Question 280
A domain policy permits only DNS and Kerberos to an identity server but a local rule appears broader; staff need to confirm effective policy. Which administrative configuration or response BEST addresses the primary requirement?
Explanation
Correct Answer
Use Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security to enforce role-specific inbound rules on the effective domain/private/public profile, keeping administrative ports limited to approved sources. This response targets the system boundary described in the case. An inbound rule must match actual profile, direction, ports and source; disabling all profiles to repair one application creates unnecessary exposure. Before applying it, verify: Inspect active network profile, effective GPO firewall rules, listener ports, remote address filters, dropped packet logs, and policy precedence. Situation: A domain policy permits only DNS and Kerberos to an identity server but a local rule appears broader; staff need to confirm effective policy.
Incorrect Answers
Inventory NTLM authentication paths and privilege-tier boundaries, enforce authentication policy silos for supported high-value accounts, and phase out unsafe NTLM dependencies after testing. This would address NTLM audit and authentication policy silo hardening, not the controlling issue in this situation. A domain-wide NTLM disable without usage discovery can break legacy systems; authentication policy silos narrow where sensitive accounts may authenticate. The targeted response is: Use Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security to enforce role-specific inbound rules on the effective domain/private/public profile, keeping administrative ports limited to approved sources. Situation: A domain policy permits only DNS and Kerberos to an identity server but a local rule appears broader; staff need to confirm effective policy.
Create tested connection security rules for domain isolation and required authenticated server-to-server IPsec, with planned exemptions for unmanaged systems. This would address Windows IPsec connection security and domain isolation, not the controlling issue in this situation. Connection security rules authenticate or protect IP traffic independently of simple port allow rules; endpoints must agree on authentication and policy. The targeted response is: Use Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security to enforce role-specific inbound rules on the effective domain/private/public profile, keeping administrative ports limited to approved sources. Situation: A domain policy permits only DNS and Kerberos to an identity server but a local rule appears broader; staff need to confirm effective policy.
Configure a Read-Only Domain Controller with an explicit Password Replication Policy permitting only approved branch identities and denying privileged account caching; plan credential exposure response. This would address RODC password replication policy in branch offices, not the controlling issue in this situation. RODCs reduce the sensitive write surface in unsecured sites, but a permissive cached-credential policy can undermine that goal. The targeted response is: Use Windows Defender Firewall with Advanced Security to enforce role-specific inbound rules on the effective domain/private/public profile, keeping administrative ports limited to approved sources. Situation: A domain policy permits only DNS and Kerberos to an identity server but a local rule appears broader; staff need to confirm effective policy.


