CompTIA SK0-005 Practice Test 73
Question 720
A change board is planning a verified response to this server event: An application VM begins swapping heavily after moving to a hypervisor host oversubscribed on RAM, despite guest free-space metrics looking normal. For the Hypervisor contention causing guest latency issue, which response elements belong in the approved plan? Select TWO answers.
- Use host and guest metrics to identify hypervisor resource contention, then right-size or rebalance allocations.
- The fault disappears under an approved version with no unrelated security controls disabled.
- Inspect cache-protection health and replace or restore supported battery/flash protection before using safe cache policy.
- Compare CPU ready, host memory reclaim, NUMA locality, datastore latency and workload peaks.
- Double the guest vCPU count on the same saturated host without measuring ready time.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:A successful outcome is: Application latency normalizes when host contention is reduced without hiding alerts.
D:These observations investigate the exact Hypervisor contention causing guest latency failure rather than unrelated components. Confirm remediation through: Application latency normalizes when host contention is reduced without hiding alerts.
Incorrect Answers
B:This statement concerns OS patch regression and rollback, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Hypervisor contention causing guest latency fault or prove its repair.
C:That option would inspect cache-protection health and replace or restore supported battery/flash protection before using safe cache policy, but it addresses a different concern. Guest CPU and memory counters alone can mask hypervisor scheduling delay and host swapping.
E:This is the unsafe shortcut in the Hypervisor contention causing guest latency scenario, not a justified remediation or diagnostic. Incident: An application VM begins swapping heavily after moving to a hypervisor host oversubscribed on RAM, despite guest free-space metrics looking normal.
Question 721
A server administrator is investigating a server issue involving incorrect switch vlan trunk allowance: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk. The change must address the documented fault without creating unrelated risk. Which corrective action is most appropriate? Select ONE best answer.
- Test client resolvers and cached records, correct zone or resolver settings and honor TTL behavior.
- Inspect forward/return routing, gateway selection and stateful firewall rules; correct the narrow route or policy.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
- Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Incorrect Answers
A:This statement concerns DNS client-specific failure, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
B:That option would inspect forward/return routing, gateway selection and stateful firewall rules; correct the narrow route or policy, but it addresses a different concern. Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
C:This is the unsafe shortcut in the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance scenario, not a justified remediation or diagnostic. Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Question 722
While reviewing the CompTIA Server+ administration incident, a technician learns: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk. Which principle most directly explains how to address the described issue safely? Select ONE best answer.
- Degraded or unstable storage may be one additional fault from data loss; immediate integrity and rebuild priorities matter.
- Intermittent IP conflicts and unauthorized DHCP options can appear as random server outages while switch ports remain healthy.
- A repeatable incident method isolates causes and prevents uncontrolled fixes from introducing new failures.
- Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Applying it leads to this operational action: Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation. The acceptance test is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Incorrect Answers
A:This statement concerns RAID degraded state and predictive drive failure, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
B:This statement concerns DHCP and IP address conflict isolation, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
C:This statement concerns Structured troubleshooting hypothesis and controlled change, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Question 723
Before a server change is approved, the on-call engineer receives this incident report: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk. Which evidence would most directly establish the stated root-cause hypothesis? Select ONE best answer.
- Capture DHCP offers and ARP announcements, inspect scope exclusions, MAC addresses and gateway options.
- Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink.
- Trace route tables, firewall session logs, interface captures and asymmetric path metrics.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations investigate the exact Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance failure rather than unrelated components. Incident: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk.
Incorrect Answers
A:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink.
C:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
D:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. This is the unsafe shortcut in the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance scenario, not a justified remediation or diagnostic.
Question 724
After the team implements a targeted remediation for Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance, the original incident was: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk. Which acceptance criterion would best demonstrate a durable and safe resolution? Select ONE best answer.
- Service is restored within response targets, temporary risk is removed and a reproducible fix is documented.
- The observed fault is reproduced, a single corrective change resolves it and the rollback and final state are documented.
- Affected clients resolve the correct application endpoint and connect consistently.
- Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Incorrect Answers
A:This statement concerns Escalation, rollback and post-incident closure, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
B:This statement concerns Structured troubleshooting hypothesis and controlled change, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair.
C:This statement concerns DNS client-specific failure, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair.
Question 725
A change board is planning a verified response to this server event: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk. For the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance issue, which response elements belong in the approved plan? Select ONE best answer.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
- Trace conflicting ARP/DHCP responses, eliminate overlapping assignments or rogue offers and correct lease options.
- Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation. Then validate the change by confirming: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
- Review EDR process trees, scheduled tasks, outbound connections, privileged logins and related host indicators.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. The proposed change and outcome assessment work together for Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance.
