HP HPE7-A08 Practice Test 80
Question 790
A branch backup upload uses a plaintext file share accessible by all employees. Which switching implementation or corrective action BEST addresses the underlying requirement?
- Recover a failed AOS-CX switch with supported image, saved configuration, verified physical inventory and secure credential restoration.
- Compare deployed AOS-CX configurations against approved Aruba Central templates or version-controlled intended state and record exceptions.
- Examine egress buffer occupancy and queue allocation for traffic-class contention rather than interpreting all latency as routing delay.
- Archive switch configs with encryption, retention and least-privilege access while avoiding uncontrolled exposure of shared credentials or tokens.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Archive switch configs with encryption, retention and least-privilege access while avoiding uncontrolled exposure of shared credentials or tokens. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. Configuration histories may contain secrets and management details, so backup security is part of switch operations. Verify before and after with: Review archive permissions, encryption state, retention policy, sensitive fields, backup audit trail and restore rights. Scenario: A branch backup upload uses a plaintext file share accessible by all employees.
Incorrect Answers
A:Recover a failed AOS-CX switch with supported image, saved configuration, verified physical inventory and secure credential restoration. This action instead applies to Backup restoration and replacement switch workflow. Restoring a file to different hardware may require port and image adaptations; backup bytes alone do not prove service recovery. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Archive switch configs with encryption, retention and least-privilege access while avoiding uncontrolled exposure of shared credentials or tokens. Scenario: A branch backup upload uses a plaintext file share accessible by all employees.
B:Compare deployed AOS-CX configurations against approved Aruba Central templates or version-controlled intended state and record exceptions. This action instead applies to Centralized configuration drift audit. A device can be online in a management console while local configuration has drifted from the governed baseline. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Archive switch configs with encryption, retention and least-privilege access while avoiding uncontrolled exposure of shared credentials or tokens. Scenario: A branch backup upload uses a plaintext file share accessible by all employees.
C:Examine egress buffer occupancy and queue allocation for traffic-class contention rather than interpreting all latency as routing delay. This action instead applies to Packet buffer pressure and head-of-line impact. Buffer pressure reflects contention and bursting; an untested priority adjustment can shift rather than solve loss. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Archive switch configs with encryption, retention and least-privilege access while avoiding uncontrolled exposure of shared credentials or tokens. Scenario: A branch backup upload uses a plaintext file share accessible by all employees.
Question 791
A building sensor cannot run EAP but operations wants it on a full-trust user VLAN through unreviewed MAB. Which switching implementation or corrective action BEST addresses the underlying requirement?
- Use approved MAC authentication or critical-role treatment for devices lacking supplicants with explicit limited privileges and monitoring.
- Apply supported access-edge protection such as DHCP snooping, ARP inspection or MAC controls where appropriate and validate trust boundaries.
- Coordinate supported VSX peer and downstream MC-LAG connectivity with the core and access design and confirm peer synchronization boundaries.
- Distinguish loss of light or cabling/optic errors from configuration faults using interface and transceiver diagnostics before changing routing policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Use approved MAC authentication or critical-role treatment for devices lacking supplicants with explicit limited privileges and monitoring. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. MAB is identity based on a spoofable identifier, so its exception path requires narrow permissions and accountability. Verify before and after with: Check endpoint identity, allowed MAC profiles, primary 802.1X attempts, fallback order, authentication timeout and role policy. Scenario: A building sensor cannot run EAP but operations wants it on a full-trust user VLAN through unreviewed MAB.
Incorrect Answers
B:Apply supported access-edge protection such as DHCP snooping, ARP inspection or MAC controls where appropriate and validate trust boundaries. This action instead applies to Port security and DHCP/ARP spoofing defenses. Trusting all access ports undermines spoofing defenses; setting uplink trust without verifying bindings can also disrupt service. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Use approved MAC authentication or critical-role treatment for devices lacking supplicants with explicit limited privileges and monitoring. Scenario: A building sensor cannot run EAP but operations wants it on a full-trust user VLAN through unreviewed MAB.
