cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 11

Question 100

An internal failover sends outbound traffic through the wrong ISP despite healthy iBGP. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect BGP path attributes and active routes at multiple iBGP speakers.
  2. Advertise a larger MED to the upstream and assume all local speakers raise LOCAL_PREF.
  3. Inspect negotiated families and show route table inet.0 protocol bgp.
  4. Inspect eligible multipath route detail and forwarding table next hops.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect BGP path attributes and active routes at multiple iBGP speakers. This checks whether enterprise routers prefer approved primary exit while allowing backup on withdrawal.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Advertise a larger MED to the upstream and assume all local speakers raise LOCAL_PREF. That bypass leaves the BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection issue unresolved. Treating MED as a replacement for internal LOCAL_PREF can select the wrong exit.

C:

Inspect negotiated families and show route table inet.0 protocol bgp. That check applies chiefly to BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family, not the current BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection issue. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

D:

Inspect eligible multipath route detail and forwarding table next hops. That check applies chiefly to BGP multipath equal-cost path installation, not the current BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection issue. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.

Question 101

A phone-plus-PC access port treats both devices' DSCP as equally trusted. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Compare loss-priority classification and drop counters under controlled congestion.
  2. Trust all DSCP on every public access port because users may have telephony apps.
  3. Test marked phone and PC packets against ingress queue assignment.
  4. Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Test marked phone and PC packets against ingress queue assignment. This checks whether untrusted workstation EF markings cannot steal the intended voice queue.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compare loss-priority classification and drop counters under controlled congestion. That check applies chiefly to Packet loss priority PLP marking, not the current QoS trust boundary at campus edge issue. A CoS trust boundary defines whose markings should be honored.

B:

Trust all DSCP on every public access port because users may have telephony apps. That bypass leaves the QoS trust boundary at campus edge issue unresolved. Trusting all edge markings lets ordinary traffic claim priority service.

D:

Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters. That check applies chiefly to Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier, not the current QoS trust boundary at campus edge issue. A CoS trust boundary defines whose markings should be honored.

Question 102

Switch authentication counters show Access-Reject from the identity system for approved clients. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs.
  2. Convert every Access-Reject into anonymous full network access.
  3. Trace authentication outcome dynamic VLAN and firewall/filter policies for the effective session.
  4. Review authentication policy and RADIUS response attributes with an authorized test identity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Review authentication policy and RADIUS response attributes with an authorized test identity. RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity. The expected validation is that access-Accept authorizes approved access while explicit rejections remain denied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure supported captive portal redirect and identity or terms policy for guest VLANs. This addresses Captive portal web authentication rather than the required RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling decision. RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity.

B:

Convert every Access-Reject into anonymous full network access. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling. Treating Access-Reject as the same failure as timeout can trigger unsafe fallback behavior.

C:

Trace authentication outcome dynamic VLAN and firewall/filter policies for the effective session. This addresses Multiple access control enforcement troubleshooting rather than the required RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling decision. RADIUS outcomes express AAA authorization decisions separate from transport connectivity.

Question 103

An AAA server recovers but endpoints remain in the temporary fallback VLAN. After deploying the recommended RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. IPv6 link-local neighbors exchange OSPFv3 packets and learn approved prefixes.
  2. Affected clients transition from fallback to the correct authorized role without stale access.
  3. Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not.
  4. Each permitted identity is authorized without inheriting unrelated devices' access.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Affected clients transition from fallback to the correct authorized role without stale access. This is the directly observable outcome for RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication. Server-recovery behavior and authentication session lifecycle affect effective access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

IPv6 link-local neighbors exchange OSPFv3 packets and learn approved prefixes. This validates OSPFv3 IPv6 link-local neighbor formation but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication result. Server-recovery behavior and authentication session lifecycle affect effective access.

C:

Authenticated users enter the intended authorized VLAN while rejected users do not. This validates Dynamic VLAN assignment from RADIUS but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication result. Server-recovery behavior and authentication session lifecycle affect effective access.