Incorrect Answers
A:This is the unsafe shortcut in the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance scenario, not a justified remediation or diagnostic. Incident: A newly deployed server cannot reach its database only when traffic crosses a specific tagged VLAN omitted from an uplink trunk.
B:That option would trace conflicting ARP/DHCP responses, eliminate overlapping assignments or rogue offers and correct lease options, but it addresses a different concern. Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
D:That option would review EDR process trees, scheduled tasks, outbound connections, privileged logins and related host indicators, but it addresses a different concern. Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Question 726
A server administrator is investigating a server issue involving incorrect switch vlan trunk allowance: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs. The change must address the documented fault without creating unrelated risk. Which corrective action is most appropriate? Select ONE best answer.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
- Compare changed package and driver versions, confirm a supported regression and execute an approved rollback or fixed update.
- Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation.
- Collect time-synchronized logs, hardware alerts and relevant volatile evidence according to incident procedures before destructive action.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
Incorrect Answers
A:This is the unsafe shortcut in the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance scenario, not a justified remediation or diagnostic. Incident: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs.
B:That option would compare changed package and driver versions, confirm a supported regression and execute an approved rollback or fixed update, but it addresses a different concern. Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
D:This statement concerns Log correlation and evidence preservation, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Question 727
While reviewing the CompTIA Server+ administration incident, a technician learns: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs. Which principle most directly explains how to address the described issue safely? Select ONE best answer.
- A close timeline between change and failure is a hypothesis to test, not automatic proof of cause.
- Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
- Evidence quality depends on provenance, timing and preservation, not only the volume of screenshots taken after recovery.
- Multipath configuration must be tested across real fabric failures and correct asymmetric access states.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Applying it leads to this operational action: Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation.
Incorrect Answers
A:This statement concerns OS patch regression and rollback, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
C:This statement concerns Log correlation and evidence preservation, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair.
D:This statement concerns SAN fabric multipath failover and latency, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Question 728
Before a server change is approved, the on-call engineer receives this incident report: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs. Which evidence would most directly establish the stated root-cause hypothesis? Select ONE best answer.
- Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
- Capture MPIO path health, initiator sessions, SAN switch errors and storage-array controller port statistics.
- Compare dig/nslookup answers per resolver, cache state, DNS suffix, zone authority and TTLs.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations investigate the exact Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance failure rather than unrelated components. Incident: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs.
Incorrect Answers
B:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
C:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
D:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. This statement concerns DNS client-specific failure, a different Server+ technical control.
Question 729
After the team implements a targeted remediation for Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance, the original incident was: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs. Which acceptance criterion would best demonstrate a durable and safe resolution? Select ONE best answer.
- Application latency normalizes when host contention is reduced without hiding alerts.
- The fault disappears under an approved version with no unrelated security controls disabled.
- Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
- Connections complete through approved paths in both directions without broad firewall bypasses.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. The remediation is: Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation.
Incorrect Answers
A:This statement concerns Hypervisor contention causing guest latency, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
B:This statement concerns OS patch regression and rollback, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair.
D:This statement concerns Routing and stateful firewall asymmetry, a different Server+ technical control. It does not directly address the reported Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance fault or prove its repair. For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A targeted investigation checks: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink. The desired recovery condition is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Question 730
A change board is planning a verified response to this server event: A hypervisor moves a VM to another switch and loses one tenant network because the destination trunk allows fewer VLANs. For the Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance issue, which response elements belong in the approved plan? Select TWO answers.
- Validate zoning, masking, path policies and fabric independence; restore optimized healthy multipath.
- Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink.
- Connections complete through approved paths in both directions without broad firewall bypasses.
- Convert every trunk to allow all VLANs to avoid diagnosing the missing tenant tag.
- Correct access/trunk VLAN membership and allowed VLAN lists while preserving intended segmentation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:These observations investigate the exact Incorrect switch VLAN trunk allowance failure rather than unrelated components. The expected technical relationship is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path.
E:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. A successful outcome is: Only intended VLANs traverse the trunk and test VMs reach their approved peers.
Incorrect Answers
A:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. This statement concerns SAN fabric multipath failover and latency, a different Server+ technical control.
C:For this incident, the relevant principle is: Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. This statement concerns Routing and stateful firewall asymmetry, a different Server+ technical control.
D:Tagged VLAN traffic must be permitted end-to-end; routing changes do not repair a missing layer-two VLAN path. Discriminate using: Inspect switchport mode, native VLAN, allowed VLAN set, MAC learning and packet tags on the affected uplink.