cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Juniper JN0-650 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
JN0-650 Exam - Verified By Experts
JN0-650 Premium File

JN0-650 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 107 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 08, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Juniper JN0-650 Practice Test 54

Question 530

A Junos eBGP session remains Active because each router expects the wrong remote autonomous system. After deploying the recommended BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Received and advertised route sets satisfy their separate intended controls.
  2. Multiple eligible next hops are installed and traffic follows approved ECMP hashing.
  3. BGP reaches Established with the expected local and remote ASN and prefix families.
  4. The stub receives an appropriate default or interarea reachability without external type-5 flooding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

BGP reaches Established with the expected local and remote ASN and prefix families. This is the directly observable outcome for BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity. BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Received and advertised route sets satisfy their separate intended controls. This validates BGP import versus export policy direction but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity result. BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility.

B:

Multiple eligible next hops are installed and traffic follows approved ECMP hashing. This validates BGP multipath equal-cost path installation but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity result. BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility.

D:

The stub receives an appropriate default or interarea reachability without external type-5 flooding. This validates OSPF stub area external LSA suppression but does not directly demonstrate the required BGP eBGP peer AS and local identity result. BGP OPEN exchange checks autonomous-system identity and capability compatibility.

Question 531

A shaper is mistakenly treated as an ingress drop-based policer. Which technical principle BEST explains the Junos egress shaping rate decision?

  1. Shaping delays packets to smooth egress rate while policing meters and may drop.
  2. Multifield classification can use packet fields beyond preexisting DSCP markings.
  3. A CoS trust boundary defines whose markings should be honored.
  4. Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Shaping delays packets to smooth egress rate while policing meters and may drop. In this situation, the relevant action is to set egress shaping to the supported carrier rate on the correct interface or queue.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Multifield classification can use packet fields beyond preexisting DSCP markings. That principle is related to Junos multifield firewall filter classification, not the main Junos egress shaping rate choice. Shaping above a carrier limit can shift congestion to an uncontrolled downstream point.

C:

A CoS trust boundary defines whose markings should be honored. That principle is related to QoS trust boundary at campus edge, not the main Junos egress shaping rate choice. Shaping above a carrier limit can shift congestion to an uncontrolled downstream point.

D:

Guest VLAN authorizes limited access for eligible unauthenticated clients. That principle is related to Guest VLAN for unauthenticated clients, not the main Junos egress shaping rate choice. Shaping above a carrier limit can shift congestion to an uncontrolled downstream point.

Question 532

A replacement OSPF peer stops at Exchange after previously becoming Full. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Verify source route active state policy terms and destination inet6.0 routes.
  2. Clear every routing daemon whenever any OSPF neighbor displays Two-Way.
  3. Collect show ospf neighbor detail and correlate state progression against network design.
  4. Inspect NSSA LSAs and translated external entries at the ABR.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Collect show ospf neighbor detail and correlate state progression against network design. This checks whether expected adjacency relationships achieve correct state for the selected network type.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Verify source route active state policy terms and destination inet6.0 routes. That check applies chiefly to OSPFv3 routing policy for external IPv6, not the current OSPF neighbor state troubleshooting workflow issue. Two-Way may be normal between DROther neighbors while Exchange stuck indicates database issues.

B:

Clear every routing daemon whenever any OSPF neighbor displays Two-Way. That bypass leaves the OSPF neighbor state troubleshooting workflow issue unresolved. Treating every Two-Way adjacency as a fatal database synchronization failure causes unnecessary changes.

D:

Inspect NSSA LSAs and translated external entries at the ABR. That check applies chiefly to OSPF NSSA type-seven translation, not the current OSPF neighbor state troubleshooting workflow issue. Two-Way may be normal between DROther neighbors while Exchange stuck indicates database issues.

Question 533

A secured OSPF link fails after one router rotates authentication credentials. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Disable all routing-protocol authentication across the network to fix one key mismatch.
  2. Assign deliberate OSPF interface costs and check the total path metric.
  3. Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required.
  4. Configure matching supported OSPF authentication parameters on both neighbors.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Configure matching supported OSPF authentication parameters on both neighbors. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability. The expected validation is that accepted authenticated Hellos lead to a stable neighbor relationship.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Disable all routing-protocol authentication across the network to fix one key mismatch. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for OSPF authentication key or algorithm. Invalid keys or incompatible authentication configuration silently discard adjacencies.

B:

Assign deliberate OSPF interface costs and check the total path metric. This addresses OSPF path cost selection rather than the required OSPF authentication key or algorithm decision. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.

