cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 67

Question 660

Two candidate routes exist but one fails import policy and another lacks a next hop. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect show route hidden extensive and relevant policy terms.
  2. Restart all OSPF neighbors before checking BGP import decisions or next-hop reachability.
  3. Inspect show bgp neighbor last error and BGP OPEN notification fields.
  4. Check BGP advertised families and show route table inet6.0 protocol bgp.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Inspect show route hidden extensive and relevant policy terms. This checks whether the active route reflects documented policy and any hidden route has an explained reason.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Restart all OSPF neighbors before checking BGP import decisions or next-hop reachability. That bypass leaves the BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis issue unresolved. Treating peer Established as proof every received prefix is installed masks routing failures.

C:

Inspect show bgp neighbor last error and BGP OPEN notification fields. That check applies chiefly to BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity, not the current BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis issue. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

D:

Check BGP advertised families and show route table inet6.0 protocol bgp. That check applies chiefly to BGP NLRI IPv6 unicast inet6 family, not the current BGP hidden and rejected path diagnosis issue. BGP neighbor state and route installation are separate control-plane gates.

Question 661

During an operational risk review, this situation is reported: A handset is in the data VLAN because no LLDP-MED network policy is advertised. If the underlying control is neglected, which failure would MOST directly follow?

  1. Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN.
  2. Overly broad summaries can attract traffic to absent component prefixes.
  3. Changing one DHCP option does not repair absent PoE or unsupported LLDP-MED.
  4. Assuming any PoE-capable port supplies every device's requested wattage is unsafe.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Basic LLDP neighbor discovery alone may not advertise the required voice VLAN. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information. A useful corrective investigation is to inspect LLDP-MED advertisements and tagged phone frames on the link.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Overly broad summaries can attract traffic to absent component prefixes. This is a OSPF interarea route summarization failure pattern, not the primary LLDP-MED voice network policy failure in this case. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.

C:

Changing one DHCP option does not repair absent PoE or unsupported LLDP-MED. This is a IP phone first-hop diagnostic workflow failure pattern, not the primary LLDP-MED voice network policy failure in this case. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.

D:

Assuming any PoE-capable port supplies every device's requested wattage is unsafe. This is a PoE class discovery and allocation failure pattern, not the primary LLDP-MED voice network policy failure in this case. LLDP-MED extends neighbor discovery with voice-oriented network policy information.

Question 662

An IP phone with a downstream computer must keep voice and workstation traffic in different VLANs. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control.
  2. Set correct voice VLAN membership and data VLAN handling for the access port.
  3. Configure supported LLDP-MED voice policy with appropriate QoS marking guidance.
  4. Configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Set correct voice VLAN membership and data VLAN handling for the access port. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies. The expected validation is that phone RTP and signaling reach voice network while PC traffic stays in data segment.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Enable the same unrestricted VLAN for phone and PC as a mandatory separation control. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic. Treating both streams as one unrestricted VLAN can violate QoS and segmentation rules.

C:

Configure supported LLDP-MED voice policy with appropriate QoS marking guidance. This addresses LLDP-MED voice priority signaling rather than the required Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic decision. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.

D:

Configure supported LLDP-MED voice VLAN network policy for the relevant ports. This addresses LLDP-MED voice network policy rather than the required Voice VLAN tagged versus PC data traffic decision. Phone access-port design can carry tagged voice and untagged data for separate policies.

Question 663

An engineer expects the IPv4 OSPF LSDB to explain a failed IPv6 destination. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Interpret neighbor state relative to network type and compare timers MTU and authentication.
  2. Troubleshoot OSPF and OSPFv3 sessions and tables as distinct address-family contexts.
  3. Disable OSPFv3 because OSPFv2 already carries every IPv6 prefix by default.
  4. Put both interfaces in the same intended OSPF area and verify shared area policy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Troubleshoot OSPF and OSPFv3 sessions and tables as distinct address-family contexts. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have related SPF logic but separate protocol and address-family configuration. The expected validation is that both IPv4 and IPv6 routes appear via their configured protocols independently.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Interpret neighbor state relative to network type and compare timers MTU and authentication. This addresses OSPF neighbor state troubleshooting workflow rather than the required OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations decision. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have related SPF logic but separate protocol and address-family configuration.

