the stream. This is direct observable evidence for PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Configure an IP host default gateway and assume that automatically elects a PIM RP. This would not be an appropriate PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree decision. Absent or inconsistent RP mapping prevents initial ASM group discovery.

C:

Use IGMPv3-capable receivers and source-specific membership where applicable. This belongs to IGMPv3 source include mode, not the specified PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree operation. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.

E:

Align multicast RPF expectations with unicast or configured multicast routing topology. This belongs to Multicast RPF shortest reverse path check, not the specified PIM sparse-mode RP shared tree operation. Sparse-mode ASM commonly uses an RP to establish initial shared-tree multicast state.

Question 361

A dual-homed access design shows repeated broadcast traffic after adding a second EVPN peer. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect route to VTEP loopback and VXLAN encapsulation transport.
  2. Disable all ESI-aware forwarding checks so every flooded packet is replicated to all ports.
  3. Inspect EVPN Type2 NLRI and destination MAC forwarding entries.
  4. Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers. This checks whether bUM frames are not looped back to the originating Ethernet segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect route to VTEP loopback and VXLAN encapsulation transport. That check applies chiefly to VXLAN VTEP loopback underlay route, not the current EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance issue. EVPN split-horizon prevents replication back toward the same multihomed Ethernet segment.

B:

Disable all ESI-aware forwarding checks so every flooded packet is replicated to all ports. That bypass leaves the EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance issue unresolved. Lack of split-horizon handling can cause duplicate or looping flooded frames.

C:

Inspect EVPN Type2 NLRI and destination MAC forwarding entries. That check applies chiefly to EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement, not the current EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance issue. EVPN split-horizon prevents replication back toward the same multihomed Ethernet segment.

Question 362

Two eligible BGP paths should be used for resilient egress when configured as multipath. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Set two interfaces to identical descriptions and assume the forwarding table hashes across both.
  2. Configure appropriate inet6-unicast family and compatible IPv6 next-hop reachability.
  3. Enable compatible BGP multipath and forwarding-table load balancing where justified.
  4. Validate supported forwarding-table hashing and load distribution across many distinct flows.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Enable compatible BGP multipath and forwarding-table load balancing where justified. BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements. The expected validation is that multiple eligible next hops are installed and traffic follows approved ECMP hashing.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set two interfaces to identical descriptions and assume the forwarding table hashes across both. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for BGP multipath equal-cost path installation. Merely seeing multiple BGP routes does not prove load balancing occurs.

B:

Configure appropriate inet6-unicast family and compatible IPv6 next-hop reachability. This addresses BGP NLRI IPv6 unicast inet6 family rather than the required BGP multipath equal-cost path installation decision. BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements.

D:

Validate supported forwarding-table hashing and load distribution across many distinct flows. This addresses BGP ECMP per-flow hashing rather than the required BGP multipath equal-cost path installation decision. BGP multipath requires compatible path properties and FIB programming beyond two received advertisements.

Question 363

An announced customer prefix appears hidden despite an Established BGP session. After deploying the recommended BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Multiple eligible next hops are installed and traffic follows approved ECMP hashing.
  2. Other areas see the approved aggregate while required specifics remain reachable.
  3. The active route reflects documented policy and any hidden route has an explained reason.
  4. Tagged prefixes follow documented export or preference behavior at the target neighbor.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The active route reflects documented policy and any hidden route has an explained reason. This is the directly observable outcome for BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Multiple eligible next hops are installed and traffic follows approved ECMP hashing. This validates BGP multipath equal-cost path installation but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis result. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

B:

Other areas see the approved aggregate while required specifics remain reachable. This validates OSPF interarea route summarization but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis result. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

D:

Tagged prefixes follow documented export or preference behavior at the target neighbor. This validates BGP communities tagging routing intent but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis result. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

Question 364

One anycast-RP node fails and multicast should continue through an alternate active node. Which technical principle BEST explains the Anycast RP with shared address decision?

  1. PIM-SM can transition from shared RP tree to a source shortest-path tree.
  2. Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance.
  3. Anycast RP can present one logical RP address across multiple physical routers.
  4. Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Anycast RP can present one logical RP address across multiple physical routers. In this situation, the relevant action is to build supported anycast-RP reachability and synchronize source awareness as required.

Incorrect Answers

A:

PIM-SM can transition from shared RP tree to a source shortest-path tree. That principle is related to ASM shared tree versus SPT switchover, not the main Anycast RP with shared address choice. Identical RP addresses without source-state coordination can break ASM reachability.

B:

Graceful restart preserves temporary forwarding state but is not unlimited reachability assurance. That principle is related to BGP graceful restart session continuity, not the main Anycast RP with shared address choice. Identical RP addresses without source-state coordination can break ASM reachability.

D:

Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state. That principle is related to Multicast routing table incoming outgoing lists, not the main Anycast RP with shared address choice. Identical RP addresses without source-state coordination can break ASM reachability.

Question 365

Two all-active EVPN leaves receive the same multicast flood traffic for a shared access segment. After deploying the recommended EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Under controlled load intended voice QoS remains protected while other classes retain service.
  2. BUM frames are not looped back to the originating Ethernet segment.
  3. The selected active leaf forwards while standby becomes active after controlled failure.
  4. Only the authorized DF forwards designated BUM traffic toward the shared segment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Only the authorized DF forwards designated BUM traffic toward the shared segment. This is the directly observable outcome for EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Under controlled load intended voice QoS remains protected while other classes retain service. This validates CoS end-to-end verification of drop behavior but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM result. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.

B:

BUM frames are not looped back to the originating Ethernet segment. This validates EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM result. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.

