NVIDIA NCP-AII Practice Test 111
Question 1100
During an NVIDIA AI factory acceptance test, engineers discover: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path. Which THREE elements together establish the appropriate corrective action, independent test evidence and verified successful outcome? Select THREE answers.
- The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service.
- Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring.
- Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity.
- Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component.
- Inspect nvidia-smi ECC history, DCGM alerts, remapped rows, Xid logs and stress test results.
- Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs.
Explanation
Correct Answers
A:This is an observable verified result, not merely a claimed configuration change: The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path.
B:This is an appropriate correction for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path. The governing mechanism is: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
F:This is the direct operational evidence to investigate: Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path. The governing mechanism is: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
Incorrect Answers
C:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path. The governing mechanism is: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand. The proportionate action is: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring. A direct check is: Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs. The acceptance condition is: The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service.
D:This alternative is relevant to Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path.
E:This alternative is relevant to GPU ECC and memory reliability diagnosis but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Inspect nvidia-smi ECC history, DCGM alerts, remapped rows, Xid logs and stress test results. Observed scenario: A failed hot-swap PSU is replaced without checking approved part number and power-cord path.
Question 1101
A production GPU cluster review identifies this condition: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. Which operational response is MOST appropriate to address the root issue? Select ONE best answer.
- Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring.
- Quarantine and diagnose affected GPUs using ECC, row-remap and diagnostic evidence before authorized repair or return.
- Drain workloads and follow the vendor's approved component replacement, firmware and postrepair diagnostic runbook.
- Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This is an appropriate correction for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Incorrect Answers
B:This alternative is relevant to GPU ECC and memory reliability diagnosis but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Quarantine and diagnose affected GPUs using ECC, row-remap and diagnostic evidence before authorized repair or return. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
C:This alternative is relevant to GPU and NVSwitch field replaceable component workflow but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Drain workloads and follow the vendor's approved component replacement, firmware and postrepair diagnostic runbook. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
D:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity. A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Question 1102
In a professional AI infrastructure deployment, a technician observes: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. Which underlying infrastructure principle BEST explains the issue? Select ONE best answer.
- Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity.
- GPU and switch field replacement changes hardware identity and fabric behavior and requires safety and validation steps.
- Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
- GPU clock and performance stability depend on sufficient chassis cooling and supported thermal operating envelope.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This is the governing infrastructure principle: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Incorrect Answers
A:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity. A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
B:That option concerns GPU and NVSwitch field replaceable component workflow. The proportionate action is: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring.
D:This alternative is relevant to Fan faults and thermal throttling investigation but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: GPU clock and performance stability depend on sufficient chassis cooling and supported thermal operating envelope. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Question 1103
The cluster operations team needs to evaluate this situation: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. Which diagnostic evidence should be obtained FIRST to substantiate the likely fault or configuration gap? Select ONE best answer.
- Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs.
- Inspect fan tachometer and BMC sensors, GPU temperature, throttle reasons, inlet mapping and workload timing.
- Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity.
- Inspect asset identifiers, FRU service records, firmware compatibility, PCIe enumeration and NVLink or NCCL results.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This is the direct operational evidence to investigate: Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Incorrect Answers
B:This alternative is relevant to Fan faults and thermal throttling investigation but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Inspect fan tachometer and BMC sensors, GPU temperature, throttle reasons, inlet mapping and workload timing. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
C:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. The governing mechanism is: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand. The proportionate action is: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring.
D:This alternative is relevant to GPU and NVSwitch field replaceable component workflow but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Inspect asset identifiers, FRU service records, firmware compatibility, PCIe enumeration and NVLink or NCCL results. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Question 1104
At a multi-node AI infrastructure handoff, the team records: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. After corrective work, which observable result BEST confirms that the requirement is met? Select ONE best answer.
- Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity.
- The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service.
- The identified cause is addressed and repeated representative work runs without the original Xid failure.
- Representative data-loading and training workloads improve within tested stable NUMA and CPU binding policy.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:This is an observable verified result, not merely a claimed configuration change: The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Incorrect Answers
A:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement: Assume redundant PSU labels guarantee safe live removal of any number of supplies regardless of remaining capacity. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan. The governing mechanism is: Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand. The proportionate action is: Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring. A direct check is: Inspect PSU health LEDs or BMC alerts, output power, PDU branches, hot-swap procedure and failover event logs. The acceptance condition is: The replacement supply operates normally and a tested approved single-feed failure preserves required service.
C:That option concerns NVIDIA GPU Xid event root cause isolation. Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
D:This alternative is relevant to AMD host CPU NUMA and memory tuning but does not directly resolve the current Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement issue: Representative data-loading and training workloads improve within tested stable NUMA and CPU binding policy. Observed scenario: A technician removes two supplies simultaneously from a critical node despite no approved maintenance plan.
Question 1105
During an NVIDIA AI factory acceptance test, engineers discover: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes. Which operational response is MOST appropriate to address the root issue? Select ONE best answer.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
- Evaluate protected storage layout, rebuild behavior, workload concurrency and sustained dataset throughput.
- Correlate cooling airflow, fan health, ambient inlet and clock-throttle reasons; repair root cause safely.
- Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:This is an appropriate correction for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Incorrect Answers
A:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
B:That option concerns Storage array throughput and RAID or erasure recovery. A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
C:This alternative is relevant to Fan faults and thermal throttling investigation but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Correlate cooling airflow, fan health, ambient inlet and clock-throttle reasons; repair root cause safely. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Question 1106
A production GPU cluster review identifies this condition: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes. Which underlying infrastructure principle BEST explains the issue? Select ONE best answer.
- A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
- NVIDIA Xid messages signal GPU-related errors with varying causes and severity; the exact code and context matter.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
- Power-supply redundancy protects uptime only when remaining units and external feeds support actual operating demand.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This is the governing infrastructure principle: A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Incorrect Answers
B:This alternative is relevant to NVIDIA GPU Xid event root cause isolation but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: NVIDIA Xid messages signal GPU-related errors with varying causes and severity; the exact code and context matter. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
C:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence. A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
D:That option concerns Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement. The proportionate action is: Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component.
Question 1107
In a professional AI infrastructure deployment, a technician observes: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes. Which diagnostic evidence should be obtained FIRST to substantiate the likely fault or configuration gap? Select ONE best answer.
- Compare bidirectional port counters, cable swaps, PCIe link state, adapter logs and test transfers.
- Review kernel and NVIDIA Xid logs, driver version, concurrent workload, ECC state and vendor diagnostic guidance.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
- Inspect lscpu NUMA topology, numactl placement, memory bandwidth, CPU affinity and GPU data-feed stalls.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:This is the direct operational evidence to investigate: Compare bidirectional port counters, cable swaps, PCIe link state, adapter logs and test transfers. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Incorrect Answers
B:This alternative is relevant to NVIDIA GPU Xid event root cause isolation but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Review kernel and NVIDIA Xid logs, driver version, concurrent workload, ECC state and vendor diagnostic guidance. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
C:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence. An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
D:This alternative is relevant to AMD host CPU NUMA and memory tuning but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Inspect lscpu NUMA topology, numactl placement, memory bandwidth, CPU affinity and GPU data-feed stalls. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Question 1108
The cluster operations team needs to evaluate this situation: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes. After corrective work, which observable result BEST confirms that the requirement is met? Select ONE best answer.
- The device either passes approved health criteria under load or is replaced with traceable fault closure.
- Restored service matches approved acceptance tests and the responsible failure mode has a documented preventative action.
- The repaired path maintains intended negotiated performance with acceptable errors under repeated RDMA stress.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This is an observable verified result, not merely a claimed configuration change: The repaired path maintains intended negotiated performance with acceptable errors under repeated RDMA stress. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
Incorrect Answers
A:This alternative is relevant to GPU ECC and memory reliability diagnosis but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: The device either passes approved health criteria under load or is replaced with traceable fault closure. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
B:This alternative is relevant to Operational fault isolation and safe rollback but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Restored service matches approved acceptance tests and the responsible failure mode has a documented preventative action. Observed scenario: An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes.
D:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence. An AI rack has one NIC port with rising physical errors and NCCL performance drops across its assigned nodes. A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
Question 1109
At a multi-node AI infrastructure handoff, the team records: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes. Which operational response is MOST appropriate to address the root issue? Select ONE best answer.
- Use a staged evidence-led incident workflow, isolate the nearest failing layer and validate a safe known-good rollback.
- Isolate the failed power path, verify redundancy budget and follow supported PSU replacement with monitoring.
- Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:This is an appropriate correction for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.
Incorrect Answers
A:This alternative is relevant to Operational fault isolation and safe rollback but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Use a staged evidence-led incident workflow, isolate the nearest failing layer and validate a safe known-good rollback. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.
B:That option concerns Redundant PSU and power path failure replacement. A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
D:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence. A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.
Question 1110
During an NVIDIA AI factory acceptance test, engineers discover: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes. Which TWO complementary elements are needed: the correct technical action and the strongest independent diagnostic evidence? Select TWO answers.
- Quarantine and diagnose affected GPUs using ECC, row-remap and diagnostic evidence before authorized repair or return.
- Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence.
- Compare bidirectional port counters, cable swaps, PCIe link state, adapter logs and test transfers.
- Inspect lscpu NUMA topology, numactl placement, memory bandwidth, CPU affinity and GPU data-feed stalls.
- Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component.
Explanation
Correct Answers
C:This is the direct operational evidence to investigate: Compare bidirectional port counters, cable swaps, PCIe link state, adapter logs and test transfers. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.
E:This is an appropriate correction for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Localize HCA, port, optic, cabling and PCIe causes before replacing the approved failed component. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes. The governing mechanism is: A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
Incorrect Answers
A:This alternative is relevant to GPU ECC and memory reliability diagnosis but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Quarantine and diagnose affected GPUs using ECC, row-remap and diagnostic evidence before authorized repair or return. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.
B:This tempting but unsafe shortcut is not a sufficient remediation for Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation: Replace healthy GPU cards to fix every InfiniBand timeout without inspecting NIC ports and fiber error evidence. A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes. A high-speed fabric fault may originate in cable, transceiver, adapter, driver or host slot rather than the GPU.
D:This alternative is relevant to AMD host CPU NUMA and memory tuning but does not directly resolve the current Failed ConnectX HCA or port fault isolation issue: Inspect lscpu NUMA topology, numactl placement, memory bandwidth, CPU affinity and GPU data-feed stalls. Observed scenario: A replacement high-speed adapter is installed in the wrong slot and negotiates fewer PCIe lanes.