cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Isaca AAIA Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
AAIA Exam - Verified By Experts
AAIA Premium Bundle
$14.99

AAIA Premium Bundle

$74.99
$89.98
  • Premium File 556 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 08, 2026
  • Training Course 110 Video Lectures
 
$89.98
$74.99
accept 22 downloads in last 7 days
block-screenshots
Purchase Isaca AAIA Exam Training Products Individually
Isaca AAIA Premium File
Premium File 556 Q&A
$76.99$69.99
Isaca AAIA Video Training Course
Training Course 110 Lectures
$21.99 $19.99
Isaca AAIA Practice Test 34

Question 330

An independent AI auditor reviews this case: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE. Which TWO complementary elements should the auditor seek: an effective corrective control and the most probative independent evidence? Select TWO answers.

  1. Inspect approved exception register, justifications, expiry, control alternatives and follow-up evidence.
  2. Map accountable GOVERN processes, context under MAP, evidence-based MEASURE and decisions under MANAGE without mischaracterizing voluntary guidance.
  3. Identify relevant AI Act roles, use-case classifications, jurisdictions and applicable obligations with competent legal input.
  4. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  5. Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

The reason it is necessary is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate. For this situation: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

E:

The reason it is necessary is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate. The corrective action is: Map accountable GOVERN processes, context under MAP, evidence-based MEASURE and decisions under MANAGE without mischaracterizing voluntary guidance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This option concerns AI policy exception governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

C:

This option concerns EU AI Act role and risk classification, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The decisive principle here is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.

D:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment weakness: Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed. For this situation: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

Question 331

A governance and assurance review uncovers the following: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE. What evidence should the auditor examine FIRST to substantiate or challenge the control owner’s claim? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  2. Inspect subgroup and accessibility tests, documented stakeholder input, complaints and corrective actions.
  3. Examine governing texts, role assessment, applicability dates, legal signoff and evidence of controls.
  4. Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The reason it is necessary is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate. The acceptable verified outcome is: The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment weakness: Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed. Effective closure requires: The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.

B:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

C:

This option concerns Regulatory change tracking without overclaiming compliance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The decisive principle here is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.

Question 332

A risk-based audit engagement examines this operating condition: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE. After management addresses the issue, which result MOST convincingly demonstrates effective remediation? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Sampled AI processes show implemented controls and closed corrective actions, with any certification claims substantiated.
  2. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  3. Affected groups can access fair service and outcomes are reassessed after changes.
  4. The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The reason it is necessary is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate. In this case: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This option concerns ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The decisive principle here is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.

B:

For this situation: An AI committee uses GOVERN and MAP labels but has no MEASURE evidence or risk treatment under MANAGE.

C:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The audit must corroborate: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Question 333

An audit committee asks for a defensible assessment of this situation: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction. What is the MOST appropriate risk-based audit recommendation that addresses the root control weakness? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  2. Evaluate foreseeable disparate impacts, accessibility needs, stakeholder participation and proportional mitigation.
  3. Assess AI management-system scope, documented processes, internal monitoring and continual improvement against applicable clauses.
  4. Map accountable GOVERN processes, context under MAP, evidence-based MEASURE and decisions under MANAGE without mischaracterizing voluntary guidance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The reason it is necessary is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate. In this case: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment weakness: Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed. In this case: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction.

B:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. A proportionate response is: Map accountable GOVERN processes, context under MAP, evidence-based MEASURE and decisions under MANAGE without mischaracterizing voluntary guidance.

C:

This option concerns ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The audit must corroborate: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Question 334

During an AI controls assessment, the team learns that a regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction. Which principle BEST explains why the observed practice is a material governance or control concern? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Disclosing AI involvement and limitations supports informed human interaction but is not a substitute for other controls.
  2. NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.
  3. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  4. Responsible AI assessment includes human and social outcomes beyond aggregate technical model accuracy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Independent audit evidence includes: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes. The corrective action is: Map accountable GOVERN processes, context under MAP, evidence-based MEASURE and decisions under MANAGE without mischaracterizing voluntary guidance.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This option concerns AI transparency and meaningful disclosure, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The decisive principle here is: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.

C:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment weakness: Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed. For this situation: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction.

D:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction.

Question 335

An independent AI auditor reviews this case: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction. What evidence should the auditor examine FIRST to substantiate or challenge the control owner’s claim? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.
  2. Inspect subgroup and accessibility tests, documented stakeholder input, complaints and corrective actions.
  3. Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.
  4. Inspect system purpose, actors, changes, market placement, impact, legal analysis and current phased applicability.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This evidence directly tests the asserted control for NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Incorrect Answers

A:

It misses the key control principle: NIST AI RMF 1.0 provides risk-management functions, not a universal legal compliance certificate.

B:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The outcome to verify is: The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.

D:

This option concerns EU AI Act role and risk classification, which is a related but different AI governance concern. The audit must corroborate: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Question 336

A governance and assurance review uncovers the following: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction. After management addresses the issue, which result MOST convincingly demonstrates effective remediation? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Affected groups can access fair service and outcomes are reassessed after changes.
  2. The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.
  3. Organization documents role-specific obligations and controls for its actual use and checks changes over time.
  4. Treat naming all four NIST functions as proof that every AI risk has been addressed.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

This is an observable validation result for NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment, not just management assurance: The documented risk cycle links context, measurement, ownership and treatment for sampled systems.

Incorrect Answers

A:

It does not establish control effectiveness for NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment.

C:

This option concerns EU AI Act role and risk classification, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: A regulator-facing memo calls the voluntary NIST framework mandatory law in every jurisdiction.

D:

The auditor should instead examine: Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Question 337

A risk-based audit engagement examines this operating condition: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001. What is the MOST appropriate risk-based audit recommendation that addresses the root control weakness? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Assess AI management-system scope, documented processes, internal monitoring and continual improvement against applicable clauses.
  2. Assess contextual transparency duties, affected audiences and effective disclosure mechanisms appropriate to use.
  3. Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate.
  4. Evaluate foreseeable disparate impacts, accessibility needs, stakeholder participation and proportional mitigation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The reason it is necessary is: ISO/IEC 42001 describes requirements for an AI management system, not instant proof from a policy document. Independent audit evidence includes: Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews.

Incorrect Answers

B:

This option concerns AI transparency and meaningful disclosure, which is a related but different AI governance concern. It does not establish control effectiveness for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls.

C:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls weakness: Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate.

D:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. It does not establish control effectiveness for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls.

Question 338

An audit committee asks for a defensible assessment of this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001. Which principle BEST explains why the observed practice is a material governance or control concern? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate.
  2. ISO/IEC 42001 describes requirements for an AI management system, not instant proof from a policy document.
  3. Model suitability depends on performance, explainability and consequences of errors; a marginal metric gain does not remove oversight obligations.
  4. Responsible AI assessment includes human and social outcomes beyond aggregate technical model accuracy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Independent audit evidence includes: Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews. In this case: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls weakness: Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate. For this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

C:

This option concerns Explainable credit-model selection for adverse decisions, which is a related but different AI governance concern. It does not establish control effectiveness for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls.

D:

This option concerns Fairness and accessibility ethical governance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

Question 339

During an AI controls assessment, the team learns that a multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001. What evidence should the auditor examine FIRST to substantiate or challenge the control owner’s claim? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Examine governing texts, role assessment, applicability dates, legal signoff and evidence of controls.
  2. Inspect use-case criticality, model comparison, reason-code fidelity, feature lineage, adverse-decision samples and appeal test results.
  3. Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate.
  4. Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The reason it is necessary is: ISO/IEC 42001 describes requirements for an AI management system, not instant proof from a policy document. This evidence directly tests the asserted control for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls: Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This option concerns Regulatory change tracking without overclaiming compliance, which is a related but different AI governance concern. It does not establish control effectiveness for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls.

B:

This option concerns Explainable credit-model selection for adverse decisions, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

C:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls weakness: Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate. The auditor should instead examine: Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews.

Question 340

An independent AI auditor reviews this case: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001. Which TWO complementary elements should the auditor seek: an effective corrective control and the most probative independent evidence? Select TWO answers.

  1. Assess contextual transparency duties, affected audiences and effective disclosure mechanisms appropriate to use.
  2. Inspect AIMS scope, roles, risk treatment, audit outcomes, nonconformities and management reviews.
  3. Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate.
  4. Assess AI management-system scope, documented processes, internal monitoring and continual improvement against applicable clauses.
  5. Inspect AI inventory, contextual risk register, model evaluations, management treatment and oversight minutes.

Explanation

Correct Answers

B:

The reason it is necessary is: ISO/IEC 42001 describes requirements for an AI management system, not instant proof from a policy document. For this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

D:

This response fits the risk associated with ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls: Assess AI management-system scope, documented processes, internal monitoring and continual improvement against applicable clauses.

Incorrect Answers

A:

This option concerns AI transparency and meaningful disclosure, which is a related but different AI governance concern. For this situation: A multinational claims AI management-system certification solely because it purchased a copy of ISO/IEC 42001.

C:

This attractive shortcut does not resolve the ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls weakness: Call the organization ISO 42001 certified based only on a slide deck or unrelated ISO certificate. Effective closure requires: Sampled AI processes show implemented controls and closed corrective actions, with any certification claims substantiated.

E:

This option concerns NIST AI RMF governance and measurement alignment, which is a related but different AI governance concern. It does not establish control effectiveness for ISO IEC 42001 AI management system controls.

ISACA Advanced in AI Audit (AAIA) Practice Tests