C:

The selected active leaf forwards while standby becomes active after controlled failure. This validates EVPN single-active multihoming access mode but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM result. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.

Question 366

Two leaf switches both start forwarding a segment intended for single-active behavior. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers.
  2. Inspect route to VTEP loopback and VXLAN encapsulation transport.
  3. Declare two parallel ordinary access trunks single-active without EVPN multihoming configuration.
  4. Inspect active and standby Ethernet segment status during a link failover.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect active and standby Ethernet segment status during a link failover. This checks whether the selected active leaf forwards while standby becomes active after controlled failure.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Trace VXLAN BUM packet source ESI and egress eligibility on both peers. That check applies chiefly to EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance, not the current EVPN single-active multihoming access mode issue. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

B:

Inspect route to VTEP loopback and VXLAN encapsulation transport. That check applies chiefly to VXLAN VTEP loopback underlay route, not the current EVPN single-active multihoming access mode issue. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

C:

Declare two parallel ordinary access trunks single-active without EVPN multihoming configuration. That bypass leaves the EVPN single-active multihoming access mode issue unresolved. Enabling unintended all-active behavior can violate a single-active attachment design.

Question 367

A PIM neighbor receives group joins from an unapproved network segment. Which technical principle BEST explains the Multicast policy group scoping decision?

  1. Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic.
  2. IGMP queriers maintain host membership state on a local multicast segment.
  3. Multicast routing policy or scoping constrains distribution without changing sender addresses.
  4. PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Multicast routing policy or scoping constrains distribution without changing sender addresses. In this situation, the relevant action is to apply scoped multicast policy restricting eligible groups at the proper boundary.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Multicast involves host membership router tree state and actual forwarding traffic. That principle is related to Multicast troubleshooting separate control and data planes, not the main Multicast policy group scoping choice. An unrestricted policy can carry sensitive multicast into unintended domains.

B:

IGMP queriers maintain host membership state on a local multicast segment. That principle is related to IGMP querier on subscriber VLAN, not the main Multicast policy group scoping choice. An unrestricted policy can carry sensitive multicast into unintended domains.

D:

PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching. That principle is related to PoE class discovery and allocation, not the main Multicast policy group scoping choice. An unrestricted policy can carry sensitive multicast into unintended domains.

Question 368

A high-PLP class does not drop earlier because drop profiles ignore loss priority. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the RED WRED drop profile thresholds implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.

  1. Configure suitable RED or WRED drop profiles and map PLP to planned thresholds.
  2. Queue statistics show probabilistic early drops according to class and PLP settings.
  3. Apply the intended scheduler map to the actual output interface.
  4. Define suitable forwarding classes and their supported queue mappings.
  5. Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Configure suitable RED or WRED drop profiles and map PLP to planned thresholds. This is the intended implementation action for RED WRED drop profile thresholds.

B:

Queue statistics show probabilistic early drops according to class and PLP settings. This is direct observable evidence for RED WRED drop profile thresholds.

Incorrect Answers

C:

Apply the intended scheduler map to the actual output interface. This belongs to Scheduler maps attached to egress interface, not the specified RED WRED drop profile thresholds operation. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.

D:

Define suitable forwarding classes and their supported queue mappings. This belongs to Junos forwarding class to queue mapping, not the specified RED WRED drop profile thresholds operation. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.

E:

Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves. This would not be an appropriate RED WRED drop profile thresholds decision. Poorly chosen thresholds can drop valuable traffic or fail to control congestion.

Question 369

A point-to-point transit link unexpectedly attempts broadcast DR election behavior. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure compatible supported point-to-point OSPF network types when appropriate.
  2. Change all interfaces to nonbroadcast without checking neighbor discovery requirements.
  3. Verify IPv6 interface participation and OSPFv3 prefix advertisement settings.
  4. Use a consistent OSPF reference-bandwidth policy across the intended routing domain.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure compatible supported point-to-point OSPF network types when appropriate. Point-to-point OSPF interfaces do not use broadcast-network DR election. The expected validation is that both ends form a Full adjacency without an unnecessary DR election.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Change all interfaces to nonbroadcast without checking neighbor discovery requirements. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for OSPF point-to-point network type. Mixed OSPF interface network types can produce confusing neighbor behavior.

C:

Verify IPv6 interface participation and OSPFv3 prefix advertisement settings. This addresses OSPFv3 IPv6 prefix advertisement rather than the required OSPF point-to-point network type decision. Point-to-point OSPF interfaces do not use broadcast-network DR election.

D:

Use a consistent OSPF reference-bandwidth policy across the intended routing domain. This addresses OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links rather than the required OSPF point-to-point network type decision. Point-to-point OSPF interfaces do not use broadcast-network DR election.

Question 370

Two Junos peers reach ExStart and repeatedly fail database-description negotiation. After deploying the recommended OSPF interface MTU mismatch change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Hello packets agree on area identification and neighbors reach Full.
  2. Remote IPv6 routers receive only the intended OSPFv3 external destinations.
  3. Packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue.
  4. Database-description exchange completes and neighbor reaches Full.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Database-description exchange completes and neighbor reaches Full. This is the directly observable outcome for OSPF interface MTU mismatch. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Hello packets agree on area identification and neighbors reach Full. This validates OSPFv2 area identifier consistency but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF interface MTU mismatch result. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

B:

Remote IPv6 routers receive only the intended OSPFv3 external destinations. This validates OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6 but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF interface MTU mismatch result. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

C:

Packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue. This validates Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier but does not directly demonstrate the required OSPF interface MTU mismatch result. OSPF database exchange can stall when peers disagree on interface MTU.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests