Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 44
Question 430
A visitor portal is reachable by direct browsing but the network device does not intercept unauthenticated traffic. The observed failure is: A configured ISE portal alone cannot redirect endpoints when the NAD lacks a matching redirect policy. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- The supported recovery is to repair authorization redirect and ACL and verify portal loading and postlogin reauthorization.
- The supported recovery is to use a wallpaper URL instead of the supported RADIUS redirect attribute.
- The supported recovery is to assume a guest portal automatically changes every switch port without RADIUS attributes.
- The supported recovery is to block all DNS and portal HTTPS traffic in the redirect ACL.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Central web authentication depends on a NAD redirect and ISE portal after initial permitted traffic. Recheck access-Accept redirect attributes, preauth ACL, DNS and HTTP reachability, and portal session.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use a wallpaper URL instead of the supported RADIUS redirect attribute. This action does not repair the identified failure. A configured ISE portal alone cannot redirect endpoints when the NAD lacks a matching redirect policy. Instead, repair authorization redirect and ACL and verify portal loading and postlogin reauthorization. For the specific situation, a visitor portal is reachable by direct browsing but the network device does not intercept unauthenticated traffic.
C:Assume a guest portal automatically changes every switch port without RADIUS attributes. This action does not repair the identified failure. A configured ISE portal alone cannot redirect endpoints when the NAD lacks a matching redirect policy. Instead, repair authorization redirect and ACL and verify portal loading and postlogin reauthorization. For the specific situation, a visitor portal is reachable by direct browsing but the network device does not intercept unauthenticated traffic.
D:Block all DNS and portal HTTPS traffic in the redirect ACL. This action does not repair the identified failure. A configured ISE portal alone cannot redirect endpoints when the NAD lacks a matching redirect policy. Instead, repair authorization redirect and ACL and verify portal loading and postlogin reauthorization. For the specific situation, a visitor portal is reachable by direct browsing but the network device does not intercept unauthenticated traffic.
Question 431
A wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow. What action addresses this authenticated network-access scenario?
- Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal.
- Choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling.
- Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority.
- Use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Verify the effect through wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. This is the targeted action for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary.
Incorrect Answers
A:Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. This does not implement the required control for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary.
C:Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. The relevant evidence is wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
D:Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead the intended policy action is choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling.
Question 432
A wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow. What verification should the engineer use before declaring success?
- WLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session.
- A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations directly establish the result of Local versus central web-auth decision boundary for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Incorrect Answers
B:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
C:A browser theme label without a current authorization trace. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
D:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Question 433
A wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow. Which underlying service behavior supports the proposed solution?
- All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling. This is the governing technical behavior for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary.
Incorrect Answers
A:All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
B:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
C:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Question 434
A wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal. Why does that proposed shortcut not satisfy the requirement?
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login.
- A justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. The relevant risk is that mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Question 435
A wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow. The observed failure is: Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- Align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model.
- Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority.
- Use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration.
- Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Recheck wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. This restores the intended operational behavior for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary.
Incorrect Answers
B:Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
C:Use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
D:Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a wireless controller's built-in guest login is confused with an ISE-hosted central guest workflow.
Question 436
A network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- In this case, choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling.
- In this case, enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority.
- In this case, use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration.
- In this case, assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Incorrect Answers
B:Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. The relevant evidence is wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
C:Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
D:Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Use the supported approach: choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling.
Question 437
A network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- The supporting evidence is wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session.
- The supporting evidence is a device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations directly establish the result of Local versus central web-auth decision boundary for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Incorrect Answers
B:A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
C:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
D:A browser theme label without a current authorization trace. This observation cannot verify Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Check wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. Local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Question 438
A network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- The governing principle is that local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components.
- The governing principle is that all Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- The governing principle is that a policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The supported implementation is to choose local web authentication or ISE central web authentication deliberately and configure compatible NAD redirect handling. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
C:All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
D:A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state. This generalization is not valid for Local versus central web-auth decision boundary. Instead local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. Verify the actual state using wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Question 439
A network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- The material consequence is that a justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
- The material consequence is that mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login.
- The material consequence is that a correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because local and central web-auth designs place the captive authentication service in different components. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Local versus central web-auth decision boundary problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
Question 440
A network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy. The observed failure is: Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model.
- The supported recovery is to use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration.
- The supported recovery is to assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal.
- The supported recovery is to enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Recheck wLC portal hosting mode, chosen redirect URL, RADIUS attributes, logon result and policy session. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
Incorrect Answers
B:Use guest email delivery settings to replace WLC web-auth configuration. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
C:Assume every controller automatically treats a local web portal as an ISE central portal. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.
D:Enable both conflicting redirects without testing priority. This action does not repair the identified failure. Mixing local form handling and external redirect policy can prevent visitors from completing the login. Instead, align controller captive portal settings and ISE policy with one supported authentication model. For the specific situation, a network upgrade moves captive authentication from controller-local forms to an ISE portal without updating policy.