Nutanix NCP-US v6.5 Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions
Question No 1:
A healthcare organization is setting up a Nutanix cluster to manage and store sensitive patient records and large imaging files. As part of compliance with healthcare data regulations (such as HIPAA), the administrator is required to ensure that:
The system can support long-term retention of large files such as medical imaging, patient records, and reports.
All stored data must be preserved for a minimum duration of two years.
No deletion or modification of the stored data should be permitted during this retention period in order to maintain data integrity and regulatory compliance.
Given these requirements, which Nutanix data service and feature is most suitable for fulfilling the organization’s long-term, tamper-proof data retention needs?
A. Files – Read-only share
B. Files – Connected share
C. Objects – WORM with versioning
D. Objects – Life Cycle Policy
Correct Answer: **C. Objects – WORM with versioning
Explanation:
In the healthcare sector, maintaining the integrity and security of sensitive data such as patient records and medical imaging is critical, particularly under regulations like HIPAA. The Nutanix solution that addresses this need most effectively is Objects with WORM (Write Once Read Many) and versioning.
WORM ensures that once data is written, it cannot be modified or deleted until the retention period expires. This feature perfectly aligns with the healthcare organization's need to retain data for a minimum of two years, without any possibility of accidental deletion or unauthorized changes. The WORM feature is enforced at the bucket level, ensuring that any data stored is protected from tampering.
In addition to WORM, versioning is a crucial aspect, as it preserves multiple historical versions of an object. This means if a newer version of a file is accidentally uploaded or overwritten, the original file remains intact and accessible, offering an extra layer of data protection.
The other options are not suitable:
Files – Read-only share can prevent user modifications, but it does not provide the immutability needed for regulatory compliance.
Files – Connected share allows access to files, but it does not meet the retention or tamper-proof requirements for compliance.
Objects – Life Cycle Policy deals with automating data movement or deletion, not protecting data from modification during its retention period.
Thus, Objects with WORM and versioning is the best Nutanix feature for achieving long-term, tamper-proof data retention in this scenario.
Question No 2:
An IT administrator has configured a distributed file share on a Nutanix Files cluster to facilitate centralized storage and access for various departments within the company. The administrator successfully connects to the shared directory from a Windows client system using Windows Explorer and begins creating new folders intended for department-specific data organization.
However, upon attempting to rename these folders according to the company’s strict naming conventions—which include specific characters, casing, or formats—the administrator discovers that the renaming operations are consistently failing. This issue persists across different client machines and user accounts, suggesting a configuration-related cause rather than a client-side error.
The administrator needs to ensure that folders within the shared directory can be renamed in compliance with the organization’s naming standards.
What is the most appropriate action the administrator should take to resolve this issue?
A. Use the Microsoft Shared Folder MMC Snap-in.
B. Modify the Files shares to use the NFS protocol.
C. Use the Files MMC Snap-in and rename the folders.
D. Modify the read/write permissions on the created folders.
Correct Answer: **D. Modify the read/write permissions on the created folders.
Explanation:
This issue is most likely caused by improper permissions on the shared folders. In a distributed file sharing environment like Nutanix Files, managing access control permissions is essential to ensure users can perform necessary actions, such as renaming folders.
In this scenario, the administrator created folders but is unable to rename them. This suggests that the Modify or Full Control permissions are not set correctly. Without these permissions, even users with administrative access cannot change folder names, which is necessary for adhering to the organization’s naming standards.
To resolve this, the administrator should review and adjust the NTFS-style permissions for the folders, ensuring that the appropriate users or groups are granted Modify or Full Control permissions. These permissions will allow the administrator and other authorized users to rename folders as needed.
The other options do not directly address the issue:
Option A (Microsoft Shared Folder MMC Snap-in) is used for managing Windows file shares, but not specifically for permission management on Nutanix Files.
Option B (Switching to NFS) changes the protocol, which may not be necessary and could complicate permission management for Windows clients.
Option C (Files MMC Snap-in) offers management tools but does not solve permission-related issues.
Therefore, adjusting the read/write permissions is the most appropriate action to ensure the administrator can rename the folders as per the company’s naming conventions.
Question No 3:
An IT administrator is trying to set up a distributed share on a Nutanix Files system that has a single-node cluster. Despite following the standard setup steps, the administrator continuously encounters failures and cannot complete the configuration.
Given Nutanix Files' architecture and prerequisites, what is the most probable cause of this failure?
A. The file server version must be above 3.8.0 to support distributed shares.
B. The system has reached the maximum number of allowed distributed shares.
C. The AOS (Acropolis Operating System) version must be higher than 6.0.
D. Distributed shares can only be configured on clusters with multiple nodes.
Correct Answer: D. Distributed shares can only be configured on clusters with multiple nodes.
Explanation:
Nutanix Files is a software-defined file storage solution integrated into the Nutanix platform, providing scalable file services for unstructured data. One of its features is the ability to create distributed shares, which enables data distribution across multiple nodes to improve performance, redundancy, and availability.
However, distributed shares rely on a multi-node file server setup to function correctly. This is because the concept of distributing data and managing requests efficiently requires multiple nodes. In a single-node cluster, there are no additional nodes to help distribute the data or workload, making it impossible to create a distributed share.
Option D correctly identifies the limitation of Nutanix Files in a single-node cluster. Without multiple nodes, distributed shares cannot be established, which is why the administrator faces repeated failures when trying to set it up.
The other options do not directly address this issue:
Option A and C concern software version requirements, which may cause problems in other scenarios but not in this specific case.
Option B refers to configuration limits, which would usually trigger an explicit error message, making it unlikely in a new or small-scale setup.
To resolve this problem, the administrator should scale the cluster to at least two nodes, allowing Nutanix Files to distribute shares as designed.
Question No 4:
Before deploying Nutanix Objects, certain prerequisite configurations must be in place to ensure optimal functionality and stability of the system. One of these configurations is crucial for proper time synchronization between components.
Which of the following configurations must be completed on both Prism Element and Prism Central before deploying Nutanix Objects?
A. Set up Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) configurations on both Prism Element and Prism Central.
B. Install and configure Domain Controllers on both Prism Element and Prism Central.
C. Set up Network Time Protocol (NTP) servers on both Prism Element and Prism Central.
D. Create a dedicated storage container either on Prism Element or Prism Central.
Correct Answer:
C. Set up Network Time Protocol (NTP) servers on both Prism Element and Prism Central.
Explanation:
In a Nutanix environment, precise time synchronization is essential, especially when deploying distributed systems like Nutanix Objects. Nutanix Objects is an object storage solution compatible with the S3 API that allows users to manage unstructured data within the Nutanix platform. During deployment, Nutanix Objects relies on components such as Prism Element (PE) and Prism Central (PC) working together in sync.
Network Time Protocol (NTP) ensures that all nodes and central management systems maintain consistent time settings. This synchronization is critical for several processes, including certificate validation, logging, performance monitoring, and the overall health of the cluster. If there are time discrepancies between PE and PC, it could result in deployment issues, data inconsistencies, or service disruptions.
Thus, configuring NTP servers on both Prism Element and Prism Central is a required step before deploying Nutanix Objects to ensure that all components are synchronized with a reliable time source.
The other options are not relevant for Nutanix Objects deployment:
Option A (VPC) is unrelated to Object configuration and pertains more to cloud network isolation.
Option B (Domain Controllers) is associated with Active Directory configurations, which are not a requirement for deploying Nutanix Objects.
Option D (Storage container) is necessary but not specifically required on both Prism Element and Prism Central for Object deployment; it can be managed through Prism Central, and containers are typically created on Prism Element clusters.
In conclusion, the setup of NTP servers on both PE and PC is a critical prerequisite to ensure Nutanix Objects functions as intended.
Question No 5:
An international organization has deployed Nutanix Files across multiple sites, including data centers located in various geographical regions worldwide. The IT team is looking to enhance their data management lifecycle and ensure compliance with internal and external regulations. They have identified the following critical requirements:
Implement a centralized management platform to monitor, manage, and control file data across all global sites from a single interface.
Automate data lifecycle management by setting tiering and archiving policies, especially for compliance and long-term retention requirements.
Strengthen data security, specifically by protecting against ransomware attacks and ensuring visibility into file access and usage patterns.
Given these needs, which Nutanix solution best addresses all of the organization’s requirements?
A. Prism Central
B. File Manager
C. Files Analytics
D. Data Lens
Correct Answer: D. Data Lens
Explanation:
Nutanix Data Lens is the ideal solution for organizations seeking a comprehensive, centralized platform for managing file data across multiple sites and geographical regions. It provides in-depth visibility, automation, and advanced security features tailored for large-scale enterprise environments.
Data Lens offers centralized visibility into the organization’s file data ecosystem. From a unified dashboard, administrators can monitor usage patterns, growth trends, access activity, and identify anomalies across all Nutanix Files deployments. This feature allows IT teams to streamline management without needing to log into individual clusters at different locations.
It also supports automated tiering and archiving policies. Organizations can set up lifecycle rules to automatically move inactive or infrequently accessed files to lower-cost storage or archival solutions. This approach helps reduce storage costs while ensuring compliance with retention policies, particularly for legal or industry-specific data governance.
Most importantly, Data Lens provides robust ransomware protection. It employs behavior-based anomaly detection to flag unusual access patterns, such as mass file deletions or encryptions, which could indicate a ransomware attack. It alerts administrators in real-time, allowing them to respond quickly and mitigate potential damage.
In comparison:
Prism Central focuses on centralized infrastructure management and is not specifically designed for file data management.
File Manager is an older interface with limited automation and security features.
Files Analytics provides insights but does not offer full lifecycle automation or advanced security functionalities.
Thus, Data Lens is the comprehensive solution that aligns with all three of the organization's requirements.
Question No 6:
When preparing to deploy Nutanix Objects on a cluster, certain infrastructure configurations must be in place to ensure successful implementation.
Which two conditions must be met before deploying Nutanix Objects?
A. Microsegmentation must be enabled.
B. AHV IPAM (IP Address Management) must be disabled on the VLAN designated for Nutanix Objects.
C. The Data Services IP must be properly configured on the Prism Element (PE).
D. DNS services must be configured and functional on the Prism Element (PE).
Correct Answers:
C. The Data Services IP must be properly configured on the Prism Element (PE).
D. DNS services must be configured and functional on the Prism Element (PE).
Explanation:
Nutanix Objects is an S3-compatible object storage service that enables enterprises to manage unstructured data within the Nutanix ecosystem. Before deploying Nutanix Objects, certain prerequisites must be met to ensure that the system is properly configured and that services are accessible.
The first critical requirement is configuring the Data Services IP (DSIP) on the Prism Element (PE). The DSIP serves as the front-end IP address for accessing various Nutanix data services, including Files, Volumes, and Objects. Without this, clients will not be able to access Nutanix Objects, as the proper IP routing for service endpoints will be missing.
Another essential prerequisite is ensuring that DNS services are configured and functioning correctly on the PE. DNS enables internal components and external clients to resolve Object service endpoints. Nutanix Objects uses domain-based URLs for buckets and access, so if DNS is not set up properly, clients will not be able to locate or interact with these resources.
The other two options are not mandatory for deploying Nutanix Objects:
Microsegmentation (Option A) is a security feature in AHV used for isolating workloads and is not necessary for deploying Objects.
AHV IPAM (Option B) does not need to be disabled. In some cases, AHV IPAM can be used to manage IP assignments, but it does not impact the ability to deploy Objects directly.
In conclusion, before deploying Nutanix Objects, ensure the Data Services IP is correctly configured and DNS services are functional on the Prism Element. These configurations will ensure that Object storage endpoints are reachable and resolvable, allowing the service to operate effectively.
Question No 7:
An IT administrator is tasked with deploying a highly available Microsoft Windows Server Failover Cluster (WSFC) for a critical enterprise application. The application needs shared storage to ensure data consistency and availability during node or system failures. The failover cluster will be set up in a hybrid configuration, with virtual machines running on a Nutanix AHV cluster and at least one bare-metal server to improve resilience and fault tolerance.
To meet the application's requirement for shared block-level storage supporting clustering features such as disk arbitration and persistent reservation (PR), the administrator must ensure that the storage solution is compatible with WSFC and accessible by all nodes in the cluster simultaneously.
Which of the following actions should the administrator take to meet this requirement?
A Provision a Volume Group with Volumes
B Create a Bucket with Objects
C Create an SMB Share with Files
D Provision a new Storage Container
Correct Answer: A
Explanation:
Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC) needs shared storage that supports block-level access with SCSI-3 Persistent Reservations (PRs) to manage access among cluster nodes. This is crucial for clustered applications such as SQL Server, which require high availability and data consistency.
In a Nutanix AHV (Acropolis Hypervisor) environment, a Volume Group offers block-level storage over iSCSI, which is well-suited for WSFC setups. A Volume Group enables multiple nodes (such as VMs or physical servers) to access the same virtual disk, a key feature for clustering. This ensures the shared storage supports failover and reservation features necessary for WSFC.
Option B, creating a Bucket with Objects, refers to object-based storage using the S3 protocol, which doesn’t support block-level access or SCSI-3 PRs, making it unsuitable for WSFC. Option C, creating an SMB Share with Files, provides file-level storage and is not appropriate for clustered environments that require block-level access. Option D, provisioning a Storage Container, is designed to manage VM disks (vDisks) but doesn’t offer shared block-level access across nodes.
Therefore, provisioning a Volume Group with Volumes is the correct action to deploy shared block storage for a hybrid AHV and bare-metal failover cluster.
Question No 8:
Which ransomware prevention solution is most effective when the list of malicious file signatures to block exceeds 300? Provide a detailed explanation of why this solution is ideal for this scenario.
A. Third-party solution
B. File Analytics
C. Data Lens
D. Flow Security Central
Correct Answer: A. Third-party solution
Explanation:
When there are over 300 malicious file signatures to block in order to protect against ransomware, it is important to select a solution that can handle such a large volume of threats effectively. A third-party solution is the best choice in this case. Here’s why:
Comprehensive Signature Detection: Third-party solutions designed for ransomware prevention are specifically built to manage extensive and constantly evolving threat databases. These solutions use signature-based detection systems that are updated frequently with new malicious file signatures, ensuring that files matching any of the listed signatures can be blocked. As the number of signatures increases, these solutions continue to offer protection against known ransomware threats.
Advanced Behavioral Analysis: Beyond signature detection, many third-party solutions utilize behavioral analysis. This allows them to detect suspicious activity associated with ransomware, such as rapid file encryption. This feature is especially useful for detecting new or unknown ransomware variants that do not yet have a signature but exhibit similar behaviors. The solution can stop such threats in their tracks before they cause damage.
Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Third-party solutions often integrate with real-time threat intelligence feeds, which provide up-to-date data on emerging ransomware variants. This helps the solution to stay ahead of evolving threats, even if the number of malicious file signatures becomes large. The continuous updates ensure that the solution can effectively block new and evolving ransomware tactics.
Scalability: Third-party ransomware prevention tools are scalable, meaning they can accommodate increasing numbers of file signatures and data. As the list of malicious signatures grows, these solutions can adjust their detection methods to efficiently manage the expanded load, making them ideal for large-scale protection efforts.
Why Not the Other Options?
B. File Analytics and C. Data Lens are primarily used for data analysis and monitoring but lack the active protection and blocking capabilities needed to prevent ransomware based on known malicious signatures. These tools are not designed to stop ransomware attacks in real-time.
D. Flow Security Central offers some security features, but it is not specialized in managing large numbers of malicious file signatures or providing the same depth of detection and prevention as a third-party solution.
In conclusion, A. Third-party solution is the most effective approach for blocking over 300 malicious file signatures. It offers advanced signature detection, behavioral analysis, real-time threat intelligence, and scalability, all of which are crucial for defending against ransomware attacks.
Question No 9:
A healthcare organization is deploying a Nutanix cluster to securely manage sensitive patient data, including large imaging files and medical records. To comply with healthcare regulations such as HIPAA, the administrator must ensure that:
The system can handle the long-term storage of large files, including medical images, patient records, and associated reports.
All stored information must be preserved for a minimum of two years.
During this retention period, data cannot be deleted or altered to maintain compliance and data integrity.
Which Nutanix data service and feature best meets the organization’s requirements for long-term, tamper-proof data retention?
A. Files – Write-Only Share
B. Files – Active Share
C. Objects – WORM with Version Control
D. Objects – Data Retention Policy
Correct Answer: **C. Objects – WORM with Version Control
Explanation:
In the healthcare industry, protecting sensitive data such as patient records and medical imaging is critical for meeting regulations like HIPAA. Nutanix offers several data services, but the most effective solution for these stringent compliance requirements is the Objects – WORM with Version Control feature.
WORM (Write Once, Read Many) ensures that once data is written, it cannot be modified or deleted before the specified retention period expires. This is precisely the functionality needed to guarantee a two-year retention period where no data can be altered or deleted. By enforcing WORM at the bucket level, Nutanix ensures data integrity and compliance for highly regulated data like medical records.
In addition, Version Control offers an added layer of protection. If a file is replaced or a new version is uploaded, the previous version remains intact and can still be accessed, ensuring historical accuracy and preventing data loss.
The other options are not suitable for this use case:
Files – Write-Only Share offers a read-only mechanism for preventing modification, but it does not guarantee data immutability or protect against accidental deletion.
Files – Active Share is useful for regular file access but lacks the necessary protection features for compliance requirements.
Objects – Data Retention Policy helps manage the lifecycle of data, including deletion or transition, but does not provide the tamper-proof capabilities of WORM.
Thus, the best choice for this healthcare organization is Objects with WORM and Version Control, as it fulfills the requirements of long-term retention, immutability, and versioning.
Question No 10:
An IT administrator has set up a distributed file share on a Nutanix Files cluster to enable centralized access and storage for different departments in the organization. After connecting to the shared directory from a Windows client system via Windows Explorer, the administrator creates new folders for departmental organization. However, when attempting to rename these folders according to strict company naming conventions, the renaming operation fails. This issue occurs across multiple client machines and user accounts, indicating that the problem is likely related to the system configuration, not the client itself.
What is the most effective action the administrator should take to ensure that the folders can be renamed in accordance with the company’s naming standards?
A. Use the Microsoft Shared Folder Management Tool.
B. Change the file shares to NFS protocol.
C. Utilize the Files Management Console to rename the folders.
D. Adjust the permissions on the folders to enable read/write access.
Correct Answer: **D. Adjust the permissions on the folders to enable read/write access.
Explanation:
The issue of failing to rename folders is typically due to improper file or folder permissions on the shared directory. In Nutanix Files, folder-level access control plays a significant role in determining what actions users can perform on files or folders. If the necessary permissions are not set, actions such as renaming or deleting files may be blocked—even by users who have created those folders.
In this case, the administrator should adjust the NTFS-style permissions on the shared folders. The correct permissions to grant would be Modify or Full Control, ensuring that authorized users, including the administrator, can rename folders according to company standards.
Here’s why the other options are not suitable:
Option A (Microsoft Shared Folder Management Tool) is used to manage shared folders on Windows servers, but it is not intended for configuring permissions on Nutanix Files.
Option B (Switching to NFS) is unnecessary because it changes the file-sharing protocol, which does not resolve permission-related issues for Windows-based clients.
Option C (Files Management Console) provides folder management options but does not address permission-related restrictions for renaming files.
Thus, modifying the folder’s read/write permissions is the most appropriate action to resolve the issue and allow the administrator to rename folders according to the company's naming policies.
