cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft MS-102 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
MS-102 Exam - Verified By Experts
MS-102 Premium Bundle
$29.98

MS-102 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 473 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 01, 2026
  • Training Course 61 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 298 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 139 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft MS-102 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft MS-102 Premium File
Premium File 473 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft MS-102 Video Training Course
Training Course 61 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft MS-102 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 298 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 49

Question 480

At Riverbend Services, the delegated administration team is responsible for a least-privilege authorization program. A regional support team must manage only a subset of users across locations. The documented evidence is: a tenant-wide user-management role would include personnel outside the region. The required outcome is to scope delegated user administration by administrative unit. The project requires audit-ready before-and-after configuration records. Which controlled deployment step would best address the requirement before broad rollout?

  1. Pilot the Defender role assignment with a test incident and limited analyst identity during Riverbend Services' least-privilege authorization program
  2. Pilot PIM activation including justification, MFA, and approval requirements where configured during Riverbend Services' least-privilege authorization program
  3. Pilot the compliance role group using a permitted search and an out-of-scope operation during Riverbend Services' least-privilege authorization program
  4. Pilot a scoped assignment with regional test users and a nonregional negative test during Riverbend Services' least-privilege authorization program

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Pilot a scoped assignment with regional test users and a nonregional negative test. This controlled implementation step is specific to administrative unit scoping. The immediate task is a narrowly scoped and reversible first implementation. It responds to the evidence that a tenant-wide user-management role would include personnel outside the region and advances the requested outcome to scope delegated user administration by administrative unit.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Pilot the Defender role assignment with a test incident and limited analyst identity. This is a controlled implementation step for defender xdr least-privilege access, where sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. This case instead reports that a regional support team must manage only a subset of users across locations. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to scope delegated user administration by administrative unit at this decision stage.

B:

Pilot PIM activation including justification, MFA, and approval requirements where configured. This is a controlled implementation step for privileged identity management just-in-time, where high-impact administrator roles should be activated only when needed with approval. This case instead reports that a regional support team must manage only a subset of users across locations. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to scope delegated user administration by administrative unit at this decision stage.

C:

Pilot the compliance role group using a permitted search and an out-of-scope operation. This is a controlled implementation step for microsoft purview role groups, where compliance analysts require access to approved investigations but not universal compliance configuration. This case instead reports that a regional support team must manage only a subset of users across locations. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to scope delegated user administration by administrative unit at this decision stage.

Question 481

At Vertex Media, the security operations team is responsible for a security incident response modernization. Security receives an incident containing correlated suspicious mail, sign-in, and device events. The documented evidence is: the Defender portal incident already groups associated alerts and entities. The required outcome is to investigate one cross-workload incident coherently. The owner requires repeatable validation using a dedicated test identity or dataset. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Triage the correlated incident in Microsoft Defender XDR rather than handling each signal in isolation during Vertex Media's security incident response modernization
  2. Run a KQL advanced hunting query correlating the relevant device and user events during Vertex Media's security incident response modernization
  3. Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence findings to enrich the investigation and assess the domain's risk during Vertex Media's security incident response modernization
  4. Use Microsoft Security Exposure Management to prioritize relevant exposure recommendations during Vertex Media's security incident response modernization

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Triage the correlated incident in Microsoft Defender XDR rather than handling each signal in isolation. This solution design step is specific to unified defender xdr incident triage. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that the Defender portal incident already groups associated alerts and entities and advances the requested outcome to investigate one cross-workload incident coherently.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Run a KQL advanced hunting query correlating the relevant device and user events. This is a solution design step for advanced hunting across signals, where a SOC needs to search raw event records for a particular suspicious process and user timeline. This case instead reports that security receives an incident containing correlated suspicious mail, sign-in, and device events. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to investigate one cross-workload incident coherently at this decision stage.

C:

Use Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence findings to enrich the investigation and assess the domain's risk. This is a solution design step for defender threat intelligence indicators, where analysts need context on an emerging malicious domain that appears in tenant telemetry. This case instead reports that security receives an incident containing correlated suspicious mail, sign-in, and device events. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to investigate one cross-workload incident coherently at this decision stage.

D:

Use Microsoft Security Exposure Management to prioritize relevant exposure recommendations. This is a solution design step for security exposure management initiatives, where the organization wants risk-based visibility into exposure that spans assets and attack paths. This case instead reports that security receives an incident containing correlated suspicious mail, sign-in, and device events. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to investigate one cross-workload incident coherently at this decision stage.

Question 482

At Meridian Energy, the cloud application security team is responsible for a cloud application risk review. A large file-sharing service appears in Cloud Discovery but has not been risk reviewed. The documented evidence is: cloud Discovery displays app usage volume, risk score, and user activity. The required outcome is to assess and govern shadow IT apps based on risk and usage. Only a named pilot cohort may be changed before the production window. Which ongoing operational signal would best reveal recurrence of this particular problem?

  1. Monitor app connector health and data collection failures during Meridian Energy's cloud application risk review
  2. Monitor use of unsanctioned cloud applications and emerging high-risk apps during Meridian Energy's cloud application risk review
  3. Monitor anomalous app activities, alert trends, and tuning decisions during Meridian Energy's cloud application risk review
  4. Monitor file-policy matches and remediation outcomes across connected apps during Meridian Energy's cloud application risk review

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Monitor use of unsanctioned cloud applications and emerging high-risk apps. This ongoing assurance step is specific to unsanctioned app risk classification. The immediate task is to watch for regression in the relevant control or service. It responds to the evidence that cloud Discovery displays app usage volume, risk score, and user activity and advances the requested outcome to assess and govern shadow IT apps based on risk and usage.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor app connector health and data collection failures. This is an ongoing assurance step for defender for cloud apps app connector, where analysts need Microsoft 365 activity and file visibility through Defender for Cloud Apps. This case instead reports that a large file-sharing service appears in Cloud Discovery but has not been risk reviewed. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assess and govern shadow IT apps based on risk and usage at this decision stage.

C:

Monitor anomalous app activities, alert trends, and tuning decisions. This is an ongoing assurance step for cloud apps anomaly detection policy, where security needs automated detection of unusual cloud application behavior across accounts. This case instead reports that a large file-sharing service appears in Cloud Discovery but has not been risk reviewed. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assess and govern shadow IT apps based on risk and usage at this decision stage.

D:

Monitor file-policy matches and remediation outcomes across connected apps. This is an ongoing assurance step for defender for cloud apps file policies, where security wants alerts when a connected cloud app exposes sensitive files through overly broad sharing. This case instead reports that a large file-sharing service appears in Cloud Discovery but has not been risk reviewed. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assess and govern shadow IT apps based on risk and usage at this decision stage.

Question 483

At Bluebird Freight, the endpoint security team is responsible for a vulnerability remediation program. Several managed Windows devices are missing from the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device inventory. The documented evidence is: the new devices have not completed Defender for Endpoint onboarding. The required outcome is to bring supported endpoints under Defender security monitoring. The change cannot weaken an unrelated control or expand access to uninvolved users. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Use the device investigation timeline to correlate suspicious process execution and network activity during Bluebird Freight's vulnerability remediation program
  2. Configure appropriate Microsoft Defender Attack surface reduction rules for the target endpoints during Bluebird Freight's vulnerability remediation program
  3. Onboard supported devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using the approved management method during Bluebird Freight's vulnerability remediation program
  4. Prioritize remediation based on Defender Vulnerability Management recommendations during Bluebird Freight's vulnerability remediation program

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Onboard supported devices to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint using the approved management method. This solution design step is specific to defender for endpoint onboarding. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that the new devices have not completed Defender for Endpoint onboarding and advances the requested outcome to bring supported endpoints under Defender security monitoring.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Use the device investigation timeline to correlate suspicious process execution and network activity. This is a solution design step for endpoint device investigation timeline, where an analyst needs to understand a suspicious process chain on a specific laptop. This case instead reports that several managed Windows devices are missing from the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device inventory. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to bring supported endpoints under Defender security monitoring at this decision stage.

B:

Configure appropriate Microsoft Defender Attack surface reduction rules for the target endpoints. This is a solution design step for attack surface reduction rule deployment, where commodity malware uses suspicious script and Office child-process behavior on managed endpoints. This case instead reports that several managed Windows devices are missing from the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device inventory. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to bring supported endpoints under Defender security monitoring at this decision stage.

D:

Prioritize remediation based on Defender Vulnerability Management recommendations. This is a solution design step for defender vulnerability management prioritization, where security must prioritize endpoint software exposure across a large workstation fleet. This case instead reports that several managed Windows devices are missing from the Microsoft Defender for Endpoint device inventory. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to bring supported endpoints under Defender security monitoring at this decision stage.

Question 484

At Bluebird Freight, the authentication services team is responsible for a privileged sign-in assurance rollout. A user reports an MFA-related sign-in failure to Microsoft 365. The documented evidence is: entra sign-in logs contain a failure reason and Conditional Access evaluation detail. The required outcome is to identify the actual sign-in policy or authentication factor causing the block. The change cannot weaken an unrelated control or expand access to uninvolved users. Which ongoing operational signal would best reveal recurrence of this particular problem?

  1. Review authentication strength failures and method adoption for privileged accounts during Bluebird Freight's privileged sign-in assurance rollout
  2. Review Temporary Access Pass issuance, use, and expiration events during Bluebird Freight's privileged sign-in assurance rollout
  3. Monitor SSPR registration and reset success rates for the targeted group during Bluebird Freight's privileged sign-in assurance rollout
  4. Monitor recurrent authentication failures for the corrected policy and user cohort during Bluebird Freight's privileged sign-in assurance rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Monitor recurrent authentication failures for the corrected policy and user cohort. This ongoing assurance step is specific to sign-in log authentication troubleshooting. The immediate task is to watch for regression in the relevant control or service. It responds to the evidence that entra sign-in logs contain a failure reason and Conditional Access evaluation detail and advances the required outcome to identify the actual sign-in policy or authentication factor causing the block.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Review authentication strength failures and method adoption for privileged accounts. This is an ongoing assurance step for authentication strength requirement, where privileged administrators must use phishing-resistant MFA instead of any two factors. The current case instead reports that a user reports an MFA-related sign-in failure to Microsoft 365. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to identify the actual sign-in policy or authentication factor causing the block at this decision stage.

B:

Review Temporary Access Pass issuance, use, and expiration events. This is an ongoing assurance step for temporary access pass bootstrap, where a new employee cannot register strong authentication methods because no usable method is yet available. The current case instead reports that a user reports an MFA-related sign-in failure to Microsoft 365. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to identify the actual sign-in policy or authentication factor causing the block at this decision stage.

C:

Monitor SSPR registration and reset success rates for the targeted group. This is an ongoing assurance step for sspr policy targeting, where a subset of employees should be permitted to reset their passwords without helpdesk tickets. The current case instead reports that a user reports an MFA-related sign-in failure to Microsoft 365. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to identify the actual sign-in policy or authentication factor causing the block at this decision stage.

Question 485

At Sterling Retail, the hybrid identity team is responsible for a directory provisioning reliability initiative. The hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. The documented evidence is: the existing Entra Connect infrastructure provides health signals that are not being reviewed. The required outcome is to monitor supported hybrid identity components proactively. The project requires audit-ready before-and-after configuration records. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Configure and use Microsoft Entra Connect Health monitoring for supported components during Sterling Retail's directory provisioning reliability initiative
  2. Correct invalid or conflicting source Active Directory identity attributes before attempting a clean sync during Sterling Retail's directory provisioning reliability initiative
  3. Enable or retain supported password hash synchronization for the hybrid identity deployment during Sterling Retail's directory provisioning reliability initiative
  4. Configure supported directory synchronization filtering for only the intended identities during Sterling Retail's directory provisioning reliability initiative

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure and use Microsoft Entra Connect Health monitoring for supported components. This solution design step is specific to entra connect health monitoring. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that the existing Entra Connect infrastructure provides health signals that are not being reviewed and advances the required outcome to monitor supported hybrid identity components proactively.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Correct invalid or conflicting source Active Directory identity attributes before attempting a clean sync. This is a solution design step for idfix directory attribute remediation, where on-premises directory users fail synchronization because some identifiers are invalid or duplicated. The current case instead reports that the hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to monitor supported hybrid identity components proactively at this decision stage.

C:

Enable or retain supported password hash synchronization for the hybrid identity deployment. This is a solution design step for password hash synchronization, where hybrid users need cloud authentication with resilience when on-premises authentication servers are unavailable. The current case instead reports that the hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to monitor supported hybrid identity components proactively at this decision stage.

D:

Configure supported directory synchronization filtering for only the intended identities. This is a solution design step for directory synchronization scoping, where only selected departments should be synchronized from on-premises AD DS to Microsoft Entra. The current case instead reports that the hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to monitor supported hybrid identity components proactively at this decision stage.

Question 486

At Summit Media, the endpoint security team is responsible for an endpoint defense modernization. Commodity malware uses suspicious script and Office child-process behavior on managed endpoints. The documented evidence is: defender ASR rule telemetry identifies the activity but no blocking rule has been deployed. The required outcome is to reduce risky endpoint behaviors using supported ASR rules. The owner requires repeatable validation using a dedicated test identity or dataset. Which controlled deployment step would best address the requirement before broad rollout?

  1. Pilot an evidence-preserving device investigation focused on a short incident window during Summit Media's endpoint defense modernization
  2. Pilot ASR rules in audit mode and tune narrow exclusions before enabling block where appropriate during Summit Media's endpoint defense modernization
  3. Pilot an approved software remediation on the highest-priority device cohort during Summit Media's endpoint defense modernization
  4. Pilot the isolation procedure on an authorized test device and document recovery controls during Summit Media's endpoint defense modernization

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Pilot ASR rules in audit mode and tune narrow exclusions before enabling block where appropriate. This controlled implementation step is specific to attack surface reduction rule deployment. The immediate task is a narrowly scoped and reversible first implementation. It responds to the evidence that defender ASR rule telemetry identifies the activity but no blocking rule has been deployed and advances the requested outcome to reduce risky endpoint behaviors using supported ASR rules.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Pilot an evidence-preserving device investigation focused on a short incident window. This is a controlled implementation step for endpoint device investigation timeline, where an analyst needs to understand a suspicious process chain on a specific laptop. This case instead reports that commodity malware uses suspicious script and Office child-process behavior on managed endpoints. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to reduce risky endpoint behaviors using supported ASR rules at this decision stage.

C:

Pilot an approved software remediation on the highest-priority device cohort. This is a controlled implementation step for defender vulnerability management prioritization, where security must prioritize endpoint software exposure across a large workstation fleet. This case instead reports that commodity malware uses suspicious script and Office child-process behavior on managed endpoints. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to reduce risky endpoint behaviors using supported ASR rules at this decision stage.

D:

Pilot the isolation procedure on an authorized test device and document recovery controls. This is a controlled implementation step for endpoint isolation response, where a confirmed compromised workstation continues making malicious network connections. This case instead reports that commodity malware uses suspicious script and Office child-process behavior on managed endpoints. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to reduce risky endpoint behaviors using supported ASR rules at this decision stage.

Question 487

At Cobalt Services, the hybrid identity team is responsible for a directory provisioning reliability initiative. Several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. The documented evidence is: branch domain controllers are reachable by supported cloud provisioning agents. The required outcome is to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario. The project requires audit-ready before-and-after configuration records. Before changing the tenant, which diagnostic investigation would most directly verify the suspected cause?

  1. Inspect SSPR writeback configuration and eligible on-premises connector agents during Cobalt Services' directory provisioning reliability initiative
  2. Inspect the sourceAnchor and synchronization mapping for the affected user attribute during Cobalt Services' directory provisioning reliability initiative
  3. Review cloud provisioning agent connectivity, configuration scope, and supported capabilities during Cobalt Services' directory provisioning reliability initiative
  4. Inspect Microsoft Entra Connect Health agent status and available sync or authentication alerts during Cobalt Services' directory provisioning reliability initiative

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Review cloud provisioning agent connectivity, configuration scope, and supported capabilities. This investigation step is specific to microsoft entra cloud sync provisioning. The immediate task is to verify the root cause, not implement a broad remedy. It responds to the evidence that branch domain controllers are reachable by supported cloud provisioning agents and advances the requested outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect SSPR writeback configuration and eligible on-premises connector agents. This is an investigation step for sspr on-premises password writeback, where a synchronized employee resets their cloud password successfully but cannot use the new password against on-premises resources. This case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

B:

Inspect the sourceAnchor and synchronization mapping for the affected user attribute. This is an investigation step for source-of-authority for synchronized attributes, where a synchronized employee display name keeps reverting after cloud-side edits. This case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

D:

Inspect Microsoft Entra Connect Health agent status and available sync or authentication alerts. This is an investigation step for entra connect health monitoring, where the hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. This case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

Question 488

At Willow Health, the messaging security team is responsible for a secure messaging operations improvement. Unknown malicious attachments evade signature-only filtering in business email. The documented evidence is: the tenant needs additional evaluation of attachments before user access. The required outcome is to use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to inspect suspicious attachments. The administrator must retain a rollback path and document evidence of success. Which ongoing operational signal would best reveal recurrence of this particular problem?

  1. Monitor outbound spam threshold alerts and compromised sender indicators during Willow Health's secure messaging operations improvement
  2. Monitor impersonation detections and false-positive reports during Willow Health's secure messaging operations improvement
  3. Monitor simulated compromise rates and training completion without exposing user secrets during Willow Health's secure messaging operations improvement
  4. Monitor Safe Attachments detections and delayed or quarantined message events during Willow Health's secure messaging operations improvement

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Monitor Safe Attachments detections and delayed or quarantined message events. This ongoing assurance step is specific to safe attachments detonation. The immediate task is to watch for regression in the relevant control or service. It responds to the evidence that the tenant needs additional evaluation of attachments before user access and advances the requested outcome to use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to inspect suspicious attachments.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Monitor outbound spam threshold alerts and compromised sender indicators. This is an ongoing assurance step for outbound spam protection, where a compromised mailbox is sending a high volume of unsolicited external mail. This case instead reports that unknown malicious attachments evade signature-only filtering in business email. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to inspect suspicious attachments at this decision stage.

B:

Monitor impersonation detections and false-positive reports. This is an ongoing assurance step for anti-phishing impersonation protection, where attackers send messages that mimic an executive's display name while using unauthorized sender identities. This case instead reports that unknown malicious attachments evade signature-only filtering in business email. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to inspect suspicious attachments at this decision stage.

C:

Monitor simulated compromise rates and training completion without exposing user secrets. This is an ongoing assurance step for attack simulation training campaign, where security awareness owners want to evaluate susceptibility to phishing using approved practice messages. This case instead reports that unknown malicious attachments evade signature-only filtering in business email. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Defender for Office 365 Safe Attachments to inspect suspicious attachments at this decision stage.

Question 489

At Orchard Health, the information governance team is responsible for a regulated records retention program. The organization needs a broad baseline retention setting for a defined workload location. The documented evidence is: the required treatment applies across the location, not merely to manually classified items. The required outcome is to configure a location-scoped retention policy. The administrator must retain a rollback path and document evidence of success. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Configure a Purview retention policy covering the required supported workload location during Orchard Health's regulated records retention program
  2. Use Content explorer to examine classified content and its location distribution during Orchard Health's regulated records retention program
  3. Configure a Purview sensitivity label with the appropriate content encryption and user permissions during Orchard Health's regulated records retention program
  4. Create a custom Purview sensitive information type using the appropriate regex and corroborating evidence during Orchard Health's regulated records retention program

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure a Purview retention policy covering the required supported workload location. This solution design step is specific to broad microsoft 365 retention policy. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that the required treatment applies across the location, not merely to manually classified items and advances the required outcome to configure a location-scoped retention policy.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Use Content explorer to examine classified content and its location distribution. This is a solution design step for content explorer classified data inventory, where the compliance manager needs to find where classified sensitive information exists in supported Microsoft 365 content. The current case instead reports that the organization needs a broad baseline retention setting for a defined workload location. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to configure a location-scoped retention policy at this decision stage.

C:

Configure a Purview sensitivity label with the appropriate content encryption and user permissions. This is a solution design step for sensitivity label encryption and access, where highly confidential finance files need persistent content protection after being shared. The current case instead reports that the organization needs a broad baseline retention setting for a defined workload location. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to configure a location-scoped retention policy at this decision stage.

D:

Create a custom Purview sensitive information type using the appropriate regex and corroborating evidence. This is a solution design step for sensitive information type custom pattern, where compliance needs to identify internal account identifiers in documents using a consistent known pattern. The current case instead reports that the organization needs a broad baseline retention setting for a defined workload location. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to configure a location-scoped retention policy at this decision stage.

Question 490

At Acorn Research, the security operations team is responsible for an enterprise security posture program. The SOC needs to accelerate repetitive Defender incident investigation while retaining oversight. The documented evidence is: eligible incidents support automated investigation and response actions. The required outcome is to use automated investigation appropriately and review response outcomes. The change cannot weaken an unrelated control or expand access to uninvolved users. Which post-change check would most directly establish that the requirement has been met?

  1. Confirm only the intended benign alert is suppressed while unrelated threat alerts remain visible during Acorn Research's enterprise security posture program
  2. Confirm automated investigation results and remediation actions match the observed threat during Acorn Research's enterprise security posture program
  3. Confirm the specific indicator is correlated with observed events before applying targeted controls during Acorn Research's enterprise security posture program
  4. Confirm query results contain the expected device, user, and event timestamps during Acorn Research's enterprise security posture program

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Confirm automated investigation results and remediation actions match the observed threat. This acceptance testing step is specific to automated incident investigation. The immediate task is to observe a concrete success condition, not rely on a configuration screenshot alone. It responds to the evidence that eligible incidents support automated investigation and response actions and advances the required outcome to use automated investigation appropriately and review response outcomes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Confirm only the intended benign alert is suppressed while unrelated threat alerts remain visible. This is an acceptance testing step for alert tuning and suppression controls, where an approved benign administration tool creates repeated Defender alerts and distracts the SOC. The current case instead reports that the SOC needs to accelerate repetitive Defender incident investigation while retaining oversight. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use automated investigation appropriately and review response outcomes at this decision stage.

C:

Confirm the specific indicator is correlated with observed events before applying targeted controls. This is an acceptance testing step for defender threat intelligence indicators, where analysts need context on an emerging malicious domain that appears in tenant telemetry. The current case instead reports that the SOC needs to accelerate repetitive Defender incident investigation while retaining oversight. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use automated investigation appropriately and review response outcomes at this decision stage.

D:

Confirm query results contain the expected device, user, and event timestamps. This is an acceptance testing step for advanced hunting across signals, where a SOC needs to search raw event records for a particular suspicious process and user timeline. The current case instead reports that the SOC needs to accelerate repetitive Defender incident investigation while retaining oversight. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use automated investigation appropriately and review response outcomes at this decision stage.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests