PMI PMP Practice Test 10
Question 90
The next review of building automation setpoints and occupancy sensors in smart building energy control upgrade is due at energy-control commissioning. A supplier failure scenario affecting building automation setpoints and occupancy sensors has already been identified and assessed, but nobody has a monitoring duty or a trigger for an authorized response. No threshold breach currently requires the board. Which management action should be taken FIRST?
- Facilitate identification of risk events and assumptions with impacted stakeholders
- Assign an accountable risk owner, early indicators and clear escalation triggers
- Evaluate probability, impact, urgency and uncertainty using agreed criteria
- Report exposure, uncertainty, options and the required decision to authorized governance
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:A known threat needs a responsible watcher and observable trigger so the team can act before a breach. Ownership and triggers convert a vague concern into an actionable risk. The team therefore has the decision evidence it needs for energy-control commissioning.
Incorrect Answers
A:Unidentified exposure cannot be prioritized or assigned. That action would address a different decision: identify credible context-specific events and assumptions with affected owners before scoring or assigning them. In this case, a known threat needs a responsible watcher and observable trigger so the team can act before a breach.
C:Meaningful prioritization requires comparable risk assessment. That action would address a different decision: comparable probability, impact, urgency and tolerance criteria distinguish safety-level threats from minor interruptions. In this case, a known threat needs a responsible watcher and observable trigger so the team can act before a breach.
D:Effective risk communication supports accountable choices. That action would address a different decision: a decision-ready exposure summary shows uncertainty, alternatives and which approval exceeds team delegation. In this case, a known threat needs a responsible watcher and observable trigger so the team can act before a breach.
Question 91
A city air-quality dashboard holds a scheduled prototype review with neighborhood groups every two weeks. Residents submit detailed complaints about missing asthma-alert accessibility at each session, but the team publishes only attendance figures and never responds to the concerns or records decisions. The register and meeting schedule are already accurate. What should the project manager improve immediately?
- Increase the number of public email announcements without addressing the previously recorded prototype concerns
- Institute a tracked two-way review: assign owners to each accessibility concern, communicate the disposition and verify changes with residents at the next session
- Remove neighborhoods with recurring criticism from the engagement plan to protect the launch schedule
- Reclassify the regulator's influence even though neither approval authority nor permit lead time is disputed
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The engagement failure is lack of response and decision traceability, not missing meetings; owned actions and confirmed closure restore trust and usable evidence.
Incorrect Answers
A:More broadcasting does not provide feedback closure or change product behavior.
C:Excluding affected residents would hide legitimate requirements and undermine the dashboard's public purpose.
D:Regulatory influence assessment is a different engagement decision and does not resolve the unaddressed prototype submissions.
Question 92
For national digital heritage exhibition, curators and public visitors depend on digitized heritage exhibits and rights clearances passing digital exhibition publication approval. Observed users of digitized heritage exhibits and rights clearances are not achieving the agreed business benefit even though the features have shipped. Benefits definitions and the operating owner exist; the next sponsored funding decision must reassess value rather than merely count delivery. Which action is the most defensible immediate response?
- Recheck benefits and adjust priorities with the sponsor before investing further
- Agree a baseline, observable benefit metric and accountable benefit owner
- Reprioritize against benefit, risk, dependencies and stakeholder feedback
- Compare expected value, risk and feedback timing before selecting an option
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Value monitoring can justify stopping or redirecting low-return work. The sponsor should compare actual operating benefit with the investment case before funding more of the same output. The digital exhibition publication approval decision then rests on evidence rather than an unsupported assumption.
Incorrect Answers
B:Benefits cannot be demonstrated without agreed measurement and ownership. The stated facts require another prerequisite first: the sponsor should compare actual operating benefit with the investment case before funding more of the same output.
C:Value-based ordering prevents loudest-voice prioritization. The stated facts require another prerequisite first: the sponsor should compare actual operating benefit with the investment case before funding more of the same output.
D:Delivery method is a means to benefits, not an end in itself. The stated facts require another prerequisite first: the sponsor should compare actual operating benefit with the investment case before funding more of the same output.
Question 93
A flood-alert sensor project considers allowing an external weather-data partner to process identifiable emergency-contact records. The partner offers no security-assurance report and requests unrestricted retention. Design approval is pending, and the public authority retains accountability for those records. What should the project manager do before approving the data flow?
- Send the complete contact dataset so the partner can determine whether safeguards are needed
- Assume contractual outsourcing transfers public-data compliance responsibility to the partner
- Assess privacy and security obligations, the partner's controls and residual exposure with qualified owners, then govern the access decision before processing
- Record the exposure only as a postlaunch lesson because the partner promises faster flood forecasts
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:A governed risk assessment and verified safeguards are prerequisites to authorization of a new sensitive processing path.
Incorrect Answers
A:Disclosure before assurance would create exactly the sensitive-data exposure needing evaluation.
B:The data controller retains its obligations even when processing is delegated to an external supplier.
D:Forecast speed is not evidence of lawful or secure handling of emergency-contact information.
Question 94
An industrial spare-parts planning platform has three quality gaps. Serial-number mapping errors spread from warehouse scanning to maintenance orders because interface checks occur only after the whole inventory integration is assembled. A new regulated cleaning solvent is specified for refurbishing returned bearings, but the test plan has no storage or worker-exposure criteria. Finally, duplicate spare-part reservations have recurred in three iterations after local code patches; the shared retry mechanism is suspected but unexamined. Select exactly THREE actions, one for each gap.
Select exactly THREE answers.
- Add serial mapping and order-interface validation during each warehouse-scanner and maintenance integration stage
- Inspect only the final spare-parts dashboard after all warehouses are connected, without testing intermediate transformations
- Treat a green maintenance-order service status as proof that serialized stock moves cannot be duplicated
- Add the cleaning solvent's applicable handling and exposure controls, with verifiable tests, to refurbishment acceptance
- Investigate the shared reservation retry path, correct its cause and prove the duplicate allocation no longer recurs
- Replace objective solvent and serialized-inventory acceptance criteria with the equipment supplier's general quality statement
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:Early mapping checks find wrong serial-to-order associations before they propagate across warehouse and maintenance systems.
D:Known chemical handling obligations must be designed into measurable exposure, storage and acceptance requirements before use.
E:Repeated local fixes show that the underlying reservation path is likely still flawed; a tested system correction addresses recurrence.
Incorrect Answers
B:Final-only inspection preserves the late-detection failure described in the first finding and multiplies reconciliation effort.
C:Service availability does not establish that parts were accurately reserved or that retry events did not create duplicate commitments.
F:Generic supplier claims do not establish chemical compliance or prove correctness of serialized spare-part movements.
Question 95
An irrigation-software team gives its cooperative board a weekly list of completed backlog items. However, the upcoming funding decision depends on whether soil-moisture coverage is reducing water losses and whether an unmitigated telemetry outage could prevent the next seasonal launch. The board already receives the reports on time and its stakeholder roles are agreed. What should the project manager change in the next board report?
- Rework stakeholder identification even though the board’s authority and information recipients are already established
- Move the same list of completed tickets to a more searchable folder without connecting it to the funding decision
- Present verified water-loss benefit trends, the telemetry exposure, recovery options, accountable owners and the specific funding decision required
- Ask each developer to describe daily impediments live while leaving the seasonal risk and value trade-off unquantified
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Exception-based reporting should link measured outcomes and material risk to alternatives, decision rights and a clear requested commitment.
Incorrect Answers
A:The right decision audience is already known; repeating stakeholder mapping will not supply the missing risk-value evidence.
B:Improving artifact location can help access but still gives directors an activity list rather than an actionable investment case.
D:Daily transparency suits a delivery team, but executive funding governance needs consolidated options and exposure rather than a stand-up transcript.
Question 96
The city school-transport team has two approved route-safety deliverables: school-zone bus stops and student pickup exception tests. Both workstreams have allocated the same accredited safety assessor for four days during one week, but that assessor has only three available days and neither team has estimated its actual inspection effort. The sponsor wants an integrated milestone commitment today. What should the project manager establish FIRST?
- Add material sustainability and compliance requirements to delivery-planning decisions
- Create an execution strategy that links increments, validation gates and operational transition
- Integrate workstream plans, dependencies and accountable handoff dates in a coherent baseline
- Estimate integrated effort and capacity with owners before committing dates
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Until the combined specialist effort and actual available test capacity are reconciled, an integrated schedule could promise more resource time than exists. Joint estimates with the workstream owners must precede an authorized date commitment.
Incorrect Answers
A:Nonfunctional impact is a critical information need, not a late decoration. That action would address a different decision: energy and lifecycle impacts must be evaluated as explicit delivery requirements before the design is locked. In this case, the overcommitted specialist and shared test resource must be estimated realistically across teams before dates are promised.
B:A deployment strategy cannot guarantee time for a tester and simulator that are simultaneously booked by two teams. Estimate shared demand and availability first.
C:Integrated dates or changes can be authorized after resource-hour demand and the single shared test resource have been sized. The immediate gap is missing feasible capacity estimates, not the format of the plan.
Question 97
A public pension portal will begin accepting digital appeals next month. One contractor knows why legacy survivor-benefit cases use a different eligibility date calculation; operations has no designated successor, and the contractor leaves at conversion. Which knowledge-transfer decision should be made FIRST?
- Purchase a general documentation suite and assume it will automatically capture the contractor's pension rule exceptions
- Classify the eligibility-date rule as transition-critical, assign a pension operations recipient and define a verifiable handover outcome before planning demonstrations
- Declare transition ready because a general training session appears on the project calendar
- Transfer unresolved survivor-benefit cases to a generic help desk after contract expiration without a case-specific handover
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The undocumented rule affects benefit rights and is held by one person. Risk-based criticality, ownership and an observable transfer criterion must be established before the expert departs.
Incorrect Answers
A:A tool does not identify the protected calculation or ensure a receiving person can apply it accurately.
C:Scheduled attendance does not establish who owns the rare-case logic or whether it can be executed correctly.
D:This knowingly exports a critical entitlement-calculation dependency to staff lacking the necessary knowledge.
Question 98
An election-services accessibility program forecasts accessibility-device retrofits 18% above the board's delegated cost-tolerance threshold. An alternative retrofit sequence may save money but could miss statutory early-voting testing. The project manager cannot approve either an overrun or a date change. What should happen next?
- Reschedule supplier payments to hide the forecast increase from this month's spending report
- Report spend as a percentage of task count without analyzing retrofit causes or access-date consequences
- Book an arbitrary contingency uplift as a routine expense without authorized tolerance review
- Analyze the cost drivers and options with access-date effects, then present an accountable decision request to the board with proper authority
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:The forecast breaches delegated financial limits, so the sponsor/board must choose between documented recovery options and authorized commitments.
Incorrect Answers
A:Payment timing does not remove projected out-of-tolerance scope cost.
B:Activity percentages do not tell the board how to protect mandated accessible testing against the forecast overrun.
C:Contingency use requires evidence and approval, not a way to conceal financial tolerance exceedance.
Question 99
A telecom tower maintenance upgrade faces a credible weather-window risk: helicopter access may be cancelled in winter, but a second access route would cost more than the threatened component installation. The risk owner needs a response that reflects tolerance, budget and safety rather than assuming all threats can be eliminated. What should the project manager recommend?
- Give every winter weather threat the same high heat-map label and treat it as an emergency issue today
- Leave the weather exposure off the register because the helicopter cancellation has not occurred
- Compare mitigation, transfer, acceptance with contingency and avoidance against the access-loss impact, safety tolerance and response cost
- Assume all residual risks disappear if the helicopter contractor accepts responsibility for flight scheduling
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:The response should balance exposure, safety constraint, feasibility and the high price of an alternate route; unconditional avoidance may destroy more value than it protects.
Incorrect Answers
A:Identical labels do not compare response economics, and the access cancellation remains a future uncertain event.
B:Risk recognition and planning are needed before a weather window is lost.
D:Contracting for flights does not transfer all project schedule or tower-maintenance safety consequences to the provider.
Question 100
A hospital laboratory interface has passed signed customer acceptance, and operations has completed an observed go-live handover. At contractual closeout, procurement discovers a disputed integration invoice and an unrecorded warranty retention amount. Both parties agree that the clinical system is accepted but disagree on the financial terms. What should the project manager ensure BEFORE declaring procurement closeout complete?
- Archive lessons and release the contract manager without resolving the disputed payment and retention conditions
- Repeat user acceptance testing even though authorized clinical acceptance has already been signed
- Rerun the operations handover drill instead of addressing the outstanding contractual obligations
- Coordinate documented invoice reconciliation, warranty-retention confirmation and authorized settlement under contract and financial governance
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:Procurement closeout requires agreed evidence of financial settlement, claims disposition and preserved warranty obligations with appropriate approval.
Incorrect Answers
A:Knowledge capture and resource release belong in closure, but cannot extinguish unsettled supplier claims or retention rights.
B:The question explicitly states that clinical acceptance is complete. Additional acceptance testing does not settle the commercial claim.
C:Operational readiness has been evidenced and is not the current dependency preventing procurement completion.