C:Coordinate supported VSX peer and downstream MC-LAG connectivity with the core and access design and confirm peer synchronization boundaries. This action instead applies to VSX and aggregation integration verification. VSX peers maintain distinct control planes; inter-switch link and keepalive health require direct monitoring. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Use approved MAC authentication or critical-role treatment for devices lacking supplicants with explicit limited privileges and monitoring. Scenario: A building sensor cannot run EAP but operations wants it on a full-trust user VLAN through unreviewed MAB.
D:Distinguish loss of light or cabling/optic errors from configuration faults using interface and transceiver diagnostics before changing routing policy. This action instead applies to Physical link failure diagnostics. A Layer 1 fault should be isolated with optical and electrical evidence before troubleshooting Layer 3 protocols. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Use approved MAC authentication or critical-role treatment for devices lacking supplicants with explicit limited privileges and monitoring. Scenario: A building sensor cannot run EAP but operations wants it on a full-trust user VLAN through unreviewed MAB.
Question 792
Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier. Which TWO complementary steps identify the appropriate network response AND the evidence needed to verify it? Select TWO.
- Inspect TCP reachability, neighbor remote AS, update source, next hop, accepted/advertised prefixes and policy counters.
- Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports.
- Enable supported multicast routing mode and appropriate PIM relationships where stream sources and listeners span routed domains.
- Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path.
- Maintenance produces attributable acceptance evidence and business users receive accurate impact updates.
Explanation
Correct Answers
B:Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. IGMP snooping relies on correct membership signaling and appropriate querier behavior; static VLAN existence is insufficient. Verify before and after with: Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path. This choice supplies the implementation half of the requested pair. Scenario: Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier.
D:Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path. These observations distinguish the stated fault or prerequisite from an unrelated feature. IGMP snooping relies on correct membership signaling and appropriate querier behavior; static VLAN existence is insufficient. The corresponding action is: Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports. This choice supplies the diagnostic or verification half of the pair. Scenario: Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier.
Incorrect Answers
A:Inspect TCP reachability, neighbor remote AS, update source, next hop, accepted/advertised prefixes and policy counters. This step pertains to BGP peer establishment and route policy validation but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports. Together with: Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path. Scenario: Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier.
C:Enable supported multicast routing mode and appropriate PIM relationships where stream sources and listeners span routed domains. This step pertains to PIM and multicast routed-path validation but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports. Together with: Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path. Scenario: Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier.
E:Maintenance produces attributable acceptance evidence and business users receive accurate impact updates. This step pertains to Scheduled change window and impact communication but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Use IGMP snooping and a suitable querier or routed multicast context to constrain multicast replication to interested ports. Together with: Check group membership entries, IGMP reports, snooping state, querier address and stream receiver path. Scenario: Receivers join an audio multicast group but the switch ages memberships with no active querier.
Question 793
A distribution trunk omitted one finance VLAN after a template deployment and finance desktops cannot reach their gateway. Which switching implementation or corrective action BEST addresses the underlying requirement?
- Trace a host's local IP, mask, gateway and ARP resolution before attributing reachability failure to routing protocols.
- Coordinate supported VSX peer and downstream MC-LAG connectivity with the core and access design and confirm peer synchronization boundaries.
- Restore only the approved missing VLAN tags and native VLAN relationship at both ends of an uplink, then test representative hosts.
- Attribute application loss to the actual congested egress queue and traffic class rather than only interface-level packet drops.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Restore only the approved missing VLAN tags and native VLAN relationship at both ends of an uplink, then test representative hosts. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. Broadly allowing every VLAN may restore one workload but violate segmentation requirements. Verify before and after with: Inspect local/peer trunk configuration, permitted VLAN list, MAC learning and DHCP/gateway tests. Scenario: A distribution trunk omitted one finance VLAN after a template deployment and finance desktops cannot reach their gateway.
Incorrect Answers
A:Trace a host's local IP, mask, gateway and ARP resolution before attributing reachability failure to routing protocols. This action instead applies to IP addressing subnet and gateway mismatch. Incorrect subnet or default gateway settings can break connectivity even while VLAN forwarding remains healthy. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Restore only the approved missing VLAN tags and native VLAN relationship at both ends of an uplink, then test representative hosts. Scenario: A distribution trunk omitted one finance VLAN after a template deployment and finance desktops cannot reach their gateway.
B:Coordinate supported VSX peer and downstream MC-LAG connectivity with the core and access design and confirm peer synchronization boundaries. This action instead applies to VSX and aggregation integration verification. VSX peers maintain distinct control planes; inter-switch link and keepalive health require direct monitoring. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Restore only the approved missing VLAN tags and native VLAN relationship at both ends of an uplink, then test representative hosts. Scenario: A distribution trunk omitted one finance VLAN after a template deployment and finance desktops cannot reach their gateway.
D:Attribute application loss to the actual congested egress queue and traffic class rather than only interface-level packet drops. This action instead applies to QoS queue drop root cause under congestion. Interface error counters can remain zero while egress queues discard packets during oversubscription. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Restore only the approved missing VLAN tags and native VLAN relationship at both ends of an uplink, then test representative hosts. Scenario: A distribution trunk omitted one finance VLAN after a template deployment and finance desktops cannot reach their gateway.
Question 794
A branch recovery drill discovers configuration archives are stored on the same failed switch being replaced. Which result BEST proves the intended network change or management control works as required?
- The updated switch boots a supported image and retains routing, authentication and management services with tested rollback readiness.
- Approved configuration revisions can be recovered during a failed cutover with an attributable operator and documented restoration outcome.
- Voice and interactive traffic retain appropriate treatment without allowing untrusted endpoints to claim highest priority unchecked.
- Unauthorized local deviations are identified and remediated without overwriting legitimate site-specific variables.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Approved configuration revisions can be recovered during a failed cutover with an attributable operator and documented restoration outcome. This is an observable forwarding, management, or policy outcome, not simply a declaration that a command completed. A config backup is useful only when its location, currency and restore procedure can be demonstrated. Scenario: A branch recovery drill discovers configuration archives are stored on the same failed switch being replaced.
Incorrect Answers
A:The updated switch boots a supported image and retains routing, authentication and management services with tested rollback readiness. This result is associated with Firmware maintenance compatibility and image fallback; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: Approved configuration revisions can be recovered during a failed cutover with an attributable operator and documented restoration outcome. Scenario: A branch recovery drill discovers configuration archives are stored on the same failed switch being replaced.
C:Voice and interactive traffic retain appropriate treatment without allowing untrusted endpoints to claim highest priority unchecked. This result is associated with QoS DSCP trust boundary and class mapping; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: Approved configuration revisions can be recovered during a failed cutover with an attributable operator and documented restoration outcome. Scenario: A branch recovery drill discovers configuration archives are stored on the same failed switch being replaced.
D:Unauthorized local deviations are identified and remediated without overwriting legitimate site-specific variables. This result is associated with Centralized configuration drift audit; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: Approved configuration revisions can be recovered during a failed cutover with an attributable operator and documented restoration outcome. Scenario: A branch recovery drill discovers configuration archives are stored on the same failed switch being replaced.
Question 795
A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply. Which TWO complementary steps identify the appropriate network response AND the evidence needed to verify it? Select TWO.
- Prepare rack units, air flow, dual power paths, cable labeling and OOB management before powering the switching hardware.
- The specific VSX fault domain is identified with safe recovery steps, not a blind dual-reboot.
- Compare installation photos, running and startup configs, topology neighbors, asset inventory and exception log.
- Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone.
- Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks.
Explanation
Correct Answers
D:Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. Port availability, available watts and uplink throughput are separate constraints in campus switch sizing. Verify before and after with: Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks. This choice supplies the implementation half of the requested pair. Scenario: A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply.
E:Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks. These observations distinguish the stated fault or prerequisite from an unrelated feature. Port availability, available watts and uplink throughput are separate constraints in campus switch sizing. The corresponding action is: Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone. This choice supplies the diagnostic or verification half of the pair. Scenario: A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply.
Incorrect Answers
A:Prepare rack units, air flow, dual power paths, cable labeling and OOB management before powering the switching hardware. This step pertains to Physical installation and rack power implementation but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone. Together with: Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks. Scenario: A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply.
B:The specific VSX fault domain is identified with safe recovery steps, not a blind dual-reboot. This step pertains to VSX peer and keepalive failure symptom isolation but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone. Together with: Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks. Scenario: A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply.
C:Compare installation photos, running and startup configs, topology neighbors, asset inventory and exception log. This step pertains to Change documentation and as-built reconciliation but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Calculate access ports, PoE classes and spare uplink capacity from endpoint inventory and growth rather than ordering by current occupied ports alone. Together with: Review endpoint counts by class, anticipated additions, PoE budgets and uplink utilization peaks. Scenario: A wiring closet has enough Ethernet ports but high-power access points would exhaust its PoE supply.
Question 796
A switch telemetry agent stops collecting for ten minutes and graphs display a misleading zero throughput dip. Which result BEST proves the intended network change or management control works as required?
- A failed pilot is isolated to its site, while later sites receive corrected runbooks and signed approval.
- A reproducible impairment is separated from a monitoring artifact with corrected alert thresholds or source data.
- The retry source and server bottleneck are isolated with sessions stabilizing and intended access policy retained.
- The affected class receives measured queue improvement under load with unrelated classes remaining usable.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:A reproducible impairment is separated from a monitoring artifact with corrected alert thresholds or source data. This is an observable forwarding, management, or policy outcome, not simply a declaration that a command completed. A dashboard spike may be a sampling or threshold artifact; monitoring values require context and reliable collection. Scenario: A switch telemetry agent stops collecting for ten minutes and graphs display a misleading zero throughput dip.
Incorrect Answers
A:A failed pilot is isolated to its site, while later sites receive corrected runbooks and signed approval. This result is associated with Multisite change phasing and blast radius reduction; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: A reproducible impairment is separated from a monitoring artifact with corrected alert thresholds or source data. Scenario: A switch telemetry agent stops collecting for ten minutes and graphs display a misleading zero throughput dip.
C:The retry source and server bottleneck are isolated with sessions stabilizing and intended access policy retained. This result is associated with Authentication storms and endpoint retry load; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: A reproducible impairment is separated from a monitoring artifact with corrected alert thresholds or source data. Scenario: A switch telemetry agent stops collecting for ten minutes and graphs display a misleading zero throughput dip.
D:The affected class receives measured queue improvement under load with unrelated classes remaining usable. This result is associated with Packet buffer pressure and head-of-line impact; it does not demonstrate the requested network behavior. The relevant acceptance test is: A reproducible impairment is separated from a monitoring artifact with corrected alert thresholds or source data. Scenario: A switch telemetry agent stops collecting for ten minutes and graphs display a misleading zero throughput dip.
Question 797
A dual-uplink access switch inadvertently connects both fibers to the same distribution chassis. Which switching implementation or corrective action BEST addresses the underlying requirement?
- Build an operational view correlating site reachability, interface error state, routing stability and user impact for prioritized response.
- Validate port maps, patching, labeling and redundant path diversity as part of physical switch commissioning.
- Install supported SFP or QSFP transceivers with matching fiber and validate interface hardware status before making logical protocol changes.
- Validate PoE power supply capacity, cable pairs and endpoint class before activating powered devices or redundant PSU policies.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Validate port maps, patching, labeling and redundant path diversity as part of physical switch commissioning. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. Physical cable mapping is a prerequisite for interpreting adjacency and uplink failover tests correctly. Verify before and after with: Compare live LLDP neighbors, optical transceiver inventory, cable identifiers, rack diagrams and authorized topology. Scenario: A dual-uplink access switch inadvertently connects both fibers to the same distribution chassis.