D:

Each permitted identity is authorized without inheriting unrelated devices' access. This validates 802.1X multi-supplicant port control but does not directly demonstrate the required RADIUS server-fail remediation and reauthentication result. Server-recovery behavior and authentication session lifecycle affect effective access.

Question 104

An ingress filter maps an intended management flow to a user VLAN unexpectedly. Which technical principle BEST explains the Filter-based VLAN assignment decision?

  1. IGMP snooping uses observed host joins to constrain layer-2 multicast replication.
  2. Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone.
  3. Filter terms are evaluated in policy order subject to terminating actions.
  4. Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Filter-based VLAN decisions can classify traffic by supported packet fields instead of fixed port membership alone. In this situation, the relevant action is to create controlled firewall-filter-based VLAN classification on eligible ingress interfaces.

Incorrect Answers

A:

IGMP snooping uses observed host joins to constrain layer-2 multicast replication. That principle is related to IGMP snooping access-port replication, not the main Filter-based VLAN assignment choice. An overly broad match can reclassify unrelated packets into the wrong broadcast domain.

C:

Filter terms are evaluated in policy order subject to terminating actions. That principle is related to Filter-based VLAN rule precedence, not the main Filter-based VLAN assignment choice. An overly broad match can reclassify unrelated packets into the wrong broadcast domain.

D:

Ethernet switches learn source MACs per VLAN and flood unknown destinations until learned. That principle is related to Ethernet MAC learning and flooding, not the main Filter-based VLAN assignment choice. An overly broad match can reclassify unrelated packets into the wrong broadcast domain.

Question 105

A host moves to a different leaf but remote VTEPs still forward to its previous MAC location. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Restore valid underlay routing to VTEP addresses and verify permitted VXLAN traffic.
  2. Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import.
  3. Configure consistent supported VLAN-to-VNI mapping in the intended routing instances.
  4. Advertise an IMET Type3 route and claim it is identical to per-host Type2 MAC reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import. EVPN Type2 routes advertise host MAC addresses with optional IP binding. The expected validation is that remote leaves install a correct MAC reachability path toward the owning VTEP.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Restore valid underlay routing to VTEP addresses and verify permitted VXLAN traffic. This addresses VXLAN VTEP loopback underlay route rather than the required EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement decision. EVPN Type2 routes advertise host MAC addresses with optional IP binding.

C:

Configure consistent supported VLAN-to-VNI mapping in the intended routing instances. This addresses VXLAN VNI to VLAN association rather than the required EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement decision. EVPN Type2 routes advertise host MAC addresses with optional IP binding.

D:

Advertise an IMET Type3 route and claim it is identical to per-host Type2 MAC reachability. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement. Missing or stale Type2 routes cause blackholing or misdirected unicast traffic.

Question 106

Two devices are candidates to send periodic IGMP membership queries. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect IGMPv3 membership and PIM (S,G) route with no shared-tree dependency.
  2. Inspect querier address and membership aging across several intervals.
  3. Increase OSPF Dead interval and assume it generates IGMP queries.
  4. Inspect route to source show multicast route and RPF neighbor interface.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect querier address and membership aging across several intervals. This checks whether periodic queries refresh receiver membership and groups do not unexpectedly expire.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect IGMPv3 membership and PIM (S,G) route with no shared-tree dependency. That check applies chiefly to SSM without rendezvous point, not the current IGMP querier on subscriber VLAN issue. IGMP queriers maintain host membership state on a local multicast segment.

C:

Increase OSPF Dead interval and assume it generates IGMP queries. That bypass leaves the IGMP querier on subscriber VLAN issue unresolved. Without an effective querier snooping tables can lose active receiver ports.

D:

Inspect route to source show multicast route and RPF neighbor interface. That check applies chiefly to Multicast RPF shortest reverse path check, not the current IGMP querier on subscriber VLAN issue. IGMP queriers maintain host membership state on a local multicast segment.

Question 107

A user device bypasses 802.1X because a permissive MAC fallback runs first. Which technical principle BEST explains the 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority decision?

  1. VXLAN network identifiers distinguish overlay Layer 2 broadcast domains.
  2. Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path.
  3. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation.
  4. 802.1X separates supplicant authenticator and authentication server roles.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path. In this situation, the relevant action is to apply deliberate supported authentication method ordering and independent role policy.

Incorrect Answers

A:

VXLAN network identifiers distinguish overlay Layer 2 broadcast domains. That principle is related to VXLAN VNI to VLAN association, not the main 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority choice. Uncontrolled method fallback can turn a stronger supplicant policy into a weak MAC-only policy.

C:

Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation. That principle is related to Captive portal web authentication, not the main 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority choice. Uncontrolled method fallback can turn a stronger supplicant policy into a weak MAC-only policy.

D:

802.1X separates supplicant authenticator and authentication server roles. That principle is related to 802.1X supplicant authenticator RADIUS roles, not the main 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority choice. Uncontrolled method fallback can turn a stronger supplicant policy into a weak MAC-only policy.

Question 108

The operator assumes priority-high can be unlimited without policy consequences. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect priority queue usage and nonpriority throughput under saturation.
  2. Gather interface CoS statistics flow captures and per-class latency before modifying rates.
  3. Put every queue at the highest priority and claim starvation is impossible.
  4. Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect priority queue usage and nonpriority throughput under saturation. This checks whether voice latency stays controlled while data classes continue transmitting.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Gather interface CoS statistics flow captures and per-class latency before modifying rates. That check applies chiefly to CoS end-to-end verification of drop behavior, not the current Scheduler strict priority and starvation issue. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation.

C:

Put every queue at the highest priority and claim starvation is impossible. That bypass leaves the Scheduler strict priority and starvation issue unresolved. Unbounded high-priority traffic can starve nonpriority queues.

D:

Inspect show class-of-service interface and forwarding-class counters. That check applies chiefly to Junos ingress BA DSCP classifier, not the current Scheduler strict priority and starvation issue. Strict priority can reduce latency but must be designed to avoid starvation.

Question 109

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: After summarization an unintended disconnected subnet becomes reachable toward a null route. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Overly broad summaries can attract traffic to absent component prefixes.
  2. A healthy IPv4 neighbor is not proof of IPv6 adjacency or prefix reachability.
  3. An overly permissive export can leak private or unreachable prefixes across the domain.
  4. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Overly broad summaries can attract traffic to absent component prefixes. OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs. A useful corrective investigation is to compare interarea LSAs and test addresses at aggregate boundaries.

Incorrect Answers

B:

A healthy IPv4 neighbor is not proof of IPv6 adjacency or prefix reachability. This is a OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interarea route summarization failure in this case. OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs.

C:

An overly permissive export can leak private or unreachable prefixes across the domain. This is a OSPF external export policy redistribution failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interarea route summarization failure in this case. OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs.

D:

Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN. This is a LLDP-MED voice network policy failure pattern, not the primary OSPF interarea route summarization failure in this case. OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs.

Question 110

A switch supplies basic PoE but the device's extension module remains unavailable. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Compare ingress classification and permitted VLANs for phone versus PC traffic.
  2. Inspect device class and port power negotiation counters.
  3. Increase the interface MTU and expect the PoE power class to increase.
  4. Inspect show lldp neighbors and packet captures from the access port.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Inspect device class and port power negotiation counters. This checks whether negotiated power class and delivered wattage match the handset requirement.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compare ingress classification and permitted VLANs for phone versus PC traffic. That check applies chiefly to Phone and PC shared switch-port security, not the current PoE class discovery and allocation issue. PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching.

C:

Increase the interface MTU and expect the PoE power class to increase. That bypass leaves the PoE class discovery and allocation issue unresolved. Assuming any PoE-capable port supplies every device's requested wattage is unsafe.

D:

Inspect show lldp neighbors and packet captures from the access port. That check applies chiefly to LLDP neighbor advertisement, not the current PoE class discovery and allocation issue. PoE detection classification and allocation are distinct from Ethernet packet switching.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests