Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 40
Question 390
An administrator adds a test authorization policy at the top and unexpectedly grants access to every device. The observed failure is: A catch-all allow above a deny can bypass the intended segmentation. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- The supported recovery is to change only an authentication report title to repair shadowed policy.
- The supported recovery is to treat policy condition order as purely cosmetic because all matching results are merged.
- The supported recovery is to reorder conditions and retest positive and negative identity-device cases.
- The supported recovery is to put a permit-any authorization profile above all restricted rules.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:ISE policy evaluation follows configured rule selection and earlier broad conditions may shadow narrower intended rules. Recheck ordered policy sets, first matched rule, condition attributes, authorization profile and packet outcome.
Incorrect Answers
A:Change only an authentication report title to repair shadowed policy. This action does not repair the identified failure. A catch-all allow above a deny can bypass the intended segmentation. Instead, reorder conditions and retest positive and negative identity-device cases. For the specific situation, an administrator adds a test authorization policy at the top and unexpectedly grants access to every device.
B:Treat policy condition order as purely cosmetic because all matching results are merged. This action does not repair the identified failure. A catch-all allow above a deny can bypass the intended segmentation. Instead, reorder conditions and retest positive and negative identity-device cases. For the specific situation, an administrator adds a test authorization policy at the top and unexpectedly grants access to every device.
D:Put a permit-any authorization profile above all restricted rules. This action does not repair the identified failure. A catch-all allow above a deny can bypass the intended segmentation. Instead, reorder conditions and retest positive and negative identity-device cases. For the specific situation, an administrator adds a test authorization policy at the top and unexpectedly grants access to every device.
Question 391
A workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions. What action addresses this authenticated network-access scenario?
- Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules.
- Choose supported authorization result attributes for dACL enforcement or dynamic VLAN based on required isolation.
- Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced.
- Authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Verify the effect through iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. This does not implement the required control for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results.
C:Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. The relevant evidence is iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
D:A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Question 392
A workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions. What verification should the engineer use before declaring success?
- A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
- ISE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
B:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
C:A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Question 393
A workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions. Which underlying service behavior supports the proposed solution?
- A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support.
- Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to choose supported authorization result attributes for dACL enforcement or dynamic VLAN based on required isolation. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
B:A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
D:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Question 394
A workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules. Why does that proposed shortcut not satisfy the requirement?
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- Accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The shortcut is unsuitable because a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. The relevant risk is that a valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test.
Question 395
A workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions. The observed failure is: A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced.
- Authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential.
- Repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation.
- Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Recheck iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Incorrect Answers
A:Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
B:Authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
D:Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a workstation should remain on its usual VLAN but have application-specific RADIUS restrictions.
Question 396
A wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- In this case, return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced.
- In this case, authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential.
- In this case, assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules.
- In this case, choose supported authorization result attributes for dACL enforcement or dynamic VLAN based on required isolation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Verify the effect through iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Incorrect Answers
A:Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. The relevant evidence is iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
B:A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
C:A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Use the supported approach: choose supported authorization result attributes for dACL enforcement or dynamic VLAN based on required isolation.
Question 397
A wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- The supporting evidence is a successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is an old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence.
- The supporting evidence is iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:These observations directly establish the result of Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Incorrect Answers
A:A successful ICMP echo that does not test the required identity-service workflow. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
B:A switch interface description without any live AAA request or response. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
C:An old diagram with no RADIUS, TACACS+ or endpoint-session evidence. This observation cannot verify Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Check iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. A downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Question 398
A wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that a captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling.
- The governing principle is that a MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership.
- The governing principle is that a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to choose supported authorization result attributes for dACL enforcement or dynamic VLAN based on required isolation. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Incorrect Answers
A:Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
B:A captive portal page automatically changes network authorization on every active NAD session without signaling. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
C:A MAC address is a cryptographic proof of endpoint device ownership. This generalization is not valid for Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results. Instead a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. Verify the actual state using iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Question 399
A wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- The material consequence is that accurate device accounting automatically created every earlier failed EAP exchange.
- The material consequence is that a valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied.
- The material consequence is that inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The shortcut is unsuitable because a downloadable ACL and a VLAN are different enforcement mechanisms with distinct NAD support. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. Inspecting a correct endpoint certificate generated the original directory outage.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the Downloadable ACL versus VLAN assignment policy results problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
Question 400
A wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured. The observed failure is: A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential.
- The supported recovery is to repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation.
- The supported recovery is to assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules.
- The supported recovery is to return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Recheck iSE authorization profile, returned RADIUS attributes, switch downloaded ACL, assigned VLAN and traffic test. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
Incorrect Answers
A:Authorize any network destination because RADIUS accepted the credential. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
C:Assume a VLAN name is a replacement for all traffic filter rules. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
D:Return an unsupported dACL format and treat it as enforced. This action does not repair the identified failure. A valid ISE Access-Accept does not guarantee the selected authorization control was applied. Instead, repair attributes and NAD compatibility then test effective segmentation. For the specific situation, a wireless user requires a different network segment yet an ACL-only profile was configured.