Incorrect Answers
A:Build an operational view correlating site reachability, interface error state, routing stability and user impact for prioritized response. This action instead applies to Troubleshooting evidence dashboard and incident triage. A good operations dashboard links measurements to service impact; it cannot autonomously declare the root cause proven. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Validate port maps, patching, labeling and redundant path diversity as part of physical switch commissioning. Scenario: A dual-uplink access switch inadvertently connects both fibers to the same distribution chassis.
C:Install supported SFP or QSFP transceivers with matching fiber and validate interface hardware status before making logical protocol changes. This action instead applies to Optic insertion and physical layer preflight. Optical mismatch or contamination should be isolated at Layer 1 before changing VLAN or routing state. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Validate port maps, patching, labeling and redundant path diversity as part of physical switch commissioning. Scenario: A dual-uplink access switch inadvertently connects both fibers to the same distribution chassis.
D:Validate PoE power supply capacity, cable pairs and endpoint class before activating powered devices or redundant PSU policies. This action instead applies to Power and PoE field commissioning. Available Ethernet ports do not imply sufficient PoE watt capacity, and redundant power modules must be matched to the intended load. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Validate port maps, patching, labeling and redundant path diversity as part of physical switch commissioning. Scenario: A dual-uplink access switch inadvertently connects both fibers to the same distribution chassis.
Question 798
Two BGP peers show Established but return traffic follows a stale next-hop route. Which switching implementation or corrective action BEST addresses the underlying requirement?
- Configure BGP neighbor identity, AS relationships, reachability and import/export controls, then validate actual installed routes.
- Roll out switching changes through a representative pilot, dependency validation and site-by-site acceptance instead of an unchecked big-bang change.
- Use separate VRFs for management, corporate, and guest routing where specified, with explicit approved inter-VRF connectivity.
- Assign untagged client access ports and explicitly required tagged VLANs to uplinks using supported AOS-CX VLAN interface modes.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Configure BGP neighbor identity, AS relationships, reachability and import/export controls, then validate actual installed routes. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. An established BGP TCP session alone does not prove all expected routes are usable or filtered correctly. Verify before and after with: Inspect TCP reachability, neighbor remote AS, update source, next hop, accepted/advertised prefixes and policy counters. Scenario: Two BGP peers show Established but return traffic follows a stale next-hop route.
Incorrect Answers
B:Roll out switching changes through a representative pilot, dependency validation and site-by-site acceptance instead of an unchecked big-bang change. This action instead applies to Multisite change phasing and blast radius reduction. Staged delivery contains risk and ensures site-specific exceptions are known before full deployment. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Configure BGP neighbor identity, AS relationships, reachability and import/export controls, then validate actual installed routes. Scenario: Two BGP peers show Established but return traffic follows a stale next-hop route.
C:Use separate VRFs for management, corporate, and guest routing where specified, with explicit approved inter-VRF connectivity. This action instead applies to VRF isolation and controlled route leaking. VRFs separate routing tables, but they do not replace security policy on deliberately interconnected services. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Configure BGP neighbor identity, AS relationships, reachability and import/export controls, then validate actual installed routes. Scenario: Two BGP peers show Established but return traffic follows a stale next-hop route.
D:Assign untagged client access ports and explicitly required tagged VLANs to uplinks using supported AOS-CX VLAN interface modes. This action instead applies to Access VLAN and trunk allowed-list design. Native or untagged VLAN behavior and tagged VLAN allowance must agree across both ends of a trunk. It does not directly resolve the controlling requirement. The targeted response is: Configure BGP neighbor identity, AS relationships, reachability and import/export controls, then validate actual installed routes. Scenario: Two BGP peers show Established but return traffic follows a stale next-hop route.
Question 799
A maintenance script switches a LAG from active negotiation to incompatible static mode. Which evidence should the network engineer inspect FIRST to isolate the problem or verify the prerequisite?
- Inspect LAG IDs, LACP partner, interface speeds, VLAN modes and member operational state before adjustment.
- Inspect serial and MAC claim, subscription, tenant organization, management network DNS/TLS/NTP and switch connectivity to Central.
- Inspect queue backlog, buffer thresholds, drop reasons, burst traffic composition and port egress rates.
- Check port mode, VLAN membership, tagged/untagged lists, allowed trunk VLANs and MAC learning per VLAN.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Inspect LAG IDs, LACP partner, interface speeds, VLAN modes and member operational state before adjustment. These observations distinguish the stated fault or prerequisite from an unrelated feature. A forced standalone port can create loops or inconsistent L2 forwarding when LACP pairing is required. The corresponding action is: Repair LACP member identity or negotiation mismatches on both peers rather than converting a redundant uplink into unmonitored standalone links. Scenario: A maintenance script switches a LAG from active negotiation to incompatible static mode.
Incorrect Answers
B:Inspect serial and MAC claim, subscription, tenant organization, management network DNS/TLS/NTP and switch connectivity to Central. These checks can help with Aruba Central inventory onboarding and assignment, but they are not the most discriminating first evidence here. Examine: Inspect LAG IDs, LACP partner, interface speeds, VLAN modes and member operational state before adjustment. Scenario: A maintenance script switches a LAG from active negotiation to incompatible static mode.
C:Inspect queue backlog, buffer thresholds, drop reasons, burst traffic composition and port egress rates. These checks can help with Packet buffer pressure and head-of-line impact, but they are not the most discriminating first evidence here. Examine: Inspect LAG IDs, LACP partner, interface speeds, VLAN modes and member operational state before adjustment. Scenario: A maintenance script switches a LAG from active negotiation to incompatible static mode.
D:Check port mode, VLAN membership, tagged/untagged lists, allowed trunk VLANs and MAC learning per VLAN. These checks can help with VLAN ID mismatch and trunk omission, but they are not the most discriminating first evidence here. Examine: Inspect LAG IDs, LACP partner, interface speeds, VLAN modes and member operational state before adjustment. Scenario: A maintenance script switches a LAG from active negotiation to incompatible static mode.
Question 800
A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free. Which TWO complementary steps identify the appropriate network response AND the evidence needed to verify it? Select TWO.
- Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters.
- Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior.
- Create LAG groups with matching LACP negotiation, physical rates, VLAN configuration and supported hash behavior.
- New templates apply correctly to pilot devices and promote only after peer, VLAN and role acceptance gates pass.
- Inspect stack topology, member state, link health, firmware compatibility, commander role and split detection.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters. These observations distinguish the stated fault or prerequisite from an unrelated feature. Spanning tree protects a looped L2 domain but root election and region consistency still require deliberate design. The corresponding action is: Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior. This choice supplies the diagnostic or verification half of the pair. Scenario: A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free.
B:Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior. This addresses the controlling network requirement rather than merely changing its symptoms. Spanning tree protects a looped L2 domain but root election and region consistency still require deliberate design. Verify before and after with: Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters. This choice supplies the implementation half of the requested pair. Scenario: A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free.
Incorrect Answers
C:Create LAG groups with matching LACP negotiation, physical rates, VLAN configuration and supported hash behavior. This step pertains to LACP link aggregation member consistency but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior. Together with: Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters. Scenario: A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free.
D:New templates apply correctly to pilot devices and promote only after peer, VLAN and role acceptance gates pass. This step pertains to Config template test and promotion pipeline but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior. Together with: Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters. Scenario: A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free.
E:Inspect stack topology, member state, link health, firmware compatibility, commander role and split detection. This step pertains to VSF stack topology and member replacement but is not one of the two complementary decisions in this case. The required response and evidence are: Configure the appropriate spanning tree mode and root placement for the Layer 2 topology, then verify alternate-port behavior. Together with: Inspect root bridge ID, port roles, path cost, MST region consistency and topology change counters. Scenario: A contractor creates a patch-cord loop and packet flooding rises despite a topology documented as loop-free.