C:

Tune eligible OSPF interface priority and plan an explicit election event where required. This addresses OSPF designated router election broadcast LAN rather than the required OSPF authentication key or algorithm decision. OSPF authentication compatibility is independent of ordinary IP reachability.

Question 534

A forwarding class has correct scheduling but packet captures show wrong outbound markings. Which technical principle BEST explains the DSCP egress rewrite rules decision?

  1. IGMP expresses host interest in groups while routing protocols move traffic between subnets.
  2. Scheduler transmit rates allocate planned bandwidth service to queues.
  3. Successful CoS needs consistent ingress classification egress scheduling and congestion management.
  4. Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Junos rewrite rules use internal forwarding class and PLP to set outbound header bits. In this situation, the relevant action is to configure appropriate rewrite rules mapping forwarding class and PLP to egress DSCP.

Incorrect Answers

A:

IGMP expresses host interest in groups while routing protocols move traffic between subnets. That principle is related to IGMPv2 membership report and leave, not the main DSCP egress rewrite rules choice. Ingress classification does not itself guarantee downstream marking consistency.

B:

Scheduler transmit rates allocate planned bandwidth service to queues. That principle is related to Scheduler transmit rate bandwidth allocation, not the main DSCP egress rewrite rules choice. Ingress classification does not itself guarantee downstream marking consistency.

C:

Successful CoS needs consistent ingress classification egress scheduling and congestion management. That principle is related to CoS end-to-end verification of drop behavior, not the main DSCP egress rewrite rules choice. Ingress classification does not itself guarantee downstream marking consistency.

Question 535

A remote router unexpectedly prefers a type-two external despite a longer route to its ASBR. Which technical principle BEST explains the OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics decision?

  1. OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric.
  2. Local route preference or policy and OSPF flooding are distinct decisions.
  3. RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements.
  4. OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

OSPF E1 includes internal cost to ASBR whereas E2 comparison primarily uses external metric. In this situation, the relevant action is to choose an intentional OSPF external metric type and test ASBR reachability assumptions.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Local route preference or policy and OSPF flooding are distinct decisions. That principle is related to OSPF routing policy import filtering, not the main OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics choice. Treating E1 and E2 as interchangeable can send traffic over an unsuitable exit.

C:

RP mapping and unicast RP reachability are separate multicast requirements. That principle is related to Static RP mapping group range, not the main OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics choice. Treating E1 and E2 as interchangeable can send traffic over an unsuitable exit.

D:

OSPF interarea summarization originates at area boundaries with reachability tradeoffs. That principle is related to OSPF interarea route summarization, not the main OSPF external type-one versus type-two metrics choice. Treating E1 and E2 as interchangeable can send traffic over an unsuitable exit.

Question 536

An address-family negotiation mistake leaves only a non-IPv4 family active. Which technical principle BEST explains the BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family decision?

  1. BGP address families determine which NLRI types may be exchanged.
  2. BGP relies on TCP transport and does not form merely because IP reachability exists.
  3. LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection.
  4. Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

BGP address families determine which NLRI types may be exchanged. In this situation, the relevant action is to enable compatible inet-unicast family capabilities and correct routing policies.

Incorrect Answers

B:

BGP relies on TCP transport and does not form merely because IP reachability exists. That principle is related to BGP TCP 179 and firewall reachability, not the main BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family choice. Session Established does not guarantee the required route family was negotiated.

C:

LOCAL_PREF is propagated within an AS and commonly steers outbound path selection. That principle is related to BGP LOCAL_PREF outbound exit selection, not the main BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family choice. Session Established does not guarantee the required route family was negotiated.

D:

Single-active multihoming deliberately avoids parallel forwarding on a shared segment. That principle is related to EVPN single-active multihoming access mode, not the main BGP NLRI IPv4 unicast inet family choice. Session Established does not guarantee the required route family was negotiated.

Question 537

A wiring-closet switch moves all ports into full employee access when RADIUS times out. Which technical principle BEST explains the RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy decision?

  1. OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have related SPF logic but separate protocol and address-family configuration.
  2. Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions.
  3. Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path.
  4. 802.1X host-mode behavior controls whether access applies per endpoint or per port.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Server timeout and explicit credential rejection should use different fallback decisions. In this situation, the relevant action is to define a risk-approved server-fail fallback action with restrictive VLAN or deny behavior.

Incorrect Answers

A:

OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 have related SPF logic but separate protocol and address-family configuration. That principle is related to OSPFv2 versus OSPFv3 operations, not the main RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy choice. Fail-open all access during AAA outages can expose critical assets.

C:

Multiple authentication methods must be composed without creating a bypass path. That principle is related to 802.1X versus MAC RADIUS method priority, not the main RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy choice. Fail-open all access during AAA outages can expose critical assets.

D:

802.1X host-mode behavior controls whether access applies per endpoint or per port. That principle is related to 802.1X multi-supplicant port control, not the main RADIUS server unreachable fallback policy choice. Fail-open all access during AAA outages can expose critical assets.

Question 538

A tenant's unicast works but unknown unicast and broadcast frames never reach remote leaves. After deploying the recommended EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes change, which result MOST directly verifies success?

  1. Remote RP learns eligible sources and establishes multicast data delivery to subscribers.
  2. Expected EVPN NLRI appears in the routing instance and route table.
  3. Same-segment endpoints communicate while other VNIs remain isolated.
  4. Each participating VTEP has the required BUM flood destinations for the VNI.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Each participating VTEP has the required BUM flood destinations for the VNI. This is the directly observable outcome for EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes. Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Remote RP learns eligible sources and establishes multicast data delivery to subscribers. This validates MSDP source active exchange but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes result. Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution.

B:

Expected EVPN NLRI appears in the routing instance and route table. This validates BGP EVPN address-family peer negotiation but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes result. Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution.

C:

Same-segment endpoints communicate while other VNIs remain isolated. This validates VXLAN VNI to VLAN association but does not directly demonstrate the required EVPN Type3 IMET inclusive multicast routes result. Type3 IMET routes signal participation in an EVPN broadcast domain for BUM distribution.

Question 539

A routed network has asymmetric unicast topology that causes multicast traffic to be dropped. Which next investigation or correction is MOST appropriate?

  1. Inspect IGMPv3 (S,G) membership report and associated forwarding state.
  2. Inspect destination group fields in received packets and routing entries.
  3. Install a route toward the multicast group instead of source and expect RPF to pass automatically.
  4. Inspect route to source show multicast route and RPF neighbor interface.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Inspect route to source show multicast route and RPF neighbor interface. This checks whether incoming multicast on the accepted RPF interface forwards to eligible downstream receivers.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Inspect IGMPv3 (S,G) membership report and associated forwarding state. That check applies chiefly to IGMPv3 source include mode, not the current Multicast RPF shortest reverse path check issue. Multicast RPF prevents loops by checking the expected route toward the source or RP.

B:

Inspect destination group fields in received packets and routing entries. That check applies chiefly to IPv4 multicast group address versus unicast, not the current Multicast RPF shortest reverse path check issue. Multicast RPF prevents loops by checking the expected route toward the source or RP.

C:

Install a route toward the multicast group instead of source and expect RPF to pass automatically. That bypass leaves the Multicast RPF shortest reverse path check issue unresolved. A valid group membership cannot compensate for a failed RPF incoming-interface check.

Question 540

A large webcast is flooding every access port in a multicast-enabled VLAN. Which configuration or operational step BEST meets the stated requirement?

  1. Align source reachability and any approved multicast RPF policy with actual topology.
  2. Enable appropriate IGMP snooping and maintain valid querier membership learning.
  3. Select appropriate IPv6 multicast addressing and scope behavior for intended receivers.
  4. Replace IGMP snooping with BGP prefix aggregation to control Layer 2 ports.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Enable appropriate IGMP snooping and maintain valid querier membership learning. IGMP snooping uses observed host joins to constrain layer-2 multicast replication. The expected validation is that multicast frames reach receiver ports instead of every port by default.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Align source reachability and any approved multicast RPF policy with actual topology. This addresses Multicast source route policy and RPF rather than the required IGMP snooping access-port replication decision. IGMP snooping uses observed host joins to constrain layer-2 multicast replication.

C:

Select appropriate IPv6 multicast addressing and scope behavior for intended receivers. This addresses IPv6 multicast scope and group use rather than the required IGMP snooping access-port replication decision. IGMP snooping uses observed host joins to constrain layer-2 multicast replication.

D:

Replace IGMP snooping with BGP prefix aggregation to control Layer 2 ports. This is a risky or ineffective shortcut for IGMP snooping access-port replication. Missing membership state or wrong querier behavior can flood or blackhole multicast.

Enterprise Routing and Switching, Professional (JNCIP-ENT) (JN0-650) Practice Tests