Cisco 300-715 Practice Test 12
Question 110
An automated site rollout creates duplicate node identities and breaks administrative registration. The observed failure is: Duplicate bootstrap identity can break certificate trust and deployment registration. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- The supported recovery is to assume a DHCP lease alone guarantees correct ISE enrollment.
- The supported recovery is to give every new PSN the same FQDN to simplify templates.
- The supported recovery is to correct the bootstrap manifest and re-enroll a supported uniquely identified node.
- The supported recovery is to bypass certificate-name checks on the entire management plane.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Automated initial provisioning must still establish distinct, trusted node identities. Recheck provisioning template, node identity, CA certificate, DNS result and completed deployment membership.
Incorrect Answers
A:Assume a DHCP lease alone guarantees correct ISE enrollment. This action does not repair the identified failure. Duplicate bootstrap identity can break certificate trust and deployment registration. Instead, correct the bootstrap manifest and re-enroll a supported uniquely identified node. For the specific situation, an automated site rollout creates duplicate node identities and breaks administrative registration.
B:Give every new PSN the same FQDN to simplify templates. This action does not repair the identified failure. Duplicate bootstrap identity can break certificate trust and deployment registration. Instead, correct the bootstrap manifest and re-enroll a supported uniquely identified node. For the specific situation, an automated site rollout creates duplicate node identities and breaks administrative registration.
D:Bypass certificate-name checks on the entire management plane. This action does not repair the identified failure. Duplicate bootstrap identity can break certificate trust and deployment registration. Instead, correct the bootstrap manifest and re-enroll a supported uniquely identified node. For the specific situation, an automated site rollout creates duplicate node identities and breaks administrative registration.
Question 111
An organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss. What action addresses this authenticated network-access scenario?
- Schedule and test supported ISE configuration and operational backups with encrypted storage and documented restore procedures.
- Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy.
- Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal.
- Delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Verify the effect through backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Incorrect Answers
B:Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. This does not implement the required control for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries.
C:Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. The relevant evidence is backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
D:Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Question 112
An organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss. What verification should the engineer use before declaring success?
- Backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist.
- A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
- A browser theme label without a current authorization trace.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations directly establish the result of ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Incorrect Answers
B:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups.
C:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
D:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. Check backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist.
Question 113
An organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss. Which underlying service behavior supports the proposed solution?
- A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- All Cisco ISE administration and policy personas perform exactly the same service.
- Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups.
- A policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The supported implementation is to schedule and test supported ISE configuration and operational backups with encrypted storage and documented restore procedures. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. Instead redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups.
B:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
D:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. Verify the actual state using backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist.
Question 114
An organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy. Why does that proposed shortcut not satisfy the requirement?
- A justified least-privilege ACL caused every unrelated network authentication fault.
- A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
- Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists.
- Reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The shortcut is unsuitable because redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Incorrect Answers
A:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. The relevant risk is that replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists.
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. Check backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist.
Question 115
An organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss. The observed failure is: Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. What recovery action restores supported network-access behavior?
- Restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements.
- Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal.
- Delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed.
- Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Incorrect Answers
B:Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
C:Delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
D:Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, an organization backs up only monitoring logs and assumes it can reconstruct all ISE policies after PAN loss.
Question 116
A multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups. What is the BEST supported ISE implementation or corrective action?
- In this case, store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal.
- In this case, delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed.
- In this case, schedule and test supported ISE configuration and operational backups with encrypted storage and documented restore procedures.
- In this case, assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Verify the effect through backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
Incorrect Answers
A:Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal. This alternative overlooks a required prerequisite or targets the wrong function. Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. The relevant evidence is backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
B:Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
D:Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Use the supported approach: schedule and test supported ISE configuration and operational backups with encrypted storage and documented restore procedures.
Question 117
A multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups. Which evidence BEST verifies the intended operational outcome?
- The supporting evidence is backup type, encryption secret escrow, restoration test, policy version and disaster-recovery checklist.
- The supporting evidence is a switch interface description without any live AAA request or response.
- The supporting evidence is a device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
- The supporting evidence is a current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:These observations directly establish the result of ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries for the described endpoint or network device. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
Incorrect Answers
B:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
C:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. A device hostname alone without the policy result or authenticated source.
D:This observation cannot verify ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. A current login screenshot from a completely unrelated ISE deployment.
Question 118
A multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups. Which technical principle BEST explains the required decision?
- The governing principle is that a policy display name alone is the complete source of enforcement state.
- The governing principle is that a successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
- The governing principle is that every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
- The governing principle is that redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The supported implementation is to schedule and test supported ISE configuration and operational backups with encrypted storage and documented restore procedures. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
Incorrect Answers
A:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
B:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. A successful switch port link signal always proves the device identity and policy were verified.
C:This generalization is not valid for ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries. Every RADIUS Access-Accept grants unrestricted access to all applications.
Question 119
A multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups. An operator proposes the following incorrect shortcut: Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy. What material risk or failure follows from that shortcut?
- The material consequence is that replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists.
- The material consequence is that reading the authentication event report caused the original network access outage.
- The material consequence is that the only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
- The material consequence is that a correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The shortcut is unsuitable because redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
Incorrect Answers
B:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
C:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. The only result is an unrelated portal background color change.
D:This unrelated assertion does not explain the ISE persona backup and disaster-recovery boundaries problem. A correctly recorded TACACS command audit caused the preceding security violation.
Question 120
A multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups. The observed failure is: Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Which controlled recovery BEST restores the intended state?
- The supported recovery is to delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed.
- The supported recovery is to restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements.
- The supported recovery is to assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy.
- The supported recovery is to store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Redundant ISE nodes help availability but do not replace recoverable configuration and data backups. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
Incorrect Answers
A:Delete all configuration archives once a second PSN is installed. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
C:Assume a standby PAN is an immutable historical backup of every policy. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.
D:Store backup encryption keys openly in a guest portal. This action does not repair the identified failure. Replicated mistakes or deleted policies can persist on all nodes when no independent backup exists. Instead, restore from an approved point after validating backup integrity and the target version requirements. For the specific situation, a multi-node ISE site needs documented configuration recovery that does not confuse node redundancy with full backups.