Appian ACD101 Exam Dumps & Practice Test Questions
Question 1:
You receive a bug report stating, "After selecting an option from the dropdown, the selected value disappears." Upon investigating, you notice that when the dropdown is interacted with, the correct options appear.
However, once a choice is made, the corresponding value updates in the rule input, but then vanishes. What could be causing this issue, and how would you resolve it?
A. The value parameter in the dropdown component is incorrectly set. You need to bind the value to the appropriate rule input or variable.
B. The user group assigned to the lookup table is incorrect. Ensure that the user is added to the appropriate user group.
C. The choice labels parameter of the dropdown field isn’t formatted as a list. You need to enclose the value in curly brackets.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The issue described in the bug report suggests that the selected value disappears after being chosen from the dropdown. This behavior is most likely related to a misconfiguration in the value binding of the dropdown component. When a value is selected in a dropdown, it should be bound to a variable or input field, which holds the selected value. If the dropdown’s value is not properly bound to the correct rule input or variable, the value may update temporarily but not persist, causing it to vanish after selection.
In option A, the solution to this problem is to ensure that the value parameter of the dropdown component is correctly linked to the appropriate rule input or variable. By binding the dropdown’s selected value to a persistent variable or input, the value will remain visible after selection.
Let's analyze the other options:
B. The user group assigned to the lookup table is incorrect. Ensure that the user is added to the appropriate user group: This would be relevant if the dropdown options were not being populated correctly or if permissions were preventing the selection. However, the bug report mentions that the correct options appear and that the issue happens after selection, making this unlikely to be the root cause of the problem.
C. The choice labels parameter of the dropdown field isn’t formatted as a list. You need to enclose the value in curly brackets: While this could cause issues with how the dropdown options are displayed or populated, the bug report specifies that the correct options appear and that the issue occurs after a choice is made. This suggests that the format of the choice labels is not the cause of the problem.
Thus, the most likely cause of the issue is a misconfigured value parameter in the dropdown component, and the correct solution is to properly bind the value to the appropriate rule input or variable. Therefore, the correct answer is A.
Question 2:
ACME Automobile manages its fleet of vehicles in Appian. The vehicle records are either "active" or "inactive." Users mainly want to view active vehicles and prefer this view by default when accessing the Vehicle Records list. However, there are times when users need to see the complete list, including inactive vehicles, typically for auditing purposes.
Which configuration would ensure that the Vehicle Records list displays only active vehicles by default but gives users the option to view all vehicles, including inactive ones, when necessary?
A. Apply conditional logic to the Visibility of the Status column in the Vehicle Records list.
B. Use a source filter to exclude vehicles that are "inactive."
C. Create a user filter on the status field, setting the default option to "active."
Answer: C
Explanation:
The correct solution is C, which suggests creating a user filter on the status field, with the default option set to "active". This approach gives users the ability to filter the list based on the vehicle's status while allowing them to modify the filter when necessary. The default filter would display only active vehicles when the user first accesses the list, and users could then manually adjust the filter to display all vehicles, including inactive ones, for purposes such as audits.
Here’s why C is the best option:
User filters are often used to allow users to filter records based on specific criteria, such as the vehicle status in this case.
By setting the default filter to "active", users will initially only see the active vehicles.
Users can then modify the filter when they need to view inactive vehicles without requiring a separate view or custom configuration.
This provides the flexibility the users need, while keeping the default view focused on the most relevant data (active vehicles).
Let’s look at the other options:
A. Apply conditional logic to the Visibility of the Status column in the Vehicle Records list: This option would apply logic to control whether the Status column is visible or not, but it would not address the need to filter the actual records in the list. It does not allow users to toggle between viewing active or inactive vehicles, making it less effective for the use case described.
B. Use a source filter to exclude vehicles that are "inactive": This option would exclude inactive vehicles from the data source entirely, which means that inactive vehicles would not appear in the list at all, even if the user wanted to view them. This approach would conflict with the requirement to allow users to see inactive vehicles when necessary.
Therefore, the best solution is C, which creates a user filter on the status field, defaulting to active vehicles but allowing users the flexibility to change the filter to view all vehicles, including inactive ones, when necessary.
Question 3:
You're tasked with creating an expression to validate email addresses. Which three test cases would ensure that the expression is thoroughly validated? (Select three.)
A. An invalid email address missing the '@' symbol: "john.doeexample.com".
B. An empty or null email address (i.e., no value entered).
C. A properly formatted email address: "[email protected]".
D. A situation where the email server is unavailable, preventing email delivery.
Answer: A, B, C
Explanation:
When validating email addresses, it's crucial to cover a variety of cases to ensure that the expression checks both valid and invalid formats effectively. Let’s break down the three test cases that would provide comprehensive coverage for email validation:
A. An invalid email address missing the '@' symbol: "john.doeexample.com":
This test case is important because one of the core rules of email format is that it must contain the @ symbol. A valid email address is typically in the form [email protected], so any address missing the @ symbol is automatically invalid. Testing for this scenario ensures the expression can detect missing @ symbols, which is one of the most common email formatting errors.B. An empty or null email address (i.e., no value entered):
Testing for an empty or null value is essential because this is a basic edge case that needs validation. A null or empty email address is invalid in almost all use cases. The expression should be able to handle this case by returning an error or indicating that the input is required.C. A properly formatted email address: "[email protected]":
This is a necessary test case to ensure that the expression works for valid email addresses. The email is correctly formatted, containing a username, the @ symbol, a domain, and a top-level domain (TLD). Ensuring the expression accepts this type of address as valid is essential for verifying that the expression works for expected inputs.
Now, let's consider D, which is about a situation where the email server is unavailable:
D. A situation where the email server is unavailable, preventing email delivery:
This is not directly relevant to email address validation. While this could be an issue during the process of sending or delivering emails, it doesn't affect the format or structure of the email address itself. Email validation is focused on checking the format, not the availability of the email server. Therefore, this test case would not be necessary for validating the email address format in the expression.
In summary, the best test cases to ensure thorough email address validation are A (missing @ symbol), B (empty or null email), and C (valid email format). These test cases address common formatting issues and help ensure that the expression works as expected across a range of inputs.
Question 4:
You are designing a user interface that will display a pie chart. The data for the chart is stored in a local variable within a parent interface object, which is then referenced by a child interface.
From a performance perspective, which method is the most efficient way to access the data needed for the pie chart?
A. Create a rule input in the child interface and pass the local variable data from the parent interface.
B. Access the local variable directly in the child interface through a process report.
C. Retrieve the data separately in the child interface to avoid passing it from the parent interface.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When designing interfaces that reference data across parent and child interfaces, performance and efficiency are critical, especially when passing data. Let’s evaluate the options based on performance considerations:
A. Create a rule input in the child interface and pass the local variable data from the parent interface:
This is the most efficient method because it involves passing the data directly from the parent interface to the child interface through a rule input. Rule inputs are specifically designed for passing data between interfaces, which allows the child interface to access the necessary data without re-fetching it or performing redundant calculations. This method ensures that the child interface can efficiently access the data without impacting performance. Additionally, this method allows for better data flow and less complexity compared to other methods.B. Access the local variable directly in the child interface through a process report:
While process reports are useful for displaying data that comes from a process model, directly accessing the local variable through a process report is typically not as efficient for performance. This approach could involve additional overhead and complexity, particularly when the child interface doesn’t directly manage the process data. It's also not an optimal method for accessing data stored locally in the parent interface. Process reports are often designed for querying large datasets or data that are part of the process flow, rather than for passing smaller, localized data between interfaces.C. Retrieve the data separately in the child interface to avoid passing it from the parent interface:
This option would result in redundant data retrieval, potentially decreasing performance. If the child interface retrieves the data independently, it will either make an additional call to the parent interface or fetch the data from another source, which could introduce unnecessary latency and extra processing. This is not the most efficient method, as it increases the number of data requests and could result in inconsistency or performance bottlenecks.
Therefore, A is the most efficient and optimal method. Passing data through a rule input ensures smooth, direct, and effective data flow from the parent to the child interface while minimizing performance issues related to redundant data fetching or unnecessary complexity.
Question 5:
When applying a default filter to a record type, how does the excluded data behave?
A. The excluded data will not appear in the record list, and users cannot remove the filter condition to view it.
B. The excluded data will not be shown in the record list, but users can still access it through a direct link to the record view.
C. The excluded data will not appear in the record list, but users can clear the filter condition to view it.
Answer: C
Explanation:
When applying a default filter to a record type, the filter condition is applied to the list of records that users see by default, hiding any records that do not meet the filter criteria. However, the behavior of excluded data depends on the configuration of the system.
C. The excluded data will not appear in the record list, but users can clear the filter condition to view it:
This is the correct behavior. When a default filter is applied, any records that do not meet the criteria will be excluded from the list. However, users still have the option to clear or adjust the filter condition if they wish to see the excluded data. The filter is typically not permanent, and users can modify it to display all records, including those that were initially excluded based on the filter settings.
Let’s review the other options:
A. The excluded data will not appear in the record list, and users cannot remove the filter condition to view it:
This option is incorrect because it implies that users would be unable to access the excluded data, which is not typically the case in most systems. Users can usually adjust or clear filters to see records that don’t meet the default filter conditions. This would be an overly restrictive setup for most use cases.B. The excluded data will not be shown in the record list, but users can still access it through a direct link to the record view:
This option is partially true but does not fully explain how filters work. While it is possible that users can access excluded records directly through a link, this is not the usual behavior of filters applied to record types. Users are more commonly expected to clear or adjust the filter to view the excluded data rather than relying on direct links.
Thus, the correct answer is C: The excluded data will not appear in the record list by default, but users can clear the filter condition to view it. This approach allows for flexibility while maintaining a focused list view based on the default filter.
Question 6:
How can you ensure that users are unable to access Tempo, preventing unauthorized access?
A. Remove users from the Tempo Users system group.
B. Modify the default User Start Page.
C. Ensure the user is placed in the Application Users group, which by default does not grant access to Tempo.
Answer: A
Explanation:
To prevent unauthorized access to Tempo (Appian's social collaboration tool), the most effective way is to control user access via system groups. In Appian, the Tempo Users system group is responsible for granting users access to Tempo. By removing users from this group, you ensure that they cannot access Tempo, even if they have access to other parts of the system.
Let’s analyze the options:
A. Remove users from the Tempo Users system group:
This is the correct answer. The Tempo Users system group specifically controls access to Tempo. Removing users from this group will prevent them from accessing Tempo. This approach ensures that only users who are part of the Tempo Users group can access the Tempo interface.B. Modify the default User Start Page:
This option does not prevent access to Tempo; it only changes what page users see when they log in. Modifying the User Start Page may help direct users to a different page or application upon login, but it doesn’t restrict access to Tempo. Users can still access Tempo through other routes unless access is explicitly restricted by removing them from the Tempo Users group or through other security controls.C. Ensure the user is placed in the Application Users group, which by default does not grant access to Tempo:
While placing a user in the Application Users group may not grant them access to Tempo, this is not a direct or reliable way to control Tempo access. The Tempo Users group is the primary control point for Tempo access, not the Application Users group. Therefore, this is not the most appropriate solution for ensuring users cannot access Tempo.
Thus, the most effective and direct method to prevent unauthorized access to Tempo is to remove users from the Tempo Users system group (A). This guarantees that users will not be able to access Tempo, regardless of their other group memberships.
Question 7:
You are developing a pizza ordering form that includes a radio button component for selecting the pizza type. The pizza selection labels list various toppings, and you want to make sure the labels are fully visible without being truncated or cut off. Which layout would you choose to ensure the labels are displayed properly?
A. Compact
B. Grid
C. Stacked
Answer: C
Explanation:
The Stacked layout is the most appropriate choice for ensuring that labels are displayed properly without being truncated or cut off, especially when the labels are long, such as in the case of pizza toppings.
Here’s why C is the best choice:
Stacked Layout:
The Stacked layout places each radio button and its corresponding label on a new line, which allows the labels to span the entire width of the form. This ensures that even longer labels (such as those listing pizza toppings) are fully visible and not cut off. It is particularly useful when you have labels that may vary in length or when you want to avoid truncation or awkward line breaks in the label text.
Let’s break down the other options:
A. Compact Layout:
The Compact layout is designed to place multiple items (such as radio buttons) in a single line, which can help save space but may cause long labels to be truncated or cut off if they don't fit within the available width. This layout would not be ideal when you want to ensure that the entire label, especially long ones like pizza toppings, is visible.B. Grid Layout:
The Grid layout allows you to place radio buttons in a grid-like structure, where they are arranged in rows and columns. While this can be useful for organizing components neatly, it still doesn't guarantee that long labels will be fully visible. If the grid is not properly adjusted to accommodate longer labels, you might still encounter truncation or cut-off text.
In summary, the Stacked layout is the best choice for ensuring the pizza selection labels (which could include long lists of toppings) are fully visible without being truncated. Each label will be placed on a new line, giving it enough space to be displayed correctly.
Question 8:
A user needs to navigate from a record summary to an external URL. Which interface component is best suited for supporting this navigation?
A. Button
B. Record Link
C. Card Layout with a Link
Answer: A
Explanation:
When users need to navigate to an external URL, a Button is the most suitable component to facilitate this navigation, especially when you want to provide a clear action that users can click to be directed to an external link.
Here’s why A is the best choice:
Button:
A Button component is a versatile and straightforward UI element designed for user interaction. It can be configured to navigate to an external URL using the link property. It’s a standard choice when you want users to take an action that leads them to another page or external resource. Buttons are often used in cases where clear, actionable instructions are needed, such as when guiding users to an external link from a record summary.
Let’s evaluate the other options:
B. Record Link:
A Record Link is used to navigate between record views within the same system (e.g., from one record to another). It is specifically designed for navigating to other records, not external URLs. While a record link is great for internal navigation within the Appian environment, it is not designed to link to external websites. Therefore, it’s not the best choice for navigating to an external URL.C. Card Layout with a Link:
A Card Layout with a Link can indeed be used to provide navigation options, and it’s more commonly used for visual layouts. However, this component is typically used for navigating within the application (like navigating between different records or views). While you can configure a link in a card layout to open an external URL, a Button is more directly suited for this purpose, as it conveys the action more clearly to the user.
Therefore, the Button component is the best suited for navigating to an external URL because of its clear, action-oriented nature and its ability to handle external links effectively.
Question 9:
A user is experiencing difficulty in navigating from one screen to another in your app. The user’s workflow relies on smooth transitions between multiple pages. Which configuration would be most effective in enhancing the user experience for page navigation?
A. Use a set of buttons with specific actions for each transition.
B. Implement a dynamic link within a record that adjusts based on the current user’s needs.
C. Use a paginated list component to control the flow of information between screens.
Answer: A
Explanation:
When considering the user experience (UX) for navigating between pages in an app, the primary goal is to ensure that transitions are intuitive and fluid. A configuration that provides clear and direct options for the user to move between screens will enhance the overall experience.
Here’s why A is the best choice:
A. Use a set of buttons with specific actions for each transition:
Buttons that are explicitly labeled with clear actions (such as "Next," "Previous," or "Go to Dashboard") are a very effective and intuitive way to navigate between different pages or screens. This configuration ensures that users know exactly what action to take to transition between pages and can follow a structured flow that aligns with their workflow. By providing direct buttons for each transition, you create an easy-to-understand navigation system that users can rely on, particularly when multiple screens or steps are involved in the process.
Now, let's evaluate the other options:
B. Implement a dynamic link within a record that adjusts based on the current user’s needs:
While a dynamic link can be useful for situations where navigation depends on user-specific data, it’s not necessarily the most effective option for smooth transitions between pages. Dynamic links may require additional logic to adjust based on user context, and this could add complexity to the user experience. If the user’s workflow relies on predictable, step-by-step navigation, relying on dynamic links could potentially introduce uncertainty or confusion, especially if the links change based on the user’s context.C. Use a paginated list component to control the flow of information between screens:
The paginated list component is generally used for breaking down large datasets into smaller chunks, making it suitable for displaying lists of records or items over multiple pages. However, using this component for page navigation may not be the best solution for workflows that require smooth transitions between distinct screens or forms. Pagination is useful for data-intensive applications but can create more friction for users who need to navigate through different screens rather than scrolling through pages of data.
Therefore, the most effective solution is to use A. a set of buttons with specific actions for each transition, as it ensures clarity and ease of use, leading to an enhanced navigation experience for the user.
Question 10:
You are working on an interface where users input data into a form. You want to ensure that the form submission triggers a validation check before processing the input. Which feature would you use to validate the form before submission?
A. Use the built-in validation function that runs on form submission.
B. Apply conditional logic in the form’s submit button to trigger validation.
C. Create an approval workflow that validates the data before processing.
Answer: A
Explanation:
To ensure that data is validated before a form is submitted, the most direct and effective method is to use the built-in validation function that is typically available for forms in most development environments. This validation function is designed to check the user input for errors or inconsistencies before the form submission is processed.
Here’s why A is the best choice:
A. Use the built-in validation function that runs on form submission:
Most modern frameworks or platforms, such as Appian, provide built-in validation functions for forms. These functions automatically check the data entered by the user before allowing the form to be submitted. If any required fields are missing or the input doesn’t meet the validation criteria (like correct formats, ranges, or specific conditions), the form submission is prevented, and the user is notified to correct their input. This approach is efficient because the validation happens as part of the form submission process itself and is tightly integrated with the user interface.
Let’s examine the other options:
B. Apply conditional logic in the form’s submit button to trigger validation:
While it is possible to apply conditional logic to the submit button, this method would require more effort to implement compared to using the built-in validation function. You would need to manually check all the conditions and ensure that the form behaves correctly when the submit button is clicked. It’s generally more complex and error-prone than simply relying on built-in validation features, which are already optimized and tested for common use cases.C. Create an approval workflow that validates the data before processing:
Creating an approval workflow could be useful in scenarios where the data needs to be reviewed by another party before processing. However, this approach adds unnecessary complexity for basic form validation. It introduces an extra step, where the data would be processed after it passes through an approval process, rather than performing an immediate validation directly before submission. This is more suitable for scenarios where formal approval is required rather than just ensuring the input meets certain validation criteria.
In summary, using the built-in validation function is the most efficient and straightforward approach for validating the form before submission. It ensures that all required fields and conditions are checked, preventing errors from being submitted and improving the user experience.
