cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 21

Question 200

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A forwarding class has correct scheduling but packet captures show wrong outbound markings. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Assuming IP DSCP automatically sets all Ethernet priority bits causes inconsistencies.
  2. An overly permissive guest VLAN becomes an alternative corporate-network entry.
  3. Ingress classification does not itself guarantee downstream marking consistency.
  4. Excessively small buffers cause avoidable drops while overlarge buffers increase delay.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Ingress classification does not itself guarantee downstream marking consistency. Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect rewrite rule binding and compare inbound versus outbound DSCP captures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Assuming IP DSCP automatically sets all Ethernet priority bits causes inconsistencies. This is a IEEE 802.1p CoS rewrite on Ethernet failure pattern, not the primary DSCP egress rewrite rules failure in this case. Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits.

B:

An overly permissive guest VLAN becomes an alternative corporate-network entry. This is a Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients failure pattern, not the primary DSCP egress rewrite rules failure in this case. Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits.

D:

Excessively small buffers cause avoidable drops while overlarge buffers increase delay. This is a Queue buffer-size allocation failure pattern, not the primary DSCP egress rewrite rules failure in this case. Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits.

Question 201

A dual-homed server's access segment must be advertised across two EVPN leaf peers. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments.
  2. Advertise correct EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto-discovery routes for the segment.
  3. Use only an IGMP group join as a substitute for Ethernet A-D advertisements.
  4. Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Advertise correct EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto-discovery routes for the segment. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence. The expected validation is that remote peers recognize Ethernet segment participation and respond to advertised withdrawals.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments. This addresses Ethernet segment identifier ESI consistency rather than the required EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery decision. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.

C:

Use only an IGMP group join as a substitute for Ethernet A-D advertisements. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery. Incorrect or missing Type1 signaling can slow convergence or misrepresent ES availability.

D:

Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import. This addresses EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement rather than the required EVPN Type1 Ethernet auto discovery decision. Type1 Ethernet A-D routes signal Ethernet segment reachability and support multihoming convergence.

Question 202

Packets are correctly assigned to a named forwarding class but reach the wrong hardware output queue. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure suitable scheduler transmit-rate reservations considering link capacity.
  2. Define suitable forwarding classes and their supported queue mappings.
  3. Rename a queue to Priority and assume the physical scheduler configuration changes.
  4. Set egress shaping to the supported carrier rate on the correct interface or queue.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Define suitable forwarding classes and their supported queue mappings. Forwarding classes express per-hop traffic treatment and map to transmission queues. The expected validation is that each packet class reaches the planned output queue with expected counters.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure suitable scheduler transmit-rate reservations considering link capacity. This addresses Scheduler transmit rate bandwidth allocation rather than the required Junos forwarding class to queue mapping decision. Forwarding classes express per-hop traffic treatment and map to transmission queues.

C:

Rename a queue to Priority and assume the physical scheduler configuration changes. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Junos forwarding class to queue mapping. Naming a class Voice without mapping it does not guarantee queue scheduling.

D:

Set egress shaping to the supported carrier rate on the correct interface or queue. This addresses Junos egress shaping rate rather than the required Junos forwarding class to queue mapping decision. Forwarding classes express per-hop traffic treatment and map to transmission queues.

Question 203

An access port times out despite network reachability to the RADIUS server. Which technical principle BEST explains the RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling decision?

  1. EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic.
  2. RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication.
  3. RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity.
  4. MAC RADIUS can authorize nonsupplicant devices but MAC identity is easier to spoof.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity. In this situation, the relevant action is to review authentication policy and RADIUS response attributes with an authorized test identity.

Incorrect Answers

A:

EVPN DF controls multihomed access delivery of broadcast unknown-unicast and multicast traffic. That principle is related to EVPN designated forwarder DF for BUM, not the main RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling choice. Treating Access-Reject as the same failure as timeout can trigger unsafe fallback behavior.

B:

RADIUS authorization can assign network context after successful authentication. That principle is related to Dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS, not the main RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling choice. Treating Access-Reject as the same failure as timeout can trigger unsafe fallback behavior.

D:

MAC RADIUS can authorize nonsupplicant devices but MAC identity is easier to spoof. That principle is related to MAC RADIUS printer onboarding, not the main RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling choice. Treating Access-Reject as the same failure as timeout can trigger unsafe fallback behavior.

Question 204

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: An RR session is Established for inet unicast but not for the EVPN address family. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Missing or stale Type2 routes cause blackholing or misdirected unicast traffic.
  2. Slight configuration mismatches can create independent MST regions and unexpected port states.
  3. Having an IP-connected VTEP does not mean its peer negotiates EVPN NLRI.
  4. Lack of split-horizon handling can cause duplicate or looping flooded frames.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Having an IP-connected VTEP does not mean its peer negotiates EVPN NLRI. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect BGP family capability and show route table bgp.evpn.0.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Missing or stale Type2 routes cause blackholing or misdirected unicast traffic. This is a EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement failure pattern, not the primary BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation failure in this case. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

B:

Slight configuration mismatches can create independent MST regions and unexpected port states. This is a MSTP region name revision and VLAN digest failure pattern, not the primary BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation failure in this case. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

D:

Lack of split-horizon handling can cause duplicate or looping flooded frames. This is a EVPN multihoming split horizon loop avoidance failure pattern, not the primary BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation failure in this case. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

Question 205

A switch has two uplinks and one must remain blocked to prevent a Layer 2 loop. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Select explicitly supported customer protocols and enforce L2PT boundaries.
  2. Disable BPDU handling to make all redundant uplinks forward without loop risk.
  3. Assign supported isolated secondary VLAN roles and permitted promiscuous uplink mapping.
  4. Tune approved MST port costs and priorities based on the intended topology.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Tune approved MST port costs and priorities based on the intended topology. Spanning tree chooses port roles to avoid loops while maintaining redundant paths. The expected validation is that root and alternate ports correspond to the planned loop-free spanning tree.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Select explicitly supported customer protocols and enforce L2PT boundaries. This addresses L2PT protocol selection and isolation rather than the required MSTP root port and alternate path decision. Spanning tree chooses port roles to avoid loops while maintaining redundant paths.

B:

Disable BPDU handling to make all redundant uplinks forward without loop risk. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for MSTP root port and alternate path. Forcing every redundant port to forwarding can create broadcast storms.

C:

Assign supported isolated secondary VLAN roles and permitted promiscuous uplink mapping. This addresses Private VLAN isolated port separation rather than the required MSTP root port and alternate path decision. Spanning tree chooses port roles to avoid loops while maintaining redundant paths.

Question 206

The corporate AAA cluster becomes unreachable during planned maintenance. After deploying the recommended RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not.
  2. Peering establishes over the authorized endpoints without opening unrelated management ports.
  3. Spoofed MAC identity cannot grant administrator or high-trust employee access.
  4. AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

AAA outages trigger the documented limited continuity state and recovery restores normal authentication. This is the directly observable outcome for RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy. Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not. This validates Dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy result. Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions.

B:

Peering establishes over the authorized endpoints without opening unrelated management ports. This validates BGP TCP 179 and firewall reachability but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy result. Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions.

C:

Spoofed MAC identity cannot grant administrator or high-trust employee access. This validates MAC RADIUS spoofing limitations but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy result. Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions.

Question 207

Ingress marked traffic is classified as best effort because no correct classifier is applied. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.

  1. Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically.
  2. Configure a supported multifield classifier or ingress firewall filter matching relevant flow fields.
  3. Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings.
  4. Packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue.
  5. Classify or remark untrusted edge traffic while retaining appropriate trusted phone service.

Explanation

Correct Answers

C:

Configure a supported behavior aggregate classifier with intended DSCP-to-forwarding-class mappings. This is the intended implementation action for Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier.

D:

Packet counters show EF-marked traffic assigned to approved forwarding class and queue. This is direct observable evidence for Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure only an egress rewrite rule and assume ingress BA classification changes automatically. This would not be an appropriate Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier decision. Incorrect ingress mapping sends high-priority traffic to default queues.

B:

Configure a supported multifield classifier or ingress firewall filter matching relevant flow fields. This belongs to Junos multifield firewall filter classification, not the specified Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier operation. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.

E:

Classify or remark untrusted edge traffic while retaining appropriate trusted phone service. This belongs to QoS trust boundary at campus edge, not the specified Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier operation. BA classification interprets existing packet markings and assigns forwarding class and loss priority.

Question 208

Congestion should drop less important traffic before delay-sensitive or protected flows. After deploying the recommended Packet loss priority PLP marking change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Aggregate flows use eligible next hops without causing excessive same-flow reordering.
  2. Outgoing packet captures show the expected DSCP values on the selected interface.
  3. Congestion accounting distinguishes low-PLP and high-PLP traffic as intended.
  4. Approved voice packets gain the intended forwarding class while bulk packets do not.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Congestion accounting distinguishes low-PLP and high-PLP traffic as intended. This is the directly observable outcome for Packet loss priority PLP marking. Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Aggregate flows use eligible next hops without causing excessive same-flow reordering. This validates BGP ECMP per-flow hashing but does not directly demonstrate the required Packet loss priority PLP marking result. Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone.

B:

Outgoing packet captures show the expected DSCP values on the selected interface. This validates DSCP egress rewrite rules but does not directly demonstrate the required Packet loss priority PLP marking result. Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone.

D:

Approved voice packets gain the intended forwarding class while bulk packets do not. This validates Junos multifield firewall filter classification but does not directly demonstrate the required Packet loss priority PLP marking result. Packet loss priority influences drop likelihood independent of forwarding class alone.

Question 209

A port carries the PC data untagged but the handset sends voice frames to the wrong tagged VLAN. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect show poe interface and total allocated versus available watts.
  2. Verify phone tag IDs and PC untagged frames in a mirrored capture.
  3. Inspect device class and port power negotiation counters.
  4. Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Verify phone tag IDs and PC untagged frames in a mirrored capture. This checks whether phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect show poe interface and total allocated versus available watts. That check applies chiefly to PoE power budget switch capacity, not the current Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic issue. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.

C:

Inspect device class and port power negotiation counters. That check applies chiefly to PoE class discovery and allocation, not the current Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic issue. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.

D:

Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control. That bypass leaves the Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic issue unresolved. Treating both streams as one unrestricted VLAN can violate QoS and segmentation rules.

Question 210

Two leaf VTEPs have underlay IP reachability but exchange no EVPN control-plane routes. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Enable compatible BGP EVPN signaling on the appropriate peers with scoped policy.
  2. Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import.
  3. Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments.
  4. Configure only OSPFv2 Hello packets and assume EVPN MAC advertisements are exchanged.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Enable compatible BGP EVPN signaling on the appropriate peers with scoped policy. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability. The expected validation is that expected EVPN NLRI appears in the routing instance and route table.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import. This addresses EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement rather than the required BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation decision. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

C:

Configure matching supported Ethernet segment identifier and multihoming attachments. This addresses Ethernet segment identifier ESI consistency rather than the required BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation decision. EVPN uses MP-BGP control-plane signaling separate from ordinary IPv4 unicast reachability.

D:

Configure only OSPFv2 Hello packets and assume EVPN MAC advertisements are exchanged. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation. Having an IP-connected VTEP does not mean its peer negotiates EVPN NLRI.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests