cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Microsoft MS-102 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
MS-102 Exam - Verified By Experts
MS-102 Premium Bundle
$29.98

MS-102 Premium Bundle

$79.99
$109.97
  • Premium File 473 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 01, 2026
  • Training Course 61 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide 298 Pages
 
$109.97
$79.99
accept 139 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Microsoft MS-102 Exam Training Products Individually
Microsoft MS-102 Premium File
Premium File 473 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Microsoft MS-102 Video Training Course
Training Course 61 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft MS-102 PDF Study Guide
Study Guide 298 Pages
$21.99 $19.99
Microsoft MS-102 Practice Test 38

Question 370

At Seabright Freight, the messaging security team is responsible for a collaboration security hardening. Inbound email contains attachments with known malware signatures. The documented evidence is: exchange Online protection needs a consistent anti-malware response for this mail flow. The required outcome is to apply malware filtering policy rather than relying only on user reports. The change cannot weaken an unrelated control or expand access to uninvolved users. Which post-change check would most directly establish that the requirement has been met?

  1. Confirm simulation reports and training assignments reflect the approved campaign during Seabright Freight's collaboration security hardening
  2. Confirm known-malware attachment messages are handled by the specified policy during Seabright Freight's collaboration security hardening
  3. Confirm allowed user actions match the policy and disallowed release paths remain blocked during Seabright Freight's collaboration security hardening
  4. Confirm abusive outbound sending is contained and legitimate mail flow remains available during Seabright Freight's collaboration security hardening

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Confirm known-malware attachment messages are handled by the specified policy. This acceptance testing step is specific to anti-malware email policy. The immediate task is to observe a concrete success condition, not rely on a configuration screenshot alone. It responds to the evidence that exchange Online protection needs a consistent anti-malware response for this mail flow and advances the required outcome to apply malware filtering policy rather than relying only on user reports.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Confirm simulation reports and training assignments reflect the approved campaign. This is an acceptance testing step for attack simulation training campaign, where security awareness owners want to evaluate susceptibility to phishing using approved practice messages. The current case instead reports that inbound email contains attachments with known malware signatures. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply malware filtering policy rather than relying only on user reports at this decision stage.

C:

Confirm allowed user actions match the policy and disallowed release paths remain blocked. This is an acceptance testing step for quarantine policy permissions, where the helpdesk needs to determine which quarantined messages users may preview or release. The current case instead reports that inbound email contains attachments with known malware signatures. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply malware filtering policy rather than relying only on user reports at this decision stage.

D:

Confirm abusive outbound sending is contained and legitimate mail flow remains available. This is an acceptance testing step for outbound spam protection, where a compromised mailbox is sending a high volume of unsolicited external mail. The current case instead reports that inbound email contains attachments with known malware signatures. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply malware filtering policy rather than relying only on user reports at this decision stage.

Question 371

At Crescent Manufacturing, the data loss prevention team is responsible for a data loss prevention rollout. The organization must prevent Microsoft 365 Copilot from processing certain highly confidential content in supported scenarios. The documented evidence is: sensitive documents carry labels and Copilot content processing needs a separate policy safeguard. The required outcome is to limit Copilot's processing of protected content using supported Purview DLP controls. Only a named pilot cohort may be changed before the production window. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Configure a Purview DLP policy covering SharePoint and OneDrive file locations during Crescent Manufacturing's data loss prevention rollout
  2. Configure Purview Endpoint DLP rules for the approved sensitive-data and device activity conditions during Crescent Manufacturing's data loss prevention rollout
  3. Configure Purview DLP for the Microsoft 365 Copilot policy location using supported sensitivity label conditions during Crescent Manufacturing's data loss prevention rollout
  4. Configure an Exchange Online DLP rule with the appropriate sensitivity condition and external-sharing action during Crescent Manufacturing's data loss prevention rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Configure Purview DLP for the Microsoft 365 Copilot policy location using supported sensitivity label conditions. This solution design step is specific to microsoft 365 copilot dlp policy location. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that sensitive documents carry labels and Copilot content processing needs a separate policy safeguard and advances the required outcome to limit Copilot's processing of protected content using supported Purview DLP controls.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Configure a Purview DLP policy covering SharePoint and OneDrive file locations. This is a solution design step for sharepoint and onedrive dlp, where sensitive files in SharePoint and OneDrive can be shared with external recipients. The current case instead reports that the organization must prevent Microsoft 365 Copilot from processing certain highly confidential content in supported scenarios. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to limit Copilot's processing of protected content using supported Purview DLP controls at this decision stage.

B:

Configure Purview Endpoint DLP rules for the approved sensitive-data and device activity conditions. This is a solution design step for endpoint data loss prevention, where users can copy sensitive documents to unmanaged removable storage on managed endpoints. The current case instead reports that the organization must prevent Microsoft 365 Copilot from processing certain highly confidential content in supported scenarios. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to limit Copilot's processing of protected content using supported Purview DLP controls at this decision stage.

D:

Configure an Exchange Online DLP rule with the appropriate sensitivity condition and external-sharing action. This is a solution design step for exchange online dlp sensitive email, where users occasionally send external messages containing regulated personal identifiers. The current case instead reports that the organization must prevent Microsoft 365 Copilot from processing certain highly confidential content in supported scenarios. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to limit Copilot's processing of protected content using supported Purview DLP controls at this decision stage.

Question 372

At Summit Manufacturing, the delegated administration team is responsible for a delegated role governance review. SOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. The documented evidence is: the SOC team uses broad tenant roles to access Defender incidents. The required outcome is to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions. Only a named pilot cohort may be changed before the production window. Which post-change check would most directly establish that the requirement has been met?

  1. Confirm permitted user operations succeed and unrelated global administration remains unavailable during Summit Manufacturing's delegated role governance review
  2. Confirm authorized Exchange tasks succeed without access to unrelated tenant settings during Summit Manufacturing's delegated role governance review
  3. Confirm approved Purview tasks succeed but unrelated configuration changes are denied during Summit Manufacturing's delegated role governance review
  4. Verify incident triage permissions work while unrelated security administration is restricted during Summit Manufacturing's delegated role governance review

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Verify incident triage permissions work while unrelated security administration is restricted. This acceptance testing step is specific to defender xdr least-privilege access. The immediate task is to observe a concrete success condition, not rely on a configuration screenshot alone. It responds to the evidence that the SOC team uses broad tenant roles to access Defender incidents and advances the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Confirm permitted user operations succeed and unrelated global administration remains unavailable. This is an acceptance testing step for user administrator least privilege, where helpdesk must manage ordinary user accounts but must not receive all tenant privileges. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

B:

Confirm authorized Exchange tasks succeed without access to unrelated tenant settings. This is an acceptance testing step for workload-specific exchange admin role, where the mail operations team needs Exchange Online management but not Microsoft 365-wide administrator access. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

C:

Confirm approved Purview tasks succeed but unrelated configuration changes are denied. This is an acceptance testing step for microsoft purview role groups, where compliance analysts require access to approved investigations but not universal compliance configuration. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

Question 373

At Aster Banking, the hybrid identity team is responsible for an on-premises identity modernization. Several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. The documented evidence is: branch domain controllers are reachable by supported cloud provisioning agents. The required outcome is to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario. The initial change must be small enough to observe before organization-wide adoption. Before changing the tenant, which diagnostic investigation would most directly verify the suspected cause?

  1. Review cloud provisioning agent connectivity, configuration scope, and supported capabilities during Aster Banking's on-premises identity modernization
  2. Inspect SSPR writeback configuration and eligible on-premises connector agents during Aster Banking's on-premises identity modernization
  3. Inspect the sourceAnchor and synchronization mapping for the affected user attribute during Aster Banking's on-premises identity modernization
  4. Inspect Microsoft Entra Connect Health agent status and available sync or authentication alerts during Aster Banking's on-premises identity modernization

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review cloud provisioning agent connectivity, configuration scope, and supported capabilities. This investigation step is specific to microsoft entra cloud sync provisioning. The immediate task is to verify the root cause, not implement a broad remedy. It responds to the evidence that branch domain controllers are reachable by supported cloud provisioning agents and advances the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Inspect SSPR writeback configuration and eligible on-premises connector agents. This is an investigation step for sspr on-premises password writeback, where a synchronized employee resets their cloud password successfully but cannot use the new password against on-premises resources. The current case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

C:

Inspect the sourceAnchor and synchronization mapping for the affected user attribute. This is an investigation step for source-of-authority for synchronized attributes, where a synchronized employee display name keeps reverting after cloud-side edits. The current case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

D:

Inspect Microsoft Entra Connect Health agent status and available sync or authentication alerts. This is an investigation step for entra connect health monitoring, where the hybrid identity team notices authentication and synchronization outages only after end users report problems. The current case instead reports that several locations need resilient agent-based identity provisioning without a dedicated central sync engine. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync for a supported provisioning scenario at this decision stage.

Question 374

At Meridian Energy, the workplace administration team is responsible for an employee account lifecycle rollout. Hundreds of users need Microsoft 365 service licenses according to department membership. The documented evidence is: direct licenses are inconsistent, and group membership is already authoritative. The required outcome is to automate supported license assignment through Microsoft Entra groups. Only a named pilot cohort may be changed before the production window. Which controlled deployment step would best address the requirement before broad rollout?

  1. Disable the departing user's account promptly and test access revocation before later lifecycle cleanup during Meridian Energy's employee account lifecycle rollout
  2. Assign the license to a pilot group after ensuring valid usage locations and available stock during Meridian Energy's employee account lifecycle rollout
  3. Add one test contact and validate directory visibility without provisioning a user mailbox during Meridian Energy's employee account lifecycle rollout
  4. Pilot the adjusted license service-plan selection with one noncritical user group during Meridian Energy's employee account lifecycle rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Assign the license to a pilot group after ensuring valid usage locations and available stock. This controlled implementation step is specific to group-based licensing. The immediate task is a narrowly scoped and reversible first implementation. It responds to the evidence that direct licenses are inconsistent, and group membership is already authoritative and advances the required outcome to automate supported license assignment through Microsoft Entra groups.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Disable the departing user's account promptly and test access revocation before later lifecycle cleanup. This is a controlled implementation step for cloud user account sign-in control, where an employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. The current case instead reports that hundreds of users need Microsoft 365 service licenses according to department membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to automate supported license assignment through Microsoft Entra groups at this decision stage.

C:

Add one test contact and validate directory visibility without provisioning a user mailbox. This is a controlled implementation step for exchange online mail contact, where a supplier needs to appear in the organization address book but must not have a mailbox or tenant sign-in. The current case instead reports that hundreds of users need Microsoft 365 service licenses according to department membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to automate supported license assignment through Microsoft Entra groups at this decision stage.

D:

Pilot the adjusted license service-plan selection with one noncritical user group. This is a controlled implementation step for license service-plan control, where users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. The current case instead reports that hundreds of users need Microsoft 365 service licenses according to department membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to automate supported license assignment through Microsoft Entra groups at this decision stage.

Question 375

At Aspen Retail, the Microsoft 365 tenant operations team is responsible for a productivity service modernization. Users report service failures across several departments despite healthy local networks. The documented evidence is: microsoft 365 Service health shows a service incident for the affected workload. The required outcome is to distinguish a Microsoft service outage from local configuration failures. The project requires audit-ready before-and-after configuration records. Which post-change check would most directly establish that the requirement has been met?

  1. Confirm pilot devices report the intended update channel and a compliant app version during Aspen Retail's productivity service modernization
  2. Confirm the domain is marked Verified in the Microsoft 365 admin center after DNS propagation during Aspen Retail's productivity service modernization
  3. Verify the Microsoft service incident is resolved and affected users recover functionality during Aspen Retail's productivity service modernization
  4. Trigger a supported notification test or verify a subsequent advisory reaches the intended recipients during Aspen Retail's productivity service modernization

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Verify the Microsoft service incident is resolved and affected users recover functionality. This acceptance testing step is specific to microsoft 365 service health incident. The immediate task is to observe a concrete success condition, not rely on a configuration screenshot alone. It responds to the evidence that microsoft 365 Service health shows a service incident for the affected workload and advances the required outcome to distinguish a Microsoft service outage from local configuration failures.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Confirm pilot devices report the intended update channel and a compliant app version. This is an acceptance testing step for microsoft 365 apps update configuration, where a managed user cohort needs predictable Microsoft 365 Apps updates rather than unmanaged version drift. The current case instead reports that users report service failures across several departments despite healthy local networks. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to distinguish a Microsoft service outage from local configuration failures at this decision stage.

B:

Confirm the domain is marked Verified in the Microsoft 365 admin center after DNS propagation. This is an acceptance testing step for custom-domain ownership verification, where the new company email domain appears in the tenant but remains unverified. The current case instead reports that users report service failures across several departments despite healthy local networks. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to distinguish a Microsoft service outage from local configuration failures at this decision stage.

D:

Trigger a supported notification test or verify a subsequent advisory reaches the intended recipients. This is an acceptance testing step for service health notifications, where the operations team learns about Microsoft 365 outages only when users open tickets. The current case instead reports that users report service failures across several departments despite healthy local networks. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to distinguish a Microsoft service outage from local configuration failures at this decision stage.

Question 376

At Beacon Manufacturing, the workplace administration team is responsible for an employee account lifecycle rollout. Users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. The documented evidence is: the assigned subscription contains multiple independently controllable service plans. The required outcome is to apply service-plan configuration to the correct license assignment. Only a named pilot cohort may be changed before the production window. Which configuration or response best meets the specified requirement?

  1. Invite the external user as a Microsoft Entra B2B guest and assign only necessary resource access during Beacon Manufacturing's employee account lifecycle rollout
  2. Create or configure a Microsoft 365 Group with approved owners and members during Beacon Manufacturing's employee account lifecycle rollout
  3. Use Microsoft Graph PowerShell with least-privilege permissions to run supported bulk user operations during Beacon Manufacturing's employee account lifecycle rollout
  4. Disable the designated service plan in the applicable license assignment where supported during Beacon Manufacturing's employee account lifecycle rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Disable the designated service plan in the applicable license assignment where supported. This solution design step is specific to license service-plan control. The immediate task is to select the technical control that matches the observed requirement. It responds to the evidence that the assigned subscription contains multiple independently controllable service plans and advances the required outcome to apply service-plan configuration to the correct license assignment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Invite the external user as a Microsoft Entra B2B guest and assign only necessary resource access. This is a solution design step for external guest collaboration, where an approved contractor requires collaboration on selected tenant resources without a regular employee account. The current case instead reports that users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply service-plan configuration to the correct license assignment at this decision stage.

B:

Create or configure a Microsoft 365 Group with approved owners and members. This is a solution design step for microsoft 365 group workspace collaboration, where a cross-functional team needs shared group conversations and files with self-service collaboration. The current case instead reports that users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply service-plan configuration to the correct license assignment at this decision stage.

C:

Use Microsoft Graph PowerShell with least-privilege permissions to run supported bulk user operations. This is a solution design step for bulk user administration with graph powershell, where human resources provides a large validated staff roster requiring repeatable account updates. The current case instead reports that users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to apply service-plan configuration to the correct license assignment at this decision stage.

Question 377

At Crescent Media, the workplace administration team is responsible for an employee account lifecycle rollout. A compliance committee needs a single email address and a permission-assignable membership. The documented evidence is: a plain distribution group covers mail but does not satisfy the permission-group need. The required outcome is to use the appropriate group type for both mail distribution and security assignment. The owner requires repeatable validation using a dedicated test identity or dataset. Which ongoing operational signal would best reveal recurrence of this particular problem?

  1. Review membership changes and permission scopes on the mail-enabled security group during Crescent Media's employee account lifecycle rollout
  2. Review service-plan assignment state and unexpected re-enablement during license changes during Crescent Media's employee account lifecycle rollout
  3. Audit shared mailbox delegate membership and anomalous access during Crescent Media's employee account lifecycle rollout
  4. Review disabled-account sign-in attempts and downstream access revocation during Crescent Media's employee account lifecycle rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Review membership changes and permission scopes on the mail-enabled security group. This ongoing assurance step is specific to mail-enabled security group. The immediate task is to watch for regression in the relevant control or service. It responds to the evidence that a plain distribution group covers mail but does not satisfy the permission-group need and advances the required outcome to use the appropriate group type for both mail distribution and security assignment.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Review service-plan assignment state and unexpected re-enablement during license changes. This is an ongoing assurance step for license service-plan control, where users need core Microsoft 365 services but one licensed service plan must remain disabled for a cohort. The current case instead reports that a compliance committee needs a single email address and a permission-assignable membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use the appropriate group type for both mail distribution and security assignment at this decision stage.

C:

Audit shared mailbox delegate membership and anomalous access. This is an ongoing assurance step for shared mailbox management, where several support agents need to manage one common support address without sharing a password. The current case instead reports that a compliance committee needs a single email address and a permission-assignable membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use the appropriate group type for both mail distribution and security assignment at this decision stage.

D:

Review disabled-account sign-in attempts and downstream access revocation. This is an ongoing assurance step for cloud user account sign-in control, where an employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. The current case instead reports that a compliance committee needs a single email address and a permission-assignable membership. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to use the appropriate group type for both mail distribution and security assignment at this decision stage.

Question 378

At Orchard Health, the delegated administration team is responsible for a privileged administration rollout. SOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. The documented evidence is: the SOC team uses broad tenant roles to access Defender incidents. The required outcome is to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions. The administrator must retain a rollback path and document evidence of success. Which controlled deployment step would best address the requirement before broad rollout?

  1. Pilot User Administrator assignment for one helpdesk staff member and test allowed and denied operations during Orchard Health's privileged administration rollout
  2. Pilot the Defender role assignment with a test incident and limited analyst identity during Orchard Health's privileged administration rollout
  3. Pilot delegated Exchange administration with a limited mail operations account during Orchard Health's privileged administration rollout
  4. Pilot the compliance role group using a permitted search and an out-of-scope operation during Orchard Health's privileged administration rollout

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Pilot the Defender role assignment with a test incident and limited analyst identity. This controlled implementation step is specific to defender xdr least-privilege access. The immediate task is a narrowly scoped and reversible first implementation. It responds to the evidence that the SOC team uses broad tenant roles to access Defender incidents and advances the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Pilot User Administrator assignment for one helpdesk staff member and test allowed and denied operations. This is a controlled implementation step for user administrator least privilege, where helpdesk must manage ordinary user accounts but must not receive all tenant privileges. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

C:

Pilot delegated Exchange administration with a limited mail operations account. This is a controlled implementation step for workload-specific exchange admin role, where the mail operations team needs Exchange Online management but not Microsoft 365-wide administrator access. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

D:

Pilot the compliance role group using a permitted search and an out-of-scope operation. This is a controlled implementation step for microsoft purview role groups, where compliance analysts require access to approved investigations but not universal compliance configuration. The current case instead reports that sOC analysts need incident triage rights without unrelated tenant administration. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to assign appropriate Defender portal permissions at this decision stage.

Question 379

At Horizon Services, the identity security team is responsible for a risk-based identity protection program. A confidential application must be available only from Intune-compliant devices. The documented evidence is: users currently gain access from personally managed devices without compliance evaluation. The required outcome is to require device compliance for the protected app. The project requires audit-ready before-and-after configuration records. Which post-change check would most directly establish that the requirement has been met?

  1. Confirm reauthentication is requested according to the configured supported session policy during Horizon Services' risk-based identity protection program
  2. Confirm a high-risk sign-in triggers the configured access requirement or block during Horizon Services' risk-based identity protection program
  3. Confirm the compliant device can satisfy the control while the unmanaged device cannot during Horizon Services' risk-based identity protection program
  4. Confirm report-only evaluations are logged without applying the policy's interactive grant controls during Horizon Services' risk-based identity protection program

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Confirm the compliant device can satisfy the control while the unmanaged device cannot. This acceptance testing step is specific to conditional access compliant-device grant. The immediate task is to observe a concrete success condition, not rely on a configuration screenshot alone. It responds to the evidence that users currently gain access from personally managed devices without compliance evaluation and advances the required outcome to require device compliance for the protected app.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Confirm reauthentication is requested according to the configured supported session policy. This is an acceptance testing step for conditional access sign-in frequency, where the organization wants users to reauthenticate periodically for a sensitive web resource. The current case instead reports that a confidential application must be available only from Intune-compliant devices. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to require device compliance for the protected app at this decision stage.

B:

Confirm a high-risk sign-in triggers the configured access requirement or block. This is an acceptance testing step for identity protection sign-in risk, where security wants stronger access controls when an individual sign-in exhibits suspicious signals. The current case instead reports that a confidential application must be available only from Intune-compliant devices. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to require device compliance for the protected app at this decision stage.

D:

Confirm report-only evaluations are logged without applying the policy's interactive grant controls. This is an acceptance testing step for conditional access report-only evaluation, where security wants to assess a new Conditional Access requirement without interrupting users. The current case instead reports that a confidential application must be available only from Intune-compliant devices. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to require device compliance for the protected app at this decision stage.

Question 380

At Keystone Banking, the workplace administration team is responsible for a collaboration membership transition. An employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. The documented evidence is: the Microsoft Entra user object remains enabled and has active sign-ins. The required outcome is to prevent future interactive sign-ins while preserving required investigation and retention paths. The initial change must be small enough to observe before organization-wide adoption. Which controlled deployment step would best address the requirement before broad rollout?

  1. Test both message delivery and the intended permission assignment with a small group during Keystone Banking's collaboration membership transition
  2. Pilot group creation with a limited membership set and verify group resource access during Keystone Banking's collaboration membership transition
  3. Pilot the guest invitation and resource permissions with one authorized external collaborator during Keystone Banking's collaboration membership transition
  4. Disable the departing user's account promptly and test access revocation before later lifecycle cleanup during Keystone Banking's collaboration membership transition

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Disable the departing user's account promptly and test access revocation before later lifecycle cleanup. This controlled implementation step is specific to cloud user account sign-in control. The immediate task is a narrowly scoped and reversible first implementation. It responds to the evidence that the Microsoft Entra user object remains enabled and has active sign-ins and advances the required outcome to prevent future interactive sign-ins while preserving required investigation and retention paths.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Test both message delivery and the intended permission assignment with a small group. This is a controlled implementation step for mail-enabled security group, where a compliance committee needs a single email address and a permission-assignable membership. The current case instead reports that an employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to prevent future interactive sign-ins while preserving required investigation and retention paths at this decision stage.

B:

Pilot group creation with a limited membership set and verify group resource access. This is a controlled implementation step for microsoft 365 group workspace collaboration, where a cross-functional team needs shared group conversations and files with self-service collaboration. The current case instead reports that an employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to prevent future interactive sign-ins while preserving required investigation and retention paths at this decision stage.

C:

Pilot the guest invitation and resource permissions with one authorized external collaborator. This is a controlled implementation step for external guest collaboration, where an approved contractor requires collaboration on selected tenant resources without a regular employee account. The current case instead reports that an employee has left the company but their account still permits Microsoft 365 interactive sign-in. It does not directly demonstrate the required outcome to prevent future interactive sign-ins while preserving required investigation and retention paths at this decision stage.

Microsoft 365 Administrator (MS-102) Practice Tests