Pass HP HPE7-A01 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

$14.99

HPE7-A01 Premium Bundle

$74.99

$89.98

Premium File 161 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 02, 2026
Study Guide 1264 Pages

$89.98

$74.99

Purchase HP HPE7-A01 Exam Training Products Individually

Premium File 161 Q&A

$76.99$69.99

Study Guide 1264 Pages

$21.99 $19.99

HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 46

Question 450

A campus core redistributes static routes into OSPF but an unintended default route propagates to every branch. Which specific corrective design step best meets the stated campus requirement?

Set intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations.
Correct the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement.
Limit redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them.
Constrain outbound BGP advertisement to approved prefixes and route-map matches for that peer.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Limit redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The proposed configuration targets the stated dependency without broadening unrelated access. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Set intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Correct the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Constrain outbound BGP advertisement to approved prefixes and route-map matches for that peer. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 451

A campus core redistributes static routes into OSPF but an unintended default route propagates to every branch. Following a targeted change, which acceptance test would most directly demonstrate success?

Verify the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure.
Verify only authorized external routes are advertised and preferred next hops remain stable at a remote peer.
Confirm BGP Established state and receipt of the expected authorized prefixes.
Verify permitted routes are advertised while restricted lab or private prefixes disappear from the peer view.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Verify only authorized external routes are advertised and preferred next hops remain stable at a remote peer. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The result tests actual working behavior, not merely a saved configuration. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Verify the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Confirm BGP Established state and receipt of the expected authorized prefixes. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Verify permitted routes are advertised while restricted lab or private prefixes disappear from the peer view. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 452

A campus core redistributes static routes into OSPF but an unintended default route propagates to every branch. The change fails acceptance. What is the safest targeted restoration action?

Withdraw the offending external advertisement and restore the prior filtered redistribution policy.
Restore the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly.
Restore the previous valid ASN and peer address if the revised neighbor relationship cannot establish.
Restore the previously approved outbound policy and withdraw unintended routes to prevent continued leakage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Withdraw the offending external advertisement and restore the prior filtered redistribution policy. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The focused rollback restores a known safe baseline before another change attempt. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Restore the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Restore the previous valid ASN and peer address if the revised neighbor relationship cannot establish. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Restore the previously approved outbound policy and withdraw unintended routes to prevent continued leakage. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 453

Two aggregation sites exchange redistributed OSPF prefixes and a locally originated route returns with a harmful metric. The review requires TWO complementary actions: one diagnostic check and one controlled configuration remedy. Select TWO actions that together meet those requirements.

Review effective OSPF interface costs and the selected path in each relevant routing table.
Review redistribution policy, route tags, imported prefix filters and the resulting external LSA path.
Repair the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement.
Constrain redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them.

Explanation

Correct Answers

Review redistribution policy, route tags, imported prefix filters and the resulting external LSA path. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. This is the required diagnosis or controlled remedy; the other keyed action supplies the complementary role. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Constrain redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. This is the required diagnosis or controlled remedy; the other keyed action supplies the complementary role. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Review effective OSPF interface costs and the selected path in each relevant routing table. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It is not one of the requested paired diagnosis and configuration actions. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Repair the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It is not one of the requested paired diagnosis and configuration actions. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 454

Two aggregation sites exchange redistributed OSPF prefixes and a locally originated route returns with a harmful metric. After the root cause is confirmed, which narrowly scoped configuration action should be selected?

Apply intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations.
Repair the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement.
Constrain redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them.
Constrain outbound BGP advertisement to approved prefixes and route-map matches for that peer for the affected campus deployment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Constrain redistribution to approved prefixes and use loop-prevention tags or filtering where the topology requires them. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The proposed configuration targets the stated dependency without broadening unrelated access. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Apply intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Repair the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Constrain outbound BGP advertisement to approved prefixes and route-map matches for that peer for the affected campus deployment. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 455

Two aggregation sites exchange redistributed OSPF prefixes and a locally originated route returns with a harmful metric. A deployment job reports success. Which observed result would actually validate the affected service?

Confirm the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure.
Confirm only authorized external routes are advertised and preferred next hops remain stable at a remote peer.
Verify BGP Established state and receipt of the expected authorized prefixes.
Confirm permitted routes are advertised while restricted lab or private prefixes disappear from the peer view.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Confirm only authorized external routes are advertised and preferred next hops remain stable at a remote peer. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The result tests actual working behavior, not merely a saved configuration. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Confirm the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Verify BGP Established state and receipt of the expected authorized prefixes. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Confirm permitted routes are advertised while restricted lab or private prefixes disappear from the peer view. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 456

Two aggregation sites exchange redistributed OSPF prefixes and a locally originated route returns with a harmful metric. If the revised setting disrupts users, which controlled rollback would be most relevant?

Withdraw the offending external advertisement and restore the prior filtered redistribution policy for the affected campus deployment.
Reinstate the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly.
Reinstate the previous valid ASN and peer address if the revised neighbor relationship cannot establish.
Reinstate the previously approved outbound policy and withdraw unintended routes to prevent continued leakage.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Withdraw the offending external advertisement and restore the prior filtered redistribution policy for the affected campus deployment. Redistribution moves routes between origins; without scope and loop controls, connectivity can change across many sites at once. The focused rollback restores a known safe baseline before another change attempt. The decision applies to the described ospf route redistribution and loops situation.

Incorrect Answers

Reinstate the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly. This instead concerns ospf path cost preference. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Reinstate the previous valid ASN and peer address if the revised neighbor relationship cannot establish. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Reinstate the previously approved outbound policy and withdraw unintended routes to prevent continued leakage. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf route redistribution and loops.

Question 457

A campus fabric prefers a slow backup OSPF link even though its high-speed primary is healthy. Which investigation would best isolate the immediate network dependency?

Inspect effective OSPF interface costs and the selected path in each relevant routing table.
Inspect BGP peer IP reachability, local and remote AS configuration and session error state.
Inspect advertised-routes output, prefix-list or route-map matches and the exact remote peer policy.
Inspect source and destination SVIs, VRFs, route lookup and the precise ACL rule matching sample traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Inspect effective OSPF interface costs and the selected path in each relevant routing table. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. The evidence check isolates the relevant prerequisite before a disruptive change. The decision applies to the described ospf path cost preference situation.

Incorrect Answers

Inspect BGP peer IP reachability, local and remote AS configuration and session error state. This instead concerns bgp neighbor asn and tcp session. BGP peering requires correctly matched autonomous-system expectations and a reachable session path; routes cannot exchange without a valid peer. It does not isolate the cause of the stated incident. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

Inspect advertised-routes output, prefix-list or route-map matches and the exact remote peer policy. This instead concerns bgp prefix filtering outbound. BGP route advertisements require explicit filtering because a functioning neighbor session does not prove prefix-sharing authorization. It does not isolate the cause of the stated incident. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

Inspect source and destination SVIs, VRFs, route lookup and the precise ACL rule matching sample traffic. This instead concerns inter-vlan routing and acl scope. Inter-VLAN routing depends on both Layer 3 reachability and filtering; a connected gateway cannot override an explicit ACL denial. It does not isolate the cause of the stated incident. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

Question 458

A campus fabric prefers a slow backup OSPF link even though its high-speed primary is healthy. Which specific corrective design step best meets the stated campus requirement?

Correct the configured neighbor AS or intended local routing instance under the approved peering agreement.
Constrain outbound BGP advertisement to approved prefixes and route-map matches for that peer.
Create the narrow approved inter-VLAN permit or deny rule on the appropriate routed interface.
Set intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Set intentional supported OSPF costs consistent with design and bandwidth expectations. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. The proposed configuration targets the stated dependency without broadening unrelated access. The decision applies to the described ospf path cost preference situation.

Incorrect Answers

Create the narrow approved inter-VLAN permit or deny rule on the appropriate routed interface. This instead concerns inter-vlan routing and acl scope. Inter-VLAN routing depends on both Layer 3 reachability and filtering; a connected gateway cannot override an explicit ACL denial. It would not implement the specifically required change. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

Question 459

A campus fabric prefers a slow backup OSPF link even though its high-speed primary is healthy. Following a targeted change, which acceptance test would most directly demonstrate success?

Confirm BGP Established state and receipt of the expected authorized prefixes.
Verify permitted routes are advertised while restricted lab or private prefixes disappear from the peer view.
Verify the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure.
Confirm permitted client traffic succeeds and negative tests to restricted subnets remain blocked.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Verify the primary next hop is selected while the backup becomes active after a controlled primary failure. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. The result tests actual working behavior, not merely a saved configuration. The decision applies to the described ospf path cost preference situation.

Incorrect Answers

Confirm permitted client traffic succeeds and negative tests to restricted subnets remain blocked. This instead concerns inter-vlan routing and acl scope. Inter-VLAN routing depends on both Layer 3 reachability and filtering; a connected gateway cannot override an explicit ACL denial. It would not establish that this function actually works. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

Question 460

A campus fabric prefers a slow backup OSPF link even though its high-speed primary is healthy. The change fails acceptance. What is the safest targeted restoration action?

Restore the previous valid ASN and peer address if the revised neighbor relationship cannot establish.
Restore the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly.
Restore the previously approved outbound policy and withdraw unintended routes to prevent continued leakage.
Reinstate the earlier least-privilege ACL and SVI policy if the adjustment expands access beyond scope.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Restore the prior accepted cost values if the updated metric diverts traffic unexpectedly. OSPF route cost influences path selection among eligible OSPF paths; it must reflect planned traffic engineering rather than simply interface link state. The focused rollback restores a known safe baseline before another change attempt. The decision applies to the described ospf path cost preference situation.

Incorrect Answers

Reinstate the earlier least-privilege ACL and SVI policy if the adjustment expands access beyond scope. This instead concerns inter-vlan routing and acl scope. Inter-VLAN routing depends on both Layer 3 reachability and filtering; a connected gateway cannot override an explicit ACL denial. It would not safely roll back the relevant failed change. The immediate problem concerns ospf path cost preference.

HPE Network Campus Access Professional (HPE7-A01) Practice Tests

HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 44 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 23-Sep-2026)
HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 45 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 22-Sep-2026)
HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 46 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 21-Sep-2026)
HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 47 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 20-Sep-2026)
HP HPE7-A01 Practice Test 48 - 10 Questions (Last Reviewed 19-Sep-2026)