C:

Disable OSPFv3 because OSPFv2 already carries every IPv6 prefix by default. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations. A healthy IPv4 neighbor is not proof of IPv6 adjacency or prefix reachability.

D:

Put both interfaces in the same intended OSPF area and verify shared area policy. This addresses OSPFv2 area identifier consistency rather than the required OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations decision. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have related SPF logic but separate protocol and address-family configuration.

Question 664

Bulk traffic suffers tail drops and TCP synchronization during recurrent congestion. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Configure suitable RED or WRED drop profiles and map PLP to planned thresholds.
  2. Apply the intended scheduler map to the actual output interface.
  3. Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves.
  4. Tune supported scheduler buffer sizes consistent with measured burst requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Configure suitable RED or WRED drop profiles and map PLP to planned thresholds. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises. The expected validation is that queue statistics show probabilistic early drops according to class and PLP settings.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Apply the intended scheduler map to the actual output interface. This addresses Scheduler maps attached to egress interface rather than the required RED WRED drop profile thresholds decision. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.

C:

Enable a firewall permit rule and assume it programs WRED probability curves. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for RED WRED drop profile thresholds. Poorly chosen thresholds can drop valuable traffic or fail to control congestion.

D:

Tune supported scheduler buffer sizes consistent with measured burst requirements. This addresses Queue buffer-size allocation rather than the required RED WRED drop profile thresholds decision. WRED can drop lower-priority traffic earlier as average queue size rises.

Question 665

A backbone adjacency has identical IP addressing but mismatched authentication type. Which technical principle BEST explains the OSPF authentication key or algorithm decision?

  1. OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster.
  2. Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state.
  3. OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends.
  4. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure matching supported OSPF authentication parameters on both neighbors.

Incorrect Answers

A:

OSPF automatic cost can require reference-bandwidth adjustment as interfaces become faster. That principle is related to OSPF reference bandwidth and high-speed links, not the main OSPF authentication key or algorithm choice. Invalid keys or incompatible authentication configuration silently discard adjacencies.

B:

Multicast forwarding depends on both RPF incoming checks and valid outgoing interface state. That principle is related to Multicast routing table incoming outgoing lists, not the main OSPF authentication key or algorithm choice. Invalid keys or incompatible authentication configuration silently discard adjacencies.

C:

OSPF adjacency requires compatible area identity at both ends. That principle is related to OSPFv2 area identifier consistency, not the main OSPF authentication key or algorithm choice. Invalid keys or incompatible authentication configuration silently discard adjacencies.

Question 666

An enterprise must avoid installing an unwanted OSPF route in the local routing table. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Verify IPv6 interface participation and OSPFv3 prefix advertisement settings.
  2. Attach an explicit OSPF export policy matching only approved active source routes.
  3. Apply supported route policy at the correct Junos OSPF import or RIB-selection control.
  4. Hide one route in show output and claim other OSPF routers no longer know the LSA.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Apply supported route policy at the correct Junos OSPF import or RIB-selection control. Local route preference or policy and OSPF flooding are distinct decisions. The expected validation is that the local route table follows documented acceptance policy while LSDB visibility is understood.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Verify IPv6 interface participation and OSPFv3 prefix advertisement settings. This addresses OSPFv3 IPv6 prefix advertisement rather than the required OSPF routing policy import filtering decision. Local route preference or policy and OSPF flooding are distinct decisions.

B:

Attach an explicit OSPF export policy matching only approved active source routes. This addresses OSPF external export policy redistribution rather than the required OSPF routing policy import filtering decision. Local route preference or policy and OSPF flooding are distinct decisions.

D:

Hide one route in show output and claim other OSPF routers no longer know the LSA. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for OSPF routing policy import filtering. Mistaking local import rejection for universal LSA suppression produces false reachability assumptions.

Question 667

Guest browser redirection works but a certificate or session issue prevents authorization. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Expose internal management networks to every guest once they open the portal page.
  2. Inspect RADIUS transaction logs response codes and matching authentication rules.
  3. Capture EAPOL on access link and RADIUS transactions toward AAA host.
  4. Inspect web redirect AAA session state and post-auth VLAN or filter.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect web redirect AAA session state and post-auth VLAN or filter. This checks whether the guest is redirected appropriately and receives only permitted post-portal access.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Expose internal management networks to every guest once they open the portal page. That bypass leaves the Captive portal web authentication issue unresolved. A portal that grants full internal access after a checkbox violates guest isolation.

B:

Inspect RADIUS transaction logs response codes and matching authentication rules. That check applies chiefly to RADIUS Access-Accept versus Access-Reject handling, not the current Captive portal web authentication issue. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation.

C:

Capture EAPOL on access link and RADIUS transactions toward AAA host. That check applies chiefly to 802.1X supplicant authenticator RADIUS roles, not the current Captive portal web authentication issue. Captive portal web authentication is not a replacement for cryptographic endpoint supplicant validation.

Question 668

A fabric expects active-active service but one leaf never forwards eligible traffic. Select TWO statements that correctly combine the EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding implementation, its evidence, or its governing principle.

  1. Traffic can use eligible multihomed links while loss of one link preserves connectivity.
  2. Configure supported all-active multihoming mode and compatible LAG or ESI settings.
  3. Disable split-horizon protection to obtain unbounded active-active forwarding.
  4. Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import.
  5. Restore valid underlay routing to VTEP addresses and verify permitted VXLAN traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answers

A:

Traffic can use eligible multihomed links while loss of one link preserves connectivity. This is direct observable evidence for EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding.

B:

Configure supported all-active multihoming mode and compatible LAG or ESI settings. This is the intended implementation action for EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding.

Incorrect Answers

C:

Disable split-horizon protection to obtain unbounded active-active forwarding. This would not be an appropriate EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding decision. Treating both uplinks as independent uncoordinated bridges can form duplication or loops.

D:

Verify local MAC learning and Type2 MAC/IP route advertisement and import. This belongs to EVPN Type2 MAC IP advertisement, not the specified EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding operation. EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.

E:

Restore valid underlay routing to VTEP addresses and verify permitted VXLAN traffic. This belongs to VXLAN VTEP loopback underlay route, not the specified EVPN all-active multihoming forwarding operation. EVPN all-active multihoming can use parallel forwarding paths with designated loop protection.

Question 669

A shared service router must reach devices across multiple private VLAN secondary groups. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Set every service port to isolated and claim community members will keep talking.
  2. Test communication matrix among each community and shared gateway.
  3. Inspect interface mode VLAN members and the learned MAC table.
  4. Inspect ethernet-switching table per VLAN and MAC movement logs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Test communication matrix among each community and shared gateway. This checks whether same-community endpoints communicate while different communities stay isolated.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Set every service port to isolated and claim community members will keep talking. That bypass leaves the Private VLAN community and promiscuous roles issue unresolved. Mistaking community roles for isolated roles can interrupt same-group operation.

C:

Inspect interface mode VLAN members and the learned MAC table. That check applies chiefly to Ethernet access interface VLAN membership, not the current Private VLAN community and promiscuous roles issue. Private VLAN community ports have scoped peer reachability and promiscuous ports serve shared resources.

D:

Inspect ethernet-switching table per VLAN and MAC movement logs. That check applies chiefly to Ethernet MAC learning and flooding, not the current Private VLAN community and promiscuous roles issue. Private VLAN community ports have scoped peer reachability and promiscuous ports serve shared resources.

Question 670

A newly added edge router fails to learn the selected RP from its PIM domain. Which technical principle BEST explains the PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping decision?

  1. IPv4 multicast destination ranges are group identifiers rather than ordinary host addresses.
  2. Multifield classification can use packet fields beyond preexisting DSCP markings.
  3. Dynamic RP discovery advertises RP group associations while PIM still requires routing reachability.
  4. RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Dynamic RP discovery advertises RP group associations while PIM still requires routing reachability. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure supported dynamic RP discovery or bootstrap policies where the topology supports them.

Incorrect Answers

A:

IPv4 multicast destination ranges are group identifiers rather than ordinary host addresses. That principle is related to IPv4 multicast group address versus unicast, not the main PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping choice. Incorrect discovery scope or policy leaves segments with stale RP maps.

B:

Multifield classification can use packet fields beyond preexisting DSCP markings. That principle is related to Junos multifield firewall filter classification, not the main PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping choice. Incorrect discovery scope or policy leaves segments with stale RP maps.

D:

RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements. That principle is related to Static RP mapping group range, not the main PIM RP discovery and bootstrap mapping choice. Incorrect discovery scope or policy leaves segments with stale RP maps.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests