cert
cert-1
cert-2

Pass Cisco 350-201 Exam in First Attempt Guaranteed!

Get 100% Latest Exam Questions, Accurate & Verified Answers to Pass the Actual Exam!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

cert-5
cert-6
350-201 Exam - Verified By Experts
350-201 Premium File

350-201 Premium File

$69.99
$76.99
  • Premium File 228 Questions & Answers. Last Update: Nov 10, 2026

Whats Included:

  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
 
$76.99
$69.99
accept 18 downloads in the last 7 days
block-screenshots
Cisco 350-201 Practice Test 28

Question 270

For an original CBRCOR educational scenario, consider: An identity alert covers successful privileged logins but the SOC has no audit of new service principal grants to the same environment. Select TWO complementary steps: the targeted correction and its strongest prechange validation.

  1. Change: Apply appropriate transport encryption, at-rest protection and runtime access restrictions to each data state and trust boundary.
  2. Check: Record OS version, device role, benchmark revision and configuration assessment output in a pilot environment.
  3. Change: Test controls against the complete attacker path and add missing segmentation or identity telemetry at the observed gap.
  4. Check: Simulate permitted and denied flows plus authorized privilege grants in a lab and compare expected logs and enforcement results.
  5. Treat one successful perimeter penetration test as proof that internal identity and east-west controls are complete.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Defense in depth requires each relevant trust boundary to be enforced and monitored rather than relying on one edge device. Evidence: Simulate permitted and denied flows plus authorized privilege grants in a lab and compare expected logs and enforcement results.

D:

Defense in depth requires each relevant trust boundary to be enforced and monitored rather than relying on one edge device. Simulate permitted and denied flows plus authorized privilege grants in a lab and compare expected logs and enforcement results.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Change: Apply appropriate transport encryption, at-rest protection and runtime access restrictions to each data state and trust boundary. Defense in depth requires each relevant trust boundary to be enforced and monitored rather than relying on one edge device.

B:

Check: Record OS version, device role, benchmark revision and configuration assessment output in a pilot environment. Defense in depth requires each relevant trust boundary to be enforced and monitored rather than relying on one edge device.

E:

For this select two assessment, the shortcut changes or bypasses the necessary correctness, governance or operational boundary rather than correcting it. Defense in depth requires each relevant trust boundary to be enforced and monitored rather than relying on one edge device.

Question 271

A SOC analyst is examining this cybersecurity operations situation: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration. A proposed shortcut is: Make every temporary security bypass permanent and remove audit collection to avoid generating alerts. What should the SOC analyst recommend as the narrowly scoped correction? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Make every temporary security bypass permanent and remove audit collection to avoid generating alerts.
  2. Tune specific signatures, thresholds and scoped allowlists using known benign workloads and preserved malicious test coverage.
  3. Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.
  4. Apply appropriate transport encryption, at-rest protection and runtime access restrictions to each data state and trust boundary.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

This targeted action addresses the observed security or operational control gap without discarding necessary controls. Applied case: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. For this best change assessment, the shortcut changes or bypasses the necessary correctness, governance or operational boundary rather than correcting it.

B:

Tune specific signatures, thresholds and scoped allowlists using known benign workloads and preserved malicious test coverage. A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

D:

Apply appropriate transport encryption, at-rest protection and runtime access restrictions to each data state and trust boundary. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Question 272

A Cisco cybersecurity incident response review finds: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration. The team proposes: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date. Which engineering principle most strongly supports the recommended response? Select ONE best answer.

  1. DNS and TLS metadata support behavioral hypotheses but cannot by themselves reveal encrypted application contents or prove compromise.
  2. UEBA scores deviations from learned behavior; contextual evidence distinguishes genuine account compromise from legitimate operational changes.
  3. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.
  4. Immutable image pipelines propagate security updates consistently; patching only live instances leaves future launches vulnerable.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Demonstrable success requires: Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required. Applied case: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

DNS and TLS metadata support behavioral hypotheses but cannot by themselves reveal encrypted application contents or prove compromise. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

B:

UEBA scores deviations from learned behavior; contextual evidence distinguishes genuine account compromise from legitimate operational changes. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

D:

Immutable image pipelines propagate security updates consistently; patching only live instances leaves future launches vulnerable. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Question 273

The SOC team has not yet approved changes. Current evidence indicates: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration. Which evidence best tests the technical diagnosis before approving a disruptive change? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Correlate CISA KEV or vendor alerts, affected versions, external reachability, mitigation status and change constraints.
  2. Compare the model explanation, supporting log timestamps and labeled benign or malicious cases before acting.
  3. Review exception approval, constrained reachability, logs and expiry in a controlled negative and positive access test.
  4. Inspect MFA challenge history, session tokens, new grants, device state and the user's confirmed activity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Applied case: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Correlate CISA KEV or vendor alerts, affected versions, external reachability, mitigation status and change constraints. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

B:

Compare the model explanation, supporting log timestamps and labeled benign or malicious cases before acting. A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

D:

Inspect MFA challenge history, session tokens, new grants, device state and the user's confirmed activity. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Question 274

A candidate correction has been tested and the platform team requires a post-change acceptance check. Original problem: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration. The response owner needs positive and negative results and evidence that legitimate security and business workflows still function. Which acceptance result demonstrates correct security operations behavior without disrupting authorized workflows? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required.
  2. Unapproved vulnerabilities or credential exposure stop deployment and authorized releases remain reproducible.
  3. Restricted local transfers are blocked or appropriately audited while approved business use remains possible.
  4. The fleet reaches the intended secure version while key network and endpoint controls remain functional and rollback is tested.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. The result must be validated using the documented device, service or access context.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Unapproved vulnerabilities or credential exposure stop deployment and authorized releases remain reproducible. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

C:

Restricted local transfers are blocked or appropriately audited while approved business use remains possible. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

D:

The fleet reaches the intended secure version while key network and endpoint controls remain functional and rollback is tested. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Question 275

An implementation sign-off request identifies the following problem: A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration. Which paired technical change and validation should close the implementation review? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Change: Evaluate behavioral baselines with device, identity, network and business context before deciding whether anomalies indicate misuse. Verify: Review baseline access patterns, session source, VPN egress, new permissions and correlated endpoint telemetry.
  2. Change: Validate field names, time windows, event source health and rule conditions, then refine content against representative samples. Verify: Run known positive and negative test cases, inspect raw and parsed events and compare rule matches before publishing.
  3. Change: Correlate identity, authorization and endpoint or network events by principal, timeline and relevant device context. Verify: Query synchronized sign-in, MFA, directory-change and EDR events for the same identity in a defined time window.
  4. Change: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date. Verify: Review exception approval, constrained reachability, logs and expiry in a controlled negative and positive access test.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. The change is successful only when: Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Change: Evaluate behavioral baselines with device, identity, network and business context before deciding whether anomalies indicate misuse.

B:

Change: Validate field names, time windows, event source health and rule conditions, then refine content against representative samples.

C:

Change: Correlate identity, authorization and endpoint or network events by principal, timeline and relevant device context. A legacy service must temporarily permit weak TLS for one partner but the exception lacks source restriction or expiration.

Question 276

A SOC analyst is examining this cybersecurity operations situation: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied. A proposed shortcut is: Make every temporary security bypass permanent and remove audit collection to avoid generating alerts. What should the SOC analyst recommend as the narrowly scoped correction? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Choose flow, logs or packet capture based on required fields, sensor placement, sampling and encryption limitations.
  2. Normalize incoming intelligence, preserve source and confidence metadata, enrich context and use bounded expiry before automated enforcement.
  3. Make every temporary security bypass permanent and remove audit collection to avoid generating alerts.
  4. Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

This targeted action addresses the observed security or operational control gap without discarding necessary controls. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Choose flow, logs or packet capture based on required fields, sensor placement, sampling and encryption limitations. A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied.

B:

This option addresses a different security operations topic (Threat intelligence platform feed lifecycle) rather than the documented Control exception validation and compensating safeguards decision.

C:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Use this instead: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.

Question 277

A Cisco cybersecurity incident response review finds: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied. The team proposes: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date. Which engineering principle most strongly supports the recommended response? Select ONE best answer.

  1. AI can prioritize likely relationships but indicator matching and attribution require independently corroborated evidence.
  2. A user anomaly is a hypothesis; subsequent privileged actions and authentication evidence change response urgency.
  3. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.
  4. Hardening guidance is platform and workload specific; a relevant benchmark needs a tested applicability and exception review.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Demonstrable success requires: Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required. This principle explains the proposed technical approach, which is: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.

Incorrect Answers

A:

AI can prioritize likely relationships but indicator matching and attribution require independently corroborated evidence. A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied.

B:

A user anomaly is a hypothesis; subsequent privileged actions and authentication evidence change response urgency. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

D:

This option addresses a different security operations topic (CIS benchmarks and vendor baselines) rather than the documented Control exception validation and compensating safeguards decision.

Question 278

The SOC team has not yet approved changes. Current evidence indicates: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied. Which evidence best tests the technical diagnosis before approving a disruptive change? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Review exception approval, constrained reachability, logs and expiry in a controlled negative and positive access test.
  2. Run known positive and negative test cases, inspect raw and parsed events and compare rule matches before publishing.
  3. Test allowed admin hosts and denied guest sources for SSH, HTTPS, SNMP and relevant control-plane protections.
  4. Compare active sockets, installed packages, process owners, business requirements and access rules before and after change.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Confirm afterward that: Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required.

Incorrect Answers

B:

Run known positive and negative test cases, inspect raw and parsed events and compare rule matches before publishing. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

C:

Test allowed admin hosts and denied guest sources for SSH, HTTPS, SNMP and relevant control-plane protections. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

D:

This option addresses a different security operations topic (Unnecessary services and listening ports) rather than the documented Control exception validation and compensating safeguards decision.

Question 279

A candidate correction has been tested and the platform team requires a post-change acceptance check. Original problem: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied. The response owner needs positive and negative results and evidence that legitimate security and business workflows still function. Which acceptance result demonstrates correct security operations behavior without disrupting authorized workflows? Select ONE best answer.

  1. Restricted local transfers are blocked or appropriately audited while approved business use remains possible.
  2. The fleet reaches the intended secure version while key network and endpoint controls remain functional and rollback is tested.
  3. Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required.
  4. Sensitive documents cannot be anonymously distributed while authorized collaboration remains intact.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Applied case: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Restricted local transfers are blocked or appropriately audited while approved business use remains possible. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

B:

The fleet reaches the intended secure version while key network and endpoint controls remain functional and rollback is tested. A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied.

D:

Sensitive documents cannot be anonymously distributed while authorized collaboration remains intact. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Question 280

For an original CBRCOR educational scenario, consider: A regulatory exception disables MFA for a service account yet no compensating credential vault or audit monitoring is applied. Select TWO complementary steps: the targeted correction and its strongest prechange validation.

  1. Check: Inspect MFA challenge history, session tokens, new grants, device state and the user's confirmed activity.
  2. Change: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.
  3. Check: Review exception approval, constrained reachability, logs and expiry in a controlled negative and positive access test.
  4. Change: Restrict management plane sources, require encrypted authenticated access and enforce documented ACL and logging controls.
  5. Make every temporary security bypass permanent and remove audit collection to avoid generating alerts.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Acceptance: Only approved clients use the exception and the team can detect abuse and remove the bypass when no longer required.

C:

Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency. Required intervention: Constrain exceptions by identity, source, time and monitoring, and schedule removal or replacement at an accountable review date.

Incorrect Answers

A:

Check: Inspect MFA challenge history, session tokens, new grants, device state and the user's confirmed activity. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

D:

Change: Restrict management plane sources, require encrypted authenticated access and enforce documented ACL and logging controls. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

E:

For this select two assessment, the shortcut changes or bypasses the necessary correctness, governance or operational boundary rather than correcting it. Compensating controls can reduce a specific residual risk but do not eliminate the need to understand and govern the original deficiency.

Performing Cybersecurity Using Cisco Security Technologies (CBRCOR) (350-201) Practice Tests